Technical Papers
Dec 20, 2023

Impact of Ergodic and Nonergodic Ground Motion Estimation on the Earthquake Resilience of Shared Distributed Energy Resource Systems

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 10, Issue 1

Abstract

Distributed energy resource systems (DERs), such as rooftop solar panels, are gaining traction in the energy sector to improve infrastructure resilience to earthquakes by facilitating electricity sharing in seismic regions (e.g., California). The seismic risk assessment of DERs requires estimating ground motion intensity measures (IMs) using ground motion models (GMMs). In this context, a few existing efforts have used ergodic GMMs, which assume that the distribution of IMs over time (across multiple events) at a single site is the same as that of ground motion IMs over space (across multiple sites). However, with the advent of large ground motion databases, it has become evident that ground motions are influenced by location-specific repeatable effects, motivating a gradual transition into nonergodic approaches that can capture these effects. However, the impact of these approaches (i.e., ergodic and nonergodic) on the seismic risk assessment of DERs has not been assessed. This study considered areas with contrasting spatial extents to assess the impact of nonergodic approaches in the seismic risk assessments of DERs. Specifically, we investigated the risk of power outages in residential communities that have access to DERs and are exposed to a significant seismic hazard. The results indicate significant differences in the estimated risk (as much as 0.2 on a scale of 0–1) between ergodic and nonergodic estimates at locations where large intensity measures and significant repeatable effects are observed. Furthermore, the nonergodic approach is better equipped to capture the spatial variation of risk estimates across a large spatial extent, but more data are required to fully realize the potential of nonergodic approaches in community-scale regions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The Californian ground-motion database, the solar irradiance data, and the code for parameter estimation in the ground motion models are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a generous gift from Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) and complemented by support from the Georgia Institute of Technology (Award DE00000701). We also thank Dr. Norman Abrahamson for the valuable discussions on nonergodic ground motion models.

