Abstract

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders is a serious problem affecting the construction workforce. Pipe workers are subjected to forward bending tasks that cause back injuries. Recent advancements in wearable robotic technologies have led to a growing interest in the use of back-support exoskeletons as a potential solution to reduce the occurrences of back injuries. However, without the willingness of workers to use exoskeletons, the intervention will not be successful in the industry. This study conducted a user assessment of a commercially available passive back-support exoskeleton for pipework in terms of usability, level of perceived discomfort, and subjective perception of the benefits, barriers to adoption, and design modifications. Fourteen pipe workers performed their regular work tasks using a passive back-support exoskeleton and provided feedback on their experience with the device. The results indicate that the exoskeleton is easy to use (4.13±0.34) and did not affect workers’ productivity (2.07±1.22). Participants reported willingness to use the exoskeleton but raised concerns about the compatibility of the exoskeleton with the safety harness. Reduced perceived discomfort was observed in the lower back. However, there was an increase in discomfort at the chest (20%), thigh (73%), and shoulder (250%). There was a strong correlation (p<0.05) between discomfort at the chest, thigh, shoulder, and upper arm and workers’ perception of usability of the exoskeleton. Health benefits such as reduction in stress in the back muscle were reported. Discomfort was experienced while using the exoskeleton in confined spaces. Design modifications, such as the integration of the safety harness and the tool strap with the exoskeleton, were identified. The findings are expected to inspire studies in the area of human-wearable robot interaction and task-specific applications of exoskeletons for construction work.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data, models, and code generated or used during the study are available upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Construction Industry Research Affiliates Program and Allan Myers.

References

Akanmu, A. A., J. Olayiwola, O. Ogunseiju, and D. McFeeters. 2020. “Cyber-physical postural training system for construction workers.” Autom. Constr. 117 (Sep): 103272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103272.
Alemi, M. M., J. Geissinger, A. A. Simon, S. E. Chang, and A. T. Asbeck. 2019. “A passive exoskeleton reduces peak and mean EMG during symmetric and asymmetric lifting.” J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 47 (Aug): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.05.003.
Alemi, M. M., S. Madinei, S. Kim, D. Srinivasan, and M. A. Nussbaum. 2020. “Effects of two passive back-support exoskeletons on muscle activity, energy expenditure, and subjective assessments during repetitive lifting.” Hum. Factors 62 (3): 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819897669.
Angelini, L., M. Caon, S. Carrino, L. Bergeron, N. Nyffeler, M. Jean-Mairet, and E. Mugellini. 2013. “Designing a desirable smart bracelet for older adults.” In Proc., 2013 ACM Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication, 425–434. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Antwi-Afari, M. F., H. Li, S. Anwer, D. Li, Y. Yu, H.-Y. Mi, and I. Y. Wuni. 2021. “Assessment of a passive exoskeleton system on spinal biomechanics and subjective responses during manual repetitive handling tasks among construction workers.” Saf. Sci. 142 (Oct): 105382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105382.
Ayodele, O. A., A. Chang-Richards, and V. González. 2020. “Factors affecting workforce turnover in the construction sector: A systematic review.” J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 146 (2): 03119010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001725.
Baltrusch, S. J., H. Houdijk, J. H. van Dieën, and J. T. Kruif. 2021. “Passive trunk exoskeleton acceptability and effects on self-efficacy in employees with low-back pain: A mixed method approach.” J. Occup. Rehabil. 31 (1): 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09891-1.
Baltrusch, S. J., J. H. van Dieën, C. A. M. van Bennekom, and H. Houdijk. 2018. “The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on functional performance in healthy individuals.” Appl. Ergon. 72 (Oct): 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.04.007.
BLS (US Bureau of Labor Statistics). 2022. “Injuries, illnesses, and fatalities.” Accessed April 28, 2022. https://www.bls.gov/iif/.
Bosch, T., J. van Eck, K. Knitel, and M. de Looze. 2016. “The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work.” Appl. Ergon. 54 (May): 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.12.003.
