Technical Papers
Jan 13, 2023

An Analytical Model to Evaluate Short- and Long-Term Performances of Post-Tensioned Concrete Box-Girder Bridges Rehabilitated by an Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete Overlay

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 3

Abstract

Potentially unfavorable stress redistributions could occur in post-tensioned concrete box-girder bridges upon deck rehabilitation by an ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) overlay. The reason for such redistributions is that the deck forms an integral part of the load-resisting mechanism so that deck rehabilitation, namely, the process of removing the deteriorated deck and casting a fresh UHPC overlay, may cause large stress redistributions in the box girder. In addition, the significantly different shrinkage behavior between the freshly cast UHPC deck overlay and the old existing concrete deck below would result in restrained stress in the UHPC–old concrete interface. Therefore, how to evaluate the stress redistributions and the potentially unfavorable stresses in the box girder resulting from construction operations and the incompatible shrinkage is a crucial issue. Here, we propose an analytical model to assess the short- and long-term performances of the concrete box girder during and after deck rehabilitation. The analytical model was verified by using finite-element models incorporating the staged construction simulation and time-dependent behavior of materials. The model can be easily established and calculated with a great amount of time-saving compared with finite-element modeling, and it applies to different types of post-tensioned concrete box-girder bridges. The analytical model involves the balancing-load concept and the age-adjusted effective modulus method (AEMM). The balancing-load concept in the short-term analysis is to account for the prestressing force, and the AEMM in the time-dependent analysis is an effective tool to determine how stresses and strains vary with time due to the creep and shrinkage of a UHPC deck overlay. A parametric study was then conducted based on the analytical model, which involved the thickness of the deck layer to be rehabilitated and the addition of steel reinforcement in the new UHPC deck overlay. Analysis results indicated that pronounced tensile stresses developed in the UHPC deck overlay, which resulted from the restraint of the free shrinkage of the UHPC overlay by the subjacent concrete deck. An increase in the thickness of the newly cast UHPC deck overlay resulted in a decrease of the tensile stress in the UHPC deck overlay, and a rehabilitation thickness of 3.8–5.1 cm (1.5–2.0 in.) was deemed appropriate for the selected bridge according to the analysis.

