Effects of Laptop Requirements on Online Architecture and Architectural Engineering Education
Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 3
Abstract
Architecture and architectural engineering (A/AE) education has always relied on traditional (face-to-face) delivery modality in a studio-based environment. However, COVID-19 impacted the field of education by effecting a transition to an Online Learning Environment (OLE), which relied on computer hardware and software for content delivery. This transition affected the A/AE faculty, which faced a new challenge in the form of online delivery of design studios. A survey was then carried out after closure of universities post-COVID-19 to assess the OLE experience of the A/AE faculty and examine the relationship between laptop requirements and faculty perceptions about online education. This study is comprised of online survey responses from 143 US A/AE educators. Respondents reflected on their experience before January 2020, during the time of COVID-19 impact or transition, and potential future impacts for the Spring of 2021. In this study, the impacts on faculty proficiency with online architecture instruction, existing technological infrastructure, and faculty communication with students were determined. Relationships were found between university or departmental laptop requirements and faculty experience with developing online coursework curriculum and delivering the curriculum only via online methods, like live streaming (synchronous), recorded lectures (asynchronous) or a blend of both. The research provides empirical evidence that depicts the impacts of COVID-19 during the transition period.
Practical Applications
Although this study does not find any causal relationships, it presents empirical evidence on the impacts of COVID-19 on Architecture and Architectural Engineering educators during the transition to online learning environment and offers several practical implications. To better prepare for similar future events and enhance resilience in architecture education, educational institutions should invest in faculty training for achieving technological proficiency, ensuring smoother transitions to digital learning and improved course quality. Additionally, as technology and online course offerings evolve, a periodic reevaluation of laptop requirements is necessary. Providing resources and support for faculty transitioning to online teaching can help ensure seamless transitions and enhance overall effectiveness. Lastly, institutions should encourage and support the adoption of online courses and initiate dialogs among stakeholders, including administrators, educators, students, industry partners, and others, to identify barriers to the success of online education and develop strategies to enhance resilience in the face of future events.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ABET (Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology). 2023a. “Accredited programs—Search engine.” Accessed January 20, 2023. https://amspub.abet.org/aps/name-search?searchType=program&keyword=architectural%20engineering.
ABET (Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology). 2023b. “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2022–2023.” Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2022-2023/.
Adhikari, S., R. Mosier, and S. Langar. 2021. “Challenge of delivering construction courses in an online environment based on faculty experiences.” In Proc., 57th Annual Associated Schools of Construction International Conf. Manchester, UK: EasyChair.
Aggarwal, A. 2021. “Teaching in a COVID-19 disrupted semester.” In Proc., Paper Presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conf. and Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).
Andadari, T. S., L. M. F. Purwanto, P. Satwiko, and R. Sanjaya. 2021. “Study of digital architecture technology: Theory and development.” J. Archit. Res. Educ. 3 (1): 95–104. https://doi.org/10.17509/jare.v3i1.30500.
Annan-Coultas, D. 2012. “Laptops as instructional tools: Student perceptions.” TechTrends 56 (5): 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-012-0596-y.
Asadpour, A. 2021. “Student challenges in online architectural design courses in Iran during the COVID-19 pandemic.” E-Learning Digital Media 18 (6): 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211022923.
Ashri, D., and B. P. Sahoo. 2021. “Open book examination and higher education during COVID-19: Case of University of Delhi.” J. Educ. Technol. 50 (1): 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239521013783.
Bakhov, I., N. Opolska, M. Bogus, V. Anishchenko, and Y. Biryukova. 2021. “Emergency distance education in the conditions of COVID-19 pandemic: Experience of Ukrainian universities.” Educ. Sci. 11: 364. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070364.
Belo, R., P. Ferreira, and R. Telang. 2014. “Broadband in school: Impact on student performance.” Manage. Sci. 60 (2): 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1770.
Boyd, D. 2013. “The characteristics of successful online students.” New Horizons Adult Educ. Human Resour. Dev. 18 (2): 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.10184.
Cole, L. B., J. Quinn, A. Akturk, and B. Johnson. 2019. “Promoting green building literacy through online laboratory experiences.” Int. J. Sustainability Higher Educ. 20 (2): 264–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2018-0149.
Cutshall, R., C. Chuleeporn, and S. Elwood. 2006. “Campus laptops: What logistical and technological factors are perceived critical?” Educ. Technol. Soc. 9 (3): 112–121.
Deigert, M. J., and P. A. Brady. 2020. “Implementing Bluebeam software in architectural engineering design courses.” In Proc., Paper Presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conf. Content Access, Virtual Online. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).
Dougherty, J. U., and M. K. Parfitt. 2009. “Framework for teaching engineering capstone design courses with emphasis on application of internet-based technologies.” J. Archit. Eng. 15 (1): 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2009)15:1(4).
EPI (Economic Policy Institute). 2020. “COVID-19 and student performance, equity, and U.S. education policy: Lessons from pre-pandemic research to inform relief, recovery, and rebuilding.” Accessed September 10, 2020. https://www.epi.org/publication/the-consequences-of-the-covid-19-pandemic-for-educa tion-performance-and-equity-in-the-united-states-what-can-we-learn-from-pre-pandemic- research-to-inform-relief-recovery-and-rebuilding/.