Cheung, Z. 2007. Ergonomic guidelines for manual material handling. San Francisco: California Dept. of Industrial Relations.
Cho, G. 2009. Smart clothing: Technology and applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Cho, Y. K., K. Kim, S. Ma, and J. Ueda. 2018. “A robotic wearable exoskeleton for construction worker’s safety and health.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2018, 19–28. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Choi, S. D., L. Yuan, and J. G. Borchardt. 2016. “Musculoskeletal disorders in construction: Practical solutions from the literature.” Prof. Saf. 61 (1): 26–32.
Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.” MIS Q. 13 (3): 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
de Looze, M. P., T. Bosch, F. Krause, K. S. Stadler, and L. W. O’Sullivan. 2016. “Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load.” Ergonomics 59 (5): 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1081988.
Frost, D. M., M. Abdoli-E, and J. M. Stevenson. 2009. “PLAD (personal lift assistive device) stiffness affects the lumbar flexion/extension moment and the posterior chain EMG during symmetrical lifting tasks.” J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 19 (6): e403–e412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.12.002.
Frymoyer, J. W., and W. L. Cats-Baril. 1991. “An overview of the incidences and costs of low back pain.” Orthop. Clin. North Am. 22 (2): 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(20)31652-7.
Gonsalves, N., M. Khalid, A. Akinniyi, O. Ogunseiju, and A. Akanmu. 2022. “Subjective evaluation of passive back-support wearable robot for simulated rebar work.” In Proc., 39th Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2022). Oulu, Finland: The International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction.
Gonsalves, N. J., O. R. Ogunseiju, A. A. Akanmu, and C. A. Nnaji. 2021. “Assessment of a passive wearable robot for reducing low back disorders during rebar work.” J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 26 (Nov): 936–952. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2021.050.
Graham, R. B., M. J. Agnew, and J. M. Stevenson. 2009. “Effectiveness of an on-body lifting aid at reducing low back physical demands during an automotive assembly task: Assessment of EMG response and user acceptability.” Appl. Ergon. 40 (5): 936–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.01.006.
Hallgren, K. A. 2012. “Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial.” Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol. 8 (1): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023.
Hensel, R., and M. Keil. 2019. “Subjective evaluation of a passive industrial exoskeleton for lower-back support: A field study in the automotive sector.” IISE Trans. Occup. Ergon. Hum. Factors 7 (3–4): 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2019.1573770.
Karahanoğlu, A., and Ç. Erbuğ. 2011. “Perceived qualities of smart wearables: Determinants of user acceptance.” In Proc., 2011 Conf. on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, DPPI ’11, 1–8. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Kermavnar, T., A. W. de Vries, M. P. de Looze, and L. W. O’Sullivan. 2021. “Effects of industrial back-support exoskeletons on body loading and user experience: An updated systematic review.” Ergonomics 64 (6): 685–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2020.1870162.
Kim, S., S. Madinei, M. M. Alemi, D. Srinivasan, and M. A. Nussbaum. 2020. “Assessing the potential for ‘undesired’ effects of passive back-support exoskeleton use during a simulated manual assembly task: Muscle activity, posture, balance, discomfort, and usability.” Appl. Ergon. 89 (Nov): 103194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103194.
Kim, S., A. Moore, D. Srinivasan, A. Akanmu, A. Barr, C. Harris-Adamson, D. M. Rempel, and M. A. Nussbaum. 2019. “Potential of exoskeleton technologies to enhance safety, health, and performance in construction: Industry perspectives and future research directions.” IISE Trans. Occup. Ergon. Hum. Factors 7 (3–4): 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2018.1561557.
Kim, S., M. A. Nussbaum, M. I. Mokhlespour Esfahani, M. M. Alemi, B. Jia, and E. Rashedi. 2018. “Assessing the influence of a passive, upper extremity exoskeletal vest for tasks requiring arm elevation: Part II: ‘Unexpected’ effects on shoulder motion, balance, and spine loading.” Appl. Ergon. 70 (Jul): 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.024.
