Calibrating a Physics-Based Corrosion Model with Field-Based Bridge Condition Data
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 5
Abstract
This paper presents a novel method for calibrating a physics-based corrosion prediction model using a deterioration curve derived from field-based bridge condition assessments. The corrosion model used in this study considers inputs such as corrosion rate to predict outputs such as concrete crack width. Deterioration curves that present bridge element condition versus time are converted into crack width versus time using inspection guidance from transportation agencies. Input parameters of the corrosion model are calibrated by matching the crack widths predicted by the corrosion model with those predicted by the deterioration curves. The calibration method is demonstrated for a reinforced concrete bridge column in this article. The corrosion rate before cracking, the pitting factor, and the ratio of corrosion rates at critical crack width and before cracking significantly influenced the model results and were calibrated. Postcalibration input parameter ranges were narrower than but within the ranges reported in the literature. A physics-based corrosion model thus calibrated using field inspection data can potentially improve the predictions of future structural health and aid in asset management.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Region 2 University Transportation Center, which is funded by the US Department of Transportation. Support was also provided by the Institute of Bridge Engineering at the University at Buffalo, the State University of New York. The opinions, findings, and views expressed in this study are the ones of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect the views, policies, standard specifications, or regulations of the parties acknowledged above. Funding agencies do not assume any liability for the contents or the use thereof.
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
- A0
- original rebar area (mm2);
- A1
- area parameter 1 depending on D0, P(t), θ1, and b in the pitting corrosion model (mm2);
- A2
- area parameter 2 depending on D0, P(t), θ2, and b in the pitting corrosion model (mm2);
- A(t)
- rebar area at time t (mm2);
- b
- width of the pit area (mm);
- C
- thickness of the concrete cover (mm);
- Ccrit
- critical chloride content (kg/m3);
- CCl(x, t)
- chloride concentration at spatial coordinate x and time t (kg/m3);
- Cs
- chloride content on the concrete exterior surface (kg/m3);
- D0
- original rebar diameter (mm);
- DCI
- effective chloride diffusion coefficient of concrete (mm2/s);
- Ec
- elastic modulus of concrete (MPa);
- erf(·)
- error function (—);
- f0
- yield strength of noncorroded reinforcement (MPa);
- f(t)
- effective yield strength of corroded rebar at time t (MPa);
- fct
- tensile strength of concrete (MPa);
- icorr
- current density;
- K
- =ratio of λ(t)afcrack to λ(t)bfcrack (—);
- mloss
- percent of rebar mass loss (or area loss per unit length) due to corrosion (—);
- P(t)
- pit depth (mm);
- Pcorr
- internal pressure caused by rust expansion (MPa);
- Qcorr
- percent weight loss (or area loss) of rebar (—);
- R
- pitting factor (—);
- r0
- radius of the thick-wall cylinder (concrete cover) (mm);
- r
- distance from the center of the thick-wall model to the interface between the rust and concrete (mm);
- ri
- radius of rebar (mm);
- W(t)
- crack width of concrete cover at time t as predicted by the corrosion model (mm);
- WLB(t)
- lower bound of crack width derived from deterioration curves at time t (mm);
- WUB(t)
- upper bound of crack width derived from deterioration curves at time t (mm);
- Wcri
- critical crack width, which is the cover crack width beyond which the corrosion rate is assumed to become constant (mm);
- average crack width derived from deterioration curves at time t (mm);
- ΔA(t)
- cross-sectional area loss of reinforcement at time t (mm2);
- δ0
- thickness of the porous zone (mm);
- λ(t)corr
- corrosion rate, amount of metallic material loss in thickness over a unit time (mm/year);
- λ(t)afcrack
- corrosion rate at critical crack width (mm/year);
- λ(t)bfcrack
- corrosion rate before cracking (mm/year);
- ν
- Poisson’s ratio of concrete (—);
- θ1
- angle parameter 1 depending on D0, P(t), and b in the pitting corrosion model (—);
- θ2
- angle parameter 2 depending on D0, P(t), and b in the pitting corrosion model (—); and
- σ
- circumferential stress caused by rust expansion (MPa).
References
AASHTO. 2013. AASHTO transportation asset management guide—A focus on implementation. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2019. AASHTO guide manual for bridge element inspection. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2014. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318-14. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Agrawal, A. K., A. Kawaguchi, and Z. Chen. 2010. “Deterioration rates of typical bridge elements in New York.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (4): 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000123.
Agrawal, A. K., G. Washer, S. Alampalli, X. Gong, and R. Cao. 2021. “Evaluation of the consistency of bridge inspection ratings in New York state.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 27 (3): 04021016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000622.
Andrade, C., and C. Alonso. 2001. “On-site measurements of corrosion rate of reinforcements.” Constr. Build. Mater. 15 (2–3): 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(00)00063-5.
Barone, G., and D. M. Frangopol. 2014. “Life-cycle maintenance of deteriorating structures by multi-objective optimization involving reliability, risk, availability, hazard and cost.” Struct. Saf. 48: 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.02.002.
