Technical Papers
Dec 17, 2021

Physics-Based Reliability Assessment of Community-Based Power Distribution System Using Synthetic Hurricanes

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 8, Issue 1

Abstract

Power distribution systems are very vulnerable during hurricane events. Failure of power distribution systems could bring significant disruptions to the community’s daily activities. Sparse historical hurricane data are insufficient to establish hurricane risk models. Therefore, it has been challenging to evaluate the pole-wire system’s performance during hurricane events under strong winds. In the present study, a probabilistic framework integrating hurricane risk modeling and physics-based analysis is proposed to assess the reliability of the power distribution system subjected to hurricane winds. Based on historical hurricane data, hurricane tracks are simulated using a modified statistical method by matching the synthetic data with the statistical characteristics from historical hurricanes facilitated by a copula model. Using a novel statistical model that implements a machine learning (ML) algorithm hurricane intensities are predicted. A hurricane risk model is established using the synthetic hurricane data. Fragility curves for each pole are obtained by physics-based Monte Carlo simulations facilitated by ML-based regression models instead of the empirical fitting model in order to incorporate the most influential factors. A surrogate model trained by the ML algorithm is employed to obtain the system fragility curve with a low computational cost. Finally, the annual failure probability of the pole-wire system could be obtained by integrating the annual hurricane wind speed probability density and the pole-wire system fragility curve.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data used during the study were provided by a third party. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider (Eversource Energy Center at the University of Connecticut) as indicated in the Acknowledgments. Some data are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions, such as the detailed dimensions and locations of the utility poles. Some data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request (data processing).

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the data and support of Eversource Energy, Connecticut, and the Eversource Energy Center at the University of Connecticut. This support is greatly appreciated. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Eversource or any other agency.

