Abstract

While the built environment negatively contributes to resource use, waste generation, and climate change, this same sector has the potential to provide innovative solutions to these complex global challenges. Circular economy (CE) strategies have the potential to provide these solutions, yet systems and incentives related to CE and the built environment are disparate and at varying stages of development. Green building rating systems, such as the Living Building Challenge, have the potential to change the market and drive innovation, but these systems need to evolve and change in alignment with the emergence of new and promising strategies, such as CE. The objective of this study was to elucidate whether implementing CE practices could help further reduce embodied carbon and life cycle carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-eq.) emissions in buildings that are already environmentally conscious to further drive market innovation. This study analyzed the potential reduction in the embodied carbon of an existing Living Building, the Frick Environmental Center, by applying various CE strategies and using life cycle assessment. The investigated strategies include (1) using materials that are biodegradable and have lower embodied carbon, (2) using salvaged alternatives for embodied carbon-intensive building products, (3) extending the lifespan of selected building materials, and (4) carbon sequestration. Given that the case study building is already LEED Platinum and Living Building certified, the results elucidated the extent of potential environmental impact savings in buildings that are already certified due to having lower environmental impacts than the industry average. The CE strategies resulted in a 30% reduction in the building’s embodied carbon (excluding end-of-life) compared with the base case. Results exemplify whether a significant decrease in the buildings’ embodied carbon/life cycle CO2-eq. emissions can be achieved as a result of implementing modest changes in design.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This paper is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant GCR-1934824). The National Science Foundation has not formally reviewed this work, and the opinions expressed are those of the authors alone. Any brand names mentioned are for informational purposes only and are not an endorsement.

References

Arora, M., F. Raspall, L. Fearnley, and A. Silva. 2021. “Urban mining in buildings for a circular economy: Planning, process and feasibility prospects.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 174: 105754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105754.
Babbitt, C. W., G. Gaustad, A. Fisher, W.-Q. Chen, and G. Liu. 2018. “Closing the loop on circular economy research: From theory to practice and back again.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 135: 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.012.
Bałdowska-Witos, P., K. Piotrowska, W. Kruszelnicka, M. Błaszczak, A. Tomporowski, M. Opielak, R. Kasner, and J. Flizikowski. 2020. “Managing the uncertainty and accuracy of life cycle assessment results for the process of beverage bottle moulding.” Polymers 12 (6): 1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12061320.
Bare, J. 2012. Tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts (TRACI) version 2.1. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
Benachio, G. L. F., M. D. C. D. Freitas, and S. F. Tavares. 2020. “Circular economy in the construction industry: A systematic literature review.” J. Cleaner Prod. 260: 121046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121046.
Bocken, N. M. P., I. de Pauw, C. Bakker, and B. van der Grinten. 2016. “Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy.” J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 33 (5): 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124.
Braungart, M. 2020. “C2C design concept.” Prof. Dr. Michael Braungart. Accessed October 8, 2021. http://braungart.epea-hamburg.org/en/content/c2c-design-concept.
Buyle, M., W. Galle, W. Debacker, and A. Audenaert. 2019. “Sustainability assessment of circular building alternatives: Consequential LCA and LCC for internal wall assemblies as a case study in a Belgian context.” J. Cleaner Prod. 218: 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.306.
CarbonCure. 2021a. “Specification considerations for engineers.” CarbonCure Technologies Inc. Accessed September 28, 2021. https://go.carboncure.com/rs/328-NGP-286/images/CarbonCure_SpecConsiderationsEngineers-2021.pdf.
CarbonCure. 2021b. “An easy way to reduce embodied carbon.” CarbonCure Technologies Inc. Accessed September 27, 2021. https://www.carboncure.com/end-users/.
Cascione, V., M. Roberts, S. Allen, B. Dams, D. Maskell, A. Shea, P. Walker, and S. Emmitt. 2022. “Integration of life cycle assessments (LCA) in circular bio-based wall panel design.” J. Cleaner Prod. 344: 130938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130938.
