Abstract

Several recent studies have investigated the opportunities of differential interferometry synthetic aperture radar (DInSAR) using satellite data for structural health monitoring (SHM) of civil structures. However, its use in structural engineering is still debated because of the lack of a general understanding of the potential and limitations of the technology for bridge SHM. To overcome this issue, specific methods of data processing and displacement assessment with error quantification need to be developed. The present paper aims at giving an insight into the use of small baseline subset-differential synthetic aperture radar interferometry (SBAS-DInSAR) as a remote-sensing technology for civil infrastructure monitoring combining information at a large scale with those associated with a single bridge. In particular, an operational framework for the selection and processing of a measurement time series representative of the structural behavior of the bridge of interest is designed in a way that fully remote characterization and assessment can be carried out by exploiting web-mapping platforms according to the crowd-sensing paradigm. The workflow, designed consistently with a structural engineering perspective, has been tested with reference to a number of bridges crossing the Tiber river in Rome (Italy), showing that the proposed fully remote monitoring procedure can effectively support satellite data processing and interpretation. Moreover, some issues in view of the general use of satellite data for bridge monitoring emerged from the study. Gaps in the measurement point distribution over the bridge decks are frequently observed over all the monitored area, therefore simplified methodologies aimed at estimating expected displacement ranges of different bridge typologies under serviceability loads have been defined enabling a rational interpretation of the data in the light of the selected radar sensor band of operation. Simplified formulations and charts for service and environmental loads are then presented with a twofold objective: (1) supporting the satellite data elaboration and interpretation by means of easy to manage open-source tools; and (2) providing estimates of the expected operational displacements of healthy structures to guide data interpretation and even algorithms for radar signals processing able to incorporate the response of structures to temperature variations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study was partially funded by ReLUIS Project 2022-2024 WP 6 (structural health monitoring and satellite data) promoted by the Italian Civil Protection Department. Activities associated with the Spizzichino Bridge are funded by the Superior Council of Public Works and ReLUIS in the framework of the WP3 (Task 3.2) and WP5 Special Projects (Task 5.6) of the research aimed at assessing and validating the national guidelines for the mitigation of the risk of bridges and transportation networks. Part of the research activities were also developed by the third author in the framework of the PNRR program, National Center for Sustainable Mobility, SPOKE 7 “CCAM, Connected Networks and Smart Infrastructure”—WP4. Additional support from the TIRS-MOMI FOE Project is also gratefully acknowledged.

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318-19. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Arangio, S., F. Calò, M. Di Mauro, M. Bonano, M. Marsela, and M. Manunta. 2014. “An application of the SBAS-DInSAR technique for the assessment of structural damage in the city of Rome.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2014 (10): 1469–1483. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.833949.
ASCE. 2021. Report card for America’s infrastructures. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Austroads. 1996. Australian bridge design code. Haymarket, NSW, Australia: Austroads.
Bernardino, P., G. Fornaro, R. Lanari, and E. Sansosti. 2002. “A new algorithm for surface deformation monitoring based on small baseline differential SAR interferograms.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 40: 2375–2383. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.803792.
Bonano, M., M. Manunta, M. Marsela, and R. Lanari. 2012. “Long-term ERS/ENVISAT deformation time-series generation at full spatial resolution via the extended SBAS technique.” Int. J. Remote Sens. 33 (15): 4756–4783. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2011.638340.
Burgmann, R., P. A. Rosen, and E. J. Fielding. 2000. “Synthetic aperture radar interferometry to measure Earth’s surface topography and its deformation.” Annu. Rev. Earth Sci. 28: 169–209. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.169.
Calò, F., D. Calcaterra, A. Iodice A, M. Parise, and M. Ramondini. 2012. “Assessing the activity of a large landslide in southern Italy by ground-monitoring and SAR interferometric techniques.” Int. J. Remote Sens. 33 (11): 3512–3530. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2011.630331.