References

Aas, K., C. Czado, A. Frigessi, and H. Bakken. 2009. “Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence.” Insur. Math. Econ. 44 (2): 182–198.
Atkinson, G. D., and C. R. Holliday. 1977. “Tropical cyclone minimum sea level pressure/maximum sustained wind relationship for the western north Pacific.” Mon. Weather Rev. 105 (4): 421–427. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1977)105%3C0421:TCMSLP%3E2.0.CO;2.
Batts, M. E., L. R. Russell, and E. Simiu. 1980. “Hurricane wind speeds in the United States.” J. Struct. Div. 106 (10): 2001–2016. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0005541.
Bishop, C. M. 2006. Pattern recognition and machine learning. New York: Springer.
Bjarnadottir, S., Y. Li, and M. G. Stewart. 2013. “Hurricane risk assessment of power distribution poles considering impacts of a changing climate.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (1): 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000108.
Bjarnadottir, S., Y. Li, and M. G. Stewart. 2014. “Risk-based economic assessment of mitigation strategies for power distribution poles subjected to hurricanes.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 10 (6): 740–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.759240.
Bowman, A. W., and A. Azzalini. 1997. Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis: The kernel approach with S-Plus illustrations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brechmann, E. C., and U. Schepsmeier. 2013. “Modeling dependence with C- and D-vine copulas: The R package CDVine.” J. Stat. Software 52 (3): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v052.i03.
Breiman, L. 1996. “Bagging predictors.” Mach. Learn. 24 (2): 123–140.
Breiman, L. 2001. “Random forests.” Mach. Learn. 45 (1): 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.
Breymann, W., A. Dias, and P. Embrechts. 2003. “Dependence structures for multivariate high-frequency data in finance.” Quant. Finance 3 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/713666155.
Brown, R. E. 2017. Electric power distribution reliability. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Chu, P. S., and J. Wang. 1998. “Modeling return periods of tropical cyclone intensities in the vicinity of Hawaii.” J. Appl. Meteorol. 37 (9): 951–960. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037%3C0951:MRPOTC%3E2.0.CO;2.
Dagher, H. J. 2006. Reliability-based design of utility pole structures. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Davidson, R. A., H. Liu, K. Sarpong, P. Sparks, and D. V. Rosowsky. 2003. “Electric power distribution system performance in Carolina hurricanes.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 4 (1): 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:1(36).
DEEP (Department of Energy and Environmental Protection). 2018. “Maps and GIS data for the state of Connecticut.” Accessed April 4, 2018. https://portal.ct.gov/DEEP.
Demaria, M., and J. Kaplan. 1994. “A statistical hurricane intensity prediction scheme (SHIPS) for the Atlantic basin.” Weather Forecasting 9 (2): 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1994)009%3C0209:ASHIPS%3E2.0.CO;2.
DeMaria, M. 2009. “A simplified dynamical system for tropical cyclone intensity prediction.” Mon. Weather Rev. 137 (1): 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2513.1.
Doyle, D. V., and L. J. Markwardt. 1966. Properties of southern pine in relation to strength grading of dimension lumber. Madison, WI: Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.
Emanuel, K., C. DesAutels, C. Holloway, and R. Korty. 2004. “Environmental control of tropical cyclone intensity.” J. Atmos. Sci. 61 (7): 843–858. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061%3C0843:ECOTCI%3E2.0.CO;2.
Emanuel, K., S. Ravela, E. Vivant, and C. Risi. 2006. “A statistical deterministic approach to hurricane risk assessment.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 87 (3): 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-87-3-299.
Gonen, T. 2007. Electric power distribution system engineering. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Grömping, U. 2009. “Variable importance assessment in regression: Linear regression versus random forest.” Am. Stat. 63 (4): 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2009.08199.
Guikema, S. D., S. M. Quiring, and S. R. Han. 2010. “Prestorm estimation of hurricane damage to electric power distribution systems.” Risk Anal. 30 (12): 1744–1752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01510.x.
Hall, T. M., and S. Jewson. 2007. “Statistical modelling of north Atlantic tropical cyclone tracks.” Tellus A: Dyn. Meteorol. Oceanogr. 59 (4): 486–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00240.x.
Ho, T. K. 1995. “Random decision forests.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Document Analysis and Recognition, 278–282. New York: IEEE.
Holland, G. 2008. “A revised hurricane pressure-wind model.” Mon. Weather Rev. 136 (9): 3432–3445. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2395.1.
Holland, G. J. 1980. “An analytic model of the wind and pressure profiles in hurricanes.” Mon. Weather Rev. 108 (8): 1212–1218. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108%3C1212:AAMOTW%3E2.0.CO;2.
IEEE. 2017a. 2017 national electrical safety code (NESC)(R). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
IEEE. 2017b. 2017 national electrical safety code (NESC). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
James, M. K., and L. B. Mason. 2005. “Synthetic tropical cyclone database.” J. Waterw. Port Coastal Ocean Eng. 131 (4): 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2005)131:4(181).
Jarvinen, B. J., C. J. Neumann, and M. A. S. Davis. 1984. A tropical cyclone data tape for the north Atlantic basin. 1886-1983: Contents, limitation. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service.
Kameshwar, S., and J. E. Padgett. 2014. “Multi-hazard risk assessment of highway bridges subjected to earthquake and hurricane hazards.” Eng. Struct. 78 (Nov): 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.05.016.
Knaff, J. A., and R. M. Zehr. 2007. “Reexamination of tropical cyclone wind-pressure relationships.” Weather Forecasting 22 (1): 71–88.
Krayer, W. R., and R. D. Marshall. 1992. “Gust factors applied to hurricane winds.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 73 (5): 613–618. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1992)073%3C0613:GFATHW%3E2.0.CO;2.
Kwasinski, A., W. W. Weaver, P. L. Chapman, and P. T. Krein. 2009. “Telecommunications power plant damage assessment for Hurricane Katrina-site survey and follow-up results.” IEEE Syst. J. 3 (3): 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2009.2026783.
Li, Y., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2006. “Hurricane damage to residential construction in the US: Importance of uncertainty modeling in risk assessment.” Eng. Struct. 28 (7): 1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.11.005.
Lin, N., and D. Chavas. 2012. “On hurricane parametric wind and applications in storm surge modeling.” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 117 (D9): 9120. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017126.
Lin, N., K. Emanuel, M. Oppenheimer, and E. Vanmarcke. 2012. “Physically based assessment of hurricane surge threat under climate change.” Nat. Clim. Change 2 (6): 462–467. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1389.
