Technical Papers
Oct 20, 2023

Causal Inference–Based Study of Key Contributors to Industrial Accidents

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 10, Issue 1

Abstract

This paper aims to study the causal relationships among several prevailing factors and the three main dimensions of the consequences of industrial accidents that involve hazardous materials. Relying on data of the Major Accident Reporting System for the period between 1979 and 2019, regression, matching and inverse probability weighting based techniques are employed to quantify the average treatment effect of many scenarios by using the standardized mean difference to assess the covariate balance. The obtained results highlight the important influence of explosions and contractors’ involvement on human casualties, major releases of hazardous materials on environmental damages, and other causes and explosions on material losses. Although human and organizational causes are involved in the three dimensions of consequences, the contribution of plant/equipment causes seems more important in the environmental and material contexts. Such results may provide a better general understanding of the causal structure in such a critical field or at least help initiate a different vision for taking advantage of the lessons learned from the occurrence of major industrial accidents.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

Ahmed, N., and Y.-H. Kuo. 2023. “Impact of cannabis on outcome in patients following traumatic injury.” Injury 54 (9): 110808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2023.05.039.
Alfarizi, M. G., F. Ustolin, J. Vatn, S. Yin, and N. Paltrinieri. 2023. “Towards accident prevention on liquid hydrogen: A data-driven approach for releases prediction.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 236 (Aug): 109276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109276.
Ali, M. S., et al. 2019. “Propensity score methods in health technology assessment: Principles, extended applications, and recent advances.” Front. Pharmacol. 10 (Sep): 973. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00973.
Austin, P. C. 2014. “A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score.” Stat. Med. 33 (6): 1057–1069. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6004.
Balasubramanian, S. G., and J. F. Louvar. 2002. “Study of major accidents and lessons learned.” Process Saf. Prog. 21 (3): 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.680210309.
Bhardwaj, U., A. P. Teixeira, and C. G. Soares. 2022. “Casualty analysis methodology and taxonomy for FPSO accident analysis.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 218 (Feb): 108169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108169.
Campari, A., A. J. N. Akel, F. Ustolin, A. Alvaro, A. Ledda, P. Agnello, P. Moretto, R. Patriarca, and N. Paltrinieri. 2023. “Lessons learned from HIAD 2.0: Inspection and maintenance to avoid hydrogen-induced material failures.” Comput. Chem. Eng. 173 (May): 108199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108199.
Ceylan, B. O., Ç. Karatuğ, E. Akyuz, Y. Arslanoğlu, and G. Boustras. 2023. “A system theory (STAMP) based quantitative accident analysis model for complex engineering systems.” Saf. Sci. 166 (Oct): 106232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106232.
Chebila, M. 2021. “Predicting the consequences of accidents involving dangerous substances using machine learning.” Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 208 (Jan): 111470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111470.
Dakkoune, A., L. Vernières-Hassimi, S. Leveneur, D. Lefebvre, and L. Estel. 2019. “Analysis of thermal runaway events in French chemical industry.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 62 (Nov): 103938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103938.
Dien, Y., N. Dechy, and E. Guillaume. 2012. “Accident investigation: From searching direct causes to finding in-depth causes—Problem of analysis or/and of analyst?” Saf. Sci. 50 (6): 1398–1407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.12.010.
Ebrahimi, H., F. Sattari, L. Lefsrud, and R. Macciotta. 2023. “A machine learning and data analytics approach for predicting evacuation and identifying contributing factors during hazardous materials incidents on railways.” Saf. Sci. 164 (Aug): 106180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106180.
eMARS (The Major Accident Reporting System). 2023. “The major accident reporting system.” Accessed October 25, 2020. https://emars.jrc.ec.europa.eu/en/emars/content.
Fu, G., X. Xie, Q. Jia, Z. Li, P. Chen, and Y. Ge. 2020. “The development history of accident causation models in the past 100 years: 24Model, a more modern accident causation model.” Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 134 (Feb): 47–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.11.027.
Ge, J., Y. Zhang, K. Xu, J. Li, X. Yao, C. Wu, S. Li, F. Yan, J. Zhang, and Q. Xu. 2022. “A new accident causation theory based on systems thinking and its systemic accident analysis method of work systems.” Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 158 (Feb): 644–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.12.036.
Gelman, A., and X.-L. Meng. 2004. Applied Bayesian modeling and causal inference from incomplete-data perspectives. New York: Wiley.
