Numerical and Experimental Investigation of a Correlation Model to Describe Spatial Variability of Concrete Properties
Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 9, Issue 4
Abstract
The heterogeneous character of concrete results in spatial variation of its material properties. Random field models are often used to account for this effect. Due to the large scatter on the correlation lengths suggested in literature, tests could be performed to determine the most appropriate correlation model and corresponding correlation length. Subsequently, different techniques can be employed to fit an analytical model to the experimental semivariogram, resulting in the most appropriate correlation model and corresponding correlation length. However, the resulting correlation lengths can largely depend on the experimental design. In this work, the effect of several parameters and choices to be made by an engineer in deriving the correlation model based on experimental data from destructive tests has been investigated. It was found that the curve-fitting method generally leads to better estimates of the scale of fluctuation compared to the maximum likelihood method. Moreover, there is a clear benefit of applying a bootstrapping procedure to the experimental data to estimate the covariance matrix adopted in the fitting procedures as well as to estimate the uncertainty related to the estimated parameters. When a measurement error is suspected to be present and cannot be neglected, the nugget should be estimated together with the variance and the scale of fluctuation. Furthermore, the Gaussian correlation model was found to be the most robust choice, even if the actual correlation model is not Gaussian. The latter was confirmed for actual experimental data on the material properties of concrete, in which a linear model was found to fit the data best but the Gaussian model provided comparable results.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This research has been made possible through funding from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) under Grant Nos. G013317N (Eline Vereecken), 12X1719N, and S001021 (Wouter Botte), for which FWO is gratefully acknowledged.
References
Cami, B., S. Javankhoshdel, K.-K. Phoon, and J. Ching. 2020. “Scale of fluctuation for spatially varying soils: Estimation methods and values.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 6 (4): 03120002. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001083.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2005. Testing hardened concrete—Part 6: Tensile splitting strength of test specimens. NBN EN 12390-6. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2019. Testing hardened concrete—Part 3: Compressive strength of test specimens. NBN EN 12390-3:2019. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chen, J., J. He, X. Ren, and J. Li. 2018. “Stochastic harmonic function representation of random fields for material properties of structures.” J. Eng. Mech. 144 (7): 04018049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001469.
Christodoulou, P., L. Pantelidis, and E. Gravanis. 2021. “A comparative assessment of the methods-of-moments for estimating the correlation length of one-dimensional random fields.” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 28 (3): 1163–1181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09408-2.
Criel, P., R. Caspeele, and L. Taerwe. 2014. “Bayesian updated correlation length of spatial concrete properties using limited data.” Comput. Concr. 13 (5): 659–677. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2014.13.5.659.
Duprat, F. 2007. “Reliability of RC beams under chloride-ingress.” Constr. Build. Mater. 21 (8): 1605–1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.08.002.
Engelund, S. 1997. Probabilistic models and computational methods for chloride ingress in concrete. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg Univ.
Feng, D.-C., Y.-P. Liang, X. Ren, and J. Li. 2022. “Random fields representation over manifolds via isometric feature mapping-based dimension reduction.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 37 (5): 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12752.
Geyer, S., I. Papaioannou, and D. Straub. 2023. “Spatial modeling of concrete strength based on data.” Struct. Saf. 103 (Jul): 102345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2023.102345.
Hajializadeh, D., M. G. Stewart, B. Enright, and E. OBrien. 2016. “Spatial time-dependent reliability analysis of reinforced concrete slab bridges subject to realistic traffic loading.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 12 (9): 1137–1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1086385.
He, J., J. Chen, X. Ren, and J. Li. 2021. “Uncertainty quantification of random fields based on spatially sparse data by synthesizing Bayesian compressive sensing and stochastic harmonic function.” Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 153 (May): 107377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107377.
He, J., R. Gao, and J. Chen. 2022. “A sparse data-driven stochastic damage model for seismic reliability assessment of reinforced concrete structures.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 223 (Jul): 108510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108510.
Hu, Y., Y. Wang, T. Zhao, and K.-K. Phoon. 2020. “Bayesian supervised learning of site-specific geotechnical spatial variability from sparse measurements.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 6 (2): 04020019. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001059.
Journel, A. G., and C. J. Huijbregts. 1978. Mining geostatistics. London: Academic Press.
