Technical Papers
Apr 19, 2023

Shear Behavior of Silty Clay–Concrete Interface Based on Large-Scale Direct Shear Test

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23, Issue 7

Abstract

This paper presents the results of an experimental study on saturated silty clay–concrete interface shear behavior, and a shear strength prediction model is established for the silty clay–concrete interface. Based on three-dimensional (3D) scanning data of actual concrete pile surfaces, regular and irregular concrete surfaces with different roughnesses are replicated in the laboratory tests. The interface shear strength is found to increase as the roughness coefficient of concrete increases; the shear process of a regular interface shows a strain softening feature, while that for an irregular interface shows strain hardening. The effect of a normal stress increase on the residual strength of a regular interface is more obvious. The modified Grasselli roughness evaluation method is reasonably effective in characterizing both regular and irregular contact surfaces. In the framework of this method, a prediction formula for the estimation of peak strength of a clay–concrete interface is proposed, which performs favorably well in comparison with test results obtained from this and previous studies.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful for financial support given by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51808421), the Science and Technology Project of China Railway Construction Group Co., Ltd. (Grant Nos. LX19-27c, LX20-32c), and the Science and Technology Planning Project of Wuhan Urban Construction Committee (Grant No. 201637).

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
Aθ
effective contact area ratio;
A0
normalized surface area steeper than 0° in the analysis direction;
C
fitting parameter of roughness;
c
cohesion of soil;
cp
peak cohesive force;
cR
residual cohesive force;
fcu
concrete cube strength;
K
fitting coefficient of peak shear strength;
RG
roughness coefficient of Grasselli method;
RMG
roughness coefficient of modified Grasselli method;
Ry
roughness coefficient of sand-pouring method;
w/c
water–cement ratio;
θ
apparent dip angle;
θmax
apparent dip angle in maximum shear direction;
σ
residual cohesive force;
τ
shear strength of soil;
τP
peak shear strength;
τR
residual shear strength;
φ
friction angle of soil;
φp
peak internal frictional angle; and
φR
residual internal frictional angle.