Goodrich, J. M., N. A. Koziol, H. Yoon, and S. Leiva. 2022. “Do Spanish-English bilingual children outperform monolingual English-speaking children on executive function tasks in early childhood? A propensity score analysis.” J. Educ. Psychol. 114 (4): 870–892. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000692.
Gu, X. S., and P. R. Rosenbaum. 1993. “Comparison of Multivariate Matching Methods: Structures, Distances, and Algorithms.” J. Comput. Graphical Stat. 2 (4): 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.1993.10474623.
Guignet, D., R. R. Jenkins, J. Belke, and H. Mason. 2023. “The property value impacts of industrial chemical accidents.” J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 120 (Jul): 102839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102839.
He, L.-Y., and K.-X. Chen. 2023. “Digital transformation and carbon performance: Evidence from firm-level data.” Environ. Dev. Sustainability (May): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03143-x.
Hernán, M. A., and J. M. Robins. 2020. Causal inference: What if. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Hulme, A., N. A. Stanton, G. H. Walker, P. Waterson, and P. M. Salmon. 2021. “Are accident analysis methods fit for purpose? Testing the criterion-referenced concurrent validity of AcciMap, STAMP-CAST and AcciNet.” Saf. Sci. 144 (Dec): 105454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105454.
Imbens, G., and D. Rubin. 2015. Causal inference for statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
King, G., and R. Nielsen. 2019. “Why Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching.” Political Anal. 27 (4): 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.11.
Krausmann, E., E. Renni, M. Campedel, and V. Cozzani. 2011. “Industrial accidents triggered by earthquakes, floods and lightning: Lessons learned from a database analysis.” Nat. Hazards 59 (Oct): 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9754-3.
Liaw, H.-J., C.-C. Liu, J.-F. Wan, and T.-L. Tzou. 2023. “Process safety management lessons learned from a fire and explosion accident caused by a liquefied petroleum gas leak in an aromatics reforming unit in Taiwan.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 83 (Jul): 105058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2023.105058.
Lindhout, P., C. van Gulijk, and B. J. M. Ale. 2011. “Underestimation of language issues in frequently used accident investigation methods: A new taxonomy problem found in Dutch accident data.” J. Hazard. Mater. 191 (1–3): 158–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.056.
Lu, D., F. Guo, and F. Li. 2020. “Evaluating the causal effects of cellphone distraction on crash risk using propensity score methods.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 143 (Aug): 105579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105579.
Morello, T. F. 2023. “Hospitalization due to fire-induced pollution in the Brazilian Amazon: A causal inference analysis with an assessment of policy trade-offs.” World Dev. 161 (Jan): 106123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106123.
Naser, M. Z., and A. T. G. Tapeh. 2023. “Causality, causal discovery, causal inference and counterfactuals in Civil Engineering: Causal machine learning and case studies for knowledge discovery.” Comput. Concr. 31 (4): 277–292. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2023.31.4.277.
Nenci, S., and D. Vurchio. 2023. “Modeling country-sectoral spillovers in generalized propensity score matching: An empirical test on trade data.” Econ. Modell. 124 (Jul): 106293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106293.
Nguyen, T.-L., G. S. Collins, J. Spence, J.-P. Daurès, P. J. Devereaux, P. Landais, and Y. Le Manach. 2017. “Double-adjustment in propensity score matching analysis: Choosing a threshold for considering residual imbalance.” BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 17 (Dec): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0338-0.
Niu, Y., Y. Fan, Y. Gao, and Y. Li. 2023. “A causal inference method for improving the design and interpretation of safety research.” Saf. Sci. 161 (May): 106082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106082.
Nyman, M. R., and M. Johansson. 2015. “Merits of using a socio-technical system perspective and different industrial accident investigation methods on accidents following natural hazards—A case study on pluvial flooding of a Swedish railway tunnel 2013.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 13 (Sep): 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.06.004.
OJEU (Official Journal of the European Union). 2012. Directive 2012/18/EU of the European parliament and of the council of 4 July 2012 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances. Luxembourg: OJEU.
Overall, N. C., C. Howard, D. Osborne, P. R. Pietromonaco, N. Satherley, and C. G. Sibley. 2023. “Applying propensity score matching to assess the impact of the pandemic on intimate relationships.” Social Personality Psychol. Compass 17 (7): e12747. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12747.
Pan, D., W. Fan, and F. Kong. 2022. “Dose environmental information disclosure raise public environmental concern? Generalized propensity score evidence from China.” J. Cleaner Prod. 379 (Dec): 134640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134640.
Pearl, J. 1993. “Comment: Graphical models, causality, and intervention.” Stat. Sci. 8 (3): 266–269. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177010894.
