Technical Papers
Jul 27, 2024

Understanding Social Interaction and Physiological Patterns in Nonlean and Last Planner System–Based Project Teams: A Comparative Study Using Immersive Virtual Reality

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 10

Abstract

There are different interactions and physiological patterns in coordination meetings between non-lean and last planner system (LPS)-based project teams. This phenomenon is the result of the top-down workflow control in the LPS that seems to influence group interaction and physiological processes differently compared to non-lean production planning and control approaches that use a bottom-up workflow control. The current LPS management practices focus on developing performance indicators instead of establishing process-oriented initiatives that optimize the temporal patterns of social interaction and physiological processes. Understanding the differences in behavioral and physiological patterns among non-lean and LPS-based project teams can support non-lean project teams in transitioning to LPS-based social and physiological patterns. Incorporating video recordings and physiological sensors such as electrodermal activity (EDA) can capture group interactions and concurrent physiological responses. The multiuser immersive virtual reality-based LPS simulation game (MILPS) is an innovative simulation tool to investigate these patterns in a controlled environment. This study uses MILPS, EDA sensors, and video recordings to investigate the impact of LPS on social interactions and physiological patterns during coordination meetings. A total of 90 participants, forming 30 groups, participated in a two-round experiment consisting of both non-lean and LPS-based project planning and working tasks. The video and EDA data were analyzed to assess the temporal pattern of interactions and associated shared physiological arousals (SPA) in both rounds. The results indicate that more iterative patterns were observed between interaction phases in LPS-based rounds, whereas more sequential patterns were observed in non-lean rounds. A higher level of SPA was found during the negotiation, identification in LPS-based round compared with the non-lean round. The contribution of this study is twofold: (1) the behavioral and physiological patterns during coordination meetings for both non-lean and LPS-based project teams are characterized; and (2) insights are generated into management and training strategies to facilitate LPS implementation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data (anonymized data collected during experiments), models (Unity models), or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to Roy Davies, Zeqi Tu, and Simeng Li for their assistance in data collection and analysis.

References

Asadian, E. 2023. “The impact of Lean methods implementation on construction team dynamics.” Doctoral thesis, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ.
Asadian, E., and R. M. Leicht. 2022. “Social interactions and team dynamics in a last planner meeting: An observational method.” In Proc., 30th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), 480–491. Auckland, New Zealand: International Group for Lean Construction.
Awada, M., R. Zhu, B. Becerik-Gerber, G. Lucas, and E. Southers. 2021. “An integrated emotional and physiological assessment for VR-based active shooter incident experiments.” In Advanced engineering informatics, 101227. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Ballard, H. G. 2000. The last planner system of production control. Birmingham, England: Univ. of Birmingham.
Behrens, F., J. A. Snijdewint, R. G. Moulder, E. Prochazkova, E. E. Sjak-Shie, S. M. Boker, and M. E. Kret. 2020. “Physiological synchrony is associated with cooperative success in real-life interactions.” Sci. Rep. 10 (1): 19609. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76539-8.
Benedek, M., and C. Kaernbach. 2010. “A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity.” J. Neurosci. Methods 190 (1): 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.04.028.
Boucsein, W. 2012. Electrodermal activity. Berlin: Springer.
Braithwaite, J. J., D. G. Watson, R. Jones, and M. Rowe. 2013. “A guide for analysing electrodermal activity (EDA) & skin conductance responses (SCRs) for psychological experiments.” Psychophysiology 49 (1): 1017–1034.
Cao, L., G. A. Davis, S. Gallagher, M. C. Schall, and R. F. Sesek. 2018. “Characterizing posture and associated physiological demand during evacuation.” Saf. Sci. 104 (Apr): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.032.
Carmeli, A., A. Levi, and R. Peccei. 2021. “Resilience and creative problem-solving capacities in project teams: A relational view.” Int. J. Project Manage. 39 (5): 546–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.03.007.
Castillo, T., L. F. Alarcón, and J. Lsalvatierra. 2016. “Last planner system, social networks and performance of construction projects.” In Proc., 24th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, 43–52. Auckland, New Zealand: International Group for Lean Construction.
