Seismic Fragility Analysis of Base-Isolated Structures Based on Response Surface Method
Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 9, Issue 3
Abstract
Base-isolated structures face a risk of damage under the action of earthquakes, and base isolation devices may be susceptible to damage during severe earthquakes. This study proposed an approach based on the response surface method to assess the base-isolated structures’ seismic fragility and investigated the reliability and effectiveness of the base-isolation technique. Three performance levels and corresponding performance criteria for general base-isolated reinforced concrete structures were specified. The proposed seismic fragility assessment approach fully considered the uncertainty of the base-isolated structures and ground motions. Uncertainty parameters of the superstructure and base isolators were characterized, and parametric sensitivity analysis of the base-isolated structure was carried out. Moreover, the seismic fragility evaluation method of base-isolation systems was studied, and a simplified evaluation equation was introduced. The proposed response surface-based method’s accuracy and efficiency were also compared with the Monte Carlo method. An actual project was taken as an example to illustrate the proposed approach. The failure probabilities of the base-isolated structure under various seismic intensity levels were calculated, and the seismic fragility curves were plotted. It indicated that the base-isolated structure could achieve the performance objectives of maintaining operation under minor earthquakes, guaranteeing life safety under moderate earthquakes, and preventing collapse under severe earthquakes. However, the seismic isolation bearings could still have large displacements under severe earthquakes. Furthermore, the seismic fragility analysis of the base-isolated and nonisolated structures was compared. It showed that the base isolation technique significantly reduced the damage probability of the superstructure under various intensity levels and effectively prevented the superstructure from entering a serious damage state. The proposed seismic fragility analysis approach and a large amount of computational data could provide a significant engineering application value for similar reinforced concrete structures and a reference value for the design of base-isolated structures.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the independent projects for State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures (Grant Nos. ZZ2020-04 and ZZ2021-03), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (CN) (Grant Nos. E2019210245 and E202210095), and S&T Program of Hebei (CN) (Grant No. 21375407D).
References
Alhan, C., and H. P. Gavin. 2005. “Reliability of base isolation for the protection of critical equipment from earthquake hazards.” Eng. Struct. 27 (9): 1435–1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.04.007.
ASCE. 1980. Building code requirement for minimum design loads in buildings and other structures. ANSI A58. Washington, DC: Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards.
ASCE. 2014. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI 41-13. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Box, G. E., and K. B. Wilson. 1951. “On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions.” J. R. Stat. Soc. B 13 (1): 1–38.
Buratti, N., B. Ferracuti, and M. Savoia. 2010. “Response surface with random factors for seismic fragility of reinforced concrete frames.” Struct. Saf. 32 (1): 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.06.003.
Castaldo, P., B. Palazzo, and P. Della Vecchia. 2015. “Seismic reliability of base-isolated structures with friction pendulum bearings.” Eng. Struct. 95 (Jul): 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.053.
Celik, O. C., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2010. “Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames—Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties.” Struct. Saf. 32 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.003.
Faravelli, L. 1989. “Response-surface approach for reliability analysis.” J. Eng. Mech. 115 (12): 2763–2781. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:12(2763).
Franchin, P., A. Lupoi, P. E. Pinto, and M. I. Schotanus. 2003. “Seismic fragility of reinforced concrete structures using a response surface approach.” J. Earthquake Eng. 7 (spec01): 45–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460309350473.
GAQSIQ (General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China). 2006. Rubber bearings—Part 3: Elastomeric seismic-protection isolators for buildings. GB/T20688.3-2006. Beijing: GAQSIQ.
Han, R., Y. Li, and J. van de Lindt. 2014. “Seismic risk of base isolated non-ductile reinforced concrete buildings considering uncertainties and mainshock–aftershock sequences.” Struct. Saf. 50 (Sep): 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.03.010.
Kounias, E. G. 1968. “Bounds for the probability of a union, with applications.” Ann. Math. Stat. 39 (6): 2154–2158. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177698049.
Kwon, O.-S., and A. Elnashai. 2006. “The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure.” Eng. Struct. 28 (2): 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.07.010.
Li, J., and J. B. Chen. 2004. “Probability density evolution method for dynamic response analysis of structures with uncertain parameters.” Comput. Mech. 34 (5): 400–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-004-0583-8.
Long, X. H., J. Fan, B. B. Yang, and B. L. Chen. 2015. “Seismic fragility analysis of an isolated continuous girder bridge using the response surface method with random factors.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 18 (12): 2059–2073. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.18.12.2059.
Mishra, S. K., and S. Chakraborty. 2013. “Performance of a base-isolated building with system parameter uncertainty subjected to a stochastic earthquake.” Int. J. Acoust. Vibr. 18 (1): 7–19. https://doi.org/10.20855/ijav.2013.18.1315.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China). 2016. Code for seismic design of buildings. GB50011-2010. Beijing: MOHURD.
Nielson, B. G., and R. DesRoches. 2007. “Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (6): 823–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.655.
Peeranan, T. 2004. Building seismic fragilities using response surface meta-models. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
Perotti, F., M. Domaneschi, and S. De Grandis. 2013. “The numerical computation of seismic fragility of base-isolated nuclear power plants buildings.” Nucl. Eng. Des. 262 (Sep): 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.04.029.
Rajashekhar, M. R., and B. R. Ellingwood. 1993. “A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis.” Struct. Saf. 12 (3): 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(93)90003-J.
Saha, S. K., V. Matsagar, and S. Chakraborty. 2016. “Uncertainty quantification and seismic fragility of base-isolated liquid storage tanks using response surface models.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 43 (Jan): 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.10.008.
Salimi Firoozabad, E., B.-G. Jeon, H.-S. Choi, and N.-S. Kim. 2015. “Seismic fragility analysis of seismically isolated nuclear power plants piping system.” Nucl. Eng. Des. 284 (Apr): 264–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.12.012.
SAPRC (The Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China). 2021. Standard for seismic isolation design of building. GB/T51408-2021. Beijing: SAPRC.
Wang, H., Z. Wang, C. Luo, S. Liu, and D. Weng. 2020. “Seismic vulnerability analysis of base-isolated structures based on response surface method.” In Proc., 17th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (17 WCEE). Sendai, Japan: National Information Centre of Earthquake Engineering at the Indian Institute of Technology in Kanpur.
Wong, F. S. 1985. “Slope reliability and response surface method.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (1): 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:1(32).
Xiao, Y., K. Ye, and W. He. 2020. “An improved response surface method for fragility analysis of base-isolated structures considering the correlation of seismic demands on structural components.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 18 (8): 4039–4059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00836-w.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 9 • Issue 3 • September 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 19, 2022
Accepted: Mar 10, 2023
Published online: May 19, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Oct 19, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Base isolation
- Concrete
- Concrete structures
- Design (by type)
- Earthquake engineering
- Earthquakes
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering materials (by type)
- Geohazards
- Geotechnical engineering
- Materials engineering
- Reinforced concrete
- Seismic design
- Seismic effects
- Seismic tests
- Structural analysis
- Structural design
- Structural engineering
- Structure reinforcement
- Structures (by type)
- Tests (by type)
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.