Case Studies
Jul 27, 2024

Ontology-Based Design Features for Representing Constructability in Architectural Design: Toward BIM in Off-Site Construction

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 10

Abstract

To enable off-site construction (OSC), architects must finalize construction details in their design deliverables as early as possible, particularly in a building information modeling (BIM) environment, to enhance design constructability and project efficiency. However, most architects lack construction knowledge and practical experience, which impedes their ability to incorporate design-specific construction input (i.e., manufacturing, logistics, assembly, and installation demands) into BIM processes at the early stages. This deficiency can lead to errors, rework, and ultimately increased construction costs. To address this challenge, this study introduces an innovative approach to incorporate constructability knowledge into architectural design processes for BIM-enabled OSC projects. The methodology involved retrospective case studies of two completed OSC projects utilizing a component-centric analysis framework. This analysis resulted in an ontology of construction-specific design features that identified 11 types of constructability issues and the characterization of nine design feature classes that were categorized into three groups: substance; intersection; and composition. These feature classes and their 29 attributes were rigorously characterized from the perspective of BIM-enabled architectural design. This feature-based approach not only extends the BIM vocabulary and semantics from an architectural standpoint but also encapsulates construction knowledge as an integral input to architectural design. Additionally, three strategies were identified, analyzed, and summarized to inform these design features and attributes and to evaluate their effectiveness of addressing constructability issues. The study’s ontological approach assists architects in acquiring a comprehensive understanding of design-specific construction knowledge, enabling them to differentiate, locate, and integrate critical types of constructability information into BIM-enabled architectural design deliverables early in the project delivery process. This paper is a foundational step in the development of automated modeling, algorithms, and constructability assessment for BIM-enabled architectural design deliverables, aimed at achieving a more streamlined construction process.

Practical Applications

The study presents several practical implications for the OSC industry, aimed at bridging the gap between architectural design and actual construction through BIM-enabled architectural design. First, the proposed construction-specific ontology of design features can assist architects in identifying and incorporating essential constructability information into BIM. Second, these design features and their attributes cover a broad spectrum of construction-specific design information, going beyond geometric details to include the semantics associated with constructability constraints and design considerations while exploring alternative design strategies and tools. Third, these design features and attributes act as a structured “construction information checklist,” which systematically guides architects in the early design stages to ensure comprehensive inclusion of all necessary construction-specific design information. Essentially, this checklist offers architects a preliminary method for incorporating constructability knowledge within a BIM environment at the initial phases of the architectural design process for OSC.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52008203), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M691560), and Jiangsu Postdoctoral Research Funding Program (2021K517C) led by Associate Professor Jianing Luo from Nanjing Tech University, China. The “China Scholarship Council/The University of British Columbia Joint Funding Program” (202108320176) also funds this research.