Chanel, G., J. M. Kivikangas, and N. Ravaja. 2012. “Physiological compliance for social gaming analysis: Cooperative versus competitive play.” Interact. Comput. 24 (4): 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2012.04.012.
Charness, G., U. Gneezy, and M. A. Kuhn. 2012. “Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design.” J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 81 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009.
Chittaro, L., and F. Buttussi. 2015. “Assessing knowledge retention of an immersive serious game vs. A traditional education method in aviation safety.” IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 21 (4): 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2391853.
Choi, B., H. Jebelli, and S. Lee. 2019. “Feasibility analysis of electrodermal activity (EDA) acquired from wearable sensors to assess construction workers’ perceived risk.” Saf. Sci. 115 (Jun): 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.01.022.
Cicchetti, D. V., and S. A. Sparrow. 1981. “Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior.” Am. J. Mental Deficiency 86 (2): 127–137.
Comu, S., J. E. Taylor, and C. S. Dossick. 2014. “Comparing global versus domestic project network facilitation in virtual workspaces.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2014, 2175–2184. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Critchley, H. D., J. Eccles, and S. N. Garfinkel. 2013. “Interaction between cognition, emotion, and the autonomic nervous system.” In Handbook of clinical neurology, 59–77. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Daniel, E. I., C. Pasquire, G. Dickens, and H. G. Ballard. 2017. “The relationship between the last planner system and collaborative planning practice in UK construction.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 24 (3): 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2015-0109.
Dawson, M. E., A. M. Schell, and D. L. Filion. 2016. “The electrodermal system.” In Handbook of psychophysiology, 217–243. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dindar, M., S. Järvelä, A. Nguyen, E. Haataja, and A. Çini. 2022. “Detecting shared physiological arousal events in collaborative problem solving.” Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 69 (Apr): 102050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102050.
Du, J., Y. Shi, Z. Zou, and D. Zhao. 2018. “CoVR: Cloud-based multiuser virtual reality headset system for project communication of remote users.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (2): 04017109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001426.
Du, J., D. Zhao, and O. Zhang. 2019. “Impacts of human communication network topology on group optimism bias in capital project planning: A human-subject experiment.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 37 (1): 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1508848.
Ekman, I., G. Chanel, S. Järvelä, J. M. Kivikangas, M. Salminen, and N. Ravaja. 2012. “Social interaction in games: Measuring physiological linkage and social presence.” Simul. Gaming 43 (3): 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878111422121.
Epure, E. V., D. Compagno, C. Salinesi, R. Deneckere, M. Bajec, and S. Žitnik. 2018. “Process models of interrelated speech intentions from online health-related conversations.” Artif. Intell. Med. 91 (Sep): 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2018.06.007.
Fauchier, D., and T. C. L. Da Alves. 2013. “Last Planner® system is the gateway to lean behaviors.” In Proc., 21st Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, 496–505. Auckland, New Zealand: International Group for Lean Construction.
Feng, Z., V. A. González, M. Spearpoint, J. Thomas, M. Trotter, G. Cabrera-Guerrero, and D. Paes. 2022. “A sequence analysis of behaviors in immersive virtual reality for indoor earthquake and post-earthquake evacuation.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 75 (Jun): 102978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102978.
Fich, L. B., P. Jönsson, P. H. Kirkegaard, M. Wallergård, A. H. Garde, and Å. Hansen. 2014. “Can architectural design alter the physiological reaction to psychosocial stress? A virtual TSST experiment.” Physiol. Behav. 135 (5): 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.034.
Flores, F., and J. J. Ludlow. 1980. “Doing and speaking in the office.” In Decision support systems: Issues and challenges, 95–118. New York: Pergamon Press.
Fluxicon. 2024. “Disco user guides.” Accessed January 10, 2024. https://www.fluxicon.com/book/read/reference/.
Ghosh, S., D. E. Dickerson, and T. Mills. 2019. “Effect of the last planner system® on social interactions among project participants.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 15 (2): 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2017.1407847.
Goldkuhl, G. 2006. “Action and media in interorganizational interaction.” Commun. ACM 49 (5): 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/1125944.1125975.