Calvi, G. M., M. Moratti M, G. J. O’Reilly, N. Scattareggia, R. Monteiro, P. Malom, M. Calvi, and R. Pinho. 2019. “Once upon a time in Italy: The tale of the morandi bridge.” Struct. Eng. Int. 2: 198–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2018.1558033.
Capogna, M., W. Salvatore, E. Renzi, and G. Tomasi. 2023. “Guidelines for the classification and management of risk, for the evaluation of safety and for the monitoring of existing bridges. An automatic calculation model for the seismic attention class optimized for the use of cloud computing services.” Procedia Struct. Integrity 44: 705–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.092.
Caprino, A., G. Bonaldo, F. Lorenzoni, and F. da Porto. 2023. “Application of multi-temporal InSAR (MT-InSAR) for structural monitoring: The case study of Scrovegni chapel in Padova.” Procedia Struct. Integrity 44: 1578–1585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.202.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 1991 Actions on structures, part 1–5: General actions: Thermal actions. EN 1991-1-1. Eurocode 1. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chen, X., M. Achilli, A. Fabris, A. Menin, M. Monego, G. Tessari, and M. Floris. 2021a. “Combining Sentinel-1 interferometry and ground-based geometics techniques for monitoring buildings affected by mass movements.” Remote Sens. 13: 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030452.
Chen, X., Y. Zheng, J. Peng, and M. Floris. 2021b. “Monitoring river water level using multiple bounces of bridges in SAR images.” Adv. Space Res. 68: 4016–4023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.08.006.
Clough, R. W., and J. Pezien. 1975. Dynamics of structures. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Columbro, C., R. R. Eudave, T. M. Ferreira, P. B. Lourenco, and G. Fabbrocino. 2022. “On the use of web mapping platforms to support the seismic vulnerability assessment of old urban area.” Remote Sens. 14: 1424. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061424.
Crosetto, M., O. Monserrat, M. Cuevas-Gonzalez, N. Devanthery, and B. Crippa. 2015. “Persistent scatterer interferometry: A review.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 115: 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.10.011.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 1990. Design of highway bridges. CSA. S6-88 and commentary. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
Cusson, D., C. Rossi, and I. F. Ozkan. 2021. “Early warning system for the detection of unexpected bridge displacements from radar satellite data.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 11: 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-020-00446-9.
Ercolessi, S., G. Fabbrocino, D. Gargaro, and C. Rainieri. 2021. “Theoretical and experimental assessment of indirect dynamic measurements for periodic inspections of road bridges.” In Proc., 1st Conf. of the Europ. Ass. on Quality and Control of Bridges Structures EUROSTRUCT, 1061–1072. Padua, Italy: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering.
Farneti E., N. Cavalagli, M. Costantini, F. Trillo, F. Minati, I. Venanzi, and F. Ubertini. 2023. “A method for structural monitoring of multispan bridges using satellite InSAR data with uncertainty quantification and its pre-collapse application to the Albiano-Magra Bridge in Italy.” Struct. Health Monit. 22: 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217221083609.
Ferretti, A., A. Fumagalli, F. Novali, C. Prati, F. Rocca, and A. Rucci. 2011. “A new algorithm for processing interferometric data-stacks: SqueeSAR.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 49 (9): 3460–3470. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2124465.
Ferretti, A., A. Monti-Guarnieri, C. Prati, F. Rocca, and D. Massonet. 2007. InSAR principles: Guidelines for SAR interferometry processing and interpretation. Noordwijk, The Netherlands: ESA Publications.
Festa, D., et al. 2022. “Nation-wide mapping and classification of ground deformation phenomena through the spatial clustering of P-SBAS InSAR measurements: Italy case study.” Sensing 189: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.04.022.
Franciosi, V. 1971. “Franciosi. Scienza delle Costruzioni (vol. III).” Liguori Editor. Naples (Italy). Scienza delle Costruzioni (vol. III). Liguori Editor. Naples (Italy).
