Technical Papers
Aug 8, 2023

Bearing Behavior of a Monopod Bucket Foundation Supporting an Offshore Wind Turbine in Sandy Soils

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23, Issue 10

Abstract

A monopod bucket foundation supporting an offshore wind turbine structure is subjected to lateral loading on account of combined wind and wave action, in addition to vertical loading from the self-weight of the turbine structure. In this numerical study, the bearing behavior of the bucket foundation in medium dense and very dense sands is investigated for varying bucket geometries, superstructure loads, and lateral loading cases. The nonlinear stress–strain response of the sandy soil is incorporated. The results of the modeling are described and evaluated in terms of the variations of displacement and rotation responses, ultimate and allowable lateral load capacities, depths of rotation center, surrounding soil deformation, and failure mechanisms. Interaction diagrams between lateral load capacity and resisting moment capacity for various limit states are presented, and their differences are brought out. As the design is dominated by requirements resulting from serviceability limit state, predictive expressions are proposed for the depth of rotation center, initial stiffness, and allowable lateral load capacity to serve as preliminary design guidelines for a monopod bucket foundation in sandy soils. The expressions are suitable for interpolation within the range of realistic parameters considered in the study.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request:
Subroutine code
Abaqus simulation files
All the data obtained from numerical simulations relevant to this study.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which have helped in improving the manuscript.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
1P
frequency at which rotor blades of wind turbine spin;
2P/3P
frequency due to the shadowing effect of two-bladed/three-bladed wind turbine;
c
cohesion of soil;
D
bucket diameter;
Ei
initial elastic modulus of soil;
ESoil
modulus of elasticity of soil;
ESoil,Ref
soil’s reference Young’s modulus of elasticity;
FLS
fatigue limit state;
H
lateral load capacity;
HAllowable
allowable lateral load capacity;
HUltimate
lateral capacity at ultimate condition or failure;
h
loading height;
Kini
initial stiffness of wind turbine foundation system;
Kp
Rankine’s passive earth pressure coefficient;
L
skirt length;
L/D
aspect ratio;
M
resisting moment capacity;
MAllowable
allowable resisting moment capacity;
MDS
medium dense sand;
MUltimate
resisting moment capacity;
SLS
serviceability limit state;
u
displacement at lid level;
ULS
ultimate limit state;
V
superstructure load;
VDS
very dense sand;
z
depth of rotation center;
γ′
effective unit weight of soil;
δ
dilation angle of soil;
ɛ
axial strain;
Θ
lid rotation at failure;
κ, λ
empirical parameters;
σ1
major principal stress;
σ3
confining pressure;
σat
atmospheric pressure;
σm
mean principal stress; and
ϕ
internal friction angle of soil.

