Technical Papers
Nov 16, 2022

The Quality of Small Social Networks and Their Performance in Architecture Design Offices

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 149, Issue 2

Abstract

Within the construction industry, there are firms dedicated to designing, executing, and restoring all types of buildings. To achieve their objectives, design offices form multidisciplinary project groups with designers from the same or other organizations. Design offices form small, unstable, and dynamic social networks dissolved at the end of each project. The flow of information through such informal organizations is decisive in their good performance. To estimate the ability of information to flow in construction organizations, social network analysis (SNA) has been used. However, SNA metrics are hardly useful for characterizing small design offices. Indeed, it is difficult to establish by SNA the quality of a small social network regarding its transmission of necessary information and performance during production processes. The purpose of this research was to figure out a metric to assess the quality of social networks in design offices based on the links’ distribution regarding their connectivity for information flow and related to their performance. Metrics and criteria for quality and configuration in small social networks were studied. The organizational structures of six architecture design firms were analyzed through three of their main social networks, and statistics were analyzed for those networks’ distribution of links and performance. As a result, relevant correlations were obtained between the proposed indicator and the efficiency in the design of the projects. Most members of the design team maintained between two and five communication links with their colleagues in the development of projects during project capture, project development, and postsale or modifications. Managers can use this information to oversee their work teams, improving the quality and configuration of social networks aiming to better performance.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Adamic, L., and E. Adar. 2005. “How to search a social network.” Social Netw. 27 (3): 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.01.007.
Alarcón, D. M., I. M. Alarcón, and L. F. Alarcón. 2013. “Social network analysis: A diagnostic tool for information flow in the AEC industry.” In Proc., 21st Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction 2013, IGLC 2013, 947–956. Fortaleza, Brazil: International Group for Lean Construction.
Aref, S., L. Dinh, R. Rezapour, and J. Diesner. 2020. “Multilevel structural evaluation of signed directed social networks based on balance theory.” Sci. Rep. 10 (1): 15228. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71838-6.
Arif, T. 2015. “The mathematics of social network analysis: Metrics for academic social networks.” Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol. Res. 4 (12): 889–893. https://doi.org/10.7753/IJCATR0412.1003.
Bastian, M., S. Heymann, and M. Jacomy. 2009. “Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks.” In Proc., Int. AAAI Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media, 361–362. Palo Alto, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
Bentley, P. 2021. “Productivity curve and social network analysis in science megaproject management.” J. Phys. Commun. 5 (11): 115004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2399-6528/ac314c.
Castillo, T., L. F. Alarcón, and J. L. Salvatierra. 2018. “Effects of last planner system practices on social networks and the performance of construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (3): 05017120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001443.
Cherven, K. 2015. Mastering Gephi network visualization. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing.
Chinowsky, P., J. Diekmann, and V. Galotti. 2008. “Social network model of construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (10): 804–812. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:10(804).
Courpasson, D., and J.-C. Thoenig. 2010. When managers Rebel. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Daft, R. L. 2012. Organizational theory and design. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Dave, B., S. Kubler, K. Främling, and L. Koskela. 2014. “Addressing information flow in lean production management and control in construction.” In Proc., 22nd Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, 581–592. Oslo, Norway: International Group for Lean Construction.
Dunbar, R., P. MacCarron, and K. Kaski. 2016. “Calling Dunbar’s numbers.” Social Netw. 47 (Oct): 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2016.06.003.
Easley, D., and J. Kleinberg. 2010. Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
European Commission. 2003. “Commission recommendation concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises.” Off. J. Eur. Union 361 (EC): 1–6.
Gane, V., and J. Haymaker. 2010. “Benchmarking current conceptual high-rise design processes.” J. Archit. Eng. 16 (3): 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000017.
Hall, J., and T. Scott. 2016. Lean six sigma: Beginner’s guide to understanding and practicing lean six sigma. Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Herrera, R. F., C. Mourgues, L. F. Alarcon, and E. Pellicer. 2019. “Assessing design process performance of construction projects.” In Proc., CIB World Building Congress 2019, 1–10. Kanata, Canada: International Council for Research and Innovation Building and Construction.
Herrera, R. F., C. Mourgues, and L. F. Alarcón. 2018. “Assessment of lean practices, performance and social networks in Chilean airport projects.” In Proc., 26th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction 2018, 603–613. Chennai, India: International Group for Lean Construction.
Herrera, R. F., C. Mourgues, L. F. Alarcón, and E. Pellicer. 2020. “Understanding interactions between design team members of construction projects using social network analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (6): 04020053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001841.
Herrera, R. F., C. Mourgues, L. F. Alarcón, and E. Pellicer. 2021. “Analyzing the association between lean design management practices and BIM uses in the design of construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (4): 04021010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002014.
Iacobucci, D., R. McBride, D. L. Popovich, and M. Rouziou. 2017. “In social network analysis, which centrality index should I use? Theoretical differences and empirical similarities among top centralities.” J. Methods Meas. Social Sci. 8 (2): 72–99. https://doi.org/10.2458/v8i2.22991.
Ilyas, M. U., M. Z. Shafiq, A. X. Liu, and H. Radha. 2013. “A distributed algorithm for identifying information hubs in social networks.” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 31 (9): 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2013.SUP.0513055.
