Technical Papers
Feb 24, 2023

Investigating the Acceptance of an Electronic Incident Reporting System in the Construction Industry: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 149, Issue 5

Abstract

Incident reporting has drawn the attention of safety experts in the construction industry to reduce the likelihood of future hazards by learning from previous events. A number of barriers have been identified that inhibit the effective reporting of safety incidents. Adopting an electronic incident reporting system (E-IRS) has immense potential to overcome these barriers and enhance incident reporting frequency in the construction industry. Nonetheless, the successful implementation of E-IRS requires an in-depth understanding of users’ acceptance of the system and the factors influencing its usage. This research employed a cross-sectional design based on the technology acceptance model (TAM) to quantitatively examine the factors influencing the adoption of E-IRS in the construction industry of developing countries. Data were collected using an online questionnaire survey to test the 11 hypothesized relationships. A total of 128 completed responses are retrieved and the results are analyzed using partial least squares-structural equation modeling. The findings indicate that perceived ease of use and trust are critical determinants that influence the acceptance behavior of E-IRS. Facilitating conditions and technological self-efficacy have a significant positive effect on perceived ease of use. In addition, social influence is found to have a significant impact on trust. The outcomes of this study provide a theoretical basis for all the concerned stakeholders to take effective measures to encourage the use of E-IRS in the construction industry, thereby reducing the likelihood of construction-related incidents.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Abdullah, F., and R. Ward. 2016. “Developing a general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning (GETAMEL) by analyzing commonly used external factors.” Comput. Hum. Behav. 56 (Mar): 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036.
Abu Alrub, A. M., Y. S. Amer, M. A. Titi, A. C. A. May, F. Shaikh, M. M. Baksh, and F. El-Jardali. 2021. “Barriers and enablers in implementing an electronic incident reporting system in a teaching hospital: A case study from Saudi Arabia.” Int. J. Health Plann. Manage. 37 (2): 854–872. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3374.
Abukhashabah, E., A. Summan, and M. Balkhyour. 2020. “Occupational accidents and injuries in construction industry in Jeddah city.” Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 27 (8): 1993–1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.06.033.
Aguilar, G. E., and K. N. Hewage. 2013. “IT based system for construction safety management and monitoring: C-RTICS 2.” Autom. Constr. 35 (11): 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.05.007.
Ajzen, I. 1985. “From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior.” In Action control, 11–39. Berlin: Springer.
Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1975. “A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes.” Psychol. Bull. 82 (2): 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076477.
Akbari, M., A. Rezvani, E. Shahriari, M. A. Zúñiga, and H. Pouladian. 2020. “Acceptance of 5 G technology: Mediation role of trust and concentration.” J. Eng. Tech. Manage. 57 (6): 101585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101585.
Alam, S. S., S. Susmit, C. Y. Lin, M. Masukujjaman, and Y. H. Ho. 2021. “Factors affecting augmented reality adoption in the retail industry.” J. Open Innovation: Technol. Market Complexity 7 (2): 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020142.
Al-Gahtani, S. S. 2016. “Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model.” Appl. Comput. Inf. 12 (1): 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2014.09.001.
Al-Rayes, S. A., F. A. Aldar, N. S. Al Nasif, Z. I. Alkhadrawi, A. Al-Fayez, and A. Alumran. 2020. “The use of electronic incident reporting system: Influencing factors.” Inf. Med. Unlocked 21 (Jan): 100477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2020.100477.
Awolusi, I., E. Marks, and M. Hallowell. 2018. “Wearable technology for personalized construction safety monitoring and trending: Review of applicable devices.” Autom. Constr. 85 (7): 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.10.010.
Bavafa, A., A. Mahdiyar, and A. K. Marsono. 2018. “Identifying and assessing the critical factors for effective implementation of safety programs in construction projects.” Saf. Sci. 106 (Jul): 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.025.
Binyamin, S. S., M. J. Rutter, and S. Smith. 2019. “Extending the technology acceptance model to understand students’ use of learning management systems in Saudi higher education.” Int. J. Emerging Technol. Learn. 14 (3): 4–21. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i03.9732.
Bryson, D., and G. Atwal. 2013. “Antecedents of attitude towards the adoption of Internet banking in Senegal.” J. Innovation Econ. Manage. 11 (1): 33–54. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.011.0033.
Cambraia, F. B., T. A. Saurin, and C. T. Formoso. 2010. “Identification, analysis and dissemination of information on near misses: A case study in the construction industry.” Saf. Sci. 48 (1): 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.06.006.
Chao, C. M. 2019. “Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model.” Front. Psychol. 10 (Jul): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652.
