Technical Papers
Apr 29, 2023

Integrating BIM and Multiple Construction Monitoring Technologies for Acquisition of Project Status Information

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 149, Issue 7

Abstract

Although novel construction tech systems have been developed to monitor construction sites, each collects data in isolation. We present an event processing model (EPM) that applies multiple monitoring technologies in parallel and a set of algorithms to interpret data from the multiple streams for operations control. In a full-scale lab experiment, multiple monitoring systems were applied to monitor workers as they built drywall partitions with a variety of systems and finishes. Data from the different streams were merged to establish what work was done, by whom, where, and for how long. The results suggest that collecting, merging, and interpreting diverse data streams using a multiple monitoring technologies system on-site can provide more complete and more accurate project status information than can be obtained from the use of any individual technology. This is essential for the automation of project progress monitoring, which is important in automating production planning and control tasks.

Practical Applications

Modern construction management approaches need more accurate, more reliable, and automated construction-progress monitoring. Manual monitoring is complicated and expensive in large, complex projects. It is difficult to perform the production control process successfully for whole projects with many related trades and resources. Automating data monitoring, data collection, and computing can reduce errors and increase efficiency compared to manual approaches. This paper presents a fully integrated system to manage production information through the construction life cycle. Different types of construction technologies could be integrated, along with a building information modeling (BIM) environment, into one common data-management system to report actual work progress and events completed on-site. The proposed system would support the decision-making process as part of construction planning in large and complex projects by providing accurate real-time information defining what work was done, by whom, in which location, and for how long. The information can be tailored to suit planners’ needs at four different levels: (1) work package, (2) task, (3) daily recording, and (4) building element. Broadly speaking, this paper presents a digital twin construction (DTC) framework to integrate data transfer and monitoring from field-to-BIM and from BIM-to-field for automated, accurate, and intelligent production control. This system can help planners improve look-ahead planning (LAP) and decision-making processes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by the Israel Ministry of Science and Technology under Grant No. 3-15651. The presented audio detection model in the “Audio Data Stream” section is an outcome of the research cooperation between the Virtual Construction Lab (VCLab) and the S.M.A.R.T. Construction Research Group from the Israel Institute Technology (Technion) and New York University Abu Dhabi (NYUAD), respectively. Thanks to Dr. Borja García de Soto from S.M.A.R.T. Construction Research Group, Division of Engineering (NYUAD), Mr. Pi Ko from S.M.A.R.T. lab (NYUAD) for his efforts in audio data labeling, and Mr. Karunakar Mannem from the Data science department (NYUAD) for his efforts in model coding. The authors thank Buildots, VisiLean, and Genda for their support for data collection. Also, thanks to Mr. Shammas Sulaiman from DSI Solutions (UAE) and Mr. Hazem Kahla from AskBIM (US) for their efforts in BIM model preparation.