Galassi, F. 2021. “Bridge’s displacement monitoring using persistent scatterer SAR interferometry.” Master thesis, Dept. of Aeronautics, Space and Geosciences, Technische Universitat Munchen.
Giordano, P. F., G. Miraglia, E. Lenticchia, R. Ceravolo, and M. P. Limongelli. 2023. “Satellite interferometric data for the seismic damage assessment.” Procedia Struct. Integrity 44: 1570–1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.201.
Giordano, P. F., Z. I. Turksezer, M. Previtali, and M. P. Limongelli. 2022. “Damage detection on a historic iron bridge using satellite DInSAR data.” Struct. Health Monit. 21 (5): 2291–2311. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217211054350.
GL. 2022. Guidelines for the classification and management of risk, safety assessment and monitoring of existing bridges. Rome, Italy: Italian Ministry of Infrastructures and sustainable mobility.
Hoppe, E. J., F. Novali, A. Rucci, A. Fumagalli, S. Del Conte, G. Falorni, and N. Toro. 2019. “Deformation monitoring of posttensioned bridges using high-resolution satellite remote sensing.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (12): 04019115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000147.
IBC (Italian Building Code). 2018. Technical code for construction. Rome, Italy: Ministry of Infrastructures and Transports.
Infante, D., D. Di Martire, P. Confuorto, R. Tomas, D. Calcaterra, and M. Ramondini. 2019. “Assessment of building behaviour in slow-moving landslide-affected areas through DInSAR data and structural analysis.” Eng. Struct. 199: 109638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109638.
IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry). 1997. In Compendium of chemical terminology. 2nd ed., edited by A. D. McNaught, and A. Wilkinson. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Jung, J., D. J. Kim, S. K. P. Vadivel, and S. H. Yun. 2019. “Long-term deflection monitoring for bridges using X and C-band time-series SAR interferometry.” Remote Sens. 11 (11): 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11111258.
Lacomme, P., J. P. Hardange, J. C. Marchais, and E. Normant. 2001. Air and spaceborne radar systems: An introduction. ISBN 978-1-891121-13-5. Norwich: William Andrew Publishing, LLC.
Lanari, R., P. Bernardino, M. Bonano, F. Casu, A. Manconi, M. Manuta, M. Manzo, and A. Pepe. 2010. “Surface displacement associated with the L’Aquila 2009 Mw 6.3 earthquake (central Italy): New evidence from SBAS-DInSAR time series analysis.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 37: L 20309. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044780.
Le, H. X., and E.-S. Hwang. 2017. “Investigation of deflection and vibration criteria for road bridges.” J. Civ. Eng. 21 (3): 829–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0532-3.
Liu, H., L. Pang, F. Li, and Z. Guo. 2019. “Hough transform and clustering for a 3-D building reconstruction with tomographic SAR point clouds.” Sensors 19: 5378. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19245378.
López, M. A., and R. Brincker. 2023. “An engineering interpretation of the complex modal mass in structural dynamics.” Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 200: 110621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110621.
Malvern, L. E. 1969. “Introduction to the mechanics of a continuous medium”. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
McCarthy, M. J. 2013. Introduction to theoretical kinematics. Cambridge, UK: MDA Press. Reface.
Milillo, P., G. Giardina, D. Perissin, G. Milillo, A. Coletta, and C. Terranova. 2019. “Pre-Collapse space geodetic observations of critical infrastructure: The Morandi bridge, Genoa, Italy.” Remote Sens. 11: 1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11121403.
Nettis, A., V. Massimi, R. Nutricato, D. O. Nitti, S. Samarelli, and G. Uva. 2023. “Satellite-based interferometry for monitoring structural deformations of bridge portfolios.” Autom. Constr. 147: 104707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104707.
Ohkura, H. 1998. “Application of SAR data to monitoring earth surface changes and displacement.” Adv. Space Res. 21 (3): 485–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00885-5.