References

Abaqus. 2010. Dassault systemes simulia corp. Providence, RI: Abaqus.
Abdel-Rahman, K., and M. Achmus. 2006. “Numerical investigations on the bearing capacity of bucket foundations under combined horizontal and moment loading.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Ultimate Limit State of Geotechnical Structures. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Geotechnical Society.
Achmus, M., C. T. Akdag, and K. Thieken. 2013. “Load-bearing behavior of suction bucket foundations in sand.” Appl. Ocean Res. 43 (1): 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2013.09.001.
Ahmed, S. S., and B. Hawlader. 2016. “Numerical analysis of large-diameter monopiles in dense sand supporting offshore wind turbines.” Int. J. Geomech. 16 (5): 04016018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000633.
Bagheri, P., S. W. Son, and J. M. Kim. 2017. “Investigation of the load-bearing capacity of suction caissons used for offshore wind turbines.” Appl. Ocean Res. 67 (1): 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2017.07.002.
Basack, S., G. Goswami, Z.-H. Dai, and P. Baruah. 2022. “Failure-mechanism and design techniques of offshore wind turbine pile foundation: Review and research directions.” Sustainability 14 (19): 12666. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912666.
Basack, S., and S. Nimbalkar. 2017. “Numerical solution of single pile subjected to torsional cyclic load.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (8): 04017016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000905.
Bhattacharya, S. 2014. “Challenges in design of foundations for offshore wind turbines.” In Engineering and Technology Reference. London, UK: The Institution of Engineering and Technology.
Bransby, F., and M. F. Randolph. 1999. “The effect of embedment depth on the undrained response of skirted foundations to combined loading.” Soils Found. 39 (4): 19–33. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.39.4_19.
Byrne, B. W., and G. T. Houlsby. 1999. “Drained behaviour of suction caisson foundations on very dense sand.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. London, UK: Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).
Byrne, B. W., and G. T. Houlsby. 2004. “Experimental investigations of the response of suction caissons to transient combined loading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (3): 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:3(240).
Byrne, B. W., F. Villalobos, G. T. Houlsby, and C. Martin. 2001. “Laboratory testing of shallow skirted foundations in sand.” In Proc., BGA Int. Conf., on Foundations: Innovations, Observations, Design and Practice, 161–173. Cambridge, UK: Thomas Telford Publishing.
Cassidy, M. J., M. F. Randolph, and B. W. Byrne. 2006. “A plasticity model describing caisson behaviour in clay.” Appl. Ocean Res. 28 (5): 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2006.08.005.
Cox, J. A., and S. Bhattacharya. 2017. “Serviceability of suction caisson founded offshore structures.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Ground Improv. 170 (3): 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.16.00088.
Deb, T. K., and B. Singh. 2021. “Vertical bearing behavior of monopod caisson foundation in sandy soils.” J. Waterw. Port Coastal Ocean Eng. 147 (4): 04021012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000634.
Doherty, J. P., G. T. Houlsby, and A. J. Deeks. 2005. “Stiffness of flexible caisson foundations embedded in nonhomogeneous elastic soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (12): 1498–1508. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1498).
EAU (Empfehlungen des Arbeitsausschusses für Ufereinfassungen). 2004. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn.
El Wakil, A. Z. 2010. “Horizontal capacity of skirted circular shallow footings on sand.” Alexandria Eng. J. 49 (4): 379–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2010.07.003.
Foglia, A., G. Gottardi, L. Govoni, and L. B. Ibsen. 2015. “Modelling the drained response of bucket foundations for offshore wind turbines under general monotonic and cyclic loading.” Appl. Ocean Res. 52 (1): 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2015.04.005.
Fu, D., C. Gaudin, Y. Tian, M. J. Cassidy, and B. Bienen. 2017. “Uniaxial capacities of skirted circular foundations in clay.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (7): 04017022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001685.
Golightly, C. 2014. “Tilting of monopiles long, heavy and stiff; pushed beyond their limits.” Ground Eng. 47 (1): 20–23.
Gourvenec, S., and S. Barnett. 2011. “Undrained failure envelope for skirted foundations under general loading.” Géotechnique 61 (3): 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.T.027.
Gourvenec, S., and M. Randolph. 2002. “Effect of strength non-homogeneity on the bearing capacity of circular skirted foundations subjected to combined loading.” In Proc., 12th Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf., 26–31. Mountain View, CA: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (ISOPE).
GWEC (Global Wind Energy Council). 2017. “Global wind 2016 report.” Accessed on March 21, 2018. www.gwec.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Global-Offshore-2016-and-Beyond.pdf.
Haiderali, A., U. Cilingir, and G. Madabhushi. 2013. “Lateral and axial capacity of monopiles for offshore wind turbines.” Indian Geotech. J. 43 (3): 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-013-0056-4.