References

Afzali-Nejad, A., A. Lashkari, and B. Farhadi. 2018. “Role of soil inherent anisotropy in peak friction and maximum dilation angles of four sand-geosynthetic interfaces.” Geotext. Geomembr. 46 (6): 869–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.08.003.
ASTM. 2012. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)). ASTM D1557. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for determining the shear strength of soil-geosynthetic and geosynthetic- geosynthetic interfaces by direct shear. ASTM D5321. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Barton, N. R., and V. Choubey. 1977. “The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice.” Rock Mech. 10 (1): 1–54.
Borana, L., J.-H. Yin, D. N. Singh, and S. K. Shukla. 2016. “Interface behavior from suction-controlled direct shear test on completely decomposed granitic soil and steel surfaces.” Int. J. Geomech. 16 (6): D4016008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000658.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 1992. Draft European standard on products and systems for the protection and repair of concrete structures. CEN TC104. CEN/TC104/WG8/TG2. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chen, C., Q. Yang, W. Leng, J. Dong, F. Xu, L. Wei, and B. Ruan. 2022. “Experimental investigation of the mechanical properties of the sand–concrete pile interface considering roughness and relative density.” Materials 15 (13): 4480. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134480.
Chen, S. J., W. C. Zhu, Q. L. Yu, and X. G. Liu. 2016. “Characterization of anisotropy of joint surface roughness and aperture by variogram approach based on digital image processing technique.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 49 (3): 855–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0795-x.
Chen, X., J. Zhang, Y. Xiao, and J. Li. 2015. “Effect of roughness on shear behavior of red clay–concrete interface in large-scale direct shear tests.” Can. Geotech. J. 52 (8): 1122–1135. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0399.
Cheng, H., X. Chen, J. Zhang, J. Li, and B. Zhang. 2017. “Experimental research on residual shear strength of red clay-concrete structure interface.” J. Cent. South Univ. 48 (9): 2458–2464.
Das, S., and D. Chakraborty. 2022. “Effect of soil and rock interface friction on the bearing capacity of strip footing placed on soil overlying hoek-brown rock mass.” Int. J. Geomech. 22 (1): 4021257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002225.
Desai, C. S. 2000. DSC-DYN2D—Computer code for static and coupled consolidation and dynamic analysis: Manual parts I, II, and III. Tucson, AZ: Univ. of Arizona.
Desai, C. S., E. C. Drumm, and M. M. Zaman. 1985. “Cyclic testing and modeling of interfaces.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (6): 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:6(793).
Desai, C. S., S. K. Pradhan, and D. Cohen. 2005. “Cyclic testing and constitutive modeling of saturated sand–concrete interfaces using the disturbed state concept.” Int. J. Geomech. 5 (4): 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:4(286).
Desai, C. S., and D. B. Rigby. 1997. “Cyclic interface and joint shear device including pore pressure effects.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123 (6): 568–579. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:6(568).
Eid, H. T., N. M. Al-Nohmi, D. Wijewickreme, and R. S. Amarasinghe. 2019. “Drained peak and residual interface shear strengths of fine-grained soils for pipeline geotechnics.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (10): 06019010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002131.
Farhadi, B., and A. Lashkari. 2017. “Influence of soil inherent anisotropy on behavior of crushed sand-steel interfaces.” Soils Found. 57 (1): 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2017.01.008.
Feng, D., J. Zhang, and W. Hou. 2021. “Three-dimensional behaviors of a gravel–steel interface considering initial shear stress.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (2): 04020158. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002435.
Grasselli, G., and P. Egger. 2003. “Constitutive law for the shear strength of rock joints based on three-dimensional surface parameters.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 40 (1): 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00101-6.
Grasselli, G., J. Wirth, and P. Egger. 2002. “Quantitative three-dimensional description of a rough surface and parameter evolution with shearing.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 39 (6): 789–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00070-9.
Han, F., E. Ganju, R. Salgado, and M. Prezzi. 2018. “Effects of interface roughness, particle geometry, and gradation on the sand–steel interface friction angle.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (12): 04018096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001990.
Horvath, R. G., T. C. Kenney, and P. Kozicki. 1985. “Methods of improving the performance of drilled piers in weak rock: Reply.” Can. Geotech. J. 22 (1): 147–148. https://doi.org/10.1139/t85-019.
Hossain, A., and J.-H. Yin. 2014. “Behavior of a pressure-grouted soil-cement interface in direct shear tests.” Int. J. Geomech. 14 (1): 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000301.
Hu, L., and J. Pu. 2004. “Testing and modeling of soil-structure interface.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (8): 851–860. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(851).
Kou, H.-l., W.-z. Diao, W.-c. Zhang, J.-b. Zheng, P. Ni, B.-A. Jang, and C. Wu. 2021. “Experimental study of interface shearing between calcareous sand and steel plate considering surface roughness and particle size.” Appl. Ocean Res. 107: 102490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2020.102490.
Lemos, L. J. L., and P. R. Vaughan. 2000. “Clay-interface shear resistance.” Géotechnique 50 (1): 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2000.50.1.55.
Liu, H., E. Song, and H. I. Ling. 2006. “Constitutive modeling of soil-structure interface through the concept of critical state soil mechanics.” Mech. Res. Commun. 33 (4): 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2006.01.002.
Liu, H. B., Y. Li, X. P. Liu, X. T. Wang, S. L. Zhang, Y. Han, and Z. Q. Jiang. 2022. “Shear performance of interface between polyvinyl alcohol fiber engineered cementations composite (PVA-ECC) and concrete: Analysis and parametric study.” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2158 (1): 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2158/1/012044.