Eringfeld, S. 2021. “Higher education and its post-coronial future: Utopian hopes and dystopian fears at Cambridge University during Covid-19.” Stud. Higher Educ. 46 (1): 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1859681.
Estes, A. C., and J. W. Lawson. 2021. “An evolving face-to-face freshman experience course during a pandemic.” In Proc., Paper Presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conf. & Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).
Flaherty, T. B., E. D. Honeycutt, and D. Powers. 1998. “Exploring text-based electronic mail surveys as means of primary data collection.” In Proc., 1998 Academy of Marketing Science Annual Conf., 260–264. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Guo, S. 2020. “Synchronous versus asynchronous online teaching of physics during the COVID-19 pandemic.” Phys. Educ. 55 (6): 065007.
Hanley, K., C. Gillespie, S. Zabar, J. Adams, and A. Kalet. 2019. “Monitoring communication skills progress of medical students: Establishing a baseline has value, predicting the future is difficult.” Patient Educ. Couns. 102 (2): 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.09.010.
Iranmanesh, A., and Z. Onur. 2021. “Mandatory virtual design studio for all: Exploring the transformations of architectural education amidst the global pandemic.” Int. J. Art Des. Educ. 40(1): 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12350.
Karim, M. A. 2021. “Hybrid and online synchronous delivery of environmental engineering during COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative study on perception, attitude, and assessment.” Eur. J. STEM Educ. 6 (1): 5. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/9688.
Kay, R., and S. Lauricella. 2016. “Assessing laptop use in higher education: The laptop use scale.” J. Comput. Higher Educ. 28 (1): 18–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-015-9106-5.
Keengwe, J., G. Schnellert, and C. Mills. 2012. “Laptop initiative: Impact on instructional technology integration and student learning.” Educ. Inf. Technol. 17: 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-010-9150-8.
Khan, S., M. E. Kambris, and H. Alfalahi. 2022. “Perspectives of university students and faculty on remote education experiences during COVID-19—A qualitative study.” Educ. Inf. Technol. 27(3): 4141–4169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10784-w.
Khashe, S., D. J. Gerber, and I. F. C. Smith. 2016. “Surveying the evolution of computing in architecture, engineering, and construction education since 2012.” J. Comput. Civil Eng. 30 (6): 4141–4169. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000580.
Khraishi, T. 2021. “Personal experiences from teaching virtually online during the COVID-19 pandemic.” In Proc., Paper Presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conf. and Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).
Kinney, L., M. Liu, and M. Thornton. 2012. “Faculty and student perceptions of online learning in engineering education.” In Proc., Paper Presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. Washington DC: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).
Komarzyńska-Świeściak, E., B. Adams, and L. Thomas. 2021. “Transition from physical design studio to emergency virtual design studio. available teaching and learning methods and tools—A case study.” Buildings 11: 312. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11070312.
Kwak, E. 2021. “Adapting pedagogy in the pandemic environment: A work-in-progress analysis of the impact of remote learning in an architectural engineering technology program.” In Proc., Paper Presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conf. and Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).
Langar, S., R. Mosier, and A. Adhikari. 2022. “Perceptions and pedagogical responses of construction educators during COVID-19.” In International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 1–21. London: Taylor & Francis.
Larkin, T. 2021. “Inclusive writing: Pre-and post-COVID-19.” In Proc., Paper Presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conf. and Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).
Lieblein, E. 2000. “Critical factors for successful delivery of online programs.” Internet Higher Educ. 3 (3): 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00036-7.
Liu, M., and L. Wronski. 2018. “Examining completion rates in web surveys via over 25,000 real-world surveys.” Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 36 (1): 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317695581.
Livesay, G. 2017. “Adaptive learning.” Canadian Architecture. Accessed December 3, 2021. https://www.canadianarchitect.com/editorial-school-of-architecture/.
Lubis, A. S., B. Hamid, I. F. Pane, and B. O. Y. Marpaung. 2018. “Analysis of facility needs level in architecture studio for students’ studio grades.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 126: 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012006.
Marti, N., D. Fonseca, E. Pena, M. Adroer, and D. Simon. 2017. “Design of interactive and collaborative learning units using TICs in architectural construction education.” Rev. Constr. 16: 34–42. https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.16.1.33.
McLaughlan, R., and I. Chatterjee. 2020. “What works in the architecture studio? Five strategies for optimising student learning.” Int. J. Art Des. Educ. 39(3): 550–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12303.
Milovanović, A., M. Kostić, A. Zorić, A. Ðorđević, M. Pešić, J. Bugarski, D. Todorović, N. Sokolović, and A. Josifovski. 2020. “Transferring COVID-19 challenges into learning potentials: Online workshops in architectural education.” Sustainability 12: 7024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177024.
Mohammed, M. F. M. 2017. “Blended E-learning in the architectural design studio: An experimental model.” Int. J. Parallel Emergent Distrib. Syst. 32 (sup1): S73–S81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445760.2017.1390103.