Lin, N., K. A. Emanuel, J. A. Smith, and E. Vanmarcke. 2010. “Risk assessment of hurricane storm surge for New York City.” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 115 (18): 1–11.
Liu, Y., and C. Singh. 2010. “Evaluation of hurricane impact on composite power system reliability considering common-cause failures.” Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manage. 1 (2): 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-010-0024-7.
Mensah, A. F., and L. Duenas-Osorio. 2014. “Outage predictions of electric power systems under hurricane winds by Bayesian networks.” In Proc., 2014 Int. Conf. on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems, PMAPS 2014. Durham, England: Durham Univ.
Mensah, A. F., and L. Dueñas-Osorio. 2016. “Efficient resilience assessment framework for electric power systems affected by hurricane events.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (8): C4015013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001423.
Michael Grayson, J., W. Pang, and S. Schiff. 2013. “Building envelope failure assessment framework for residential communities subjected to hurricanes.” Eng. Struct. 51 (Jun): 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.027.
Nelsen, R. B. 2007. An introduction to copulas. New York: Springer.
Neumann, C. J. 1987. The National Hurricane Center risk analysis program (HURISK). Miami: National Hurricane Center.
Ouyang, M., and L. Dueñas-Osorio. 2014. “Multi-dimensional hurricane resilience assessment of electric power systems.” Struct. Saf. 48 (May): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.01.001.
Ouyang, M., L. Dueñas-Osorio, and X. Min. 2012. “A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems.” Struct. Saf. 36–37 (May–Jul): 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004.
Park, Y. J., C. R. Glagola, K. R. Gurley, and K. Son. 2014. “Performance assessment of the Florida electric-power network system against hurricanes.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 15 (3): 04014003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000132.
Peterka, J. A., and S. Shahid. 1998. “Design gust wind speeds in the United States.” J. Struct. Eng. 124 (2): 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:2(207).
Phadke, A. C., C. D. Martino, K. Fai, and S. H. Houston. 2003. “Modeling of tropical cyclone winds and waves for emergency management.” Ocean Eng. 30 (4): 553–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-8018(02)00033-1.
Quiñonero-Candela, J., and C. E. Rasmussen. 2005. “A unifying view of sparse approximate Gaussian process regression.” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 6 (1): 1939–1959.
Rasmussen, C. E. 2006. Gaussian processes for machine learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ryan, P. C., M. G. Stewart, N. Spencer, and Y. Li. 2014. “Reliability assessment of power pole infrastructure incorporating deterioration and network maintenance.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 132 (Dec): 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.07.019.
Salman, A. M., Y. Li, and M. G. Stewart. 2015. “Evaluating system reliability and targeted hardening strategies of power distribution systems subjected to hurricanes.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 144 (Dec): 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.028.
Scott, D. W. 2015. Multivariate density estimation: Theory, practice, and visualization. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Shafieezadeh, A., U. P. Onyewuchi, M. M. Begovic, and R. Desroches. 2014. “Age-dependent fragility models of utility wood poles in power distribution networks against extreme wind hazards.” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 29 (1): 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2013.2281265.
Stern, R. E., So, J. ng, and D. B. Work. 2017. “Accelerated Monte Carlo system reliability analysis through machine-learning-based surrogate models of network connectivity.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 164 (Aug): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.01.021.
Svetnik, V., A. Liaw, and C. Tong. 2004. Variable selection in random forest with application to quantitative structure-activity relationship. Branchburg, NJ: Biometrics Research, Merck & Co.
Vapnik, V. 1995. The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: Springer.
Vapnik, V., S. E. Golowich, M. Ave, and M. Hill. 1997. “Support vector method for function approximation, regression estimation, and signal processing.” In Advances in neural information processing systems, 281–287. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vickery, P. J., P. F. Skerlj, and L. A. Twisdale. 2000. “Simulation of hurricane risk in the U.S. using empirical track model.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (10): 1222–1237. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1222).
Williams, C. K. I. 1998. “Prediction with Gaussian processes: From linear regression to linear prediction and beyond.” In Learning in graphical models, 599–621. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Winkler, J., L. Dueñas-Osorio, R. Stein, and D. Subramanian. 2010. “Performance assessment of topologically diverse power systems subjected to hurricane events.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95 (4): 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.11.002.
Yuan, H., W. Zhang, J. Zhu, and A. C. Bagtzoglou. 2018. “Resilience assessment of overhead power distribution systems under strong winds for hardening prioritization.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 4 (4): 04018037. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000988.
Zhang, C., H. Wei, X. Zhao, T. Liu, and K. Zhang. 2016. “A Gaussian process regression based hybrid approach for short-term wind speed prediction.” Energy Convers. Manage. 126 (Oct): 1084–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.086.
Zhu, J., and W. Zhang. 2018. “Probabilistic fatigue damage assessment of coastal slender bridges under coupled dynamic loads.” Eng. Struct. 166 (Jul): 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.073.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 8Issue 1March 2022

History

Received: Mar 29, 2021
Accepted: Oct 6, 2021
Published online: Dec 17, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 17, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Qin Lu, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8364-9953. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4707-4336. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • A Probabilistic Method for Integrating Physics-Based and Data-Driven Storm Outage Prediction Models for Power Systems, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1171, 10, 2, (2024).
  • Modeling Tree Damages and Infrastructure Disruptions under Strong Winds for Community Resilience Assessment, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-956, 9, 1, (2023).
  • The Typhoon Wind Hazard Assessment Considering the Correlation among the Key Random Variables Using the Copula Method, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1018, 9, 2, (2023).
  • Bayesian Decision Network–Based Optimal Selection of Hardening Strategies for Power Distribution Systems, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001253, 8, 3, (2022).
  • Integrated Structural and Socioeconomic Hurricane Resilience Assessment of Residential Buildings in Coastal Communities, Natural Hazards Review, 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000564, 23, 3, (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share