Kluth, K., and M. Hefferle. 2022. “Field study to objectify the stress and strain on male workers during car wheel changes in the course of using an active exoskeleton.” In Proc. 21st Congress of the Int. Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021) Volume V: Methods & Approaches, edited by N. L. Black, W. P. Neumann, and I. Noy, 300–307. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
Kuber, P. M., and E. Rashedi. 2020. “Product ergonomics in industrial exoskeletons: Potential enhancements for workforce efficiency and safety.” Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 22 (6): 729–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2020.1850905.
La Bara, L. M. A., L. Meloni, D. Giusino, and L. Pietrantoni. 2021. “Assessment methods of usability and cognitive workload of rehabilitative exoskeletons: A systematic review.” Appl. Sci. 11 (15): 7146. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11157146.
Lewis, J. R. 1994. “Sample sizes for usability studies: Additional considerations.” Hum. Factors 36 (2): 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089403600215.
Madinei, S., M. M. Alemi, S. Kim, D. Srinivasan, and M. A. Nussbaum. 2020. “Biomechanical assessment of two back-support exoskeletons in symmetric and asymmetric repetitive lifting with moderate postural demands.” Appl. Ergon. 88 (Oct): 103156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103156.
Marcum, J., and D. Adams. 2017. “Work-related musculoskeletal disorder surveillance using the Washington state workers’ compensation system: Recent declines and patterns by industry, 1999–2013.” Am. J. Ind. Med. 60 (5): 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22708.
Marino, M. 2019. “Impacts of using passive back assist and shoulder assist exoskeletons in a wholesale and retail trade sector environment.” IISE Trans. Occup. Ergon. Hum. Factors 7 (3–4): 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2019.1645057.
Meyer, J. T., R. Gassert, and O. Lambercy. 2021. “An analysis of usability evaluation practices and contexts of use in wearable robotics.” J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 18 (1): 170. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00963-8.
Motti, V. G., and K. Caine. 2014. “Human factors considerations in the design of wearable devices.” Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 58 (1): 1820–1824. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581381.
Ogunseiju, O., N. Gonsalves, and C. Nnaji. 2021. “Subjective evaluation of passive back-support exoskeleton for flooring work.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., ASC 2021. 57th Annual Associated Schools of Construction Int. Conf., 10–17. Manchester, UK: EasyChair.
Ogunseiju, O. R., N. Gonsalves, A. A. Akanmu, D. Bairaktarova, D. A. Bowman, and F. Jazizadeh. 2022. “Mixed reality environment for learning sensing technology applications in Construction: A usability study.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 53 (Aug): 101637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101637.
Okpala, I., C. Nnaji, O. Ogunseiju, and A. Akanmu. 2022. “Assessing the role of wearable robotics in the construction industry: Potential safety benefits, opportunities, and implementation barriers.” In Automation and robotics in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry, edited by H. Jebelli, M. Habibnezhad, S. Shayesteh, S. Asadi, and S. Lee, 165–180. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
Olmsted-Hawala, E. L., E. D. Murphy, S. Hawala, and K. T. Ashenfelter. 2010. “Think-aloud protocols: Analyzing three different think-aloud protocols with counts of verbalized frustrations in a usability study of an information-rich web site.” In Proc., 2010 IEEE Int. Professional Communication Conf., 60–66. New York: IEEE.
Rohcraher, H. 2010. “The role of users in the social shaping of environmental technologies.” Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 16 (2): 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610304516.
Rosecrance, J. C., T. M. Cook, and C. L. Zimmermann. 1996. “Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms among construction workers in the pipe trades.” Work 7 (1): 13–20. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-1996-7103.
Rugelj, D., and F. Sevšek. 2011. “The effect of load mass and its placement on postural sway.” Appl. Ergon. 42 (6): 860–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.02.002.