Chen, J. H., N. T. T. Ha, H. W. Tai, and C. A. Chang. 2020. “The willingness to adopt the internet of things (IoT) conception in Taiwan’s construction industry.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 26 (6): 534–550. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.12639.
Choudhry, R. M., and H. Zahoor. 2016. “Strengths and weaknesses of safety practices to improve safety performance in construction projects in Pakistan.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 142 (4): 04016011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000292.
Chow, M., D. K. Herold, T. M. Choo, and K. Chan. 2012. “Extending the technology acceptance model to explore the intention to use second life for enhancing healthcare education.” Comput. Educ. 59 (4): 1136–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.011.
Compeau, D. R., and C. A. Higgins. 1995. “Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills.” Inf. Syst. Res. 6 (2): 118–143. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.118.
Cronbach, L. J. 1951. “Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.” Psychometrika 16 (3): 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555.
Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.” MIS Q.: Manage. Inf. Syst. 13 (3): 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
De Silva, N., U. Rathnayake, and K. M. U. B. Kulasekera. 2018. “Under-reporting of construction accidents in Sri Lanka.” J. Eng. Des. Technol. 16 (6): 850–868. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-07-2017-0069.
Duthler, K. W. 2006. “The politeness of requests made via email and voicemail: Support for the hyper-personal model.” J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 11 (2): 500–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00024.x.
El-Emran, M., and A. Granić. 2021. “Is it still valid or outdated? A bibliometric analysis of the technology acceptance model and its applications from 2010 to 2020.” In Recent advances in technology acceptance models and theories, edited by M. Al-Emran and K. Shaalan. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64987-6.
Elshafey, A., C. C. Saar, E. B. Aminudin, M. Gheisari, and A. Usmani. 2020. “Technology acceptance model for augmented reality and building information modeling integration in the construction industry.” J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 25 (Aug): 161–172. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2020.010.
Fang, D., and H. Wu. 2013. “Development of a Safety Culture Interaction (SCI) model for construction projects.” Saf. Sci. 57 (Aug): 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.02.003.
Gefen, D., and D. Straub. 2000. “The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption.” J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 1 (1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00008.
Gnoni, M. G., and J. H. Saleh. 2017. “Near-miss management systems and observability-in-depth: Handling safety incidents and accident precursors in light of safety principles.” Saf. Sci. 91 (1): 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.012.
Hair, J. F., C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2011. “PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet.” J. Marketing Theory Pract. 19 (2): 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
Hair, J. F., J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle. 2019. “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM.” Eur. Bus. Rev. 31 (1): 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
Hinze, J., J. N. Devenport, and G. Giang. 2006. “Analysis of construction worker injuries that do not result in lost time.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (3): 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:3(321).
Ifinedo, P. 2016. “The moderating effects of demographic and individual characteristics on nurses’ acceptance of information systems: A Canadian study.” Int. J. Med. Inf. 87 (Mar): 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.012.
Indrayana, D. V., I. Mahani, M. Amin, A. Rafsanjani, and K. Cahyandi. 2020. “Comparison study of the investigation of reporting regulations on the accidents of construction work in Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, and Indonesia.” Syst. Rev. Pharm. 11 (2): 857–871. https://doi.org/10.31838/srp.2020.2.120.
Jimenez, I. A. C., L. C. C. García, M. G. Violante, F. Marcolin, and E. Vezzetti. 2021. “Commonly used external tam variables in e-learning, agriculture and virtual reality applications.” Future Internet 13 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202010.0023.v1.
Kamal, S. A., M. Shafiq, and P. Kakria. 2020. “Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM).” Technol. Soc. 60 (Feb): 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101212.
Kuo, Y., T. Lee, M. E. Mills, and K. Lin. 2012. “The evaluation of a web-based incident reporting system.” Comput. Inf. Nurs. 30 (7): 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1097/NXN.0b013e31825106ea.
Lee, S., J. Yu, and D. Jeong. 2015. “BIM acceptance model in construction organizations.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (3): 04014048. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000252.
Lee, Y. C. 2006. “An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an e-learning system.” Online Inf. Rev. 30 (5): 517–541. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520610706406.
Levtzion-Korach, O., H. Alcalai, E. J. Orav, E. Graydon-Baker, C. Keohane, D. W. Bates, and A. S. Frankel. 2009. “Evaluation of the contributions of an electronic web-based reporting system: Enabling action.” J. Patient Saf. 5 (1): 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0b013e318198dc8d.
Linton, J. 1998. “Diffusion of innovations.” In Circuits assembly, 9. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Liu, D., W. Lu, and Y. Niu. 2018. “Extended technology-acceptance model to make smart construction systems successful.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (6): 04018035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001487.