Liu, J., P. Lv, Y. Cui, and J. Liu. 2014. “Experimental study on direct shear behavior of frozen soil–concrete interface.” Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 104–105: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.04.007.
Maghsoodi, S., O. Cuisinier, and F. Masrouri. 2020. “Effect of temperature on the cyclic behavior of clay–structure interface.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (10): 04020103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002360.
Martinez, A., S. Palumbo, and B. D. Todd. 2019. “Bioinspiration for anisotropic load transfer at soil-structure interfaces.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (10): 04019074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002138.
Potyondy, J. G. 1961. “Skin friction between various soils and construction materials.” Géotechnique 11 (4): 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1961.11.4.339.
Rehman, Z., F. Luo, T. Wang, and G. Zhang. 2020. “Large-scale test study on the three-dimensional behavior of the gravel–concrete interface of a CFR dam.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (6): 04020046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001701.
Saberi, M., C.-D. Anan, J.-M. Konrad, and A. Lashkari. 2016. “A critical state two-surface plasticity model for gravelly soil-structure interfaces under monotonic and cyclic loading.” Comput. Geotech. 80: 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.06.011.
Shakir, R. R., and J.-g. Zhu. 2010. “An examination of the mechanical interaction of drilling slurries at the soil-concrete contact.” J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. A 11 (4): 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A0900456.
Skempton, A. W. 1985. “Residual strength of clays in landslides, folded strata and the laboratory.” Géotechnique 35 (1): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.1.3.
Taha, A., and M. Fall. 2014. “Shear behavior of sensitive marine clay–steel interfaces.” Acta Geotech. 9 (6): 969–980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-014-0321-4.
Tang, H., Y. Ge, L. Wang, Y. Yuan, L. Huang, and M. Sun. 2012. “Study on estimation method of rock mass discontinuity shear strength based on three-dimensional laser scanning and image technique.” [In Chinese.] J. Earth Sci. 23 (6): 908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-012-0301-2.
Tatone, B. S. A., and G. Grasselli. 2009. “A method to evaluate the three-dimensional roughness of fracture surfaces in brittle geomaterials.” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80 (12): 181–106.
Toufigh, V., S. Shirkhorshidi, and M. Hosseinali. 2017. “Experimental investigation and constitutive modeling of polymer concrete and sand interface.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (1): 04016043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000695.
Tsubakihara, Y., and H. Kishida. 1993. “Frictional behaviour between normally consolidated clay and steel by two direct shear type apparatuses.” Soils Found. 33 (2): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.33.2_1.
Uesugi, M., and H. Kishida. 1986. “Influential factors of friction between steel and dry sands.” Soils Found. 26 (2): 33–46. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.26.2_33.
Wang, N., J. Zhang, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, Y. Ma, L. Zhao, and Q. Guo. 2020a. “Experimental study on mechanical properties of grout–soil interface in anchor system of rammed earthen sites.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (6): 04020064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001706.
Wang, Y., X. Liu, M. Zhang, and X. Bai. 2020b. “Effect of roughness on shear characteristics of the interface between silty clay and concrete.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020 (2): 1–9.
Wang, Y. B., C. Zhao, and Y. Wu. 2020c. “Study on the effects of grouting and roughness on the shear behavior of cohesive soil-concrete interfaces.” Materials (Basel) 13 (14): 3043. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13143043.
Xiao, S., M. T. Suleiman, R. Elzeiny, C. Naito, S. Neti, and M. AI-Khawaja. 2018. “Effect of temperature and radial displacement cycles on soil-concrete interface properties using modified thermal borehole shear test.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (7): 04018036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001892.
Yang, W., Y. Wang, L. Wang, and J. Guo. 2020. “Time-dependent behaviour of clay-concrete interfaces with different contact surface roughnesses under shear loading.” Mech. Time-Depend. Mater. 25 (1479): 539–564.
Yavari, N., A. M. Tang, J.-M. Pereira, and G. Hassen. 2016. “Effect of temperature on the shear strength of soils and the soil–structure interface.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (7): 1186–1194. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0355.
Zhang, W.-c., H. Jing, and H.-l. Kou. 2020. “Effects of relative roughness and particle size on the interface behavior of concrete suction caisson foundation for offshore wind turbines.” Energies 13 (22): 5866. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225866.
Zhao, Z. F., and G. F. Zhao. 1999. “Experimental research on treating interface of young on old concrete with high pressure water jet method.” [In Chinese.] J. Dalian Univ. Technol. 39 (4): 558–561.
Zhou, H., X. He, and M. Kwasniewski. 2000. “Fractal dimension of rough surface estimated by the cubic covering method.” Tribology 20 (6): 455–459.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23Issue 7July 2023

History

Received: Aug 10, 2022
Accepted: Dec 16, 2022
Published online: Apr 19, 2023
Published in print: Jul 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Sep 19, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Junchao Yang [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan Univ. of Technology, Wuhan 430070, P. R. China. Email: [email protected]
Yuanyou Xia [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan Univ. of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Student, School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Yunnan Univ., Kunming 650500, P. R. China. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan Univ. of Technology, Wuhan 430070, P. R. China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei Univ. of Technology, Wuhan 430068, P. R. China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share