Practical Applications

Post-tensioned concrete box-girder bridges are one of the most common bridges worldwide. The concrete bridge deck, the surface of a bridge that carries the roadway, is most prone to damage in a bridge due to years of exposure to unfavorable environmental conditions and direct impact loadings from vehicles. The deck rehabilitation for deteriorated post-tensioned concrete box-girder bridges has become an urgent maintenance issue. However, potentially unfavorable mechanical behavior could occur in the bridge during a series of deck rehabilitation operations, that is, the process of deck removal and construction of a new deck. A careful evaluation of the bridge’s mechanical behavior during the entire deck rehabilitation construction process is essential to ensure a safe and feasible deck rehabilitation strategy. Here, we propose an analytical model to evaluate the bridge behavior during and after the deck rehabilitation, which offers an effective and time-saving tool for bridge engineers and researchers to rapidly assess the short- and long-term responses of post-tensioned concrete box-girder bridges. In addition, how rehabilitation thickness affects the bridge behavior during the construction was studied based on the analytical model, and then the appropriate rehabilitation thickness of the deck was recommended according to the analysis.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Aaleti, S., and S. Sritharan. 2019. “Quantifying bonding characteristics between UHPC and normal-strength concrete for bridge deck application.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (6): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001404.
Abdellatef, M., J. Vorel, R. Wendner, and M. Alnaggar. 2017. “Lattice discrete particle modeling of time dependent behavior of prestressed concrete beams.” In Proc., 2017 PCI Convention & National Bridge Conf. Chicago, IL: The Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI)
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 1992. Prediction of creep, shrinkage, and temperature effects in concrete structures. ACI 209R-92. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Bastien-Masse, M., and E. Brühwiler. 2016. “Composite model for predicting the punching resistance of R-UHPFRC–RC composite slabs.” Eng. Struct. 117: 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.017.
Branson, D. E., and M. L. Christiason. 1971. “Time dependent concrete properties related to design-strength and elastic properties, creep, and shrinkage.” Spec. Publ. 27: 257–278.
Branson, D. E., B. L. Meyers, and K. M. Kripanarayanan. 1970. Loss of prestress, camber, and deflection of non-composite and composite structures using different weight concretes. Iowa City, IA: Dept. of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Univ. of Iowa.
Brühwiler, E. 2020. “UHPFRC technology to enhance the performance of existing concrete bridges.” Struct, Infrastruct. Eng. 16 (1): 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1605395.
Brühwiler, E., and E. Denarié. 2008. “Rehabilitation of concrete structures using ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Symp. on Ultra High Performance Concrete, 1–8. Kassel, Germany: Kassel University Press.
Brühwiler, E., and E. Denarié. 2013. “Rehabilitation and strengthening of concrete structures using ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete.” Struct. Eng. Int. 23 (4): 450–457.
Carbonell Muñoz, M. A., D. K. Harris, T. M. Ahlborn, and D. C. Froster. 2014. “Bond performance between ultrahigh-performance concrete and normal-strength concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 26 (8): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000890.
Farzad, M., M. Shafieifar, and A. Azizinamini. 2019. “Experimental and numerical study on bond strength between conventional concrete and ultra high-performance concrete (UHPC).” Eng. Struct. 186: 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.030.
Gilbert, R. I., and M. A. Bradford. 1995. “Time-dependent behavior of continuous composite beams at service loads.” J. Struct. Eng. 121 (2): 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:2(319).
Gilbert, R. I., and G. Ranzi. 2010. Time-dependent behaviour of concrete structures. London: Routledge.
Graybeal, B. A. 2006. Material property characterization of ultra-high performance concrete. FHWA-HRT-06-103. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Habel, K., E. Denarié, and E. Brühwiler. 2006. “Time dependent behavior of elements combining ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concretes (UHPFRC) and reinforced concrete.” Mater. Struct.s 39 (289): 557–569.
Haber, Z. B., I. De la Varga, B. A. Graybeal, B. Nakashoji, and R. El-Helou. 2018a. Properties and behavior of UHPC-class materials. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration. Office of Infrastructure Research and Development.
Haber, Z. B., J. F. Munoz, I. De la Varga, and B. A. Graybeal. 2018b. “Bond characterization of UHPC overlays for concrete bridge decks: Laboratory and field testing.” Constr. Build. Mater. 190: 1056–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.167.
Haber, Z. B., J. F. Munoz, and B. A. Graybeal. 2017. Field testing of an ultra-high performance concrete overlay. FHWA-HRT-17-096. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Hadl, P., R. Della Pietra, K. H. Hoang, E. Pilch, and N. V. Tue. 2015. “Application of UHPC as road bridge topping within the adaptation of an existing conventional bridge to an integral abutment bridge in Austria.” Beton- Stahlbetonbau 110 (2): 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/best.201400091.
Kamen, A. 2006. “Time dependent behaviour of ultra high performance fibre reinforced concrete (UHPFRC).” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 6th Int. PhD Symp. in Civil Engineering, 1–8. Zürich, Switzerland: Institute of Structural Engineering (IBK) Zürich.
Kheir, J., A. Klausen, T. A. Hammer, L. De Meyst, B. Hilloulin, K. Van Tittelboom, A. Loukili, and N. De Belie. 2021. “Early age autogenous shrinkage cracking risk of an ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) wall: Modelling and experimental results.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 257: 108024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.108024.
Lin, T. Y. 1963. “Load-balancing method for design and analysis of prestressed concrete structures.” J. Proc. 60 (6): 719–742.