References

Abdul-Ghafour, S., P. Ghodous, B. Shariat, E. Perna, and F. Khosrowshahi. 2014. “Semantic interoperability of knowledge in feature-based CAD models.” Comput. Aided Des. 56 (Sep): 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2014.06.001.
AIA California Council. 2007. Integrated project delivery, a guide. Washington, DC: American Institute of Architects.
Bakhshi, S., M. R. Chenaghlou, F. P. Rahimian, D. J. Edwards, and N. Dawood. 2022. “Integrated BIM and DfMA parametric and algorithmic design based collaboration for supporting client engagement within offsite construction.” Autom. Constr. 133 (Feb): 104015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104015.
Besharati-Foumani, H., M. Lohtander, and J. Varis. 2020. “Fundamentals and new achievements in feature-based modeling, a review.” Procedia Manuf. 51 (Jun): 998–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.140.
Bhatija, V. P., N. Thomas, and N. Dawood. 2017. “A preliminary approach towards integrating knowledge management with building information modeling (K BIM) for the construction industry.” Int. J. Innovation Manage. Technol. 8 (1): 64–70. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijimt.2017.8.1.704.
Bhonde, D. 2023. Understanding the changes resulting from the virtualization of BIM-enabled collaborative design processes in the building construction industry. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Univ. of British Columbia.
Calderon, F. 2018. “Quality control and quality assurance in hybrid mass timber high-rise construction: A case study of the Brock Commons.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia.
Cao, J., E. Vakaj, R. K. Soman, and D. M. Hall. 2022. “Ontology-based manufacturability analysis automation for industrialized construction.” Autom. Constr. 139 (Apr): 104277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104277.
Charef, R., H. Alaka, and S. Emmitt. 2018. “Beyond the third dimension of BIM: A systematic review of literature and assessment of professional views.” J. Build. Eng. 19 (Mar): 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.04.028.
Choi, J., S. Lee, and I. Kim. 2020. “Development of quality control requirements for improving the quality of architectural design based on BIM.” Appl. Sci. 10 (20): 7074. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207074.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). 1986. Constructability: A primer, CII. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Cuellar Lobo, J. D., Z. Lei, H. Liu, H. X. Li, and S. Han. 2021. “Building information modeling-(BIM-) based generative design for drywall installation planning in prefabricated construction.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2021 (1): 6638236. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6638236.
Cunningham, J. J., and J. R. Dixon. 1998. “Designing with features: The origin of features.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., ASME Computers in Engineering Conf., 237–243. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Dixon, J. R., and C. L. Dym. 1986. “Artificial intelligence and geometric reasoning in manufacturing technology.” Appl. Mech. Rev. 39 (9): 1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3149521.
Fadoul, A., W. Tizani, and C. A. Osorio-Sandoval. 2020. “A knowledge-based model for constructability assessment of buildings design using BIM.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, 147–159. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Fallahi, A. 2017. “Innovation in hybrid mass timber high-rise construction: A case study of UBC’s Brock Commons project.” Accessed January 20, 2023. https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0345634.
Fellows, R., and A. Liu. 2021. Research methods for construction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Gao, S., R. Jin, and W. Lu. 2020. “Design for manufacture and assembly in construction: A review.” Build. Res. Inf. 48 (5): 538–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2019.1660608.
Gbadamosi, A. Q., A. M. Mahamadu, L. O. Oyedele, O. O. Akinade, P. Manu, L. Mahdjoubi, and C. Aigbavboa. 2019. “Offsite construction: Developing a BIM-based optimizer for assembly.” J. Cleaner Prod. 215 (Apr): 1180–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.113.
Gruber, T. R. 1993. “A translation approach to portable ontology specifications.” Knowl. Acquis. 5 (2): 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008.
Hess, D. R. 2004. “Retrospective studies and chart reviews.” Respir. Care 49 (10): 1171–1174.
Hwang, B. G., X. Zhao, and K. W. Yang. 2019. “Effect of BIM on rework in construction projects in Singapore: Status quo, magnitude, impact, and strategies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (2): 04018125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001600.
Jiang, L., and R. M. Leicht. 2016. “Supporting automated constructability checking for formwork construction: An ontology.” J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 21 (28): 456–478.
Kasbar, M. 2017. “Investigating the performance of the construction process of an 18-storey mass timber hybrid building.” Accessed January 30, 2023. https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0347252.
Kasbar, M., S. Staub-French, A. Pilon, E. Poirier, Z. Teshnizi, and T. Froese. 2021. “Construction productivity assessment on Brock Commons Tallwood House.” Constr. Innov. 21 (4): 951–968. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-11-2019-0118.
Khan, S. 2016. “Using the last planner system to improve workflow in BIM-based building design projects.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Art, Design and Architecture, Univ. of Huddersfield.
Kim, K. Y., D. G. Manley, and H. Yang. 2006. “Ontology-based assembly design and information sharing for collaborative product development.” Comput.-Aided Des. 38 (12): 1233–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2006.08.004.
Kiviniemi, A., and M. Fischer. 2009. “Potential obstacles to using BIM in architectural design.” In Collaborative construction information management, 46–64. New York: Routledge.
Lam, P. T., F. W. Wong, and A. P. Chan. 2006. “Contributions of designers to improving buildability and constructability.” Des. Stud. 27 (4): 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.10.003.
Liu, H., M. Lu, and M. Al-Hussein. 2016. “Ontology-based semantic approach for construction-oriented quantity take-off from BIMs in the light-frame building industry.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 30 (2): 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2016.03.001.
Liu, H., Y. Zhang, Z. Lei, H. X. Li, and S. Han. 2021. “Design for manufacturing and assembly: A BIM-enabled generative framework for building panelization design.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2021 (1): 5554551. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5554551.
Lu, W., T. Tan, J. Xu, J. Wang, K. Chen, S. Gao, and F. Xue. 2021. “Design for manufacture and assembly (DfMA) in construction: The old and the new.” Archit. Eng. Des. Manage. 17 (1–2): 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2020.1768505.