Gonzalez, V., L. F. Alarcon, and F. Mundaca. 2008. “Investigating the relationship between planning reliability and project performance.” Prod. Plann. Control 19 (5): 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537280802059023.
Gonzalez, V. A., R. Sacks, I. Pavez, M. Poshdar, L. B. Alon, and V. Priven. 2015. “Interplay of lean thinking and social dynamics in construction.” In Proc., 23rd Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction, 681–690. Auckland, New Zealand: International Group for Lean Construction.
González, V., L. F. Alarcón, S. Maturana, F. Mundaca, and J. Bustamante. 2010. “Improving planning reliability and project performance using the reliable commitment model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (10): 1129–1139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000215.
Gorse, C. A., and S. Emmitt. 2007. “Communication behaviour during management and design team meetings: A comparison of group interaction.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 25 (11): 1197–1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701567413.
Greenwald, S. W., Z. Wang, M. Funk, and P. Maes. 2017. “Investigating social presence and communication with embodied avatars in room-scale virtual reality.” Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 725 (Jun): 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60633-0_7.
Günther, C. W., and W. M. P. Van Der Aalst. 2007. “Fuzzy mining—Adaptive process simplification based on multi-perspective metrics.” In Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 328–343. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0_24.
Hamzeh, F. R. 2011. “The lean journey: Implementing the last planner® system in construction.” In Proc., 19th Annual Conf. of the International Group for Lean Construction, 561–572. Auckland, New Zealand: International Group for Lean Construction.
Hatfield, E., J. T. Cacioppo, and R. L. Rapson. 1993. “Emotional contagion.” Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci. 2 (3): 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953.
Henning, R. A., A. G. Armstead, and J. K. Ferris. 2009. “Social psychophysiological compliance in a four-person research team.” Appl. Ergon. 40 (6): 1004–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.04.009.
Henning, R. A., and K. T. Korbelak. 2005. “Social-psychophysiological compliance as a predictor of future team performance.” Int. J. Psychol. Sci. 48 (2): 84–92. https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2005.84.
Herndon, B., and K. Lewis. 2015. “Applying sequence methods to the study of team temporal dynamics.” Organ. Psychol. Rev. 5 (4): 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386614538276.
Hoogeboom, M. A. M. G., A. Saeed, M. L. Noordzij, and C. P. M. Wilderom. 2021. “Physiological arousal variability accompanying relations-oriented behaviors of effective leaders: Triangulating skin conductance, video-based behavior coding and perceived effectiveness.” Leadership Q. 32 (6): 101493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101493.
iMotions. 2017. Galvanic skin response—The complete pocket guide. Boston, MA: iMotions.
iMotions. 2023. “GSR R-notebooks.” Accessed January 10, 2024. https://imotions.com/products/imotions-lab/developers/r-notebooks/.
Iorio, J., J. E. Taylor, and C. Sturts Dossick. 2012. “A bridge too far: Examining the impact of facilitators on information transfer in global virtual project networks.” Eng. Project Organ. J. 2 (4): 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/21573727.2011.642478.
Jang, H., et al. 2022. “Graphene e-tattoos for unobstructive ambulatory electrodermal activity sensing on the palm enabled by heterogeneous serpentine ribbons.” Nat. Commun. 13 (1): 6604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34406-2.
Kalsaas, B. T., and R. Sacks. 2011. “Conceptualization of interdependency and coordination between construction tasks.” In Proc., 19th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction. Auckland, New Zealand: International Group for Lean Construction.
Kauffeld, S., and R. A. Meyers. 2009. “Complaint and solution-oriented circles: Interaction patterns in work group discussions.” Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 18 (3): 267–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320701693209.
Kelsey, M., R. V. Palumbo, A. Urbaneja, M. Akcakaya, J. Huang, I. R. Kleckner, and M. S. Goodwin. 2017. “Artifact detection in electrodermal activity using sparse recovery.” In Compressive sensing VI: From diverse modalities to big data analytics, 92–101. Anaheim, CA: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2264027.