Cellura, M., F. Guarino, S. Longo, and M. Mistretta. 2014. “Energy life-cycle approach in Net zero energy buildings balance: Operation and embodied energy of an Italian case study.” Energy Build. 72: 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.12.046.
Circle Economy. 2019. The circularity gap report 2019. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Circle Economy.
Circle Economy. 2021a. The circularity gap report 2021. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Circle Economy.
Circle Economy. 2021b. “The key elements of the circular economy.” Accessed October 15, 2021. https://www.circle-economy.com/circular-economy/key-elements.
Circular Designs. 2020. “Circular economy.” Accessed January 9, 2022. https://circular-designs.org/2020/09/16/circular-economy/.
CLF (Carbon Leadership Forum). 2020. Embodied carbon 101. Seattle, WA: CLF.
Copeland, S., and M. Bilec. 2020. “Buildings as material banks using RFID and building information modeling in a circular economy.” Procedia CIRP 90: 143–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.122.
Croes, P. R., and W. J. V. Vermeulen. 2021. “The assessment of positive impacts in LCA of products.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 26 (1): 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01820-x.
Cruz Rios, F., and D. Grau. 2020. “Circular economy in the built environment: Designing, deconstructing, and leasing reusable products.” In Encyclopedia of renewable and sustainable materials, edited by I. Choudhury, and S. Hashmi, 338–343. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Cruz Rios, F., D. Grau, and W. K. Chong. 2019. “Reusing exterior wall framing systems: A cradle-to-cradle comparative life cycle assessment.” Waste Manage. (Oxford) 94: 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.040.
Deng, R., N. L. Chang, Z. Ouyang, and C. M. Chong. 2019. “A techno-economic review of silicon photovoltaic module recycling.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 109: 532–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.020.
Deng, R., N. Chang, M. M. Lunardi, P. Dias, J. Bilbao, J. Ji, and C. M. Chong. 2021. “Remanufacturing end-of-life silicon photovoltaics: Feasibility and viability analysis.” Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 29 (7): 760–774. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3376.
Densley Tingley, D., and J. Allwood. 2014. Reuse of structural steel: The opportunities and challenges. Middlesbrough, UK: Teeside Univ.
Densley Tingley, D., J. Giesekam, and S. Cooper-Searle. 2018. “Applying circular economic principles to reduce embodied carbon.” In Embodied carbon in buildings, edited by F. Pomponi, C. De Wolf, and A. Moncaster, 265–285. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
De Wolf, C., E. Hoxha, and C. Fivet. 2020. “Comparison of environmental assessment methods when reusing building components: A case study.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 61: 102322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102322.
De Wolf, C., F. Pomponi, and A. Moncaster. 2017. “Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice.” Energy Build. 140: 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.075.
DOE. 2021. “Alternative fuels data center: Emissions from hybrid and plug-in electric vehicles.” Accessed October 7, 2021. https://afdc.energy.gov/vehicles/electric_emissions.html.
Durmisevic, E. 2019. Circular economy in construction: Design strategies for reversible buildings. https://www.bamb2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Reversible-Building-Design-Strateges.pdf.
Eberhardt, L. C. M., H. Birgisdóttir, and M. Birkved. 2019. “Life cycle assessment of a Danish office building designed for disassembly.” Build. Res. Inf. 47 (6): 666–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2018.1517458.
ecoinvent. 2020. “Ecoinvent 3.” ecoinvent - the world’s most consistent & transparent life cycle inventory database. Accessed September 8, 2020. https://www.ecoinvent.org/.
EMF (Ellen MacArthur Foundation). 2015. Towards a circular economy: Business rationale for an accelerated transition. Cowes, UK: EMF.
EMF (Ellen MacArthur Foundation). 2019. Completing the picture: How the circular economy tackles climate change. Cowes, UK: EMF.
EPA. 2020. Advancing sustainable materials management (2018 fact sheet): Assessing trends in materials generation and management in the United States. Washington, DC: EPA.
