Technical Papers
Apr 27, 2023

Identification of Amplitude-Dependent Damping Ratio and Flutter Derivatives of a Streamlined Box Girder under Various Wind Angles of Attack

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 7

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive investigation on the characteristics of the aerodynamic damping and amplitude-dependent flutter derivatives of a streamlined box girder for various wind angles of attack through a scaled section-model free vibration wind tunnel test. The response characteristics of the section model in vertical, torsional, and vertical–torsional coupled directions are investigated. A piecewise sliding windows fitting method, which is effective, generic, and at the same time provides an accurate estimation of the amplitude-dependent damping ratio, is proposed. The method is applied in three experimental measured examples, and the yielded results match satisfactorily with the measurements, confirming the feasibility and the advantage of the proposed method. Besides, the modal damping ratios of the section model for the considered degrees of freedom at different cases are identified from the method. The evolution of the aerodynamic damping with the wind speed and wind angle of attack and its influence on the generation of stable and unstable limit cycle oscillations and flutter response are discussed. The contribution of vertical and torsional motion to the generation of different flutter types is revealed. The full set of amplitude-dependent flutter derivatives is identified from the experimental modal properties of the different dynamic systems. The accuracy of the flutter derivatives is cross-validated through a free vibration wind tunnel test.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The support for this work provided in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 52208506), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant no. 2682021ZTPY074), and the Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Program (Grant no. 2022NSFSC0440) is greatly acknowledged. The author would like to sincerely acknowledge Prof. Xinzhong Chen from Texas Tech University for his supervising during the conduct of the research.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
A(tj)
back-calculated instantaneous amplitude envelope;
Adiv,α, Adiv,h
largest torsional and vertical amplitudes recorded by the sampling system when the section model is performing a divergent hard-type flutter;
Aexc,α1, Aexc,α2
artificially excited initial torsional amplitudes with different levels;
Aexc,h1, Aexc,h1
artificially excited initial vertical amplitudes with different levels;
Afinal,α, Afinal,h
final torsional and vertical amplitudes of the section model at each wind speed;
Al (l=1M)
segment of the amplitude envelope;
As(s=α,h)
vibration amplitude in the vertical–torsional direction;
At
tested instantaneous amplitude of a vibration time history with noise included;
A,cal, Auh,cal
calculated unstable LCOs corresponding to torsional and vertical motions;
Aα,cal, Ah,cal
calculated stable LCOs corresponding to torsional and vertical motions;
Ay
instantaneous amplitude of motion (i.e., amplitude envelope);
Ay0
steady-state amplitude of a stable LCO;
a1, a2, t0
coefficients of the prescribed function related to the GTR response;
b
half-width of a bridge deck;
E[·]
mathematical expectation;
e
fitting error of the function F;
F
prescribed function used to fit the amplitude envelope of motion;
fs
sampling frequency;
Hi*, Ai* (i
1–4) = amplitude-dependent flutter derivatives;
h, α
vertical and torsional displacements;
I
mass moment of inertia per unit length of the coupled oscillating system;
k
reduced frequency, =ωb/U;
Lse(t), Mse(t)
self-excited forces (lift force and moment, respectively);
M
total number of segments;
m
mass of oscillating system per unit length;
N
sample number of the fitted instantaneous amplitude at time instant tj;
NAl
data point number of a segment;
NT
total number of data points;
Nw
number of segments included in a window;
n
logarithm of the instantaneous amplitude of noise;
t
time;
U
mean wind speed;
y
free vibration displacement time history of a motion;
Δt
time increment of each segment;
μ
nondimensional mass of an oscillating system, =ρb2/m;
υ
nondimensional effective mass moment of inertia, =ρb4/I;
φ
instantaneous phase of motion;
ρ
air density;
ω
instantaneous circular frequency of motion, = 2πfy;
ωh
natural circular frequency of the vertical oscillating system, =2πfh;
ω2
modal circular frequency of the coupled oscillating system in the torsional modal branch;
ω~h
modal frequency of the SDOF vertical oscillating system;
ωα
natural circular frequency in the torsional direction of the oscillating system, =2πfα;
Ψ
amplitude ratio between vertical and torsional motions, =Ah/(bAα);
ψ
phase difference between vertical and torsional motions;
ξy
time-varying (or amplitude-dependent) damping ratio;
ξy,l(tj)
damping ratio corresponding to the tj time instant at the lth window;
ξy,mean
mean value of the damping ratio at each time instant;
ξα, ξh
nonlinear torsional and vertical structural damping ratios;
ξ~h
modal damping of the SDOF vertical oscillating system;
ξ2
modal damping ratio of the coupled oscillating system in the torsional modal branch; and
ϑ, Rd2, ω¯1, ξ¯1
parameters related to the coupled flutter closed-form solution.