Kim, N., J. Kim, and C. R. Ahn. 2021. “Predicting workers’ inattentiveness to struck-by hazards by monitoring biosignals during a construction task: A virtual reality experiment.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 49 (Aug): 101359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101359.
Koskela, L. 2000. An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction. Espoo, Finland: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
Koskela, L., and G. Howell. 2002. “The underlying theory of project management is obsolete.” In Proc., PMI Research Conf., 293–302. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Kuhn, M., A. M. V. Gerlicher, and T. B. Lonsdorf. 2022. “Navigating the manyverse of skin conductance response quantification approaches—A direct comparison of trough-to-peak, baseline correction, and model-based approaches in Ledalab and PsPM.” Psychophysiology 59 (9): e14058. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14058.
Latini, A., E. Di Giuseppe, and M. D’Orazio. 2023. “Development and application of an experimental framework for the use of virtual reality to assess building users’ productivity, comfort, and adaptive-behaviour.” J. Build. Eng. 70 (Sep): 106280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106280.
LaValle, S. 2023. Virtual reality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
LeBreton, J. M., and J. L. Senter. 2008. “Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement.” Organ. Res. Methods 11 (4): 815–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642.
Lee, G., B. Choi, H. Jebelli, C. R. Ahn, and S. Lee. 2020. “Wearable biosensor and collective sensing—Based approach for detecting older adults’ environmental barriers.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 34 (2): 04020002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000879.
Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., and J. A. Allen. 2014. “How fun are your meetings? Investigating the relationship between humor patterns in team interactions and team performance.” J. Appl. Psychol. 99 (6): 1278–1287. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038083.
Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., J. A. Allen, and S. Kauffeld. 2013. “A sequential analysis of procedural meeting communication: How teams facilitate their meetings.” J. Appl. Commun. Res. 41 (4): 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2013.844847.
Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., H. Hung, and J. Keyton. 2017. “New frontiers in analyzing dynamic group interactions: Bridging social and computer science.” Small Group Res. 48 (5): 519–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417718941.
Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., R. A. Meyers, S. Kauffeld, A. Neininger, and A. Henschel. 2011. “Verbal interaction sequences and group mood: Exploring the role of team planning communication.” Small Group Res. 42 (6): 639–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496411398397.
Li, N., J. Du, V. A. González, and J. Chen. 2022. “Methodology for extended reality—Enabled experimental research in construction engineering and management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (10): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002367.
Li, X., W. Hu, Y. Li, and Z. Mao. 2023. “Exploring what synchronized physiological arousal can reveal about the social regulatory process in a collaborative argumentation activity.” Front. Psychol. 13 (Jan): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1042970.
Liu, C., V. González, G. Lee, G. Cabrera-Guerrero, Y. Zou, and R. Davies. 2024. “Integrating the last planner system (LPS) and immersive virtual reality: Exploring the social mechanisms produced by the LPS in projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 150 (7): 04024070. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-14430.
Liu, C., G. A. Vicente, P. Ignacio, and D. C. Roy. 2022. “Exploring the socio-technical nature of lean-based production planning and control using immersive virtual reality.” In Lean construction 4.0, edited by V. A. González, F. Hamzeh, and L. F. Alarcón. London: Routledge.
Lugrin, J. L., M. Wiedemann, D. Bieberstein, and M. E. Latoschik. 2015. “Influence of avatar realism on stressful situation in VR.” In Proc., 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality Conf., VR 2015, 227–228. New York: IEEE.
MacFarland, T. W., and J. M. Yates. 2016. “Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test.” In Introduction to nonparametric statistics for the biological sciences using R, edited by T. W. MacFarland and J. M. Yates, 133–175. Berlin: Springer.
Malmberg, J., E. Haataja, T. Seppänen, and S. Järvelä. 2019a. “Are we together or not? The temporal interplay of monitoring, physiological arousal and physiological synchrony during a collaborative exam.” Int. J. Comput.-Support Collab. Learn 14 (4): 467–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09311-4.
Malmberg, J., S. Järvelä, J. Holappa, E. Haataja, X. Huang, and A. Siipo. 2019b. “Going beyond what is visible: What multichannel data can reveal about interaction in the context of collaborative learning?” Comput. Human Behav. 96 (July): 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.030.