EPA. 2021. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2019. Washington, DC: EPA.
Flooring Inc. 2022. “Linoleum vs. Vinyl flooring: Which is better?” Accessed February 3, 2022. https://www.flooringinc.com/buyers-guide/linoleum-vs-vinyl-flooring.html.
Font Vivanco, D., and E. van der Voet. 2014. “The rebound effect through industrial ecology’s eyes: A review of LCA-based studies.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 19 (12): 1933–1947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0802-6.
Francart, N., and T. Malmqvist. 2020. “Investigation of maintenance and replacement of materials in building LCA.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 588: 032027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/3/032027.
Gardner, H. M., V. Hasik, A. Banawi, M. Olinzock, and M. M. Bilec. 2020. “Whole building life cycle assessment of a living building.” J. Archit. Eng. 26 (4): 04020039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000436.
Geisendorf, S., and F. Pietrulla. 2018. “The circular economy and circular economic concepts-a literature analysis and redefinition.” Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 60 (5): 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21924.
Ghisellini, P., C. Cialani, and S. Ulgiati. 2016. “A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems.” J. Cleaner Prod. 114: 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007.
Gorree, M., J. B. Guinée, G. Huppes, and L. van Oers. 2000. Environmental life cycle assessment of linoleum. Leiden, Netherlands: Centre of Environmental Science – Leiden University (CML-UL).
Grant, C., J. Garcia, and A. Hicks. 2020. “Environmental payback periods of multi-crystalline silicon photovoltaics in the United States – How prioritizing based on environmental impact compares to solar intensity.” Sustainable Energy Technol. Assess. 39: 100723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100723.
Hart, J., K. Adams, J. Giesekam, D. D. Tingley, and F. Pomponi. 2019. “Barriers and drivers in a circular economy: The case of the built environment.” Procedia CIRP 80: 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.12.015.
Hasik, V., N. E. Anderson, W. O. Collinge, C. L. Thiel, V. Khanna, J. Wirick, R. Piacentini, A. E. Landis, and M. M. Bilec. 2017. “Evaluating the life cycle environmental benefits and trade-offs of water reuse systems for net-zero buildings.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 51 (3): 1110–1119. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03879.
Hossain, M. U., and S. T. Ng. 2018. “Critical consideration of buildings” environmental impact assessment towards adoption of circular economy: An analytical review.” J. Cleaner Prod. 205: 763–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.120.
Howden. 2020. “Concrete vs Cement: What’s the difference?” Accessed September 28, 2021. https://www.howden.com/en-us/articles/cement/how-is-cement-made.
IEA-EBC (International Energy Agency-Energy in Buildings and Community). 2016. “Annex 57 || Evaluation of embodied energy and CO2 Equivalent emissions for building construction.” Accessed October 18, 2021. https://www.iea-ebc.org/projects/project?AnnexID=57.
ILFI (International Living Future Institute). 2018. “Frick environmental center.” Accessed July 13, 2021. https://living-future.org/lbc/case-studies/frick-environmental-center/.
ILFI (International Living Future Institute). 2019. Living building challenge 4.0: A visionary path to a regenerative future. Seattle, WA: ILFI.
ILFI (International Living Future Institute). 2021a. “Living building challenge.” International Living Future Institute. Accessed October 14, 2021. https://living-future.org/lbc/.
ILFI (International Living Future Institute). 2021b. “Living building challenge basics.” International Living Future Institute. Accessed October 15, 2021. https://living-future.org/lbc/basics4-0/.
Islam, M. Z., M. E. Sarker, M. M. Rahman, M. R. Islam, A. T. M. F. Ahmed, M. S. Mahmud, and M. Syduzzaman. 2022. “Green composites from natural fibers and biopolymers: A review on processing, properties, and applications.” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 41 (13-14): 526–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844211058708.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2006a. “Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework.” ISO 14040:2006. Accessed September 23, 2018. https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2006b. “Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines.” ISO 14044:2006. Accessed September 23, 2018. https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html.
