Development of a Protocol for Engineering Applications of Evidence Theory
Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 8, Issue 3
Abstract
Recent data trends and analysis have highlighted the need to incorporate more imprecise, ambiguous, and unreliable data into uncertainty analysis traditionally handled by probability theory. However, data fraught with potential error and missing information are not well suited for analysis using probability theory due to high epistemic uncertainty. Evidence theory offers an alternative method of assessing epistemic uncertainty and is well suited for expanded use in engineering applications. Unfortunately, a unified approach to the application of evidence theory is lacking. To address this gap, we developed a protocol for engineering applications of evidence theory. The protocol proposes a logical procedure for defining the frame of discernment, the initial assignment of belief mass, the selection of combination rule, and sensitivity analysis. A literature review of prevailing methods related to the application of evidence theory highlighted concepts and considerations to address. The steps of the protocol were explored and discussed using an example problem including several rule combinations in order to highlight differences in the results and implications of making different analytical decisions. The protocol proposed herein is intended to facilitate engineering applications of evidence theory and to promote more widespread use of the theory in the field of civil engineering.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code that support the finding of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The financial support of the first author through United States Department of Education Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need Grant P200A180024 is gratefully acknowledged.
References
Agarwal, H., J. E. Renaud, E. L. Preston, and D. Padmanabhan. 2004. “Uncertainty quantification using evidence theory in multidisciplinary design optimization.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 85 (1): 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.017.
Alim, S. 1988. “Application of Dempster-Shafer theory for interpretation of seismic parameters.” J. Struct. Eng. 114 (9): 2070–2084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:9(2070).
Appriou, A. 1997. “Multisensor data fusion in situation assessment processes.” In Qualitative and quantitative practical reasoning, lecture notes in computer science, edited by D. M. Gabbay, R. Kruse, A. Nonnengart, and H. J. Ohlbach, 1–15. Berlin: Springer.
Attoh-Okine, B. N. O., and D. Martinelli. 1994. “Belief-function framework for handling uncertainties in pavement management system decision making.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1455: 153–158.
Attoh-Okine, N. O. 2002. “Aggregating evidence in pavement management decision-making using belief functions and qualitative Markov tree.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C Appl. Rev. 32 (3): 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2002.804443.
Attoh-Okine, N. O., A. T. Cooper, and S. A. Mensah. 2009. “Formulation of resilience index of urban infrastructure using belief functions.” IEEE Syst. J. 3 (2): 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2009.2019148.
Attoh-Okine, N. O., and J. Gibbons. 2001. “Use of belief function in brownfield infrastructure redevelopment decision making.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 127 (3): 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2001)127:3(126).
Ballent, W., R. B. Corotis, and C. Torres-Machi. 2020. “Dempster–Shafer theory applications in post-seismic structural damage and social vulnerability assessment.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 5 (4): 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2019.1583488.
Bao, Y., H. Li, Y. An, and J. Ou. 2012. “Dempster–Shafer evidence theory approach to structural damage detection.” Struct. Health Monit. 11 (1): 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921710395813.
Behrouz, M., and S. Alimohammadi. 2018. “Uncertainty analysis of flood control measures including epistemic and aleatory uncertainties: Probability theory and evidence theory.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 23 (8): 04018033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001675.
Bi, Y., J. Guan, and D. Bell. 2008. “The combination of multiple classifiers using an evidential reasoning approach.” Artif. Intell. 172 (15): 1731–1751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2008.06.002.
Bogler, P. L. 1987. “Shafer-dempster reasoning with applications to multisensor target identification systems.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 17 (6): 968–977. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1987.6499307.
Cai, J., L. Shuai, and C. Hubo. 2018. “Accurate mapping of underground utilities: An information fusion approach based on Dempster-Shafer theory.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2018, 712–721. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481295.071.
Chen, L., and S. S. Rao. 1998. “A modified Dempster-Shafer theory for multicriteria optimization.” Eng. Optim. 30 (3–4): 177–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03052159808941243.
Chen, Q., A. Whitbrook, U. Aickelin, and C. Roadknight. 2014. “Data classification using the Dempster–Shafer method.” J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 26 (4): 493–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2014.886301.
Corotis, R. B. 2015. “An overview of uncertainty concepts related to mechanical and civil engineering.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part B: Mech. Eng. 1 (4): 040801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030461.