Luo, J. 2018. “Productization for order of building composition towards building industrialization.” Doctoral dissertations, School of Architecture, Southeast Univ.
Luo, J., H. Zhang, and W. Sher. 2017. “Insights into architects’ future roles in off-site construction.” Constr. Econ. Build. 17 (1): 107–120. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v17i1.5252.
Luo, J., H. Zhang, and W. Sher. 2021. “A mixed method for measuring incompatibilities between manufacturing approaches and off-site construction.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 28 (9): 2516–2548. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2019-0358.
Mehrbod, S., S. Staub-French, N. Mahyar, and M. Tory. 2019a. “Beyond the clash: Investigating BIM-based building design coordination issue representation and resolution.” J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 24 (2019): 33–57.
Mehrbod, S., S. Staub-French, N. Mahyar, and M. Tory. 2019b. “Characterizing interactions with BIM tools and artifacts in building design coordination meetings.” Autom. Constr. 98 (Apr): 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.025.
Mehrbod, S., S. Staub-French, and M. Tory. 2020. “BIM-based building design coordination: Processes, bottlenecks, and considerations.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 47 (1): 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2018-0287.
Mills, A. J., G. Durepos, and E. Wiebe. 2009. Encyclopedia of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Moudgil, M. 2017. “Feasibility study of using cross-laminated timber core for the UBC tall wood building.” Electronic theses and dissertations, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia.
Nepal, M. P., S. Staub-French, R. Pottinger, and A. Webster. 2012. “Querying a building information model for construction-specific spatial information.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 26 (4): 904–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2012.08.003.
Nepal, M. P., S. Staub-French, R. Pottinger, and J. Zhang. 2013. “Ontology-based feature modeling for construction information extraction from a building information model.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 27 (5): 555–569. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000230.
Perkins & Will. 2019. “University of British Columbia Orchard commons case study.” Accessed August 14, 2023. https://vancouver.housing.ubc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Orchard-Commons-Design-Case-Study.pdf.
Poirier, E., S. Staub-French, A. Pilon, A. Fallahi, Z. Teshnizi, T. Tannert, and T. Froese. 2021. “Design process innovation on Brock Commons Tallwood house.” Constr. Innovation 22 (1): 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-11-2019-0116.
Rausch, C., M. Nahangi, C. Haas, and W. Liang. 2019. “Monte Carlo simulation for tolerance analysis in prefabrication and offsite construction.” Autom. Constr. 103 (Apr): 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.026.
Raviv, G., A. Shapira, and R. Sacks. 2012. “Relationships between methods for constructability analysis during design and constructability failures in projects.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World, 515–524. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Santiago Diaz. 2017. “Computational design in construction.” Accessed April 12, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6_UF-jL9S4.
Shah, J. J., and M. Mäntylä. 1995. Parametric and feature-based CAD/CAM: concepts, techniques, and applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Shahrokhi, H. 2016. Understanding how advanced parametric design can improve the constructability of building designs. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Univ. of British Columbia.
Staub-French, S., and M. P. Nepal. 2007. “Reasoning about component similarity in building product models from the construction perspective.” Autom. Constr. 17 (1): 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2007.02.013.
Staub-French, S., A. Pilon, E. Poirier, A. Fallahi, M. Kasbar, F. Calderon, Z. Teshnizi, and T. Froese. 2021. “Construction process innovation on Brock Commons Tallwood house.” Constr. Innovation 22 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-11-2019-0117.
Tabesh, A. R., and S. Staub-French. 2006. “Modeling and coordinating building systems in three dimensions: A case study.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 33 (12): 1490–1504. https://doi.org/10.1139/l06-124.
Tam, V. W., C. M. Tam, S. X. Zeng, and W. C. Ng. 2007. “Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction.” Build. Environ. 42 (10): 3642–3654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.003.
Tauriainen, M., J. Puttonen, A. Saari, P. Laakso, and K. Forsblom. 2014. “The assessment of constructability: BIM cases.” In eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction, 55–61. Vienna, VA: ITCON Services.
Tommelein, I. D., and S. Gholami. 2012. “Root causes of clashes in building information models.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 20th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, 10. San Diego: Montezume Publishing.
Van Leeuwen, J. P. 1999. “Modelling architectural design information by features: An approach to dynamic product modelling for application in architectural design.” Ph.D. thesis, Built Environment, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. https://doi.org/10.6100/IR524571.
Wang, L., and F. Leite. 2016. “Formalized knowledge representation for spatial conflict coordination of mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP) systems in new building projects.” Autom. Constr. 64 (Sep): 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.12.020.
Yin, R. K. 2009. Vol. 5 of Case study research: Design and methods. London: SAGE.
Yin, X., H. Liu, Y. Chen, and M. Al-Hussein. 2019. “Building information modelling for off-site construction: Review and future directions.” Autom. Constr. 101 (Jan): 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.010.
Yuan, Z., C. Sun, and Y. Wang. 2018. “Design for manufacture and assembly-oriented parametric design of prefabricated buildings.” Autom. Constr. 88 (Aug): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.021.
Zhang, C., T. Zayed, W. Hijazi, and S. Alkass. 2016. “Quantitative assessment of building constructability using BIM and 4D simulation.” Open J. Civ. Eng. 6 (03): 442. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2016.63037.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150Issue 10October 2024

History

Received: Nov 14, 2023
Accepted: Apr 15, 2024
Published online: Jul 27, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 27, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, College of Architecture, Nanjing Tech Univ., 30 Puzhu South Rd., Nanjing, Jiangsu 211816, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6884-3309. Email: [email protected]
Research Associate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, 2002 - 6250 Applied Science Ln., Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3824-4946. Email: [email protected]
Sheryl Staub-French, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, 2002 - 6250 Applied Science Ln., Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share