Research on Dynamic Characteristics Analysis and Control Law Design Method of Model Aircraft in Wind Tunnel–Based Virtual Flight Testing
Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 36, Issue 3
Abstract
In the three-degree-of-freedom virtual flight test, the scaled model has no translational motion, which will result in the model’s dynamics being different from that of free flight, and this difference will directly affect its effectiveness in simulating free flight and the design of the flight control law. In this paper, the longitudinal and lateral-directional dynamic characteristics of virtual flight are studied from the three aspects of modal characteristics, disturbance response characteristics, and control response characteristics. The dynamic characteristic difference between the virtual flight test and free flight is analyzed. In addition, the scaling ratio of the model will also lead to differences in the flight control law design methods of virtual flight and full-size aircraft. The control law design method of the virtual flight test is established by studying the similarity relation of control law parameters between full-size aircraft and the scaled model, and the correctness of similar design of closed-loop control law parameters of the scaled model is verified by a virtual flight test. Finally, the attitude control law parameters obtained from the virtual flight test are applied to the six-degree-of-freedom flight simulation of a full-size aircraft, and the simulation results show that the three-axis attitude control law designed based on the virtual flight test also has good performance in the six-degree-of-freedom flight of the full-size aircraft, and the response of attitude angle and angular rate are approximately the same for both.
Practical Applications
Generally, the steady aerodynamic data of the aircraft are obtained through the traditional static wind tunnel test to construct the aerodynamic model of the aircraft. The aerodynamic model established by this method may not be able to accurately simulate the actual dynamic flight. However, the actual test flight of full-size aircraft has many disadvantages, such as high cost and high risk. To simulate real flight on the ground, the method of placing the scaled model in a wind tunnel for dynamic flight is proposed, which is called wind tunnel–based virtual flight testing (WTBVFT). The scaled model is connected with the strut through a three-degree-of-freedom rotation mechanism and installed in the wind tunnel test section, so that the model has three degrees of freedom of angular motion and no translational motion. This paper analyzes the differences in dynamics between virtual flight and free flight under open-loop and closed-loop control. The results show that the virtual flight test can simulate the angular motion of free flight well and can be used to design, verify, and simulate the attitude control law of full-size aircraft well.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Carnduff, S., S. Erbsloeh, A. Cooke, and M. Cook. 2008. “Development of a low cost dynamic wind tunnel facility utilizing MEMS inertial sensors.” In Proc., 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 196. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2008-196.
Carnduff, S. D., S. D. Erbsloeh, A. K. Cooke, and M. V. Cook. 2009. “Characterizing stability and control of subscale aircraft from wind-tunnel dynamic motion.” J. Aircr. 46 (1): 137–147. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.36730.
Cook, M. V. 2012. Flight dynamics principles: A linear systems approach to aircraft stability and control. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2010-0-65889-5.
Etkin, B., and L. D. Reid. 1959. Dynamics of flight. New York: Wiley.
Fu, J., Z. Shi, Z. Gong, M. H. Lowenberg, D. Wu, and L. Pan. 2021. “Virtual flight test techniques to predict a blended-wing-body aircraft in-flight departure characteristics.” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 35 (1): 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2021.01.006.
Gal-Or, B. 1994. “Fundamentals and similarity transformations of vectored aircraft.” J. Aircr. 31 (1): 181–187. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46472.
Gatto, A., and M. H. Lowenberg. 2006. “Evaluation of a three degree of freedom test rig for stability derivative estimation.” J. Aircr. 43 (6): 1747–1761. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.19821.
Guo, L., M. Zhu, N. Bowen, K. Peng, and C. Zhong. 2017. “Initial virtual flight test for a dynamically similar aircraft model with control augmentation system.” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 30 (2): 602–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2016.12.034.
He, S., S. Guo, Y. Liu, and W. Luo. 2021. “Passive gust alleviation of a flying-wing aircraft by analysis and wind-tunnel test of a scaled model in dynamic similarity.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 113 (Jun): 106689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106689.
Ignatyev, D. I., K. G. Zaripov, M. E. Sidoryuk, K. A. Kolinko, and A. N. Khrabrov. 2016. “Wind tunnel tests for validation of control algorithms at high angles of attack using autonomous aircraft model mounted in 3DOF gimbals.” In Proc., AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conf. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-3106.