Dempster, A. P. 1968. “A generalization of Bayesian inference.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 30 (2): 205–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1968.tb00722.x.
Dempster, A. P. 2008. “The Dempster–Shafer calculus for statisticians.” Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 48 (2): 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2007.03.004.
Denoeux, T. 2000. “A neural network classifier based on Dempster-Shafer theory.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Humans 30 (2): 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.833094.
Denoeux, T. 2006. “The cautious rule of combination for belief functions and some extensions.” In Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Information Fusion, 1–8. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIF.2006.301572.
Denoeux, T. 2008a. “Conjunctive and disjunctive combination of belief functions induced by nondistinct bodies of evidence.” Artif. Intell. 172 (2–3): 234–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.05.008.
Denoeux, T. 2008b. “A -nearest neighbor classification rule based on Dempster-Shafer theory.” In Classic works of the Dempster-Shafer theory of belief functions, studies in fuzziness and soft computing, edited by R. R. Yager and L. Liu, 737–760. Berlin: Springer.
Denoeux, T. 2013. “Maximum likelihood estimation from uncertain data in the belief function framework.” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 25 (1): 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2011.201.
Denoeux, T. 2019. “Logistic regression, neural networks and Dempster–Shafer theory: A new perspective.” Knowl.-Based Syst. 176 (Jul): 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.03.030.
Denœux, T., O. Kanjanatarakul, and S. Sriboonchitta. 2015. “EK-NNclus: A clustering procedure based on the evidential K-nearest neighbor rule.” Knowl.-Based Syst. 88 (Nov): 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.08.007.
Dezert, J., and A. Tchamova. 2011. “On the behavior of Dempster’s rule of combination.” Preprint, submitted on March 22, 2011. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00577983.
Dubois, D., and H. Prade. 1986. “On the unicity of Dempster rule of combination.” Int. J. Intell. Syst. 1 (2): 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.4550010204.
Fetz, T., M. Oberguggenberger, and S. Pittschmann. 2000. “Applications of possibility and evidence theory in civil engineering.” Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst. 8 (3): 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488500000216.
Helton, J. C., J. D. Johnson, and W. L. Oberkampf. 2004. “An exploration of alternative approaches to the representation of uncertainty in model predictions.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 85 (1): 39–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.025.
Hester, P. 2012. “Epistemic uncertainty analysis: An approach using expert judgment and evidential credibility.” J. Qual. Reliab. Eng. 8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/617481.
Hou, Y. 2021. “Sensitivity analysis of epistemic uncertainty on input parameters and system structure using Dempster-Shafer theory.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part B: Mech. Eng. 7 (2): 020908. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050166.
Huang, L., S. Ruan, and T. Denoeux. 2021. “Covid-19 classification with deep neural network and belief functions.” Preprint, submitted January 18, 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.06958.
Inagaki, T. 1993. “Dempster-Shafer theory and its applications.” Chap. 15 in New trends in system reliability evaluation, edited by K. B. Misra, 587–624. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Jiang, W., and W. Hu. 2018. “An improved soft likelihood function for Dempster–Shafer belief structures.” Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33 (6): 1264–1282. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21980.
Kronprasert, N., and N. Kikuchi. 2011. “Measuring validity of reasoning process for transportation planning using Bayesian inference and Dempster-Shafer theory.” In Proc., Vulnerability, Uncertainty, and Risk, edited by B. M. Ayyub, 121–128. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/41170(400)15.
Kyburg, H. E. 1988. “Knowledge.” In Vol. 5 of Machine intelligence and pattern recognition, uncertainty in artificial intelligence, edited by J. F. Lemmer and L. N. Kanal, 263–272. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Lehmann, E. L. 2011. Fisher, Neyman, and the creation of classical statistics. New York: Springer.
Liu, Z.-G., Q. Pan, and J. Dezert. 2013. “A new belief-based K-nearest neighbor classification method.” Pattern Recognit. 46 (3): 834–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2012.10.001.
Martin, A., A. Jousselme, and C. Osswald. 2008. “Conflict measure for the discounting operation on belief functions.” In Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Information Fusion, 1–8. New York: IEEE.
Murphy, C. K. 2000. “Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts.” Decis. Support Syst. 29 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(99)00084-6.
Oberkampf, W. L., S. M. DeLand, B. M. Rutherford, K. V. Diegert, and K. F. Alvin. 2002. “Error and uncertainty in modeling and simulation.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 75 (3): 333–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00120-X.