Joensuu, T., H. Edelman, and A. Saari. 2020. “Circular economy practices in the built environment.” J. Cleaner Prod. 276: 124215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124215.
Kalmykova, Y., M. Sadagopan, and L. Rosado. 2018. “Circular economy–From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 135: 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034.
Karche, T., and M. R. Singh. 2019. “The application of hemp (cannabissativa L.) for a green economy: A review.” Turk. J. Bot. 43: 710–723. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1907-15.
Kayaçetin, N. C., and A. M. Tanyer. 2020. “Embodied carbon assessment of residential housing at urban scale.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 117: 109470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109470.
Kirchherr, J., D. Reike, and M. Hekkert. 2017. “Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 127: 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005.
Knoeri, C., E. Sanyé-Mengual, and H.-J. Althaus. 2013. “Comparative LCA of recycled and conventional concrete for structural applications.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 18 (5): 909–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0544-2.
Kocs, E. A. 2017. “The Global Carbon Nation: Status of CO2 Capture, Storage and Utilization.” In Vol. 148 of “EPJ web conf.”, edited by D. Cahen, L. Cifarelli, D. Ginley, A. Slaoui, A. Terrasi, and F. Wagner. Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences.
Korhonen, J., C. Nuur, A. Feldmann, and S. E. Birkie. 2018. “Circular economy as an essentially contested concept.” J. Cleaner Prod. 175: 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111.
Korjenic, A., V. Petránek, J. Zach, and J. Hroudová. 2011. “Development and performance evaluation of natural thermal-insulation materials composed of renewable resources.” Energy Build. 43 (9): 2518–2523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.06.012.
Lee, J.-K., J.-S. Lee, Y.-S. Ahn, G.-H. Kang, H.-E. Song, M.-G. Kang, Y.-H. Kim, and C.-H. Cho. 2018. “Simple pretreatment processes for successful reclamation and remanufacturing of crystalline silicon solar cells.” Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 26 (3): 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2963.
Luscuere, L., and D. Mulhall. 2018. “Circularity information management for buildings.” In Designing for the circular economy, edited by M. Charter, 369–380. New York: Routledge.
Mahmoudi, S., N. Huda, and M. Behnia. 2021. “Critical assessment of renewable energy waste generation in OECD countries: Decommissioned PV panels.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 164: 105145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105145.
Malabi Eberhardt, L. C., A. van Stijn, F. Nygaard Rasmussen, M. Birkved, and H. Birgisdottir. 2020. “Development of a life cycle assessment allocation approach for circular economy in the built environment.” Sustainability 12 (22): 9579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229579.
Malmqvist, T., M. Nehasilova, A. Moncaster, H. Birgisdottir, F. Nygaard Rasmussen, A. Houlihan Wiberg, and J. Potting. 2018. “Design and construction strategies for reducing embodied impacts from buildings–Case study analysis.” Energy Build. 166: 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.033.
Manjunatha, M., S. Preethi, H. G. Mounika, and K. N. Niveditha. 2021. “Life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete prepared with sustainable cement-based materials.” Mater. Today:. Proc. 47: 3637–3644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.248.
Material Economics. 2018. The circular economy: A powerful force for climate mitigation. Stockholm, Sweden: Material Economics.
Mattison, B., S. Rezaiezadeh, K. Godfrey, and R. Nazari. 2013. An investigation into alternatives to PVC flooring in UBC Food Service areas. Vancouver, Canada: Univ. of British Columbia.
McDonough, W., and M. Braungart. 2009. Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. London: Vintage Books.
Michelini, G., R. N. Moraes, R. N. Cunha, J. M. H. Costa, and A. R. Ometto. 2017. “From linear to circular economy: PSS conducting the transition.” Procedia CIRP 64: 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.012.
Minne, E., and J. C. Crittenden. 2015. “Impact of maintenance on life cycle impact and cost assessment for residential flooring options.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 20 (1): 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0809-z.
