Technical Papers
May 12, 2023

Generalized Stratified Sampling for Efficient Reliability Assessment of Structures against Natural Hazards

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 149, Issue 7

Abstract

Performance-based engineering for natural hazards facilitates the design and appraisal of structures with rigorous evaluation of their uncertain structural behavior under potentially extreme stochastic loads expressed in terms of failure probabilities against stated criteria. As a result, efficient stochastic simulation schemes are central to computational frameworks that aim to estimate failure probabilities associated with multiple limit states using limited sample sets. In this work, a generalized stratified sampling scheme is proposed in which two phases of sampling are involved: the first is devoted to the generation of strata-wise samples and the estimation of strata probabilities, whereas the second phase aims at the estimation of strata-wise failure probabilities. Phase-I sampling enables the selection of a generalized stratification variable (i.e., not necessarily belonging to the input set of random variables) for which the probability distribution is not known a priori. To improve the efficiency, Markov Chain Monte Carlo Phase-I sampling is proposed when Monte Carlo simulation is deemed infeasible, and optimal Phase-II sampling is implemented based on user-specified target coefficients of variation for the limit states of interest. The expressions for these coefficients are derived with due regard to the sample correlations induced by the Markov chains and the uncertainty in the estimated strata probabilities. The proposed stochastic simulation scheme reaps the benefits of near-optimal stratified sampling for a broader choice of stratification variables in high-dimensional reliability problems with a mechanism to approximately control the accuracy of the estimators of multiple failure probabilities. The practicality and efficiency of the scheme are demonstrated using two examples involving the estimation of failure probabilities associated with highly nonlinear responses induced by wind and seismic excitations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This research effort was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Nos. CMMI-1750339 and CMMI-2118488. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Amelin, M. 2004. “On Monte Carlo simulation and analysis of electricity markets.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
Arnab, R. 2017. Survey sampling theory and applications. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
Arunachalam, S., and S. M. J. Spence. 2021. “A stochastic simulation scheme for the estimation of small failure probabilities in wind engineering applications.” In Proc., European Safety and Reliability Conf. (ESREL 2021). Singapore: Research Publishing.
ASCE. 2019. Prestandard for performance-based wind design. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2022. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7-22. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Atkinson, G. M., and W. Silva. 2000. “Stochastic modeling of California ground motions.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90 (2): 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1785/0119990064.
Au, S. 2007. “Augmenting approximate solutions for consistent reliability analysis.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 22 (1): 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2006.08.004.
Au, S.-K., and J. L. Beck. 1999. “A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations.” Struct. Saf. 21 (2): 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(99)00014-4.
Au, S.-K., and J. L. Beck. 2001. “Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 16 (4): 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(01)00019-4.
Au, S.-K., and J. L. Beck. 2003a. “Important sampling in high dimensions.” Struct. Saf. 25 (2): 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00047-4.
Au, S.-K., and J. L. Beck. 2003b. “Subset simulation and its application to seismic risk based on dynamic analysis.” J. Eng. Mech. 129 (8): 901–917. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:8(901).
Baker, J. W. 2015. “Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis.” Earthquake Spectra 31 (1): 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1193/021113EQS025M.
Bect, J., L. Li, and E. Vazquez. 2017. “Bayesian subset simulation.” SIAM/ASA J. Uncertainty Quantif. 5 (1): 762–786. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1078276.
Bojórquez, E., and J. Ruiz-García. 2013. “Residual drift demands in moment-resisting steel frames subjected to narrow-band earthquake ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (11): 1583–1598. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2288.
Boore, D. M. 2003. “Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method.” Pure Appl. Geophys. 160 (3): 635–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012553.
Boore, D. M., and W. B. Joyner. 1997. “Site amplifications for generic rock sites.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 87 (2): 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0870020327.
Chen, X., and A. Kareem. 2005. “Proper orthogonal decomposition-based modeling, analysis, and simulation of dynamic wind load effects on structures.” J. Eng. Mech. 131 (4): 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:4(325).
Cochran, W. G. 2007. Sampling techniques. New York: Wiley.
Der Kiureghian, A. 2022. Structural and system reliability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Der Kiureghian, A., and O. Ditlevsen. 2009. “Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter?” Struct. Saf. 31 (2): 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020.
Elkady, A. 2016. “Collapse risk assessment of steel moment resisting frames designed with deep wide-flange columns in seismic regions.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill Univ.
Elkady, A., and D. G. Lignos. 2015. “Effect of gravity framing on the overstrength and collapse capacity of steel frame buildings with perimeter special moment frames.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (8): 1289–1307. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2519.
Elkady, A., and D. G. Lignos. 2019. Two-dimensional OpenSees numerical models for archetype steel buildings with special moment frames. San Francisco: GitHub.
Evans, W. D. 1951. “On stratification and optimum allocations.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 46 (253): 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1951.10500772.
Fishman, G. 2013. Monte Carlo: Concepts, algorithms, and applications. New York: Springer.
Glasgow, G. 2005. “Stratified sampling types.” In Encyclopedia of social measurement, 683–688. New York: Elsevier.
Gurley, K., and A. Kareem. 1999. “Applications of wavelet transforms in earthquake, wind and ocean engineering.” Eng. Struct. 21 (2): 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00139-9.
