Case Studies
Sep 30, 2024

Bid Variability in Public–Private Partnerships: Lessons from Asset Monetization through the Toll-Operate-Transfer Model in India

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 12

Abstract

Public–private partnerships are an important tool for infrastructure development, but variability in bids can undermine value for money. This study investigated bid variability in India’s initial two auction road assets under the Toll-Operate-Transfer (TOT) model. A comparative case study research design was utilized involving an in-depth analysis of the TOT I and TOT II auctions. Data was gathered from project reports, guidelines, news articles, stakeholder interviews, and then thematically analyzed. The analysis revealed substantial bid variability within and between the auctions. The findings showed bid variability within the auctions depended on the information gaps owing to the timing and quality of the information released by the auctioneer, the tender conditions and tender process, potential value enhancement and securitization of assets by the bidders, heterogeneous bidder objectives across asset types, and strategic bidding assumptions. The bid variability between the TOT I and TOT II auctions depended on asset quality, declared reserve price, sociopolitical factors, and the prevailing business conditions. While TOT I road quality and growth prospects encouraged strong bidding, overpricing, shifting business scenarios, and political uncertainty in TOT II states depressed bids below expectations. Results indicated that transparency around asset characteristics and traffic forecasts enables realistic bid assessments to control variability. It can inform bid rationalization and pricing mechanisms for future auctions of public infrastructure. Setting reserve prices reflecting project specifics also helped anchor bid ranges. Attracting larger bidder pools countered the influence of overly optimistic/pessimistic valuations. Gradual expansion into new geographies allowed adaptive policy learning.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. These include anonymized interview transcripts, auction documents and reports, bidding data and descriptive statistics, and qualitative data analysis files (NVivo).

Acknowledgments

This paper was written based on an awarded Ph.D. degree with the Ph.D. thesis titled “Political Deals and Bid Variability in Monetization of Indian Toll Road Assets” supported by the National University of Singapore (NUS) Research Scholarship. The authors would like to express their gratitude to NUS for providing the financial support and research facilities that made this study possible. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which have significantly improved the quality of this manuscript.