References

Abrahamson, N. A., N. M. Kuehn, M. Walling, and N. Landwehr. 2019. “Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis in California using nonergodic ground-motion models.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 109 (4): 1235–1249. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120190030.
Abrahamson, N. A., W. J. Silva, and R. Kamai. 2014. “Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (3): 1025–1055. https://doi.org/10.1193/070913EQS198M.
Abrahamson, N. A., and R. Youngs. 1992. “A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 82 (1): 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0820010505.
Adhikari, B., S. R. Mishra, S. B. Marahatta, N. Kaehler, K. Paudel, J. Adhikari, and S. Raut. 2017. “Earthquakes, fuel crisis, power outages, and health care in Nepal: Implications for the future.” Disaster Med. Public Health Preparedness 11 (5): 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2016.195.
Andrieu, C., N. De Freitas, A. Doucet, and M. I. Jordan. 2003. “An introduction to MCMC for machine learning.” Mach. Learn. 50 (1): 5–43. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020281327116.
Boore, D. M., J. P. Stewart, E. Seyhan, and G. M. Atkinson. 2014. “NGA-West2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (3): 1057–1085. https://doi.org/10.1193/070113EQS184M.
Çağnan, Z., R. A. Davidson, and S. D. Guikema. 2006. “Post-earthquake restoration planning for Los Angeles electric power.” Earthquake Spectra 22 (3): 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2222400.
California Energy Commission. 2015. “New residential zero net-energy action plan 2015-2020.” In CA energy efficiency strategic plan. Sacramento, CA: California Energy Commission.
Campbell, K. W., and Y. Bozorgnia. 2014. “NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (3): 1087–1115. https://doi.org/10.1193/062913EQS175M.
Ceferino, L., A. Kiremidjian, and G. Deierlein. 2018a. “Probabilistic model for regional multiseverity casualty estimation due to building damage following an earthquake.” J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 4 (3): 04018023. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000972.
Ceferino, L., A. Kiremidjian, and G. Deierlein. 2018b. “Regional multiseverity casualty estimation due to building damage following a Mw 8.8 earthquake scenario in Lima, Peru.” Earthquake Spectra 34 (4): 1739–1761. https://doi.org/10.1193/080617EQS154M.
Ceferino, L., N. Lin, and D. Xi. 2022. “Stochastic modeling of solar irradiance during hurricanes.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 36 (9): 2681–2693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02154-2.
Ceferino, L., N. Lin, and D. Xi. 2023. “Bayesian updating of solar panel fragility curves and implications of higher panel strength for solar generation resilience.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 229 (Jun): 108896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108896.
Ceferino, L., C. Liu, I. Alisjahbana, S. Patel, T. Sun, A. Kiremidjian, and R. Rajagopal. 2020a. “Earthquake resilience of distributed energy resources.” In Proc., 17th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Ceferino, L., J. Mitrani-Reiser, A. Kiremidjian, G. Deierlein, and C. Bambarén. 2020b. “Effective plans for hospital system response to earthquake emergencies.” Nat. Commun. 11 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18072-w.
Chiou, B. S.-J., and R. R. Youngs. 2014. “Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra.” Earthquake Spectra. 30 (3): 1117–1153. https://doi.org/10.1193/072813EQS219M.
Dawood, H. M., and A. Rodriguez-Marek. 2013. “A method for including path effects in ground-motion prediction equations: An example using the Mw 9.0 Tohoku earthquake aftershocks.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 103 (2): 1360–1372. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120125.
EIA (Energy Information Administration). 2012. Annual energy outlook 2012, with projections to 2035. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Fuglstad, G. A., D. Simpson, F. Lindgren, and H. Rue. 2019. “Constructing priors that penalize the complexity of Gaussian random fields.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 114 (525): 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1415907.
Gelman, A., J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, D. B. Dunson, A. Vehtari, and D. B. Rubin. 2013. Bayesian data analysis. London: CRC Press.
GeoPentech. 2015. Southwestern United States ground motion characterization SSHAC level 3. Santa Ana, CA: GeoPentech.
Glasgo, B., C. Hendrickson, and I. M. Azevedo. 2017. “Using advanced metering infrastructure to characterize residential energy use.” Electr. J. 30 (3): 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2017.03.004.
Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. 2009. The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. Berlin: Springer.
Heresi, P., and E. Miranda. 2021. “Fragility curves and methodology for estimating postearthquake occupancy of wood-frame single-family houses on a regional scale.” J. Struct. Eng. 147 (5): 04021039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002989.
Idriss, I. 2014. “An NGA-West2 empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values generated by shallow crustal earthquakes.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (3): 1155–1177. https://doi.org/10.1193/070613EQS195M.
Jayaram, N., and J. W. Baker. 2009. “Correlation model for spatially distributed ground-motion intensities.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 38 (15): 1687–1708. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.922.
Ji, C., A. Cabas, A. Kottke, M. Pilz, J. Macedo, and C. Liu. 2022. “A DesignSafe earthquake ground motion database for California and surrounding regions.” Earthquake Spectra 39 (1): 702–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930221141108.
Kavousian, A., R. Rajagopal, and M. Fischer. 2013. “Determinants of residential electricity consumption: Using smart meter data to examine the effect of climate, building characteristics, appliance stock, and occupants’ behavior.” Energy 55 (Aug): 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.03.086.
Kuehn, N. M., and N. A. Abrahamson. 2020. “Spatial correlations of ground motion for nonergodic seismic hazard analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 49 (1): 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3221.
Kyozuka, H., et al. 2022. “The effects of the Great East Japan Earthquake on perinatal outcomes: Results of the pregnancy and birth survey in the Fukushima Health Management Survey.” J. Epidemiol. 32 (12): 57–63. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20210444.
Landwehr, N., N. M. Kuehn, T. Scheffer, and N. Abrahamson. 2016. “A nonergodic ground-motion model for California with spatially varying coefficients.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 106 (6): 2574–2583. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120160118.