Oberkampf, W. L., and J. C. Helton. 2002. Evidence theory for engineering applications. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Reineking, T. 2014. “Belief functions: Theory and algorithms.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science, Universitat Bremen.
Seites-Rundlett, W., M. Z. Bashar, C. Torres-Machi, and R. B. Corotis. 2022. “Combined evidence model to enhance pavement condition prediction from highly uncertain sensor data.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 217 (Jan): 108031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108031.
Sentz, K., and S. Ferson. 2002. Combination of evidence in Dempster-Shafer theory. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
Shafer, G. 1976. A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Shafer, G. 1990. “Perspectives on the theory and practice of belief functions.” Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 4 (5): 323–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/0888-613X(90)90012-Q.
Shafer, G. 2016. “A mathematical theory of evidence turns 40.” Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 79 (Dec): 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2016.07.009.
Smarandache, F., and J. Dezert. 2005. “Information fusion based on new proportional conflict redistribution rules.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Information Fusion, 8. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIF.2005.1591955.
Smets, P. 1990. “The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model.” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 12 (5): 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.55104.
Smets, P. 1992. “The transferable belief model for expert judgements and reliability problems.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 38 (1): 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(92)90105-T.
Smets, P. 2007. “Analyzing the combination of conflicting belief functions.” Inf. Fusion 8 (4): 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2006.04.003.
Smets, P., and R. Kennes. 1994. “The transferable belief model.” Artif. Intell. 66 (2): 191–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)90026-4.
Soua, R., A. Koesdwiady, and F. Karray. 2016. “Big-data-generated traffic flow prediction using deep learning and Dempster-Shafer theory.” In Proc., 2016 Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 3195–3202. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2016.7727607.
Talon, A., C. Curt, and D. Boissier. 2014. “Performance assessment based on evidence theory and fuzzy logic: Application to building and dam performance.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 28 (1): 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000255.
Tarko, A., and R. N. Rouphail. 1997. “Intelligent traffic data processing for ITS applications.” J. Transp. Eng. 123 (4): 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1997)123:4(298).
Truong, T. Q., J. Zhang, and Z. Li. 2019. Dempster-Shafer-Step (DSS) tradeoff analysis method for multicriteria transportation investment decision making. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Webb, D., and B. M. Ayyub. 2017. “Sustainability quantification and valuation. II: Probabilistic framework and metrics for sustainable construction.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 3 (3): E4016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000894.
Yager, R. R. 1987. “On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules.” Inf. Sci. 41 (2): 93–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(87)90007-7.
Yager, R. R., and L. Liu. 2008. “Classic works of the Dempster-Shafer theory of belief functions.” Studies in fuzziness and soft computing. Berlin: Springer.
Yang, J. B., and D. L. Xu. 2013. “Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination.” Artif. Intell. 205 (2): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2013.09.003.
Zadeh, L. A. 1984. “Review of a mathematical theory of evidence.” AI Mag. 5 (3): 81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v5i3.452.
Zargar, A., R. Sadiq, G. Naser, F. I. Khan, and N. N. Neumann. 2012. “Dempster-Shafer theory for handling conflict in hydrological data: Case of snow water equivalent.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 26 (3): 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000149.
Zhao, X., H. Gu, G. Song, Y. L. Mo, and J. Xu. 2010. “Structural health monitoring with data fusion method.” In Proc., Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments, 2509–2517. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Zhou, D., T. Wei, H. Zhang, S. Ma, and F. Wei. 2018. “An information fusion model based on Dempster–Shafer evidence theory for equipment diagnosis.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part B: Mech. Eng. 4 (2): 021005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037328.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 8 • Issue 3 • September 2022
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 20, 2021
Accepted: Feb 12, 2022
Published online: Jul 4, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Dec 4, 2022
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Analysis (by type)
- Bibliographies
- Computing in civil engineering
- Continuum mechanics
- Data analysis
- Dynamics (solid mechanics)
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering mechanics
- Errors (statistics)
- Frames
- Information management
- Mathematics
- Methodology (by type)
- Motion (dynamics)
- Probability
- Research methods (by type)
- Sensitivity analysis
- Solid mechanics
- Statistics
- Structural engineering
- Structural members
- Structural systems
- Uncertainty principles
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.