References

Ahn, C. R., S. Lee, C. Sun, H. Jebelli, K. Yang, and B. Choi. 2019. “Wearable sensing technology applications in construction safety and health.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (11): 03119007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001708.
Alarcón, L. 1997. Lean construction. Rotterdam: CRC Press.
Ballard, G., and G. Howell. 1994. “Implementing lean construction: Stabilizing work flow.” In Proc., 2nd Annual Meeting of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, Santiago, Chile, 101–110. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema Publishers.
Ballard, G., and I. D. Tommelein. 1999. “Aiming for continuous flow.” Accessed June 24, 2015. https://p2sl.berkeley.edu/References/White_Papers/.
Ballard, H. G. 2000. “The last planner system of production control.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Birmingham.
Bertelsen, S., and L. Koskela. 2004. “Construction beyond lean: A new understanding of construction management.” In Proc., 12th Annual Conf. in the Int. Group for Lean Construction. Elsinore, Denmark: Lean Construction.
Bhargavi, R. 2016. “Complex event processing framework for big data applications.” In Data science and big data computing, 41–56. Cham: Springer.
Bhatla, A., B. Pradhan, and J. O. Choi. 2016. “Identifying wastes in construction process and implementing the last planner system in India.” J. Constr. Eng. Project Manage. 6 (1): 11–19. https://doi.org/10.6106/JCEPM.2016.6.1.011.
Biddiscombe, P. 2005. “3D laser scan tunnel inspections keep expressway infrastructure project on schedule.” White Paper-Trimble. Accessed January 13, 2021. https://www.neigps.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/022543-125_3DScan_TunnelInspect_WP_0605_lr.pdf.
Bosche, F., C. T. Haas, and P. Murray. 2008. “Performance of automated project progress tracking with 3D data fusion.” In Proc., CSCE 2008 Annual Conf. Quebec, Canada: Citeseer.
Brilakis, I., and C. T. M. Haas. 2019. Infrastructure computer vision. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Buildots. 2022. “Buildots.” Accessed April 20, 2020. https://buildots.com/.
Chen, C. Y., J. H. Fu, T. Sung, P.-F. Wang, E. Jou, and M.-W. Feng. 2014. “Complex event processing for the internet of things and its applications.” In Proc., 2014 IEEE Int. Conf. on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE). New York: IEEE.
Cheng, T., and J. Teizer. 2013. “Real-time resource location data collection and visualization technology for construction safety and activity monitoring applications.” Autom. Constr. 34 (Sep): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.017.
Dave, B., S. Kubler, K. Främling, and L. Koskela. 2016. “Opportunities for enhanced lean construction management using Internet of Things standards.” Autom. Constr. 61 (Jan): 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.10.009.
Deming, W. 2000. Out of the crisis, originally published in 1982 by Massachusetts Institute of technology. Cambridge, MA: Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
Deria, A., P. Ghannad, and Y.-C. Lee. 2022. “Integrating AI in an audio-based digital twin for autonomous management of roadway construction.” In Construction Research Congress 2022, 530–540. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483961.056.
Dong, N., M. Fischer, Z. Haddad, and R. Levitt. 2013. “A method to automate look-ahead schedule (LAS) generation for the finishing phase of construction projects.” Autom. Constr. 35 (Nov): 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.05.023.
Flouris, I., N. Giatrakos, A. Deligiannakis, M. Garofalakis, M. Kamp, and M. Mock. 2017. “Issues in complex event processing: Status and prospects in the Big Data era.” J. Syst. Software 127 (May): 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.011.
Forbes, L. H., and S. M. Ahmed. 2010. Modern construction: Lean project delivery and integrated practices. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
GendaTech. 2022. “GendaTech.” Accessed December 30, 2020. https://www.gendatech.com/.
Hamzeh, F., G. Ballard, and I. D. Tommelein. 2012. “Rethinking lookahead planning to optimize construction workflow.” Lean Constr. J. 1 (1): 15–34.
Hamzeh, F. R., I. Saab, I. D. Tommelein, and G. Ballard. 2015a. “Understanding the role of ‘tasks anticipated’ in lookahead planning through simulation.” Autom. Constr. 49 (Jan): 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.09.005.
Hamzeh, F. R., E. Zankoul, and C. Rouhana. 2015b. “How can ‘tasks made ready’ during lookahead planning impact reliable workflow and project duration?” Construct. Manage. Econ. 33 (4): 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2015.1047878.
Hasan, S., and R. Sacks. 2021. “Building Information Modeling (BIM) and construction tech integration for construction operations: State of the art.” In Proc., 2021 European Conf. on Computing in Construction, 358–365. Haifa, Israel: Technion-Israel Institute of Technology. https://doi.org/10.35490/EC3.2021.179.
