Experimental and Analytical Behavior of GFRP-Reinforced Concrete Box Girders under Pure Torsion
Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 28, Issue 1
Abstract
Concrete box girders are significant structural elements in various engineering applications due to higher torsional stiffness and low self-weight. The use of glass fiber–reinforced polymers (GFRPs) as internal bars has been adopted for many structural applications. So far, the torsional behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) box girders reinforced with GFRP bars has not been addressed. Therefore, this paper presents experimental data on the torsional behavior of RC box girders reinforced with GFRP bars and stirrups. Six box girders measuring 4,000 mm in length, 380 mm in height, and 380 mm in width, with a wall thickness of 100 mm, were tested under pure torsional moment over a clear span of 2,000 mm. The test parameters included the type and amount of torsional reinforcement. The test specimens comprised four box girders entirely reinforced with GFRP reinforcement, one box girder with only longitudinal GFRP bars, and one box girder reinforced with steel reinforcement as a reference specimen. The test results indicate that the torsional strength of the steel and GFRP box girders was significantly affected by stirrup capacity; stirrup stiffness did not affect the torsional strength. Increasing the web’s GFRP reinforcement ratio increased the torsional strength and stiffness. An analytical iterative softened membrane model for torsion (SMMT) was modified to predict the entire torsional behavior of the GFRP-reinforced concrete box girders. The model was validated by comparing the analytical results to the experimental results of the four GFRP-reinforced concrete box girders. The comparison indicates that the model was able to predict the cracking and ultimate torsional strength and the corresponding twist with reasonable agreement. In addition, a noniterative Rahal model was modified to predict the ultimate torsional strength of FRP-reinforced concrete members. At last, the experimental ultimate torsional strength was assessed with the corresponding value calculated according to available fiber-reinforced polymer design codes and guides.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
This project was made possible with funding provided by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The authors gratefully acknowledge the GFRP-bar manufacturer Pultrall Inc. (Thetford Mines, QC, Canada) for the donation of FRP material and the technical staff of the structural lab in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Sherbrooke.
References
AASHTO. 2018. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications for GFRP-reinforced concrete. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Alabdulhady, M. Y., K. Aljabery, and L. H. Sneed. 2019. “Analytical study on the torsional behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with FRCM composite.” J. Compos. Constr. 23 (2): 04019006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE).
Ali, A. H., H. M. Mohamed, and B. Benmokrane. 2016. “Shear strength of circular concrete beams reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars and spirals.” ACI Struct. J. 114 (1): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.14359/51689423.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2015. Guide for the design and construction of concrete reinforced with FRP bars. ACI 440.1R-15. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Askandar, N. H., A. D. Mahmood, and R. Kurda. 2022. “Behaviour of RC beams strengthened with FRP strips under combined action of torsion and bending.” Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 26 (9): 4263–4279. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2020.1847690.
ASTM. 2021a. Standard test method for tensile properties of fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite bars. ASTM D7205/D7205M-21. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2021b. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39/C39M-21. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2021c. Standard test method for strength of fiber reinforced polymer bent bars in bend locations. ASTM D7914/D7914M-21. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Benmokrane, B., E. El-Salakawy, A. El-Ragaby, and S. El-Gamal. 2007. “Performance evaluation of innovative concrete bridge deck slabs reinforced with fibre-reinforced-polymer bars.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 34 (3): 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1139/l06-173.
Bernaldo, L. F. A., and S. M. R. Lopes. 2008. “Behaviour of concrete beams under torsion: NSC plain and hollow beams.” Mater. Struct. 41: 1143–1167. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9315-0.
Chalioris, C. E., and C. G. Karayannis. 2013. “Experimental investigation of RC beams with rectangular spiral reinforcement in torsion.” Eng. Struct. 56: 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.003.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2012. Reapproved in 2017—Design and construction of building components with fiber reinforced polymers. CSA S806-12 (2017). Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2019. Canadian highway bridge design code. CAN/CSA-S6-19. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
Deifalla, A., M. Hamed, A. Saleh, and T. Ali. 2014. “Exploring GFRP bars as reinforcement for rectangular and L-shaped beams subjected to significant torsion: An experimental study.” Eng. Struct. 59: 776–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.027.