Lavrentiadis, G., et al. 2021. “Overview and introduction to development of nonergodic earthquake ground-motion models.” Preprint, submitted November 15, 2021. http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.07921.
Lavrentiadis, G., N. A. Abrahamson, and N. M. Kuehn. 2023. “A non-ergodic effective amplitude ground-motion model for California.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 21 (11): 5233–5264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01206-w.
Lin, P.-S., B. Chiou, N. Abrahamson, M. Walling, C.-T. Lee, and C.-T. Cheng. 2011. “Repeatable source, site, and path effects on the standard deviation for empirical ground-motion prediction models.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 101 (5): 2281–2295. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090312.
Liu, C., and J. Macedo. 2022. “Impact of ergodic versus nonergodic seismic hazard estimation on the risk assessment of liquefaction-induced ground damage.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 112 (5): 2562–2579. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120210335.
Liu, C., J. Macedo, and G. Candia. 2021. “Performance-based probabilistic assessment of liquefaction-induced building settlements.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 151 (Jun): 106955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106955.
Liu, C., J. Macedo, and A. Kottke. 2023. “Evaluating the performance of nonergodic ground motion models in the Ridgecrest area.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 21 (11): 5347–5373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01342-x.
Markhvida, M., B. Walsh, S. Hallegatte, and J. Baker. 2020. “Quantification of disaster impacts through household well-being losses.” Nat. Sustainability 3 (7): 538–547. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0508-7.
Marnay, C., H. Aki, K. Hirose, A. Kwasinski, S. Ogura, and T. Shinji. 2015. “Japan’s pivot to resilience: How two microgrids fared after the 2011 earthquake.” IEEE Power Energy Mag. 13 (3): 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPE.2015.2397333.
Massie, A., and N. R. Watson. 2011. “Impact of the Christchurch earthquakes on the electrical power system infrastructure.” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 44 (4): 425–430. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.425-430.
Miller, M., and J. Baker. 2015. “Ground-motion intensity and damage map selection for probabilistic infrastructure network risk assessment using optimization.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (7): 1139–1156. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2506.
Onur, T., C. E. Ventura, and W. L. Finn. 2005. “Regional seismic risk in British Columbia—Damage and loss distribution in Victoria and Vancouver.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 32 (2): 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1139/l04-098.
Padgett, J. E., R. DesRoches, and E. Nilsson. 2010. “Regional seismic risk assessment of bridge network in Charleston, South Carolina.” J. Earthquake Eng. 14 (6): 918–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460903447766.
Parker, G. A., A. S. Baltay, J. Rekoske, and E. M. Thompson. 2020. “Repeatable source, path, and site effects from the 2019 M 7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 110 (4): 1530–1548. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120200008.
Patel, S., L. Ceferino, C. Liu, A. Kiremidjian, and R. Rajagopal. 2021. “The disaster resilience value of shared rooftop solar systems in residential communities.” Earthquake Spectra 37 (4): 2638–2661. https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930211020020.
Rasmussen, C. E. 2003. “Gaussian processes in machine learning.” In Summer school on machine learning, 63–71. Berlin: Springer.
Rue, H., S. Martino, and N. Chopin. 2009. “Approximate Bayesian inference for latent gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations.” J. R. Stat. Soc. B 71 (2): 319–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00700.x.
Sengupta, M., Y. Xie, A. Lopez, A. Habte, G. Maclaurin, and J. Shelby. 2018. “The National Solar Radiation Data Base (NSRDB).” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 89 (Jun): 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.003.
Sung, C. H., N. A. Abrahamson, N. M. Kuehn, P. Traversa, and I. Zentner. 2022. “A nonergodic ground-motion model of fourier amplitude spectra for France.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 21 (11): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01403-1.
Thompson, E., D. J. Wald, and C. Worden. 2014. “A VS30 map for California with geologic and topographic constraints.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 104 (5): 2313–2321. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120130312.
van der Meer, D. W., M. Shepero, A. Svensson, J. Widén, and J. Munkhammar. 2018. “Probabilistic forecasting of electricity consumption, photovoltaic power generation and net demand of an individual building using Gaussian Processes.” Appl. Energy 213 (Apr): 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.104.
Wei, M., S. H. Lee, T. Hong, B. Conlon, L. McKenzie, B. Hendron, and A. German. 2021. “Approaches to cost-effective near-net zero energy new homes with time-of-use value of energy and battery storage.” Adv. Appl. Energy 2 (Aug): 100018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100018.
Wei, S., S. Barbot, R. Graves, J. J. Lienkaemper, T. Wang, K. Hudnut, Y. Fu, and D. Helmberger. 2015. “The 2014 Mw 6.1 South Napa earthquake: A unilateral rupture with shallow asperity and rapid afterslip.” Seismol. Res. Lett. 86 (2): 344–354. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220140249.
Wilcox, S. M. 2012. National solar radiation database 1991-2010 update: User’s manual. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Lab.
Zeng, A., H. Ho, and Y. Yu. 2020. “Prediction of building electricity usage using gaussian process regression.” J. Build. Eng. 28 (8): 101054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101054.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 10Issue 1March 2024

History

Received: Jun 21, 2023
Accepted: Sep 14, 2023
Published online: Dec 20, 2023
Published in print: Mar 1, 2024
Discussion open until: May 20, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, School of Civil and Enviromental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30318. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5183-4265
Frederick Olmsted Early Career Professor, School of Civil and Enviromental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30318 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0457-4824. Email: [email protected]
Geotechnical Earthquake Engineer, Pacific Gas & Electric, Co., 245 Market St., San Francisco, CA 94101. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1861-5682
Luis Ceferino, M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Urban Engineering, New York Univ., New York, NY 10012.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share