Jin, J., J. Gubbi, S. Marusic, and M. Palaniswami. 2014. “An information framework for creating a smart city through Internet of Things.” IEEE Internet Things J. 1 (2): 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2013.2296516.
Jun, C., and C. Chi. 2014. “Design of complex event-processing IDS in internet of things.” In Proc., 2014 6th Int. Conf. on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation. New York: IEEE.
Kalsaas, B. T., and R. Sacks. 2011. “Conceptualization of interdependency and coordination between construction tasks.” In Proc., IGLC-19. Arlington, VA: Lean Construction.
Kim, P., J. Chen, J. Kim, and Y. K. Cho. 2018. SLAM-driven intelligent autonomous mobile robot navigation for construction applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Kopsida, M., I. Brilakis, and P. A. Vela. 2015. “A review of automated construction progress monitoring and inspection methods.” In Vol. 2015 of Proc., 32nd CIB W78 Conf. 2015 Oct, 421–431. Eindhoven, Netherlands: International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction.
Koskela, L. 1992. Application of the new production philosophy to construction. Stanford: Stanford Univ.
Lappalainen, E. M., O. Seppänen, A. Peltokorpi, and V. Singh. 2021. “Transformation of construction project management toward situational awareness.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 28 (8): 2199–2221. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2020-1053.
Mengiste, E., and B. García de Soto. 2018. “Using the rate of color evolution of a point cloud to monitor the performance of construction trades.” In Proc., 18th Int. Conf. on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality (CONVR2018). Auckland, New Zealand: Univ. of Auckland.
Navon, R., and R. Sacks. 2007. “Assessing research issues in automated project performance control (APPC).” Autom. Constr. 16 (4): 474–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2006.08.001.
Pan, Y., and L. Zhang. 2021. “A BIM-data mining integrated digital twin framework for advanced project management.” Autom. Constr. 124 (Apr): 103564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103564.
Pellicer, E., F. Cerveró, A. Lozano, and J. L. Ponz-Tienda. 2015. “The last planner system of construction planning and control as a teaching and learning tool.” In Proc., 9th Int. Technology, Education and Development Conf., 4877–4884. Limerick, Ireland: Univ. of Limerick.
Pušnik, M., M. Galun, and B. Šumak. 2020. “Improved Bluetooth low energy sensor detection for indoor localization services.” Sensors 20 (8): 2336. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082336.
Sacks, R., R. Barak, B. Belaciano, U. Gurevich, and E. Pikas. 2011. “Field tests of the KanBIM lean production management system.” In Proc., 19th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, 465–476. Lima, Peru: Granay Montero and Pontifica Universidad Católica del Perú.
Sacks, R., M. Girolami, and I. Brilakis. 2020. “Building information modelling, artificial intelligence and construction tech.” Dev. Built Environ. 4 (Nov): 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2020.100011.
Sacks, R., L. Koskela, B. A. Dave, and R. Owen. 2010. “Interaction of lean and building information modeling in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (9): 968–980. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000203.
Versatile. 2022. “Versatile.” Accessed May 4, 2020. https://www.versatile.ai/.
VisiLean. 2022. “VisiLean.” Accessed May 7, 2020. https://visilean.com/.
WakeCap. 2022. “WakeCap.” Accessed July 17, 2020. https://www.wakecap.com/.
Wu, E., Y. Diao, and S. Rizvi. 2006. “High-performance complex event processing over streams.” In Proc., 2006 ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, 407–418. New York: Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library.
Zhang, C., and D. Arditi. 2013. “Automated progress control using laser scanning technology.” Autom. Constr. 36 (Dec): 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.08.012.
Zhuang, S. 2020. “Real-time indoor location tracking in construction site using BLE beacon trilateration.” M.S. thesis, School of Science, Aalto Univ. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/43581/master_Zhuang_Siyan_2020.pdf.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 149Issue 7July 2023

History

Received: Jun 22, 2022
Accepted: Nov 16, 2022
Published online: Apr 29, 2023
Published in print: Jul 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Sep 29, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8399-9221. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9427-5053. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Challenges of Automating Interior Construction Progress Monitoring, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-14637, 150, 9, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share