Minunno, R., T. O’Grady, G. M. Morrison, and R. L. Gruner. 2020. “Exploring environmental benefits of reuse and recycle practices: A circular economy case study of a modular building.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 160: 104855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104855.
Mollaei, A., N. Ibrahim, and K. Habib. 2021. “Estimating the construction material stocks in two Canadian cities: A case study of Kitchener and Waterloo.” J. Cleaner Prod. 280: 124501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124501.
Morseletto, P. 2020. “Restorative and regenerative: Exploring the concepts in the circular economy.” J. Ind. Ecol. 24 (4): 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12987.
Munaro, M. R., S. F. Tavares, and L. Bragança. 2020. “Towards circular and more sustainable buildings: A systematic literature review on the circular economy in the built environment.” J. Cleaner Prod. 260: 121134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121134.
Nehasilova, M., J. Potting, and E. Soulti. 2016. Evaluation of Embodied Energy and CO2eq for Building Construction (Annex 57) Subtask 4: Case studies and recommendations for the reduction of embodied energy and embodied greenhouse gas emissions from buildings. Tokyo: Institute for Building Environment and Energy Conservation.
Niero, M., A. J. Negrelli, S. B. Hoffmeyer, S. I. Olsen, and M. Birkved. 2016. “Closing the loop for aluminum cans: Life Cycle Assessment of progression in Cradle-to-Cradle certification levels.” J. Cleaner Prod. 126: 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.122.
Norouzi, M., M. Chàfer, L. F. Cabeza, L. Jiménez, and D. Boer. 2021. “Circular economy in the building and construction sector: A scientific evolution analysis.” J. Build. Eng. 44: 102704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102704.
NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory). 2020. “U.S. life cycle inventory database.” U.S. Life Cycle Inventory (USLCI) Database. Accessed September 8, 2020. https://www.nrel.gov/lci/.
Pan, W., and Y. Teng. 2021. “A systematic investigation into the methodological variables of embodied carbon assessment of buildings.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 141: 110840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110840.
Pittsburgh Parks. 2020. “Frick environmental center | Pittsburgh parks conservancy.” Accessed September 29, 2021. https://pittsburghparks.org/frick-environmental-center/.
Pomponi, F., and A. Moncaster. 2016. “Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment–What does the evidence say?” J. Environ. Manage. 181: 687–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.036.
Pomponi, F., and A. Moncaster. 2017. “Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework.” J. Cleaner Prod. 143: 710–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055.
PRé Sustainability. 2020. “SimaPro LCA software.” Sustainability software for fact-based decisions. Accessed September 8, 2020. https://pre-sustainability.com/solutions/tools/simapro/.
Rios, F. C., W. K. Chong, and D. Grau. 2015. “Design for disassembly and deconstruction - challenges and opportunities.” Procedia Eng. 118: 1296–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.485.
Röck, M., M. R. M. Saade, M. Balouktsi, F. N. Rasmussen, H. Birgisdottir, R. Frischknecht, G. Habert, T. Lützkendorf, and A. Passer. 2020. “Embodied GHG emissions of buildings – The hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation.” Appl. Energy 258: 114107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114107.
Saidani, M., B. Yannou, Y. Leroy, F. Cluzel, and A. Kendall. 2019. “A taxonomy of circular economy indicators.” J. Cleaner Prod. 207: 542–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.014.
Sassoni, E., S. Manzi, A. Motori, M. Montecchi, and M. Canti. 2014. “Novel sustainable hemp-based composites for application in the building industry: Physical, thermal and mechanical characterization.” Energy Build. 77: 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.03.033.
Schroeder, P., K. Anggraeni, and U. Weber. 2019. “The relevance of circular economy practices to the sustainable development goals.” J. Ind. Ecol. 23 (1): 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12732.
Seo, S., et al. 2016. Evaluation of embodied energy and CO2eq for building construction (annex 57). Japan: Institute for Building Environment and Energy Conservation.
Stahel, W. R. 2019. The circular economy: A user’s guide. New York: Routledge.
