Technical Papers
Aug 5, 2021

Estimation of Failure Probability Function under Imprecise Probabilities by Active Learning–Augmented Probabilistic Integration

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7, Issue 4

Abstract

Imprecise probabilities have gained increasing popularity for quantitatively modeling uncertainty under incomplete information in various fields. However, it is still a computationally challenging task to propagate imprecise probabilities because a double-loop procedure is usually involved. In this contribution, a fully decoupled method, termed as active learning–augmented probabilistic integration (ALAPI), is developed to efficiently estimate the failure probability function (FPF) in the presence of imprecise probabilities. Specially, the parameterized probability-box models are of specific concern. By interpreting the failure probability integral from a Bayesian probabilistic integration perspective, the discretization error can be regarded as a kind of epistemic uncertainty, allowing it to be properly quantified and propagated through computational pipelines. Accordingly, an active learning probabilistic integration (ALPI) method is developed for failure probability estimation, in which a new learning function and a new stopping criterion associated with the upper bound of the posterior variance and coefficient of variation are proposed. Based on the idea of constructing an augmented uncertainty space, an imprecise augmented stochastic simulation (IASS) method is devised by using the random sampling high-dimensional representation model (RS-HDMR) for estimating the FPF in a pointwise stochastic simulation manner. To further improve the efficiency of IASS, the ALAPI is formed by an elegant combination of the ALPI and IASS, allowing the RS-HDMR component functions of the FPF to be properly inferred. Three benchmark examples are investigated to demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request (MATLAB code of the proposed ALPI method, ALAPI method, IASS method and three numerical examples; OpenSees model of the 120-bar space truss structure in the third example).

Acknowledgments

The first author would like to appreciate the financial support from China Scholarship Council (CSC). The second author is grateful to the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. NSFC 51905430) and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. The second and forth authors would also like to show their thankfulness to the support of Mobility Program 2020 from Sino-German Center (Grant No. M-0175).