Liu, Y., and A. K. Schindler. 2019. “Finite-element modeling of early-age concrete behavior under high level of tensile stress.” Mater. Struct. 52 (2): 1–14.
Ma, Z., Y. Li, Z. Cao, S. Zhang, S. Hou, J. Liu, and X. Ruan. 2022. “Early age shrinkage and mechanical effect of ultra-high-performance concrete composite deck: A case study with in situ test and numerical simulation.” Materials 15 (10): 3628. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15103628.
Mohebbi, A., B. Graybeal, and Z. Haber. 2022. “Time-dependent properties of ultrahigh-performance concrete: Compressive creep and shrinkage.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 34 (6): 04022096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004219.
Oesterlee, C., E. Denarié, and E. Brühwiler. 2007. “UHPFRC protection layer on the crash barrier walls of a bridge.” In Advances in construction materials, edited by C. U. Grosse, 203–210. Berlin: Springer.
Pelke, E., A. Jaborek, D. Berger, and E. Brühwiler. 2018. “Überführungsbauwerk der L3378 bei Fulda-Lehnerz: Erster Einsatz von UHFB in Deutschland im Straßenbrückenbau, Teil 1: Projektentwicklung und Baudurchführung.” Beton- Stahlbetonbau 113 (11): 831–841. https://doi.org/10.1002/best.201800050.
Shafieifar, M., M. Farzad, and A. Azizinamini. 2017. “Experimental and numerical study on mechanical properties of ultra high performance concrete (UHPC).” Constr. Build. Mater. 156: 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.170.
Sritharan, S., G. Doiron, D. Bierwagen, B. Keierleber, and A. Abu-Hawash. 2018. “First application of UHPC bridge deck overlay in North America.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (26): 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118755665.
Teng, L., M. Valipour, and K. H. Khayat. 2021. “Design and performance of low shrinkage UHPC for thin bonded bridge deck overlay.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 118: 103953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.103953.
Wan-Wendner, L., R. Wan-Wendner, and G. Cusatis. 2018. “Age-dependent size effect and fracture characteristics of ultra-high performance concrete.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 85: 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.09.010.
Wibowo, H., and S. Sritharan. 2018. Use of ultra-high-performance concrete for bridge deck overlays. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Wilson, E. L. 2017. CSI analysis reference manual for SAP 2000, ETABS, SAFE and CSI bridge. Berkeley, CA: Computer & Structures.
WRI (Wire Reinforcement Institute). 2016. Manual of standard practice, structural welded wire reinforcement. Naugatuck, CT: WRI.
Xie, T., C. Fang, M. S. M. Ali, and P. Visintin. 2018. “Characterizations of autogenous and drying shrinkage of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC): An experimental study.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 91: 156–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.05.009.
Xu, Y., J. Liu, J. Liu, P. Zhang, Q. Zhang, and L. Jiang. 2018. “Experimental studies and modeling of creep of UHPC.” Constr. Build. Mater. 175: 643–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.157.
Yin, H., K. Shirai, and W. Teo. 2019. “Numerical model for predicting the structural response of composite UHPC–concrete members considering the bond strength at the interface.” Compos. Struct. 215: 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.040.
Yoo, D. Y., and Y. S. Yoon. 2015. “Structural performance of ultra-high-performance concrete beams with different steel fibers.” Eng. Struct. 102: 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.08.029.
Zhang, Y. 2020. Deck replacement and rehabilitation of post-tensioned concrete box-girder bridges. Davis, CA: Univ. of California.
Zhang, Y., and Y. H. Chai. 2019. Post-tensioned concrete box-girder bridge deck replacement analysis. Technical Rep. Sacramento, CA: California Dept. of Transportation.
Zhang, Y., and Y. H. Chai. 2020. “Bridge deck replacement of posttensioned concrete box-girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (12): 4020107.
Zhang, Y., and Y. H. Chai. 2021. “Numerical analysis of bridge deck rehabilitation by ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) overlay.” Structures, 4791–4802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.044.
Zhang, Y., S. Huang, Y. Zhu, H. H. Hussein, and X. Shao. 2022. “Experimental validation of damaged reinforced concrete beam strengthened by pretensioned prestressed ultra-high-performance concrete layer.” Eng. Struct. 260: 114251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114251.
Zhang, Y., H. Xin, and J. A. F. O. Correia. 2021. “Fracture evaluation of ultra-high-performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC).” Eng. Fail. Anal. 120: 105076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105076.
Zhang, Y., P. Zhu, Y. Zhu, C. Bao, X. Shao, and J. Shi. 2018. “NC-UHPC composite structure for long-term creep-induced deflection control in continuous box-girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (6): 04018034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001241.
Zhu, L., J. J. Wang, X. Li, G. Y. Zhao, and X. J. Huo. 2020a. “Experimental and numerical study on creep and shrinkage effects of ultra high-performance concrete beam.” Composites, Part B 184: 107713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107713.
Zhu, Y., D. Meng, Y. Zhang, and H. H. Hussein. 2022. “Long-term performance of a continuous box-girder bridge constructed using precast segments with wet ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) joints.” Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 17: e01285.
Zhu, Y., Y. Zhang, H. H. Hussein, J. Liu, and G. Chen. 2020b. “Experimental study and theoretical prediction on shrinkage-induced restrained stresses in UHPC-RC composites under normal curing and steam curing.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 110: 103602.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28Issue 3March 2023

History

Received: Jan 28, 2022
Accepted: Oct 19, 2022
Published online: Jan 13, 2023
Published in print: Mar 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 13, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong Univ., Xi’an 710049, P. R. China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3088-9520. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share