Li, Y., T. Vrouwenvelder, G. H. Wijnants, and J. Walraven. 2004. “Spatial variability of concrete deterioration and repair strategies.” Struct. Concr. 5 (3): 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1680/stco.2004.5.3.121.
Liang, Y. P., X. Ren, and D.-C. Feng. 2022. “Efficient stochastic finite element analysis of irregular wall structures with inelastic random field properties over manifold.” Comput. Mech. 69 (Jan): 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-021-02084-4.
Matheron, G. 1965. Les variables regionalisees et leur estimation. Paris: Masson.
NORDTEST. 1999. Concrete, mortar and cement-based repair materials: Chloride migration coefficient from non-steady-state migration experiments. NT BUILD 492. Espoo, Finland: NORDTEST.
O’Connor, A. J., and O. Kenshel. 2013. “Experimental evaluation of the scale of fluctuation for spatial variability modeling of chloride-induced reinforced concrete corrosion.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000370.
Olea, R. A., and E. Pardo-Igúzquiza. 2011. “Generalized bootstrap method for assessment of uncertainty in semivariogram inference.” Math. Geosci. 43 (Feb): 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-010-9269-6.
Solow, A. R. 1985. “Bootstrapping correlated data.” J. Int. Assoc. Math. Geol. 17 (7): 769–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01031616.
Stewart, M. G., and J. A. Mullard. 2007. “Spatial time-dependent reliability analysis of corrosion damage and the timing of first repair for RC structures.” Eng. Struct. 29 (7): 1457–1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.09.004.
Straub, D. 2011. “Reliability updating with inspection and monitoring data in deteriorating reinforced concrete slabs.” In Proc., ICASP11—11th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, 2309–2316. London: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11332-340.
Straub, D., V. Malioka, and M. H. Faber. 2009. “A framework for the asset integrity management of large deteriorating concrete structures.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 5 (3): 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470601017369.
Tomizawa, Y., and I. Yoshida. 2022. “Benchmarking of Gaussian process regression with multiple random fields for spatial variability estimation.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 8 (4): 04022052. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001277.
Tran, T. V., E. Bastidas-Arteaga, F. Schoefs, S. Bonnet, A. J. O’Connor, and F. Lanata. 2012. “Structural reliability analysis of deteriorating RC bridges considering spatial variability.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, Resilience and Sustainability, 698–705. London: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b12352-94.
Vanmarcke, E. 2010. Random fields analysis and synthesis. Singapore: World Scientific.
Vanmarcke, E. H. 1977. “Probabilistic modeling of soil profiles.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 103 (11): 1227–1246. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000517.
Vereecken, E. 2022. Applied Bayesian pre-posterior and life-cycle cost analysis for determining and optimizing the value of structural health monitoring for concrete structures. Ghent, Belgium: Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent Univ.
Vu, K. A., and M. G. Stewart. 2005. “Predicting the likelihood and extent of reinforced concrete corrosion-induced cracking.” J. Struct. Eng. 131 (11): 1681–1689. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:11(1681).
Vu, K. A. T. 2003. Corrosion-induced cracking and spatial timedependent reliability analysis of reinforced concrete structures. Newcastle, NSW, Australia: Univ. of Newcastle.
Webster, R., and M. A. Oliver. 1992. “Sample adequately to estimate variograms of soil properties.” J. Soil Sci. 43 (1): 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1992.tb00128.x.
Zhao, T., and Y. Wang. 2020. “Non-parametric simulation of non-stationary non-Gaussian 3D random field samples directly from sparse measurements using signal decomposition and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 203 (Nov): 107087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107087.
Zheng, L., and S. E. Silliman. 2000. “Estimating the theoretical semivariogram from finite numbers of measurements.” Water Resour. Res. 36 (1): 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900270.
Zhou, H., Y. Li, Q. Wen, and G. Deodatis. 2023. “Stochastic field model for the residual radius along the length of naturally and artificially corroded rebars.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 19 (10): 1366–1377. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2022.2027471.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 30, 2023
Accepted: Jun 20, 2023
Published online: Aug 11, 2023
Published in print: Dec 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jan 11, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Analysis (by type)
- Concrete
- Correlation
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering materials (by type)
- Gaussian process
- Material mechanics
- Material properties
- Materials engineering
- Mathematics
- Methodology (by type)
- Models (by type)
- Numerical analysis
- Numerical methods
- Numerical models
- Parameters (statistics)
- Probability
- Statistics
- Stochastic processes
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.