Bu, G., J. Lee, H. Guan, Y. Loo, and M. Blumenstein. 2015. “Prediction of long-term bridge performance: Integrated deterioration approach with case studies.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil 29 (3): 04014089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000591.
Cao, C., M. M. Cheung, and B. Y. Chan. 2013. “Modelling of interaction between corrosion-induced concrete cover crack and steel corrosion rate.” Corros. Sci. 69: 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2012.11.028.
Crank, J. 1979. The mathematics of diffusion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Cui, F., H. Zhang, M. Ghosn, and Y. Xu. 2018. “Seismic fragility analysis of deteriorating rc bridge substructures subject to marine chloride-induced corrosion.” Eng. Struct. 155: 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.067.
Dominguez, M. T. 2019. Transportation asset management plan. Albany, NY: New York State Dept. Of Transportation.
Du, Y., L. Clark, and A. Chan. 2005. “Residual capacity of corroded reinforcing bars.” Mag. Concr. Res. 57 (3): 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2005.57.3.135.
El Maaddawy, T., and K. Soudki. 2007. “A model for prediction of time from corrosion initiation to corrosion cracking.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 29 (3): 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.11.004.
Enright, M. P., and D. M. Frangopol. 1998. “Service-life prediction of deteriorating concrete bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 124 (3): 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:3(309).
Fakhri, H. 2019. “Corrosion mitigation in reinforced concrete structures using engineered cementitious composites.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. At Buffalo.
Li, S., Y. Xu, S. Zhu, X. Guan, and Y. Bao. 2015. “Probabilistic deterioration model of high-strength steel wires and its application to bridge cables.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 11 (9): 1240–1249. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.948462.
Life-365™. 2020. “Life-365 service life predication modelTM, Version 2.2.3.” Life-365 Consortium. Accessed September 2020 http://www.life-365.org.
Mauch, M., and S. Madanat. 2001. “Semiparametric hazard rate models of reinforced concrete bridge deck deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 7 (2): 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:2(49).
Morcous, G. 2011. Developing deterioration models for Nebraska bridges. SPR-P1(11) M302. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska Transportation Center.
NYSDOT (New York Department of Transportation). 2014. NYSDOT bridge inspection manual. Albany, NY: NYSDOT.
NYSDOT (New York Department of Transportation). 2017. NYSDOT bridge inspection manual. Albany, NY: NYSDOT.
Otieno, M., H. Beushausen, and M. Alexander. 2016. “Chloride-induced corrosion of steel in cracked concrete–Part I: Experimental studies under accelerated and natural marine environments.” Cem. Concr. Res. 79: 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.08.009.
Stewart, M. G. 2004. “Spatial variability of pitting corrosion and its influence on structural fragility and reliability of RC beams in flexure.” Struct. Saf. 26 (4): 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2004.03.002.
Thomas, R., J. Eric Mann, and Z. M. Chill. 2012. Bridge inspector’s reference manual. FHWA NHI 12-049. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Val, D. V., and R. E. Melchers. 1997. “Reliability of deteriorating rc slab bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 123 (12): 1638–1644. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:12(1638).
Veshosky, D., C. R. Beidleman, G. W. Buetow, and M. Demir. 1994. “Comparative analysis of bridge superstructure deterioration.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (7): 2123–2136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:7(2123).
Vidal, T., A. Castel, and R. Francois. 2004. “Analyzing crack width to predict corrosion in reinforced concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res. 34 (1): 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00246-1.
Vu, K. a. T., and M. G. Stewart. 2000. “Structural reliability of concrete bridges including improved chloride-induced corrosion models.” Struct. Saf. 22 (4): 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(00)00018-7.
Wang, H. 2022. “Corrosion and seismic analyses of reinforced concrete bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. at Buffalo.
Wang, H., R. Ranade, and P. Okumus. 2022. “Estimating chloride exposure of reinforced concrete bridges using vehicle spray and splash mechanisms.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2022.2052910.
Wang, H., R. Ranade, and P. Okumus. 2023. “Seismic fragility of reinforced concrete bridge columns utilizing ductile fiber-reinforced concrete covers.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 19 (5): 708–730.
Wang, Y., C. Liu, Y. Wang, Q. Li, and B. Yan. 2020. “Semi-empirical prediction model of chloride-induced corrosion rate in uncracked reinforced concrete exposed to a marine environment.” Electrochim. Acta 331: 135376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135376.
Weyers, R. E., M. Fitch, E. Larsen, I. Al-Qadi, W. Chamberlin, and P. Hoffman. 1994. Concrete bridge protection and rehabilitation: Chemical and physical techniques—Service life estimates. Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP-S-668). Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Yanev, B., and X. Chen. 1993. “Life-cycle performance of New York city bridges.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1389: 17.
Yuan, Y., J. Jiang, and T. Peng. 2010. “Corrosion process of steel bar in concrete in full lifetime.” ACI Mater. J. 107 (6): 562.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 14, 2022
Accepted: Jan 4, 2023
Published online: Mar 9, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Aug 9, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.