Pearl, J. 2009. “Causal inference in statistics: An overview.” Stat. Surv. 3 (Oct): 96–146. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-SS057.
Rad, M. A., L. M. Lefsrud, and M. T. Hendry. 2023. “Application of systems thinking accident analysis methods: A review for railways.” Saf. Sci. 160 (Apr): 106066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106066.
Ricci, F., V. C. Moreno, and V. Cozzani. 2023. “Natech accidents triggered by cold waves.” Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 173 (May): 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.03.022.
Rosenbaum, P. R. 1989. “Optimal matching for observational studies.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 84 (408): 1024–1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1989.10478868.
Rosenbaum, P. R. 2010. Design of observational studies. New York: Springer.
Rosenbaum, P. R., and D. B. Rubin. 1983. “The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects.” Biometrika 70 (1): 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.
Rubin, D. B. 1973. “Matching to remove bias in observational studies.” Biometrics 29 (1): 159–183. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529684.
Sattari, F., R. Macciotta, D. Kurian, and L. Lefsrud. 2021. “Application of Bayesian network and artificial intelligence to reduce accident/incident rates in oil & gas companies.” Saf. Sci. 133 (Jan): 104981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104981.
Seya, H., K. Yoshida, and S. Inoue. 2021. “Verification of Zone-30-policy effect on accident reduction using propensity score matching method for multiple treatments.” Case Stud. Transp. Policy 9 (2): 693–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.03.007.
Stephenson, V., C. J. Oates, A. Finlayson, C. Thomas, and K. J. Wilson. 2021. “Causal graphical models for systems-level engineering assessment.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 7 (2): 04021011. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001116.
Takeshita, K. M., T. I. Hayashi, and H. Yokomizo. 2020. “The effect of intervention in nickel concentrations on benthic macroinvertebrates: A case study of statistical causal inference in ecotoxicology.” Environ. Pollut. 265 (Oct): 115059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115059.
Tamascelli, N., N. Paltrinieri, and V. Cozzani. 2023. “Learning from major accidents: A meta-learning perspective.” Saf. Sci. 158 (Feb): 105984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105984.
Tamascelli, N., R. Solini, N. Paltrinieri, and V. Cozzani. 2022. “Learning from major accidents: A machine learning approach.” Comput. Chem. Eng. 162 (Jun): 107786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107786.
Vallerotonda, M. R., S. Ansaldi, A. Pirone, T. Bragatto, and P. Bragatto. 2022. “Accident triggered by electrical failures in Seveso sites.” Chem. Eng. Trans. 91: 211–216. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2291036.
Wen, J. X., M. Marono, P. Moretto, E.-A. Reinecke, P. Sathiah, E. Studer, E. Vyazmina, and D. Melideo. 2022. “Statistics, lessons learned and recommendations from analysis of HIAD 2.0 database.” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47 (38): 17082–17096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.170.
Yabe, T., Y. Zhang, and S. V. Ukkusuri. 2020. “Quantifying the economic impact of disasters on businesses using human mobility data: A Bayesian causal inference approach.” EPJ Data Sci. 9 (1): 36. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00255-6.
Yue, Y., W. Gai, and G. Boustras. 2023. “Exploration of the causes of ammonium nitrate explosions: Statistics and analysis of accidents over the past 100 years.” Saf. Sci. 158 (Feb): 105954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105954.
Zhai, G., K. Xie, D. Yang, and H. Yang. 2022. “Assessing the safety effectiveness of citywide speed limit reduction: A causal inference approach integrating propensity score matching and spatial difference-in-differences.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 157 (Mar): 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.01.004.
Zhang, Y., H. Li, and G. Ren. 2023. “Road safety evaluation with multiple treatments: A comparison of methods based on simulations.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 190 (Sep): 107170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107170.
Zubizarreta, J. R., E. Stuart, D. S. Small, and P. R. Rosenbaum. 2023. Handbook of matching and weighting adjustments for causal inference. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 10Issue 1March 2024

History

Received: Apr 18, 2023
Accepted: Aug 29, 2023
Published online: Oct 20, 2023
Published in print: Mar 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Mar 20, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Laboratoire de Recherche en Prévention Industrielle (LRPI)-Institute of Health and Safety, Univ. of Batna 2, Fésdis, Batna 05078, Algeria. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Laboratoire de Recherche en Prévention Industrielle (LRPI)-Institute of Health and Safety, Univ. of Batna 2, Fésdis, Batna 05078, Algeria (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5456-1562. Email: [email protected]
Rachid Nait-Said, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Laboratoire de Recherche en Prévention Industrielle (LRPI)-Institute of Health and Safety, Univ. of Batna 2, Fésdis, Batna 05078, Algeria. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share