Deifalla, A. F., A. G. Zapris, and C. E. Chalioris. 2021. “Multivariable regression strength model for steel fiber-reinforced concrete beams under torsion.” Materials 14 (14): 3889. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14143889.
El-Gamal, S., E. El-Salakawy, and B. Benmokrane. 2007. “Influence of reinforcement on the behavior of concrete bridge deck slabs reinforced with FRP bars.” J. Compos. Constr. 11 (5): 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:5(449).
El-Sayed, A. K., E. El-Salakawy, and B. Benmokrane. 2007. “Mechanical and structural characterization of new carbon FRP stirrups for concrete members.” J. Compos. Constr. 11 (4): 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11.
Hadhood, A., M. G. Gouda, M. H. Agamy, H. M. Mohamed, and A. Sherif. 2020. “Torsion in concrete beams reinforced with GFRP spirals.” Eng. Struct. 206: 110174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110174.
Hsu, T. T. C., and Y. L. Mo. 2010. Unified theory of concrete structures. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Hsu, T. T. C., and R. R. H. Zhu. 2002. “Softened membrane model for reinforced concrete elements in shear.” ACI Struct. J. 99 (4): 460–469. https://doi.org/10.14359/12115.
Jeng, C.-H. 2015. “Unified softened membrane model for torsion in hollow and solid reinforced concrete members: Modeling precracking and postcracking behavior.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (10): 04014243. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001212.
Jeng, C.-H., and T. T. C. Hsu. 2009. “A softened membrane model for torsion in reinforced concrete members.” Eng. Struct. 31 (9): 1944–1954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.038.
Jeng, C.-H., S.-F. Peng, and M. Chao. 2014. “Constitutive relationships of concrete for hollow RC members in pure torsion.” Mag. Concr. Res. 66 (17): 896–912. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.14.00017.
Karayannis, C. G., P. M. K. Kosmidou, and C. E. Chalioris. 2018. “Reinforced concrete beams with carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer bars—Experimental study.” Fibers 6 (4): 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib6040099.
Maranan, G., A. Manalo, K. Kurunasena, and B. Benmokrane. 2015. “Bond stress-slip behavior: Case of GFRP bars in geopolymer concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 27 (1): 04014116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001046.
Mcmullen, A. E., and B. Vijaya Rangan. 1978. “Pure torsion in rectangular sections—A re-examination.” ACI Struct. J. 75: 511–519.
Mohamed, H. M., and B. Benmokrane. 2015. “Torsion behavior of concrete beams reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars and stirrups.” ACI Struct. J. 112 (5): 543–552. https://doi.org/10.14359/51687824.
Mohamed, H. M., and B. Benmokrane. 2016. “Reinforced concrete beams with and without FRP web reinforcement under pure torsion.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (3): 04015070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000839.
Mohamed, H. M., O. Chaallal, and B. Benmokrane. 2015. “Torsional moment capacity and failure mode mechanisms of concrete beams reinforced with carbon FRP bars and stirrups.” J. Compos. Constr. 19 (2): 04014049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000515.
Mousa, S., H. M. Mohamed, B. Benmokrane, and E. Ferrier. 2018. “Flexural behavior of full-scale circular concrete members reinforced with basalt FRP bars and spirals: Tests and theoretical studies.” Compos. Struct. 203: 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.107.
Rahal, K. N., and M. P. Collins. 1995. “Analysis of sections subjected to combined shear and torsion – a theoretical model.” ACI Mater. J. 92 (4): 459–469. https://doi.org/10.14359/995.
Rahal, K. N. 2013. “Torsional strength of normal and high strength reinforced concrete beams.” Eng. Struct. 56: 2206–2216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.09.005.
Zhou, J., W. Shen, and S. Wang. 2017. “Experimental study on torsional behavior of FRC and ECC beams reinforced with GFRP bars.” Constr. Build. Mater. 152: 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.131.
Zhu, R. R. H., and T. T. C. Hsu. 2002. “Poisson effect in reinforced concrete membrane elements.” ACI Struct. J. 99 (5): 631–640. https://doi.org/10.14359/12303.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 28 • Issue 1 • February 2024
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 4, 2022
Accepted: Sep 17, 2023
Published online: Oct 19, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Mar 19, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.