Stijn, A. V., L. C. M. Eberhardt, B. Wouterszoon Jansen, and A. Meijer. 2020. “Design guidelines for circular building components based on LCA and MFA: The case of the Circular Kitchen.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 588 (4): 042045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/4/042045.
Swift, J., D. Ness, N. Chileshe, K. Xing, and J. Gelder. 2015. “Enabling the reuse of building components: A dialogue between the virtual and physical worlds.” In Proc., of the Unmaking Waste Conf. Adelaide, SA: University of South Australia.
UL. 2016. Environmental product declaration - mesa ceiling panels. Mumbai, India: Armstrong Ceiling Solutions.
UL. 2020. “Embodied vs Operational carbon.” Accessed January 9, 2022. https://spot.ul.com/blog/embodied-vs-operational-carbon/.
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2020. 2020 global status report for buildings and construction: Towards a zero-emission, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP.
USGBC (US Green Building Council). 2017. “Frick park environmental center.” US Green Building Council. Accessed September 29, 2021. https://www.usgbc.org/projects/frick-park-environmental-center?view=scorecard.
USGBC (US Green Building Council). 2018. “Benefits of green building.” US Green Building Council. Accessed January 10, 2022. https://www.usgbc.org/articles/benefits-green-building.
USGBC (US Green Building Council). 2019a. “How LEED v4.1 addresses embodied carbon.” US Green Building Council. Accessed October 15, 2021. https://www.usgbc.org/articles/how-leed-v41-addresses-embodied-carbon.
USGBC (US Green Building Council). 2019b. “How LEED v4.1 addresses the circular economy.” US Green Building Council. Accessed October 15, 2021. https://www.usgbc.org/articles/how-leed-v41-addresses-circular-economy.
USGBC (US Green Building Council). 2021. “LEED rating system.” US Green Building Council. Accessed October 8, 2021. https://www.usgbc.org/leed.
van Stijn, A., L. C. Malabi Eberhardt, B. Wouterszoon Jansen, and A. Meijer. 2021. “A Circular Economy Life Cycle Assessment (CE-LCA) model for building components.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 174: 105683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105683.
Ventura, A., V.-L. Ta, T. S. Kiessé, and S. Bonnet. 2021. “Design of concrete: Setting a new basis for improving both durability and environmental performance.” J. Ind. Ecol. 25 (1): 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13059.
Waldman, B., M. Huang, and K. Simonen. 2020. “Embodied carbon in construction materials: A framework for quantifying data quality in EPDs.” Build. Cities 1 (1): 625–636. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.31.
WNC Roofing. 2020. “How long does a commercial roof last?” Accessed September 29, 2021. https://wncroofing.com/how-long-does-a-commercial-roof-last-2/.
WorldGBC (World Green Building Council). 2019. Bringing embodied carbon upfront: Coordinated action for the building and construction sector to tackle embodied carbon. London: WorldGBC.
Zampori, L., G. Dotelli, and V. Vernelli. 2013. “Life cycle assessment of hemp cultivation and use of hemp-based thermal insulator materials in buildings.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (13): 7413–7420. https://doi.org/10.1021/es401326a.
Zimmermann, R. K., K. Kanafani, F. N. Rasmussen, C. Andersen, and H. Birgisdóttir. 2020. “LCA-framework to evaluate circular economy strategies in existing buildings.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 588: 042044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/4/042044.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 29Issue 3September 2023

History

Received: Feb 8, 2022
Accepted: Jan 10, 2023
Published online: May 3, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Oct 3, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation, Swanson School of Engineering, Univ. of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4724-8594. Email: [email protected]
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation, Swanson School of Engineering, Univ. of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5513-5696. Email: [email protected]
Federica Geremicca [email protected]
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation, Swanson School of Engineering, Univ. of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261. Email: [email protected]
William Kepler Whiteford Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering and Co-director of the Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation, Swanson School of Engineering, Univ. of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6101-6263. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share