Gurley, K. R., M. A. Tognarelli, and A. Kareem. 1997. “Analysis and simulation tools for wind engineering.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 12 (1): 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(96)00010-0.
Hsu, W.-C., and J. Ching. 2010. “Evaluating small failure probabilities of multiple limit states by parallel subset simulation.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 25 (3): 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2010.01.003.
Iwata, Y., H. Sugimoto, and H. Kuwamura. 2006. “Reparability limit of steel structural buildings based on the actual data of the Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake.” In Vol. 1057 of Proc., 38th Joint Panel Wind and Seismic Effects, 23–32. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
Jakobsen, F., and H. Madsen. 2004. “Comparison and further development of parametric tropical cyclone models for storm surge modelling.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 92 (5): 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.01.003.
Jalayer, F., and J. L. Beck. 2006. “Using information theory concepts to compare alternative intensity measures for representing ground motion uncertainty.” In Proc., 8th US National Conf. Earthquake Engineering, Paper ID 974. New York: Curran Associates.
Koutsourelakis, P.-S., H. J. Pradlwarter, and G. I. Schueller. 2004. “Reliability of structures in high dimensions, part I: Algorithms and applications.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 19 (4): 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2004.05.001.
Kramer, S. L. 2003. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Li, B. 2022. “Rapid stochastic response estimation of dynamic nonlinear structures: Innovative frameworks and applications.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Michigan.
Li, B., W.-C. Chuang, and S. M. J. Spence. 2021. “An adaptive fast nonlinear analysis (AFNA) algorithm for rapid time history analysis.” In Proc., 8th ECCOMAS Thematic Conf. on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. Athens, Greece: National Technical Univ. of Athens.
Li, D.-Q., Z.-Y. Yang, Z.-J. Cao, S.-K. Au, and K.-K. Phoon. 2017. “System reliability analysis of slope stability using generalized subset simulation.” Appl. Math. Modell. 46 (Jun): 650–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.01.047.
Li, H.-S., Y.-Z. Ma, and Z. Cao. 2015. “A generalized subset simulation approach for estimating small failure probabilities of multiple stochastic responses.” Comput. Struct. 153 (Jun): 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.10.014.
Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves. 2006. OpenSees command language manual. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Melchers, R. 1989. “Importance sampling in structural systems.” Struct. Saf. 6 (1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(89)90003-9.
Melchers, R. E., and A. T. Beck. 2018. Structural reliability analysis and prediction. New York: Wiley.
Neyman, J. 1934. “On the two different aspects of the representative method: The method of stratified sampling and the method of purposive selection.” J. R. Stat. Soc. 97 (4): 558–606. https://doi.org/10.2307/2342192.
Ouyang, Z., and S. M. J. Spence. 2021. “A performance-based wind engineering framework for engineered building systems subject to hurricanes.” Front. Built Environ. 7 (Nov):720764.
Papaioannou, I., W. Betz, K. Zwirglmaier, and D. Straub. 2015. “MCMC algorithms for subset simulation.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 41 (Jul): 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.06.006.
Papaioannou, I., C. Papadimitriou, and D. Straub. 2016. “Sequential importance sampling for structural reliability analysis.” Struct. Saf. 62 (Sep): 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.06.002.
Pharr, M., W. Jakob, and G. Humphreys. 2017. “13 - Monte Carlo integration.” In Physically based rendering. 3rd ed., edited by M. Pharr, W. Jakob, and G. Humphreys, 747–802. Boston: Morgan Kaufmann.
Rao, J. N. K. 1973. “On double sampling for stratification and analytical surveys.” Biometrika 60 (1): 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/60.1.125.
Schueller, G. I., H. J. Pradlwarter, and P.-S. Koutsourelakis. 2004. “A critical appraisal of reliability estimation procedures for high dimensions.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 19 (4): 463–474.
Shields, M. D., and J. Zhang. 2016. “The generalization of Latin hypercube sampling.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 148 (Apr): 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.002.
Shinozuka, M., and G. Deodatis. 1991. “Simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation.” Appl. Mech. Rev. 44 (4): 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3119501.
Shinozuka, M., and G. Deodatis. 1996. “Simulation of multi-dimensional gaussian stochastic fields by spectral representation.” Appl. Mech. Rev. 49 (1): 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3101883.
Shome, N., C. A. Cornell, P. Bazzurro, and J. E. Carballo. 1998. “Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses.” Earthquake Spectra 14 (3): 469–500. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586011.
Stein, M. 1987. “Large sample properties of simulations using Latin hypercube sampling.” Technometrics 29 (2): 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1987.10488205.
Sudret, B. 2012. “Meta-models for structural reliability and uncertainty quantification.” Preprint, submitted March 12, 2012. https://arxiv.org/abs/1203.2062.
Vetter, C., and A. A. Taflanidis. 2012. “Global sensitivity analysis for stochastic ground motion modeling in seismic-risk assessment.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 38 (Jul): 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.01.004.
Vickery, P., P. Skerlj, and L. Twisdale. 2000. “Simulation of hurricane risk in the US using empirical track model.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (10): 1222–1237. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1222).
Vickery, P. J., and L. A. Twisdale. 1995a. “Prediction of hurricane wind speeds in the United States.” J. Struct. Eng. 121 (11): 1691–1699. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:11(1691).
Vickery, P. J., and L. A. Twisdale. 1995b. “Wind-field and filling models for hurricane wind-speed predictions.” J. Struct. Eng. 121 (11): 1700–1709. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:11(1700).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 149Issue 7July 2023

History

Received: Oct 19, 2022
Accepted: Feb 21, 2023
Published online: May 12, 2023
Published in print: Jul 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Oct 12, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1338-8169. Email: [email protected]
Seymour M. J. Spence, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share