Man, S. S., S. Alabdulkarim, A. H. S. Chan, and T. Zhang. 2021. “The acceptance of personal protective equipment among Hong Kong construction workers: An integration of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior with risk perception and safety climate.” J. Saf. Res. 79 (Dec): 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.09.014.
Martowirono, K., J. D. Jansma, S. J. Van Luijk, C. Wagner, and A. B. Bijnen. 2012. “Possible solutions for barriers in incident reporting by residents.” J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 18 (1): 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01544.x.
Maslen, S., J. Hayes, J. Wong, and C. Scott-Young. 2020. “Witch hunts and scapegoats: An investigation into the impact of personal liability concerns on engineers’ reporting of risks.” Environ. Syst. Decis. 40 (3): 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-020-09757-0.
Mitropoulos, P., T. S. Abdelhamid, and G. A. Howell. 2005. “Systems model of construction accident causation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (7): 816–825. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:7(816).
Mun, Y. Y., J. D. Jackson, J. S. Park, and J. C. Probst. 2006. “Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view.” Inf. Manage. 43 (3): 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.08.006.
Nikou, S. A., and A. A. Economides. 2017. “Mobile-based assessment: Integrating acceptance and motivational factors into a combined model of self-determination theory and technology acceptance.” Comput. Hum. Behav. 68 (Mar): 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.020.
Okpala, I., C. Nnaji, and I. Awolusi. 2022. “Wearable sensing devices acceptance behavior in construction safety and health: Assessing existing models and developing a hybrid conceptual model.” Constr. Innov. 22 (1): 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-04-2020-0056.
Oswald, D., F. Sherratt, and S. Smith. 2018. “Problems with safety observation reporting: A construction industry case study.” Saf. Sci. 107 (11): 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.004.
Park, E., S. J. Kwon, and J. Han. 2019. “Antecedents of the adoption of building information modeling technology in Korea.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 26 (8): 1735–1749. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2018-0174.
Park, Y., H. Son, and C. Kim. 2021. “Investigating the determinants of construction professionals’ acceptance of web-based training: An extension of the technology acceptance model.” Autom. Constr. 22 (Mar): 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.016.
Probst, T. M., and A. X. Estrada. 2010. “Accident under-reporting among employees: Testing the moderating influence of psychological safety climate and supervisor enforcement of safety practices.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 42 (5): 1438–1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.06.027.
Purnomo, S. H., and Y. H. Lee. 2013. “E-learning adoption in the banking workplace in Indonesia: An empirical study.” Inf. Dev. 29 (2): 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666912448258.
Qin, X., Y. Shi, K. Lyu, and Y. Mo. 2020. “Using a TAM-toe model to explore factors of building information modelling (BIM) adoption in the construction industry.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 26 (3): 259–277. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.12176.
Qureshi, A., V. Garcia-Font, H. Rifà-Pous, and D. Megías. 2021. “Collaborative and efficient privacy-preserving critical incident management system.” Expert Syst. Appl. 163 (Jan): 113727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113727.
Raheem, A. A., and R. R. A. Issa. 2016. “Safety implementation framework for the Pakistani construction industry.” Saf. Sci. 82 (Feb): 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.019.
Rahman, M. M., M. F. Lesch, W. J. Horrey, and L. Strawderman. 2017. “Assessing the utility of TAM, TPB, and UTAUT for advanced driver assistance systems.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 108 (Nov): 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.011.
Rezaei, R., L. Safa, and M. M. Ganjkhanloo. 2020. “Understanding farmers’ ecological conservation behavior regarding the use of integrated pest management—An application of the technology acceptance model.” Global Ecol. Conserv. 22 (Jun): e00941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00941.
Rossignol, N. 2015. “Practices of incident reporting in a nuclear research center: A question of solidarity.” Saf. Sci. 80 (Dec): 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.030.
Salloum, S. A., A. Qasim Mohammad Alhamad, M. Al-Emran, A. Abdel Monem, and K. Shaalan. 2019. “Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model.” IEEE Access 7 (Sep): 128445–128462. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467.
Sandberg, E., and E. Albrechtsen. 2018. “A study of experience feedback from reported unwanted occurrences in a construction company.” Saf. Sci. 107 (1): 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.028.
Sarcheshmeh, E., M. Bijani, and H. Sadighi. 2018. “Adoption behavior towards the use of nuclear technology in agriculture: A causal analysis.” Technol. Soc. 55 (Nov): 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.08.001.