References

Amandolese, X., S. Michelin, and M. Choquel. 2013. “Low speed flutter and limit cycle oscillations of a two-degree-of-freedom flat plate in a wind tunnel.” J. Fluids Struct. 43: 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.09.002.
Andrianne, T., and G. Dimitriadis. 2013. “Experimental and numerical investigations of the torsional flutter oscillations of a 4:1 rectangular cylinder.” J. Fluids Struct. 41: 64–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.01.007.
Caughey, T. K. 1963. “Equivalent linearization techniques.” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35 (11): 1706–1711. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1918794.
Chen, F. X., Y. M. Chen, and J. K. Liu. 2012. “Equivalent linearization method for the flutter system of an airfoil with multiple nonlinearities.” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 17 (12): 4529–4535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.06.002.
Chen, X. 2007. “Improved understanding of bimodal coupled bridge flutter based on closed-form solutions.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (1): 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:1(22).
Chen, X., and A. Kareem. 2004. “Efficacy of the implied approximation in the identification of flutter derivatives.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (12): 2070–2074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:12(2070).
Chen, X., and A. Kareem. 2006. “Revisiting multimode coupled bridge flutter: Some new insights.” J. Eng. Mech. 132 (10): 1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:10(1115).
Chen, X., M. Matsumoto, and A. Kareem. 2000. “Time domain flutter and buffeting response analysis of bridges.” J. Eng. Mech. 126 (1): 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:1(7).
Chowdhury, A. G., and P. P. Sarkar. 2003. “A new technique for identification of eighteen flutter derivatives using a three-degree-of-freedom section model.” Eng. Struct. 25 (14): 1763–1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.07.002.
Chowdhury, A. G., and P. P. Sarkar. 2005. “Experimental identification of rational function coefficients for time-domain flutter analysis.” Eng. Struct. 27 (9): 1349–1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.019.
Ding, Q., Z. Y. Zhou, L. Zhu, and H. Xiang. 2010. “Identification of flutter derivatives of bridge decks with free vibration technique.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 98 (12): 911–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.09.005.
Feldman, M. 2011. “Hilbert transform in vibration analysis.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 25: 735–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.07.018.
Fujino, Y., M. Ito, I. Shino, M. Iwamoto, Y.-I. Hikami, M. Tatsumi, and T. Miyata. 1990. “Wind tunnel study of long-span suspension bridge under smooth and turbulent flow.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 33 (1–2): 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(90)90046-F.
Gao, G., and L. Zhu. 2015. “Nonlinearity of mechanical damping and stiffness of a spring-suspended sectional model system for wind tunnel tests.” J. Sound Vib. 355: 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2015.05.033.
Gao, G., L. Zhu, W. Han, and J. Li. 2018. “Nonlinear post-flutter behavior and self-excited force model of a twin-side-girder bridge deck.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 177: 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.12.007.
Gao, G., L. Zhu, J. Li, W. Han, L. Wei, and Q. Yan. 2022. “Nonlinear post-flutter bifurcation of a typical twin-box bridge deck: Experiment and empirical modeling.” J. Fluids Struct. 112: 103583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2022.103583.
Gao, G., L. Zhu, J. Li, W. Han, and B. Yao. 2020. “A novel two-degree-of-freedom model of nonlinear self-excited force for coupled flutter instability of bridge decks.” J. Sound Vib. 480: 115406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115406.
Ge, Y. J., and H. Tanaka. 2000. “Aerodynamic flutter analysis of cable-supported bridges by multi-mode and full-mode approaches.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 86 (2–3): 123–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00007-6.
Gu, M., and X.-R. Qin. 2004. “Direct identification of flutter derivatives and aerodynamic admittances of bridge decks.” Eng. Struct. 26 (14): 2161–2172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.015.
Gu, M., R. Zhang, and H. Xiang. 2000. “Identification of flutter derivatives of bridge decks.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 84 (2): 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00051-3.
Hahn, S. L. 1996. Hilbert transforms in signal processing. Boston: Artech House.
Ibrahim, S. R., and E. C. Mikulcik. 1997. “A method for the direct identification of vibration parameters from the free response.” Shock. Vib. Bulletin 47 (4): 183–198.
Li, K., Y. Han, C. S. Cai, P. Hu, and C. Li. 2021. “Experimental investigation on post-flutter characteristics of a typical steel–truss suspension bridge deck.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 216: 104724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104724.
Li, Z., B. Wu, H. Liao, M. Li, Q. Wang, and H. Shen. 2022. “Influence of the initial amplitude on the flutter performance of a 2D section and 3D full bridge with a streamlined box girder.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 222: 104916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2022.104916.