Harte, M., B. Basu, and S. R. K. Nielsen. 2012. “Dynamic analysis of wind turbines including soil-structure interaction.” Eng. Struct. 45 (1): 509–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.041.
Houlsby, G. T., L. B. Ibsen, and B. W. Byrne. 2005a. “Suction caissons for wind turbines.” In Proc., Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, 75–93. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Houlsby, G. T., R. Kelly, J. Huxtable, and B. W. Byrne. 2005b. “Field trials of suction caissons in clay for offshore wind turbine foundations.” Géotechnique 55 (4): 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2005.55.4.287.
Hung, L. C., and S.-R. Kim. 2014. “Evaluation of undrained bearing capacities of bucket foundations under combined loads.” Mar. Georesour. Geotechnol. 32 (1): 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2012.735346.
Ibsen, L. B., A. Barari, and K. A. Larsen. 2014. “Adaptive plasticity model for bucket foundations.” J. Eng. Mech. 140 (2): 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000633.
Ibsen, L. B., A. Barari, and K. A. Larsen. 2015. “Effect of embedment on the plastic behavior of bucket foundations.” J. Waterw. Port Coastal Ocean Eng. 141 (6): 06015005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000284.
Ibsen, L. B., S. Liingaard, and S. A. Nielsen. 2005. “Bucket foundation, a status.” In Proc., Copenhagen Offshore Wind. Brussels, Belgium: The European Wind Energy Association.
Jing, Y., Y. Wang, J. Huang, W. Wang, and L. Luo. 2021. “Failure envelopes of composite bucket foundation for offshore wind turbines under combined loading with considering different scour depths.” Shock Vib. 2021 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7922572.
Larsen, K. A., L. B. Ibsen, and A. Barari. 2013. “Modified expression for the failure criterion of bucket foundations subjected to combined loading.” Can. Geotech. J. 50 (12): 1250–1259. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0308.
Li, D., L. Feng, and Y. Zhang. 2014. “Model tests of modified suction caissons in marine sand under monotonic lateral combined loading.” Appl. Ocean Res. 48 (1): 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2014.08.005.
Li, D., Y. Zhang, L. Feng, and Y. Gao. 2015. “Capacity of modified suction caissons in marine sand under static horizontal loading.” Ocean Eng. 102 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.033.
Liu, M., M. Yang, and H. Wang. 2014. “Bearing behavior of wide-shallow bucket foundation for offshore wind turbines in drained silty sand.” Ocean Eng. 82 (1): 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.02.034.
Malhotra, S. 2011. Selection, design and construction of offshore wind turbine foundations. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.
Mehravar, M., O. Harireche, and A. Faramarzi. 2016. “Evaluation of undrained failure envelopes of caisson foundations under combined loading.” Appl. Ocean Res. 59 (1): 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2016.05.001.
Vahdatirad, M., A. T. Diaz, S. Nielsen, L. B. Ibsen, L. V. Andersen, S. Firouzianbandpey, and D. Griffiths. 2016. “A load-displacement based approach to assess the bearing capacity and deformations of mono-bucket foundations.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf., on Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Villalobos, F. A., B. W. Byrne, and G. T. Houlsby. 2009. “An experimental study of the drained capacity of suction caisson foundations under monotonic loading for offshore applications.” Soils Found. 49 (3): 477–488. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.49.477.
Wang, X., X. Yang, and X. Zeng. 2017. “Centrifuge modeling of lateral bearing behavior of offshore wind turbine with suction bucket foundation in sand.” Ocean Eng. 139 (1): 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.04.046.
Yang, X., X. Wang, and X. Zeng. 2017. “Numerical simulation of the lateral loading capacity of a bucket foundation.” In Proc., Geotechnical Frontiers 2017, 112–121. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Zhang, Y.-k., Y.-f. Gao, D.-y. Li, and A. H. Mahfouz. 2016. “H-M bearing capacity of a modified suction caisson determined by using load-/displacement-controlled methods.” China Ocean Eng. 30 (6): 926–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-016-0060-4.
Zhu, B., B. W. Byrne, and G. T. Houlsby. 2013. “Long-term lateral cyclic response of suction caisson foundations in sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (1): 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000738.
Zhu, B., D.-q. Kong, R.-p. Chen, L.-g. Kong, and Y.-m. Chen. 2011. “Installation and lateral loading tests of suction caissons in silt.” Can. Geotech. J. 48 (7): 1070–1084. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-021.
Zhu, B., W.-l. Zhang, P.-p. Ying, and Y.-m. Chen. 2014. “Deflection-based bearing capacity of suction caisson foundations of offshore wind turbines.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140 (5): 04014013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001107.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23Issue 10October 2023

History

Received: Jul 18, 2022
Accepted: Apr 30, 2023
Published online: Aug 8, 2023
Published in print: Oct 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jan 8, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tanmoy Kumar Deb [email protected]
Institute of Engineering and Technology, JK Lakshmipat Univ., Jaipur, Rajasthan 302026, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Baleshwar Singh, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam 781039, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share