References

Agarwal, S., J. Li, E. Teo, and A. Cheong. 2017. “Strategic sequential bidding for government land auction sales—Evidence from Singapore.” J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 57 (4): 535–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-017-9625-0.
Ahmed, M. O., I. H. El-adaway, K. T. Coatney, and M. S. Eid. 2016. “Construction bidding and the winner’s curse: Game theory approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (2): 04015076. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001058.
Albalate, D., and G. Bel. 2009. “Regulating concessions of toll motorways: An empirical study on fixed vs. variable term contracts.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 43 (2): 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.11.008.
Allen, J., and M. Pryke. 2013. “Financialising household water: Thames water, MEIF, and ‘ring-fenced’ politics.” Cambridge J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 6 (3): 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst010.
Ashton, P., M. Doussard, and R. Weber. 2012. “The financial engineering of infrastructure privatization: What are public assets worth to private investors?” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 78 (3): 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2012.715540.
Ashton, P., M. Doussard, and R. Weber. 2016. “Reconstituting the state: City powers and exposures in Chicago’s infrastructure leases.” Urban Stud. 53 (7): 1384–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014532962.
Athias, L., and A. Nuñez. 2008. “Winner’s curse in toll road concessions.” Econ. Lett. 101 (3): 172–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2008.07.017.
Aznar, B., E. Pellicer, S. Davis, and P. Ballesteros-Pérez. 2017. “Factors affecting contractor’s bidding success for international infrastructure projects in Australia.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 23 (7): 880–889. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1341955.
Barrett, D., and A. Twycross. 2018. “Data collection in qualitative research.” Evidence-Based Nurs. 21 (3): 63–64. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2018-102939.
Bel, G., and J. Foote. 2009. “Tolls, terms and public interest in road concessions privatization: A comparative analysis of recent transactions in the USA and France.” Transport Rev. 29 (3): 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640802432144.
Bulow, J., and P. Klemperer. 1996. “Auctions versus negotiations.” Am. Ecom. Rev. 86 (1): 180–194.
Casady, C. B., and R. R. Geddes. 2020. “Asset recycling for social infrastructure in the United States.” Public Works Manage. Policy 25 (3): 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X20911652.
David Wayne, R., III. 2016. “A national study on leveraging public infrastructure funds: Project performance and financing source analysis for public-private partnerships (PPP) in the US transportation sector.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State Univ.
Delmon, J. 2021. “PPP for existing assets and asset recycling.” In Private sector investment in infrastructure. Hague, Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer Law International.
de Sousa Trincão, M. 2014. “The cost of public-private partnerships for the public partner: The road sector in Portugal.” Master’s thesis, Católica Lisbon School of Business and Economics, Universidade Catolica Portuguesa.
DPIIT (Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade). 2024. India investment grid. New Delhi, India: DPIIT, Government of India.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building theories from case study research.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 14 (4): 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557.
Fenn, M. 2018. “Recycling public assets: An idea whose time has come?” In Canada: The state of the federation 2015, edited by R. A. John, L. A. G. David, H. Kyle, J. André, and A. Y. Robert, 185–196. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Fielding, G. J., and D. B. Klein. 1993. “How to franchise highways.” J. Transport Econ. Policy 27 (2): 113–130.
Foreman, P., and J. K. Murnighan. 1996. “Learning to avoid the winner’s curse.” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 67 (2): 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0072.
Guasch, J. L. 2004. Granting and renegotiating infrastructure concessions: Doing it right. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Hannes, K., and C. Lockwood. 2012. Synthesizing qualitative research: Choosing the right approach. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Kagel, J. H., and D. Levin. 1986. “The winner’s curse and public information in common value auctions.” Am. Econ. Rev. 76 (5): 894–920.
Klemperer, P. 1999. “Auction theory: A guide to the literature.” J. Ecom. Surv. 13 (3): 227–286.
Klemperer, P. 2010. “The product-mix auction: A new auction design for differentiated goods.” J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 8 (2–3): 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2010.tb00523.x.
Koul, P., P. Verma, and L. Arora. 2021. “Road infrastructure development under PPP model in India: A credit rating perspective.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 11 (2): 266–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-08-2020-0137.
Levitt, R. E., W. R. Scott, M. J. Garvin, and P. Edward Elgar. 2019. Public-private partnerships for infrastructure development: Finance, stakeholder alignment, governance. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Maniar, H. 2010. “Risk analysis of infrastructure projects: A case study on build-operate-transfer projects in India.” ICFAI J. Financ. Risk Manage. 7 (4): 34.
Milgrom, P. R. 2004. Putting auction theory to work. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Milgrom, P. R., and R. J. Weber. 1982. “A theory of auctions and competitive bidding.” Econometrica 50 (5): 1089–1122. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911865.
MoRTH (Ministry of Road Transport and Highways). 2024. “Allocation of funds to the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) for projects under National Highways (Original)—General during the financial year 2023-24.” Accessed September 20, 2024. https://morth.nic.in/allocation-funds-national-highways-authority-india-nhai-projects-under-national-highways-original-10.
Nowacki, C. 2019. The financier state: Infrastructure planning and asset recycling in New South Wales, Australia. Sydney, Australia: Univ. of Sydney.
Noy, C. 2008. “Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research.” Int. J. Social Res. Methodol. 11 (4): 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305.
Ohashi, H. 2009. “Effects of transparency in procurement practices on government expenditure: A case study of municipal public works.” Rev. Ind. Organ. 34 (3): 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-009-9208-1.
Palinkas, L. A., S. M. Horwitz, C. A. Green, J. P. Wisdom, N. Duan, and K. Hoagwood. 2015. “Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research.” Adm. Policy Mental Health Mental Health Serv. Res. 42 (5): 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
Patil, N. A., D. Tharun, and B. Laishram. 2016. “Infrastructure development through PPPs in India: Criteria for sustainability assessment.” J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 59 (4): 708–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1038337.
Seow, O., L. Kenneth, and M. Chee. 2005. “Factors influencing auction outcomes: Bidder turnout, auction houses and market conditions.” J. Real Estate Res. 27 (2): 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2005.12091157.
Shankar, R., and W. Tan. 2021. “Spatial distribution of road assets in Indian TOT auctions.” CSID J. Infrastruct. Dev. 4 (1): 21–31. https://doi.org/10.32783/csid-jid.v4i1.213.
Sinha, A. K., and K. N. Jha. 2021. “Financing constraints of public–private partnership projects in India.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 28 (1): 246–269. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-06-2018-0237.
Snyder, T. P., and M. J. Luby. 2013. “The sale and lease of public assets: Fiscal savior or sacrilege?” Public Works Manage. Policy 18 (3): 204–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X12461260.
Solomon, L. 2009. The promise and perils of infrastructure privatization: The Macquarie model. 1st ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stake, R. E. 1995. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Tirumala, R. D., and P. Tiwari. 2023. Advances in Infrastructure Finance. 1st ed. Singapore: Springer.
Ubbels, B., and E. T. Verhoef. 2008. “Auctioning concessions for private roads.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 42 (1): 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2007.08.001.
Verhoef, E. T. 2007. “Second-best road pricing through highway franchising.” J. Urban Econ. 62 (2): 337–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2006.11.001.
Villani, E., L. Greco, and N. Phillips. 2017. “Understanding value creation in public-private partnerships: A comparative case study.” J. Manage. Stud. 54 (6): 876–905. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12270.
Weber, B., M. Staub-Bisang, and H. W. Alfen. 2016. Infrastructure as an asset class: Investment strategy, sustainability, project finance and PPP. 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications: Design and methods. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Zhang, Z. 2013. “Evaluating long-term leasing of toll roads based on probabilistic and multiple-criteria techniques.” Master’s thesis, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150Issue 12December 2024

History

Received: Feb 22, 2024
Accepted: Jul 17, 2024
Published online: Sep 30, 2024
Published in print: Dec 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Feb 28, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Research Fellow, Dept. of the Built Environment, College of Design and Engineering, National Univ. of Singapore, 4 Architecture Dr., Singapore 117566 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5578-3481. Email: [email protected]
Willie Tan, Ph.D.
Professor, Dept. of the Built Environment, National Univ. of Singapore, 4 Architecture Dr., Singapore 117566.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share