Abstract

Driven by high-profile events, much attention has been paid to the progressive collapse behavior of building structures. Comparably less research has addressed bridges, especially long-span cable-stayed bridges. In this paper, the progressive collapse behavior of a prototype long-span cable-stayed bridge is computationally investigated through stay-cable removal analyses. The simulations are carried out by direct sudden removal of a single stay cable at different locations and sequential removal of multiple cables. Dynamic effects as well as material and geometric nonlinearities are accounted for in the simulations, which are used to investigate critical cable loss locations and system response to the various cable loss scenarios. The simulation results show that the prototype bridge exhibits good robustness against failure of a single stay cable. When multiple cables are removed, the bridge is less tolerant to cable losses near its supporting pylons than its midspan. For the former, it exhibits an instability-type partial collapse as opposed to an unzipping type of progressive collapse followed by pylon failure for the latter.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All the data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the Federal Highway Administration under contract number DTFH61-14-D-00010. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Highway Administration.

References

AASHTO. 2020. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 9th ed. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
Agrawal, A. K., S. El-Tawil, Q. Chen, and H. Wang. 2022, In the press. Redundancy in long span bridges for risk mitigation in a multi-hazard environment. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Alashker, Y., H. Li, and S. El-Tawil. 2011. “Approximations in progressive collapse modeling.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (9): 914–924. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000452.
Aoki, Y., H. Valipour, B. Samali, and A. Saleh. 2013. “A study on potential progressive collapse responses of cable-stayed bridges.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 16 (4): 689–706. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.16.4.689.
Bao, Y., S. K. Kunnath, S. El-Tawil, and H. S. Lew. 2008. “Macromodel-based simulation of progressive collapse: RC frame structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (7): 1070–1078. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:7(1070).
Cai, J.-g., Y.-x. Xu, L.-p. Zhuang, J. Feng, and J. Zhang. 2012. “Comparison of various procedures for progressive collapse analysis of cable-stayed bridges.” J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. A 13 (5): 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1100296.
Cao, R., A. K. Agrawal, and S. El-Tawil. 2020a. “Overheight impact on bridges: A computational case study of the Skagit River bridge collapse.” Eng. Struct. 237: 112215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112215.
Cao, R., S. El-Tawil, and A. K. Agrawal. 2020b. “Miami pedestrian bridge collapse: Computational forensic analysis.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (1). 04019134. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001532.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2006. Design of steel structures. Part 1.11: Design of structures with tension components. Eurocode 3. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chopra, A. K. 2012. Dynamics of structures. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Connor, R. J., F. J. Bonachera Martín, A. Varma, Z. Lai, and C. Korkmaz. 2018. Fracture-critical system analysis for steel bridges (No. Project 12-87A). NCHRP Rep. No. 883. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Das, R., A. D. Pandey, M. J. Mahesh, P. Saini, and S. Anvesh. 2016. “Progressive collapse of a cable stayed bridge.” Procedia Eng. 144: 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.05.016.
DOD (Department of Defense). 2009. Unified facilities criteria: Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse. UFC 4-023-03. Herndon, VA: USDOD.
GSA (General Services Administration). 2003. Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects. Washington, DC: GSA.
Hyttinen, E., J. Valimaki, and E. Jarvenpaa. 1994. “Cable stayed bridges effect, of breaking of a cable.” In Vol. 1994 of Proc., Air Force Personnel Center Conf., Cable Stayed and Suspension Bridges, 303–311.Paris, France: AFPC.
JSCE (Japan Society of Civil Engineers). 2007. Standard specifications for steel and composite structures. Tokyo: JSCE.
Kao, C. S., and C. H. Kou. 2010. “The influence of broken cables on the structural behavior of long-span cable-stayed bridges.” J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 18 (3): 395–404.
Kawai, Y., D. Siringoringo, and Y. Fujino. 2014. “Failure analysis of the hanger clamps of the Kutai-Kartanegara Bridge from the fracture mechanics viewpoint.” J. JSCE 2 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2208/journalofjsce.2.1_1.
Kent, D. C., and R. Park. 1971. “Flexural members with confined concrete.” J. Struct. Div. 97 (7): 1969–1990. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0002957.
Khandelwal, K., S. El-Tawil, S. K. Kunnath, and H. S. Lew. 2008a. “Macromodel-based simulation of progressive collapse: Steel frame structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (7): 1070–1078. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:7(1070).
Khandelwal, K., S. El-Tawil, and F. Sadek. 2008b. “Progressive collapse analysis of seismically designed steel braced frames.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 65 (3): 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.02.007.
LSTC (Livermore Software Technology Corporation). 2020. “LS-DYNA® keywords user manual Volume I-Keyword.” Accessed September 9, 2020. https://www.dynasupport.com/manuals/ls-dyna-manuals/ls -dyna_manual_volume_i_r12.pdf.
Mozos, C. M., and A. C. Aparicio. 2010a. “Parametric study on the dynamic response of cable stayed bridges to the sudden failure of a stay, Part I: Bending moment acting on the deck.” Eng. Struct. 32 (10): 3288–3300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.003.
Mozos, C. M., and A. C. Aparicio. 2010b. “Parametric study on the dynamic response of cable stayed bridges to the sudden failure of a stay, Part II: Bending moment acting on the pylons and stress on the stays.” Eng. Struct. 32 (10): 3301–3312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.002.
Narita, N., and K. Yokoyama. 1991. “A summarized account of damping capacity and measures against wind action in cable-stayed bridges in Japan.” Cable-stayed bridges: Recent developments and their future, 257–278. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
PTI (Post-Tensioning Institute). 2006. Post-tensioning manual. 6th ed. Phoenix, AZ: Post-Tensioning Institute.
PTI (Post-Tensioning Institute). 2007. Recommendations for stay cable design, testing and installation. 4th ed. Phoenix, AZ: Post-Tensioning Institute.
TTSB (Taiwan Transportation Safety Board). 2020. Final report on Nanfangao sea-crossing bridge collapse. Rep. No. TTSB-HOR-20-11-001. Taipei, Taiwan: TTSB.
Vecchio, F. J., and W. Shim. 2004. “Experimental and analytical reexamination of classic concrete beam tests.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (3): 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:3(460).
Wolff, M., and U. Starossek. 2010. “Cable-loss analyses and collapse behavior of cable-stayed bridges.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf., International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization, 2179–2186. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Zhou, Y., and S. Chen. 2015. “Numerical investigation of cable breakage events on long-span cable-stayed bridges under stochastic traffic and wind.” Eng. Struct. 105: 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.009.
Zoli, T. P., and R. Woodward. 2005. “Design of long span bridges for cable loss.” In Vol. 90 of Proc., Int. Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering Symp. Report, 17–25. Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE).
Zoli, T. P., and J. Steinhouse. 2007. “Some considerations in the design of long span bridges against progressive collapse.” In Proc., 23rd US-Japan Bridge Engineering Workshop. Tsukuba, Japan: Public Works Research Institute.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28Issue 9September 2023

History

Received: May 5, 2022
Accepted: May 19, 2023
Published online: Jul 13, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Dec 13, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY 10031 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8651-5210. Email: [email protected]
Postdoctoral Researcher, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY 10031. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6854-511X. Email: [email protected]
Sherif El-Tawil, F.ASCE [email protected]
Antoine E. Naaman Collegiate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105. Email: [email protected]
Anil K. Agrawal, Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
Herbert G. Kayser Professor of Structural Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY 10031. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, WB 721302, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8758-7486. Email: [email protected]
Waider Wong [email protected]
Engineer, Federal Highway Administration, Baltimore, MD 21201. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share