References

Alvarez, D. A., F. Uribe, and J. E. Hurtado. 2018. “Estimation of the lower and upper bounds on the probability of failure using subset simulation and random set theory.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 100 (Feb): 782–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.07.040.
Au, S. 2005. “Reliability-based design sensitivity by efficient simulation.” Comput. Struct. 83 (14): 1048–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.015.
Bae, S., C. Park, and N. H. Kim. 2020. “Estimating effect of additional sample on uncertainty reduction in reliability analysis using Gaussian process.” J. Mech. Des. 142 (11): 111706. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047002.
Beer, M., S. Ferson, and V. Kreinovich. 2013. “Imprecise probabilities in engineering analyses.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 37 (1–2): 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.01.024.
Briol, F.-X., C. J. Oates, M. Girolami, M. A. Osborne, and D. Sejdinovic. 2019. “Probabilistic integration: A role in statistical computation?” Stat. Sci. 34 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1214/18-STS660.
Bucher, C. G., and U. Bourgund. 1990. “A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems.” Struct. Saf. 7 (1): 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(90)90012-E.
Buckley, J. J. 2005. Vol. 115 of Fuzzy probabilities: New approach and applications. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Cui, F., and M. Ghosn. 2019. “Implementation of machine learning techniques into the subset simulation method.” Struct. Saf. 79 (Jul): 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.02.002.
Der Kiureghian, A., and O. Ditlevsen. 2009. “Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter?” Struct. Saf. 31 (2): 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020.
Dubourg, V., B. Sudret, and F. Deheeger. 2013. “Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 33 (Jul): 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2013.02.002.
Echard, B., N. Gayton, and M. Lemaire. 2011. “AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation.” Struct. Saf. 33 (2): 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.01.002.
Echard, B., N. Gayton, M. Lemaire, and N. Relun. 2013. “A combined importance sampling and kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 111 (Mar): 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.10.008.
Faes, M., and D. Moens. 2019. “Recent trends in the modeling and quantification of non-probabilistic uncertainty.” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 27 (3): 633–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09327-x.
Faes, M., M. A. Valdebenito, X. Yuan, P. Wei, and M. Beer. 2021b. “Augmented reliability analysis for estimating imprecise first excursion probabilities in stochastic linear dynamics.” Adv. Eng. Software 155 (May): 102993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2021.102993.
Faes, M. G., M. A. Valdebenito, D. Moens, and M. Beer. 2020. “Bounding the first excursion probability of linear structures subjected to imprecise stochastic loading.” Comput. Struct. 239 (Oct): 106320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106320.
Faes, M. G., M. A. Valdebenito, D. Moens, and M. Beer. 2021a. “Operator norm theory as an efficient tool to propagate hybrid uncertainties and calculate imprecise probabilities.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 152 (May): 107482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107482.
Jiang, C., R. Bi, G. Lu, and X. Han. 2013. “Structural reliability analysis using non-probabilistic convex model.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 254 (Feb): 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2012.10.020.
Li, G., S.-W. Wang, and H. Rabitz. 2002. “Practical approaches to construct RS-HDMR component functions.” J. Phys. Chem. A 106 (37): 8721–8733. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp014567t.
Ling, C., Z. Lu, and X. Zhang. 2020. “An efficient method based on AK-MCS for estimating failure probability function.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 201 (Sep): 106975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106975.
Liu, H., C. Jiang, X. Jia, X. Long, Z. Zhang, and F. Guan. 2018. “A new uncertainty propagation method for problems with parameterized probability-boxes.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 172 (Apr): 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.12.004.
Liu, H., C. Jiang, J. Liu, and J. Mao. 2019. “Uncertainty propagation analysis using sparse grid technique and saddlepoint approximation based on parameterized p-box representation.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 59 (1): 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2049-5.
Liu, W.-S., and S. H. Cheung. 2017. “Reliability based design optimization with approximate failure probability function in partitioned design space.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 167 (Nov): 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.07.007.
Möller, B., and M. Beer. 2004. Fuzzy randomness: Uncertainty in civil engineering and computational mechanics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Murphy, K. P. 2012. Machine learning: A probabilistic perspective. London: MIT Press.
O’Hagan, A. 1991. “Bayes–hermite quadrature.” J. Stat. Plann. Inference 29 (3): 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3758(91)90002-V.
Rasmussen, C. E. 2003. “Gaussian processes in machine learning.” In Summer school on machine learning, 63–71. Berlin: Springer.
Rasmussen, C. E., and Z. Ghahramani. 2003. “Bayesian Monte Carlo.” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 505–512.
Sentz, K., and S. Ferson. 2002. Vol. 4015 of Combination of evidence in Dempster-Shafer theory. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
Song, J., M. Valdebenito, P. Wei, M. Beer, and Z. Lu. 2020a. “Non-intrusive imprecise stochastic simulation by line sampling.” Struct. Saf. 84 (May): 101936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101936.
Song, J., P. Wei, M. Valdebenito, and M. Beer. 2020b. “Active learning line sampling for rare event analysis.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 147 (Jan): 107113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107113.
Song, J., P. Wei, M. Valdebenito, and M. Beer. 2020c. “Adaptive reliability analysis for rare events evaluation with global imprecise line sampling.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 372 (Dec): 113344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113344.
Sun, S., G. Fu, S. Djordjević, and S.-T. Khu. 2012. “Separating aleatory and epistemic uncertainties: Probabilistic sewer flooding evaluation using probability box.” J. Hydrol. 420–421 (Feb): 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.12.027.
Wei, P., F. Liu, Z. Lu, and Z. Wang. 2018. “A probabilistic procedure for quantifying the relative importance of model inputs characterized by second-order probability models.” Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 98 (Jul): 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2018.04.007.
Wei, P., F. Liu, M. Valdebenito, and M. Beer. 2021. “Bayesian probabilistic propagation of imprecise probabilities with large epistemic uncertainty.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 149 (Feb): 107219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107219.
Wei, P., Z. Lu, and J. Song. 2014. “Extended Monte Carlo simulation for parametric global sensitivity analysis and optimization.” AIAA J. 52 (4): 867–878. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052726.
Wei, P., J. Song, S. Bi, M. Broggi, M. Beer, Z. Lu, and Z. Yue. 2019a. “Non-intrusive stochastic analysis with parameterized imprecise probability models: I. Performance estimation.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 124 (Jun): 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.01.058.
Wei, P., J. Song, S. Bi, M. Broggi, M. Beer, Z. Lu, and Z. Yue. 2019b. “Non-intrusive stochastic analysis with parameterized imprecise probability models: II. Reliability and rare events analysis.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 126 (Jul): 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.02.015.
Wei, P., C. Tang, and Y. Yang. 2019c. “Structural reliability and reliability sensitivity analysis of extremely rare failure events by combining sampling and surrogate model methods.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part O: J. Risk Reliab. 233 (6): 943–957. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X19844666.
Wei, P., X. Zhang, and M. Beer. 2020. “Adaptive experiment design for probabilistic integration.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 365 (Jun): 113035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113035.
Yager, R. R., and V. Kreinovich. 1999. “Decision making under interval probabilities.” Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 22 (3): 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0888-613X(99)00028-6.
Yuan, X., M. G. Faes, S. Liu, M. A. Valdebenito, and M. Beer. 2021. “Efficient imprecise reliability analysis using the augmented space integral.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 210 (Jun): 107477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107477.
Yuan, X., Z. Zheng, and B. Zhang. 2020. “Augmented line sampling for approximation of failure probability function in reliability-based analysis.” Appl. Math. Modell. 80 (Apr): 895–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.11.009.
Zhang, H. 2012. “Interval importance sampling method for finite element-based structural reliability assessment under parameter uncertainties.” Struct. Saf. 38 (Sep): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.01.003.
Zhang, H., H. Dai, M. Beer, and W. Wang. 2013. “Structural reliability analysis on the basis of small samples: An interval quasi-Monte Carlo method.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 37 (1–2): 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.03.001.
Zhang, H., R. L. Mullen, and R. L. Muhanna. 2010. “Interval Monte Carlo methods for structural reliability.” Struct. Saf. 32 (3): 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2010.01.001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7Issue 4December 2021