Mosier, R., S. Adhikari, and S. Langar. 2021. “Education in the times of pandemic: A retrospective review.” In Proc., Paper Presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Midwest Section Conf. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).
NAAB (National Architectural Accrediting Board). 2023. “Accredited programs. Accessed January 31, 2023.” https://www.naab.org/accredited-programs/#:∼:text=The%20NAAB%20is%20the%20agency,in%20the%20U.S.%20and%20abroad.
Nassr, R. M., A. Aborujilah, D. A. Aldossary, and A. A. A. Aldossary. 2020. “Understanding education difficulty during COVID-19 lockdown: Reports on Malaysian University students’ experience.” IEEE Access 8: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3029967.
NCARB (National Council of Architectural Registration Boards). 2021. “Architectural experience program guidelines.” Accessed November 11, 2022. https://www.ncarb.org/sites/default/files/AXP-Guidelines.pdf.
NCEES (National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying). n.d. Accessed December 20, 2021. https://ncees.org/licensure/.
NSPE (National Society of Professional Engineers). 2023. “How to get licensed.” Accessed January 31, 2023. https://www.nspe.org/resources/licensure/how-get-licensed.
Newby, G. B. 2003. “Student laptop ownership requirement and centralization of information technology services at a large public university.” Ann. Cases Inf. Technol. 5: 201–212. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-061-5.ch013.
Nulty, D. D. 2008. “The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done?” Assess. Eval. Higher Educ. 33 (3): 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293231.
Og, Y., S. Ishizaki, M. Gross, and E. Do. 2013. “A theoretical framework of design critiquing in architecture studios.” Des. Stud. 34: 302–325. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.08.004.
Orcutt, R., L. Campbell, M. Gervits, B. Opar, and K. Edwards. 2021. “COVID-19 pandemic: Architecture librarians respond.” Art Doc.: J. Art Lib. Soc. North Am. 40 (1): 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1086/714593.
Pew Research Center. 2021. “7% of Americans don’t use the internet. Who are they?” Accessed August 9, 2022. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/04/02/7-of-americans-dont-use-the-internet-who-are-they/.
Rababah, A., et al. 2021. “University social responsibility during the COVID-19 pandemic: Universities’ case in the BRICS countries.” Sustainability 13: 7035. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137035.
Raichle, M. E., and D. A. Gusnard. 2001. “Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain.” Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2 (10): 685–694. https://doi.org/10.1038/35094500.
Redondo, E., I. Navarro, A. Sánchez, and D. Fonseca. 2012. “Augmented reality on architectural and building engineering learning processes. Two study cases.” Ubiquitous Comput. Commun. J. 7: 1269–1279.
Rodriguez, C., R. Hudson, and C. Niblock. 2018. “Collaborative learning in architectural education: Benefits of combining conventional studio, virtual design studio and live projects.” Br. J. Educ. Technol. 49 (3): 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12535.
Rosen, Y., and D. Beck-Hill. 2012. “Intertwining digital content and a one-to-one laptop environment in teaching and learning: Lessons from the time to know program.” J. Res. Technol. Educ. 44 (3): 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2012.10782588.
Saleh, A., and K. Bista. 2017. “Examining factors impacting online survey response rates in educational research: Perceptions of graduate students.” J. Multidiscip. Eval. 13 (29): 63–74. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v13i29.487.
Saliklis, E., R. Arens, and J. Hanus. 2009. “Teaching architects and engineers: Up and down the taxonomy.” In Proc., Paper Presented at 2009 ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).
Simonen, K. 2014. “Iterating structures: Teaching engineering as design.” J. Archit. Eng. 20 (3): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000152.
Sopher, H., D. Fisher Gewirtzman, and Y. E. Kalay. 2019. “Going immersive in a community of learners? Assessment of design processes in a multi-setting architecture studio.” Br. J. Educ. Technol. 50 (5): 2109–2128. doi:10.1111/bjet.12857. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12857.
Suryawinata, B., Y. Mariana, and S. Wijaksono. 2020. “Portable architecture studio recording video as solution for space limitation.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 426: 012076. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1755-1315/426/1/012076.
Tingerthal, J., N. Tymvios, R. Mosier, and K. G. Talley. 2021. “Responding to the COVID pandemic: Results and reflections on round-table discussions at ASEE 2020.” In Proc., Paper Presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conf. & Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).
Viswanathan, S., and M. F. Wyne. 2013. “Looking into the future: Online engineering education—Experience revealed.” In Proc., 120th American Society for Engineering Education Conf. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).
West, P., F. Paige, W. Lee, N. Watts, and G. Scales. 2022. “Using learning analytics and student perceptions to explore student interactions in an online construction management course.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 148 (4): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000066.
Woo, J. H., M. Clayton, and R. Johnson. 2006. “Computer-mediated communication in a distributed design studio.” In Proc., Paper Presented at 2006 ASEE Annual Conf. & Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 29 • Issue 3 • September 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 4, 2022
Accepted: May 15, 2023
Published online: Jul 5, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Dec 5, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.