Saurin, T. A., C. T. Formoso, R. Reck, B. M. Beck da Silva Etges, and J. L. D. Ribeiro. 2015. “Findings from the analysis of incident-reporting systems of construction companies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (9): 05015007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000988.
Sepasgozaar, S. M. E., S. Shirowzhan, and C. Wang. 2017. “A scanner technology acceptance model for construction projects.” Procedia Eng. 180 (Jan): 1237–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.285.
Singh, A., and S. C. Misra. 2021. “Safety performance & evaluation framework in Indian construction industry.” Saf. Sci. 134 (Feb): 105023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105023.
Son, H., S. Lee, and C. Kim. 2015. “What drives the adoption of building information modeling in design organizations? An empirical investigation of the antecedents affecting architects’ behavioral intentions.” Autom. Constr. 49 (Jan): 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.10.012.
Son, H., Y. Park, C. Kim, and J. S. Chou. 2012. “Toward an understanding of construction professionals’ acceptance of mobile computing devices in South Korea: An extension of the technology acceptance model.” Autom. Constr. 28 (Dec): 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.07.002.
Su, W. J. G. 2014. “The impacts of safety climate and computer self-efficacy on near-miss incident reporting intentions.” In Proc., PICMET 2014—Portland Int. Center for Management of Engineering and Technology, Proceedings: Infrastructure and Service Integration, 1738–1745. New York: IEEE.
Sukendro, S., A. Habibi, K. Khaeruddin, B. Indrayana, S. Syahruddin, F. A. Makadada, and H. Hakim. 2020. “Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model to understand students’ use of e-learning during Covid-19: Indonesian sport science education context.” Heliyon 6 (11): e05410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410.
Šumak, B., M. Heričko, and M. Pušnik. 2011. “A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types.” Comput. Hum. Behav. 27 (6): 2067–2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.005.
Umeokafor, N., K. Evangelinos, and A. Windapo. 2020. “Strategies for improving complex construction health and safety regulatory environments.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 22 (7): 1333–1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1707853.
Venkatesh, V., and H. Bala. 2008. “Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions.” Decis. Sci. 39 (2): 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.
Venkatesh, V., and F. D. Davis. 1996. “A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test.” Decis. Sci. 27 (3): 451–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x.
Venkatesh, V., and F. D. Davis. 2000. “Theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies.” Manage. Sci. 46 (2): 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view.” MIS Q.: Manage. Inf. Syst. 27 (3): 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.
Venkatesh, V., J. Y. L. Thong, and X. Xu. 2012. “Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology.” MIS Q.: Manage. Inf. Syst. 36 (1): 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412.
Wallace, L. G., and S. D. Sheetz. 2014. “The adoption of software measures: A technology acceptance model (TAM) perspective.” Inf. Manage. 51 (2): 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.12.003.
Walsh, K., J. Antony, and C. Burns. 2010. “Electronic adverse incident reporting in hospitals.” Leadersh. Health Serv. 23 (4): 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511871011079047.
Wong, T. K. M., S. S. Man, and A. H. S. Chan. 2021. “Exploring the acceptance of PPE by construction workers: An extension of the technology acceptance model with safety management practices and safety consciousness.” Saf. Sci. 139 (3): 105239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105239.
Wu, J. H., W. S. Shen, L. M. Lin, R. A. Greenes, and D. W. Bates. 2008. “Testing the technology acceptance model for evaluating healthcare professionals’ intention to use an adverse event reporting system.” Int. J. Qual. Health Care 20 (2): 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm074.
Wu, J. H., S. C. Wang, and L. M. Lin. 2007. “Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: A structural equation model.” Int. J. Med. Inf. 76 (1): 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.06.006.
Yousafzai, S. Y., G. R. Foxall, and J. G. Pallister. 2007. “Technology acceptance: A meta-analysis of the TAM: Part 1.” J. Modell. Manage. 2 (3): 251–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465660710834453.
Yuan, M., Z. Li, X. Li, X. Luo, X. Yin, and J. Cai. 2021. “Proposing a multifaceted model for adopting prefabricated construction technology in the construction industry.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2021-0613.
Zou, P. X. W., R. Y. Sunindijo, and A. R. J. Dainty. 2014. “A mixed methods research design for bridging the gap between research and practice in construction safety.” Saf. Sci. 70 (Dec): 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.07.005.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 149Issue 5May 2023

History

Received: Apr 19, 2022
Accepted: Nov 8, 2022
Published online: Feb 24, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jul 24, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Student, Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management, National Univ. of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6884-2819. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management, National Univ. of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7332-7763. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management, National Univ. of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2223-8111. Email: [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic Univ., Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4222-7222. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share