Kumar, R., A. K. Ghosh, and A. Misra. 2013. “Parameter estimation from flight data of hansa-3 aircraft using quasi-steady stall modeling.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 26 (3): 544–554. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000155.
Liu, Z., F. Cen, B. Nie, L. Fan, and H. Sun. 2017. “Similarity criteria and simulation method for flight control system of free-flight test in low speed wind tunnel.” Acta Aerodynamica Sin. 35 (5): 693–699. https://doi.org/10.7638/kqdlxxb-2017.0029.
Lowenberg, M., and H. Kyle. 2002. “Development of a pendulum support rig dynamic wind tunnel apparatus.” In Proc., AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conf. and Exhibit. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-4879.
Lyu, P., S. Bao, J. Lai, S. Liu, and Z. Chen. 2018. “A dynamic model parameter identification method for quadrotors using flight data.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part G: J. Aerosp. Eng. 233 (6): 1990–2002. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410018767754.
Manning, E. I. I. T., C. Ratliff, and E. Marquart. 1995. “Bridging the gap between ground and flight tests—Virtual flight testing (VFT).” In Proc., Aircraft Engineering, Technology, and Operations Congress. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1995-3875.
Navaratna, P. D. B. 2020. Virtual flight testing in a wind tunnel using a manoeuvre rig. Bristol, UK: Univ. of Bristol.
Navaratna, P. D. B., M. H. Lowenberg, and S. A. Neild. 2019. “Minimally constrained flight simulation in wind tunnel.” J. Aircr. 56 (4): 1353–1366. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C035199.
Nelson, R. C. 1998. Flight stability and automatic control. New York: WCB/McGraw-Hill.
Papageorgiou, G., and K. Glover. 2002. “Two-degree-of-freedom control of an actively controlled wind-tunnel model.” J. Guid. Control Dyn. 25 (3): 510–516. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4911.
Pattinson, J., M. H. Lowenberg, and M. G. Goman. 2013. “Investigation of poststall pitch oscillations of an aircraft wind-tunnel model.” J. Aircr. 50 (6): 1843–1855. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C032184.
Pontillo, A., S. Yusuf, G. Lopez, D. Rennie, and M. Lone. 2020. “Investigating pitching moment stall through dynamic wind tunnel test.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part G: J. Aerosp. Eng. 234 (2): 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410019861853.
Roskam, J. 1995. Airplane flight dynamics and automatic flight controls. Lawrence, KS: DARcorporation.
Stengel, R. F. 2015. Flight dynamics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
USAF (United States Air Force). 1980. Military specification-flying qualities of piloted airplane. MIL-F-8785C. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: USAF.
Wang, G., M. Zhang, Y. Tao, J. Li, D. Li, Y. Zhang, C. Yuan, W. Sang, and B. Zhang. 2020. “Research on analytical scaling method and scale effects for subscale flight test of blended wing body civil aircraft.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 106 (Nov): 106114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106114.
Wang, L., X. Zuo, H. Liu, T. Yue, X. Jia, and J. You. 2019. “Flying qualities evaluation criteria design for scaled-model aircraft based on similarity theory.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 90 (Jul): 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.04.032.
Wolowicz, C. H., J. Brown Jr., and W. P. Gilbert. 1979. Similitude requirements and scaling relationships as applied to model testing. Humpton, VA: Langley Research Center.
Wu, Z., L. Wang, J. Lin, and J. Ai. 2014. “Investigation of lateral-directional aerodynamic parameters identification method for fly-by-wire passenger airliners.” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 27 (4): 781–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2014.03.018.
Wu, Z., L. Wang, Z. Xu, and X. Tan. 2013. “Investigation of longitudinal aerodynamic parameters identification method for fly-by-wire passenger airliners.” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 26 (5): 1156–1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2013.09.002.
Yue, T., X. Zuo, L. Wang, J. Geng, and H. Zhang. 2022. “Similarity relations of PID flight control parameters of scaled-model and full-size aircraft.” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 58 (4): 2950–2960. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2022.3143481.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 21, 2022
Accepted: Jan 19, 2023
Published online: Mar 9, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Aug 9, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.