Ponzo, C. F., C. Iacovino, R. Ditommaso, M. Bonano, R. Lanari, F. Soldovieri, V. Cuomo, F. Bozzano, P. Ciampi, and M. Rompato. 2021. “Transport infrastructures SHM using integrated SAR data and on-site vibrational acquisitions: “Ponte della Musica-Armando Trovajoli” case study.” App. Sci. 11: 6504. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146504.
Qin, X., M. Liao, M. Yang, and L. Zhang. 2017. “Monitoring structure health of urban bridges with advanced multi-temporal InSAR analysis.” Ann. Gis 23 (4): 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2017.1382572.
Rainieri, C., and G. Fabbrocino. 2014. “Operational modal analysis of civil engineering structures: An introduction and guide for applications”. New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN: 978-1-4939-0766-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0767-0.
Rosati, I., G. Fabbrocino, and C. Rainieri. 2022. “A discussion about the Douglas-Reid model updating method and its prospective application to continuous vibration-based SHM of a historical building.” Eng. Struct. 273: 115058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115058.
Rymsza, J. 2021. “Causes of the collapse of the Polcevera viaduct in Genoa, Italy.” Appl. Sci. 11 (17): 8098. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178098.
Sandoli, A., G. P. Lignola, A. Prota, and G. Fabbrocino. 2023. “Seismic fragility assessment of inner peripheries of Italy through digital crowd-sourcing technologies.” Buildings 13 (2): 562. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020562.
SAP. 2000. “Structural Analysis Computer Program.” CSI.
Sartorelli, L., M. Previtali, P. F. Giordano, M. P. Limongelli, F. Ballio, and A. Uttini. 2021. “Use of SAR satellite data in bridge monitoring with application to urban areas.” In Int. Workshop on Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 935–955. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Savini, F., A. Marra, A. Cordisco, M. Giallonardo, G. Fabbrocino, and I. Trizio. 2022. “A complex virtual reality system for the management and visualization of bridge data.” Scires. it 12 (1): 49–66. https://doi.org/10.2423/i22394303v12n1p49.
Sousa, J., and M. L. Bastos. 2013. “Multi-temporal SAR interferometry reveals acceleration of bridge sinking before collapse.” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 13 (3): 659–667. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-659-2013.
Talledo, D. A., et al. 2022. “Satellite radar interferometry: Potential and limitations for structural assessment and monitoring.” J. Build. Eng. 46: 103756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103756.
Tessitore, S., D. Di Martire, D. Calcaterra, D. Infante, M. Ramondini, and G. Russo. 2017. “Multitemporal synthetic aperture radar for bridges monitoring.” In Vol. 10431 of Proc., Remote Sensing Technologies and Applications in Urban Environments II, 104310C. Warsaw, Poland: SPIE Remote Sensing.
UNI/TR. 2016. “Guidelines for Structural Monitoring.” UNI/TR 11634.
Zizi, M., P. Bencivenga, and G. De Matteis. 2023. “Handling policies for Italian existing bridges with a territorial approach: The case study of caserta, Italy.” Structures 48: 1306–1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.12.114.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 29Issue 11November 2024

History

Received: Jan 9, 2024
Accepted: Jun 13, 2024
Published online: Sep 5, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Feb 5, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Biosciences and Territory, Univ. of Molise, via Francesco de Sanctis 1, 80166 Campobasso, Italy; Secondary Branch of L’Aquila, Institute for Construction Technologies, National Research Council of Italy, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0189-3683. Email: [email protected]
Emanuele Petracca, Ph.D., P.E. [email protected]
Dept. of Biosciences and Territory, Univ. of Molise, via Francesco de Sanctis 1, 80166 Campobasso, Italy. Email: [email protected]
Researcher, Secondary Branch of Naples, Institute for Construction Technologies, National Research Council of Italy, 80146 Naples, Italy. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4854-0850. Email: [email protected]
Full Professor, Dept. of Biosciences and Territory, Univ. of Molise, via Francesco de Sanctis 1, 80166 Campobasso, Italy; Secondary Branch of L’Aquila, Institute for Construction Technologies, National Research Council of Italy, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4918-5398. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share