Field Monitoring of Cross Frames in Composite Steel I-Girder Bridges
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 8
Abstract
Many of the current fatigue design specifications for cross frames, especially those in composite steel bridge systems, have primarily been based on computational studies and component-level laboratory experiments. To fully understand the behavior of cross frames when subjected to in-service truck traffic and to critically evaluate legacy design provisions, in-service field monitoring of cross frames in various composite systems is important. Therefore, select cross frames in three bridges in the greater Houston area were instrumented with strain gage sensors—one straight bridge with normal supports, one straight bridge with skewed supports, and one horizontally curved bridge with radial supports. For each bridge, rainflow counting techniques and other postprocessing procedures were implemented for a monitoring period of one month to compare the measured cross-frame response. Among other key observations, the measured data demonstrated that load-induced force effects in the cross frames of the skewed bridge system exceeded those in the bridges with normal or radial supports and that cross-frame response was highly sensitive to the longitudinal and transverse truck positions. In all cases, though, the measured damage accumulated on all instrumented cross-frame members during their respective monitoring periods, if extrapolated to the entire service life, would likely not cause significant load-induced cracking in the critical welded gusset-to-member connections.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The research venture outlined in this paper was sponsored by the Transportation Research Board and the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). The specific work documented was conducted in support of NCHRP Project 12-113, “Proposed Modification to AASHTO Cross-Frame Analysis and Design.” The authors would like to acknowledge all members of the NCHRP 12-113 review panel: Dr. Waseem Dekelbab (Senior Program Officer), Norman McDonald (Chair), Xiaohua Hannah Cheng, Domenic Coletti, Karl Frank, John Hastings, Thomas Macioce, Michelle Romage-Chambers, Dayi Wang, and Stephen Maher. Additionally, Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) engineers Jamie Farris, Walter Fisher, Yongqian Lin, and Dennis Johnson provided significant assistance in locating candidate bridges for the field instrumentation. In addition, TxDOT organized lane closures and provided dump trucks for controlled live load tests, as well as provided general traffic control to assist in the instrumentation of the bridges. The Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) provided computing resources to conduct the extensive parametric studies associated with this research.
References
AASHTO. 1994. LRFD bridge design specifications. 1st ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2020. LRFD bridge design specifications. 9th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Battistini, A., W. Wang, S. Donahue, T. Helwig, M. Engelhardt, and K. Frank. 2013. Improved cross frame details. Final Rep. No. TxDOT 0-6564. Austin, TX: TxDOT.
Connor, R. J., and J. W. Fisher. 2006. “Identifying effective and ineffective retrofits for distortion fatigue cracking in steel bridges using field instrumentation.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (6): 745–752. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:6(745).
Downing, S., and D. Socie. 1982. “Simple rainflow counting algorithms.” Int. J. Fatigue 4: 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(82)90018-4.
Fasl, J. 2013. “Estimating the remaining fatigue life of steel bridges using field measurements.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas.
Fasl, J., T. Helwig, S. L. Wood, and K. Frank. 2012. “Use of strain data to estimate remaining fatigue life of a fracture-critical bridge.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2313: 63–71. https://doi.org/10.3141/2313-07.
Fasl, J., M. Romage, T. Helwig, R. Herman, and K. Frank. 2009. “Field measurements on steel girder bridge with skewed supports utilizing lean-on bracing.” In Structures 2009: Don't mess with structural engineers, 125–134. Austin, TX: ASCE.
Helwig, T., and Z. Fan. 2000. Field and computational studies of steel trapezoidal box girder bridges. TxDOT Research Rep. No. 1395-3. Houston: Univ. of Houston.
Keating, P., K. Saindon, and S. Wilson. 1997. Cross frame diaphragm fatigue and load distribution behavior in steel highway bridges. TxDOT Research Rep. No. 1360-2F. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute.
McConnell, J. R., M. Radovic, and K. Ambrose. 2016. “Field evaluation of cross-frame and girder live-load response in skewed steel I-girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (3): 04015062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000846.
McDonald, G., and K. Frank. 2009. “The fatigue performance of angle cross-frame members in bridges.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas.
Micro-Measurements. 2018. “Weldable strain gages.” Accessed January 15, 2021. http://www.vishaypg.com/docs/11519/standard-weldable.pdf.
Miner, M. A. 1945. “Cumulative damage in fatigue.” J. Appl. Mech. 12: A159–A164. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4009458.
Modjeski and Masters. 2015. Bridges for service life beyond 100 years: Service limit state design. SHRP 2 Rep. No. S2-R19B-RW-1. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Reichenbach, M., J. White, S. Park, E. Zecchin, M. Moore, Y. Liu, C. Liang, B. Kovesdi, T. Helwig, and M. Engelhardt. 2021. Proposed modifications to AASHTO cross-frame analysis and design. NCHRP Rep. No. 962. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Romage, M. 2008. “Field measurements on lean-on bracing system for steel I-girder bridges with skewed supports.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas.
Rowles, L. 2014. “Field load test of a curved Steel I-Girder bridge during construction and comparison with 2D grid modeling approach.” Struct. Congr. 2014: 687–698.
TxDOT. 2019. “Concrete single slope traffic rail.” Accessed February 1, 2022. https://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/cmd/cserve/standard/bridge/RL-SSTR-19.pdf.
TxDOT. 2020a. “Miscellaneous details: Steel girders and beams.” Accessed April 20, 2020. ftp://ftp.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/cmd/cserve/standard/bridge/spgdste1-20.pdf.
TxDOT. 2020b. “Transportation planning maps.” Accessed February 1, 2022. https://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/transportation-planning/maps.html.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 17, 2023
Accepted: Feb 28, 2024
Published online: May 17, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 17, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.