Schmidtler, J., K. Bengler, F. Dimeas, and A. Campeau-Lecours. 2017. “A questionnaire for the evaluation of physical assistive devices (QUEAD): Testing usability and acceptance in physical human-robot interaction.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 876–881. New York: IEEE.
Siedl, S. M., and M. Mara. 2021. “Exoskeleton acceptance and its relationship to self-efficacy enhancement, perceived usefulness, and physical relief: A field study among logistics workers.” Wearable Technol. 2 (Sep): e10. https://doi.org/10.1017/wtc.2021.10.
Tullis, T. S., and J. N. Stetson. 2014. “A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability.” Accessed April 5, 2015. https://dgs.ie/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/A-Comparison-of-Questionnaires-for-Assessing-Website-Usability-.pdf.
Umer, W., H. Li, G. P. Y. Szeto, and A. Y. L. Wong. 2017. “Low-cost ergonomic intervention for mitigating physical and subjective discomfort during manual rebar tying.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (10): 04017075. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001383.
Vi, P. 2006. “A field study investigating the effects of a rebar-tying machine on trunk flexion, tool usability and productivity.” Ergonomics 49 (14): 1437–1455. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130600805028.
Virzi, R. A. 1992. “Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: How many subjects is enough?” Hum. Factors 34 (4): 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089203400407.
Wang, X., X. S. Dong, S. D. Choi, and J. Dement. 2017. “Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among construction workers in the United States from 1992 to 2014.” Occup. Environ. Med. 74 (5): 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2016-103943.
Wege, A., and A. Zimmermann. 2007. “Electromyography sensor based control for a hand exoskeleton.” In Proc., 2007 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), 1470–1475. New York: IEEE.
Welsh, E. 2002. “Dealing with data: Using NVivo in the qualitative data analysis process.” Forum Qual. Sozialforsch./Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 3 (2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.2.865.
Yan, X., H. Li, A. R. Li, and H. Zhang. 2017. “Wearable IMU-based real-time motion warning system for construction workers’ musculoskeletal disorders prevention.” Autom. Constr. 74 (Feb): 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.11.007.
Yan, X., H. Li, H. Zhang, and T. M. Rose. 2018. “Personalized method for self-management of trunk postural ergonomic hazards in construction rebar ironwork.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 37 (Aug): 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2018.04.013.
Young-Corbett, D. E., M. A. Nussbaum, and W. W. Winchester. 2010. “Usability evaluation of drywall sanding tools.” Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 40 (1): 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2009.09.001.
Zhang, T., and H. Huang. 2018. “A lower-back robotic exoskeleton: Industrial handling augmentation used to provide spinal support.” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 25 (2): 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2018.2815083.
Zhu, Z., A. Dutta, and F. Dai. 2021. “Exoskeletons for manual material handling: A review and implication for construction applications.” Autom. Constr. 122 (Feb): 103493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103493.
Ziaei, M., A. Choobineh, H. Ghaem, and M. Abdoli-Eramaki. 2021. “Evaluation of a passive low-back support exoskeleton (Ergo-Vest) for manual waste collection.” Ergonomics 64 (10): 1255–1270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2021.1915502.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 149Issue 5May 2023

History

Received: Jun 6, 2022
Accepted: Dec 5, 2022
Published online: Feb 16, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jul 16, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Nihar Gonsalves [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Myers Lawson School of Construction, Virginia Tech, 1345 Perry St., Blacksburg, VA 24061 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Abiola Akanmu, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Myers Lawson School of Construction, Virginia Tech, 1345 Perry St., Blacksburg, VA 24061. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Myers Lawson School of Construction, Virginia Tech, 1345 Perry St., Blacksburg, VA 24061. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3531-8137. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Myers Lawson School of Construction, Virginia Tech, 1345 Perry St., Blacksburg, VA 24061. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6299-3042. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Myers Lawson School of Construction, Virginia Tech, 1345 Perry St., Blacksburg, VA 24061. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3970-0541. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share