Mänty, K., H. Järvenoja, and T. Törmänen. 2020. “Socio-emotional interaction in collaborative learning: Combining individual emotional experiences and group-level emotion regulation.” Int. J. Educ. Res. 102 (2020): 101589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101589.
Mayo, O., M. Lavidor, and I. Gordon. 2021. “Interpersonal autonomic nervous system synchrony and its association to relationship and performance—A systematic review and meta-analysis.” Physiol. Behav. 235 (Jun): 113391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113391.
Medina-Mora, R., T. Winograd, R. Flores, and F. Flores. 1992. “Action workflow approach to workflow management technology.” In Proc., Conf. on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 281–288. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Meta. 2024. “Meta Quest 2—Technical specifications.” Accessed January 10, 2024. https://www.meta.com/nz/quest/products/quest-2/tech-specs/#tech-specs.
Miller, L. J., D. N. McIntosh, J. McGrath, V. Shyu, M. Lampe, A. K. Taylor, F. Tassone, K. Neitzel, T. Stackhouse, and R. J. Hagerman. 1999. “Electrodermal responses to sensory stimuli in individuals with fragile X syndrome: A preliminary report.” Am. J. Med. Genet. 83 (4): 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19990402)83:4%3C268::AID-AJMG7%3E3.0.CO;2-K.
Mønster, D., D. D. Håkonsson, J. K. Eskildsen, and S. Wallot. 2016. “Physiological evidence of interpersonal dynamics in a cooperative production task.” Physiol. Behav. 156 (Mar): 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.004.
Mossman, A., and S. Ramalingam. 2021. “Last planner, everyday learning, shared understanding & rework.” In Proc., 29th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, 697–706. Auckland, New Zealand: International Group for Lean Construction.
Naveteur, J., and E. Freixa I Baque. 1987. “Individual differences in electrodermal activity as a function of subjects’ anxiety.” Personality Individual Differ. 8 (5): 615–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(87)90059-6.
Nguyen, A., S. Järvelä, C. Rosé, H. Järvenoja, and J. Malmberg. 2023. “Examining socially shared regulation and shared physiological arousal events with multimodal learning analytics.” Br. J. Educ. Technol. 54 (1): 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13280.
OBS project. 2024. “OBS studio.” Accessed January 10, 2014. https://obsproject.com/.
Ogden, R. S., C. Dobbins, K. Slade, J. McIntyre, and S. Fairclough. 2022. “The psychophysiological mechanisms of real-world time experience.” Sci. Rep. 12 (1): 12890. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16198-z.
Oh, C. S., J. N. Bailenson, and G. F. Welch. 2018. “A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications.” Front. Rob. AI 5 (Oct): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00114.
Palumbo, R. V., M. E. Marraccini, L. L. Weyandt, O. Wilder-Smith, H. A. McGee, S. Liu, and M. S. Goodwin. 2017. “Interpersonal autonomic physiology: A systematic review of the literature.” Personal Soc. Psychol. Rev. 21 (2): 99–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316628405.
Pijeira-Díaz, H. J., H. Drachsler, S. Järvelä, and P. A. Kirschner. 2019. “Sympathetic arousal commonalities and arousal contagion during collaborative learning: How attuned are triad members?” Comput. Human Behav. 92 (Mar): 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.008.
Priven, V., and R. Sacks. 2015. “Effects of the last planner system on social networks among construction trade crews.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (6): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000975.
Reijswoud, V., and J. Dietz. 1999. DEMO modelling handbook. Delft, Netherlands: Delft Univ. of Technology.
Retamal, F., L. A. Salazar, and L. F. Alarcón. 2022. “Online monitoring and implementation of commitment management performance and its impact on project planning in four construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (10): 05022011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002372.
Roth, D., J. L. Lugrin, D. Galakhov, A. Hofmann, G. Bente, M. E. Latoschik, and A. Fuhrmann. 2016. “Avatar realism and social interaction quality in virtual reality.” In Proc., IEEE Virtual Reality, 277–278. New York: IEEE.