History

Received: Dec 17, 2020
Accepted: May 26, 2021
Published online: Aug 5, 2021
Published in print: Dec 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 5, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Chao Dang, M.ASCE [email protected]
Doctoral Student, Institute for Risk and Reliability, Leibniz Univ. Hannover, Callinstr. 34, Hannover 30167, Germany. Email: [email protected]
Pengfei Wei [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Mechanics, Civil Engineering, and Architecture, Northwestern Polytechnical Univ., Xi’an 710072, PR China. (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Jingwen Song [email protected]
Research Assistant Professor, Advanced Research Laboratories, Tokyo City Univ., 1-28-1 Tamazutsumi Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158-8557, Japan. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Institute for Risk and Reliability, Leibniz Univ. Hannover, Callinstr. 34, Hannover 30167, Germany; Part-Time Professor, Institute for Risk and Uncertainty, Univ. of Liverpool, Peach St., Liverpool L69 7ZF, UK; Guest Professor, International Joint Research Center for Engineering Reliability and Stochastic Mechanics, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, PR China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0611-0345. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • A Decoupling Algorithm for Efficient Estimation of Failure Probability Function Based on Statistical Moment Functions, Journal of Mechanical Design, 10.1115/1.4064812, 146, 10, (2024).
  • Estimation of Response Expectation Bounds under Parametric P-Boxes by Combining Bayesian Global Optimization with Unscented Transform, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1169, 10, 2, (2024).
  • An improved adaptive Kriging model for importance sampling reliability and reliability global sensitivity analysis, Structural Safety, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2023.102427, 107, (102427), (2024).
  • An improved adaptive Kriging model-based metamodel importance sampling reliability analysis method, Engineering with Computers, 10.1007/s00366-023-01941-5, (2024).
  • L-Moments-Based FORM Method for Structural Reliability Analysis Considering Correlated Input Random Variables, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings13051261, 13, 5, (1261), (2023).
  • Bounding imprecise failure probabilities in structural mechanics based on maximum standard deviation, Structural Safety, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2022.102293, 101, (102293), (2023).
  • An efficient method for accessing structural reliability indexes via power transformation family, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109097, 233, (109097), (2023).
  • Seismic risk analysis based on imprecise distribution and failure probability function under multidimensional limit state, Structures, 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.02.036, 50, (963-977), (2023).
  • A novel single-loop meta-model importance sampling with adaptive Kriging for time-dependent failure probability function, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 10.1007/s00158-023-03523-x, 66, 4, (2023).
  • Regression Models for Machine Learning, Machine Learning in Modeling and Simulation, 10.1007/978-3-031-36644-4_9, (341-371), (2023).
  • See more

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share