Jahani, B., S. Reza Seyyed Javadein, and H. Abedi Jafari. 2010. “Measurement of enterprise architecture readiness within organizations.” Bus. Strategy Ser. 11 (3): 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/17515631011043840.
Kassem, M., N. Iqbal, G. Kelly, S. Lockley, and N. Dawood. 2014. “Building information modelling: Protocols for collaborative design processes.” J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 19 (7): 126–149.
Kereri, J. O., and C. M. Harper. 2019. “Social networks and construction teams: Literature review.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (4): 03119001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001628.
Koskela, L. 2000. An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction. Espoo, Finland: Technical Research Centre of Finland.
Krackhardt, D., and J. R. Hanson. 1993. “Informal networks: The company behind the chart.” Harvard Bus. Rev. 71 (Jun): 104–111.
Lawyer, G. 2015. “Understanding the influence of all nodes in a network.” Sci. Rep. 5 (1): 8665. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08665.
Lin, S. 2015. “An analysis for construction engineering networks.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (5): 04014096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000956.
Luo, L., Q. He, E. J. Jaselskis, and J. Xie. 2017. “Construction project complexity: Research trends and implications.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (7): 04017019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001306.
Luo, L., Q. He, J. Xie, D. Yang, and G. Wu. 2016. “Investigating the relationship between project complexity and success in complex construction projects.” Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 33 (2): 04016036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000471.
Oluwatayo, A. A., and D. Amole. 2014. “Organizational structure of architectural firms and their performances.” Int. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 3 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijcem.20140301.01.
Pentland, A. 2014. Social physics: How good ideas spread—The lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin Group US.
Pérez, D., C. Lagos, and L. Fernando Alarcón. 2022. “Key last planner system metrics to assess project performance in high-rise building and industrial construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (1): 04021179. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002209.
Porter, M. 2008. “The five competitive forces that shape strategy.” Harvard Bus. Rev. 86 (1): 25–40.
Pryke, S. D. 2004. “Analysing construction project coalitions: Exploring the application of social network analysis.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 22 (8): 787–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619042000206533.
Qiu, J., L. Donaldson, and B. N. Luo. 2012. “the benefits of persisting with paradigms in organizational research.” Acad. Manage. Perspect. 26 (1): 93–104. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2011.0125.
Radosavljevic, M., and J. Bennett. 2012. Construction management strategies: A theory of construction management. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Richards, W., and O. Macindoe. 2010. “Characteristics of small social networks.” In Technical Report, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, 40. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Rojas, M. J., R. F. Herrera, C. Mourgues, J. L. Ponz-Tienda, L. F. Alarcón, and E. Pellicer. 2019. “BIM use assessment (BUA) tool for characterizing the application levels of BIM uses for the planning and design of construction projects.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019: 9094254. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9094254.
Sacks, R., L. Koskela, B. A. Dave, and R. Owen. 2010. “Interaction of lean and building information modeling in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (9): 968–980. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000203.
Salvatierra, J. L., M. Galvez, F. Bastias, T. Castillo, R. F. Herrera, and L. F. Alarcón. 2019. “Developing a benchmarking system for architecture design firms.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 26 (1): 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2018-0211.
Santos, R., A. A. Costa, and A. Grilo. 2017. “Bibliometric analysis and review of Building Information Modelling literature published between 2005 and 2015.” Autom. Constr. 80 (Jun): 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.03.005.
Scott, J. 2013. Social network analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Segarra, L., R. F. Herrera, L. F. Alarcón, and E. Pellicer. 2017. “Knowledge management and information flow through social networks analysis in Chilean architecture firms.” In Proc., 25th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, 413–420. Lima, Peru: International Group for Lean Construction.
Sonnenwald, D. H. 1996. “Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process.” Des. Stud. 17 (3): 277–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(96)00002-6.
Tribelsky, E., and R. Sacks. 2011. “An empirical study of information flows in multidisciplinary civil engineering design teams using lean measures.” Archit. Eng. Des. Manage. 7 (2): 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2011.582332.
Urwick, L. F. 1974. “Academy of management.” Acad. Manage. J. 17 (2): 349–354. https://doi.org/10.2307/254987.
Watts, A., and M. Jackson. 2001. “The existence of pairwise stable networks.” J. Econ. Lit. Classif. Numbers 14 (3): 2–16.
Zeffane, R., S. A. Tipu, and J. C. Ryan. 2011. “Communication, commitment & trust: Exploring the triad.” Int. J. Bus. Manage. 6 (6): 77–87. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n6p77.
Zheng, X., Y. Le, A. P. C. Chan, Y. Hu, and Y. Li. 2016. “Review of the application of social network analysis (SNA) in construction project management research.” Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (7): 1214–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.005.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 149Issue 2February 2023

History

Received: Dec 6, 2021
Accepted: Sep 28, 2022
Published online: Nov 16, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Apr 16, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo, Av. Antonio José Sucre km 1½, Riobamba 0600108, Ecuador. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3472-3456. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Avenida Brasil 2147, Valparaíso 23662804, Chile (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5186-3154. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Macul, Santiago 7820436, Chile. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9277-2272. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share