Sacks, R., U. Gurevich, and B. Belaciano. 2015. “Hybrid discrete event simulation and virtual reality experimental setup for construction management research.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 29 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000366.
Salazar, L. A., P. Arroyo, and L. F. Alarcón. 2020. “Key indicators for linguistic action perspective in the last planner® system.” Sustainability 12 (20): 8728. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208728.
Salazar, L. A., G. Ballard, P. Arroyo, and L. F. Alarcón. 2022. “Development of a commitment management system for construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (12): 05022012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002376.
Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Setz, C., B. Arnrich, J. Schumm, R. La Marca, G. Troster, and U. Ehlert. 2010. “Discriminating stress from cognitive load using a wearable EDA device.” IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 14 (2): 410–417. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITB.2009.2036164.
Shi, Y., J. Du, and D. A. Worthy. 2020. “The impact of engineering information formats on learning and execution of construction operations: A virtual reality pipe maintenance experiment.” Autom. Constr. 119 (Nov): 103367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103367.
Tehrani, B. M., J. Wang, and D. Truax. 2022. “Assessment of mental fatigue using electroencephalography (EEG) and virtual reality (VR) for construction fall hazard prevention.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 29 (9): 3593–3616. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2021-0017.
Tomaka, J., and J. Blascovich. 1994. “Effects of justice beliefs on cognitive appraisal of and subjective physiological, and behavioral responses to potential stress.” J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 67 (4): 732–740. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.732.
Tomashin, A., I. Gordon, and S. Wallot. 2022. “Interpersonal physiological synchrony predicts group cohesion.” Front. Hum. Neurosci. 16 (4): 903407. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.903407.
Ulhassan, W., H. Westerlund, J. Thor, C. Sandahl, U. von Thiele Schwarz, U. von Schwarz, and U. von Thiele Schwarz. 2014. “Does Lean implementation interact with group functioning?” J. Health Organ. Manage. 28 (2): 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-03-2013-0065.
van Dooren, M., J. J. G. G. J. de Vries, and J. H. Janssen. 2012. “Emotional sweating across the body: Comparing 16 different skin conductance measurement locations.” Physiol. Behav. 106 (2): 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.01.020.
Viana, D. D., C. T. Formoso, and E. L. Isatto. 2017. “Understanding the theory behind the last planner system using the language-action perspective: Two case studies.” Prod. Plann. Control 28 (3): 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2016.1233360.
Wallace, W. A. 1987. The influence of design team communication content upon the architectural decision making process in the pre contract design stages. Edinburgh, Scotland: Heriot-Watt Univ.
Wang, G. A., H. J. Wang, J. Li, A. S. Abrahams, and W. Fan. 2015. “An analytical framework for understanding knowledge-sharing processes in online Q&A communities.” ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst. 5 (4): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2629445.
Weigand, H. 2003. “Coordination through communication.” In Proc., 8th Int. Working Conf. on the Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modeling (LAP 2003), 115–134. Delft, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
Xia, X., N. Li, and V. A. González. 2021. “Exploring the influence of emergency broadcasts on human evacuation behavior during building emergencies using virtual reality technology.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 35 (2): 04020065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000953.
Yin, R. K. 2003. Designing case studies. Qualitative research methods. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: SAGE.
Zangróniz, R., A. Martínez-Rodrigo, J. Pastor, M. López, and A. Fernández-Caballero. 2017. “Electrodermal activity sensor for classification of calm/distress condition.” Sensors 17 (10): 2324. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102324.
Zou, H., N. Li, and L. Cao. 2017. “Emotional response–Based approach for assessing the sense of presence of subjects in virtual building evacuation studies.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 31 (5): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000679.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150Issue 10October 2024

History

Received: Jan 19, 2024
Accepted: May 3, 2024
Published online: Jul 27, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 27, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6653-9920. Email: [email protected]
Vicente A. González, M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3408-3863
Professor and Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Digital Lean Construction, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2R3. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3408-3863
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2R3. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6341-2585
Guillermo Cabrera-Guerrero https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8238-7426
Associate Professor, School of Computer Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2340025, Chile. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8238-7426.
Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6150-6126

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share