Matsumoto, M., Y. Niihara, Y. Kobayashi, H. Shirato, and H. Hamasaki. 1995. “Flutter mechanism and its stabilization of bluff bodies.” In Proc., 9 Int. Conf. on Web Engineering, 827–838. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Matsumoto, M. 1996. “Aerodynamic damping of prisms.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 59 (2–3): 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(96)00005-0.
Náprstek, J., and S. Pospıšil. 2011. “Post-critical behavior of a simple non-linear system in a cross-wind.” Eng. Mech. 18 (3/4): 193–201.
Noda, M., H. Utsunomiya, F. Nagao, M. Kanda, and N. Shiraishi. 2003. “Effects of oscillation amplitude on aerodynamic derivatives.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 91 (1–2): 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00338-0.
Poulsen, N. K., A. Damsgaard, and T. A. Reinhold. 1992. “Determination of flutter derivatives for the great belt bridge.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 41: 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90403-W.
Sarkar, P. P., N. P. Jones, and R. H. Scanlan. 1994. “Identification of aeroelastic parameters of flexible bridges.” J. Eng. Mech. 120 (8): 1718–1742. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:8(1718).
Scanlan, R. H. 1997. “Amplitude and turbulence effects on bridge flutter derivatives.” J. Struct. Eng. 123 (2): 232–236. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:2(232).
Scanlan, R. H., and J. J. Tomko. 1971. “Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 97 (6): 1717–1737. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0001526.
Siedziako, B., O. Øiseth, and A. Rønnquist. 2017. “An enhanced forced vibration rig for wind tunnel testing of bridge deck section models in arbitrary motion.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 164: 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.02.011.
Tang, D., E. H. Dowell, and L. N. Virgin. 1998. “Limit cycle behavior of an airfoil with a control surface.” J. Fluids Struct. 12 (7): 839–858. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1998.0174.
Wang, Y., X. Chen, and Y. Li. 2020. “Nonlinear self-excited forces and aerodynamic damping associated with vortex-induced vibration and flutter of long span bridges.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 204: 104207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104207.
Wu, B., X. Chen, Q. Wang, H. Liao, and J. Dong. 2020a. “Characterization of vibration amplitude of nonlinear bridge flutter from section model test to full bridge estimation.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 197: 104048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.104048.
Wu, B., H. Liao, H. Shen, Q. Wang, H. Mei, and Z. Li. 2022. “Multimode coupled nonlinear flutter analysis for long-span bridges by considering dependence of flutter derivatives on vibration amplitude.” Comput. Struct. 260: 106700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106700.
Wu, B., Q. Wang, H. Liao, and H. Mei. 2020b. “Hysteresis response of nonlinear flutter of a truss girder: Experimental investigations and theoretical predictions.” Comput. Struct. 238: 106267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106267.
Wu, Y., X. Chen, and Y. Wang. 2021. “Identification of linear and nonlinear flutter derivatives of bridge decks by unscented Kalman filter approach from free vibration or stochastic buffeting response.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 214: 104650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104650.
Xu, F., J. Yang, M. Zhang, and H. Yu. 2021. “Experimental investigations on post-flutter performance of a bridge deck sectional model using a novel testing device.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 217: 104752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104752.
Xu, F., X. Ying, and Z. Zhang. 2016. “Effects of exponentially modified sinusoidal oscillation and amplitude on bridge deck flutter derivatives.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (5): 06016001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000884.
Ying, X., F. Xu, M. Zhang, and Z. Zhang. 2017. “Numerical explorations of the limit cycle flutter characteristics of a bridge deck.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 169: 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.06.020.
Yuan, W., S. Laima, W.-L. Chen, and H. Li. 2021. “External excitation effects on the flutter characteristics of a 2-DOF rigid rectangular panel.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 209: 104486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104486.
Zhu, L.-D., G.-Z. Gao, and Q. Zhu. 2020. “Recent advances, future application and challenges in nonlinear flutter theory of long span bridges.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 206: 104307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104307.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28Issue 7July 2023

History

Received: Sep 27, 2022
Accepted: Mar 6, 2023
Published online: Apr 27, 2023
Published in print: Jul 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Sep 27, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, School of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, Wind Engineering Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu 610031, China. Email: [email protected]
Huoming Shen [email protected]
Professor, School of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu 610031, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Bridge Engineering, Wind Engineering Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu 610031, China. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Bridge Engineering, Wind Engineering Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu 610031, China. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Southwest Petroleum Univ., Chengdu 610500, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share