Technical Papers
Jul 15, 2021

Development of a New Technique for Safety Risk Assessment in Construction Projects Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7, Issue 3

Abstract

This study follows the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to develop a semiquantitative technique to assess the safety risk of construction projects based on effective parameters affecting the probability and severity rates. Various studies targeting safety risk assessment in construction projects together with their research characteristics were investigated. In the second step, the initial structure of risk assessment was designed based on a semiquantitative technique of safety risk assessment. In the third step, a three-round Delphi method was employed, and an expert panel comprising 41 project managers and senior authorities of construction projects determined the existing components of the two factors of risk probability and severity. Finally, the weights of the components of risk probability and severity were determined so that their roles in determining the level of final risk could be specified. The normalized weights of probability and severity factors for calculating the semiquantitative safety were 0.48296 and 0.51704, respectively. Moreover, the incident probability factor included the four components of technical inspection, human reliability, incident learning, and hazard detection, with the following weights, respectively: 0.303, 0.364, 0.088, and 0.245. The incident severity factor included the four components of human injury, financial loss, operational interruption, and reputation damage, with the following weights, respectively: 0.369, 0.233, 0.191, and 0.207. The utilization of this technique can help reduce the risk of occupational incidents in construction projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and codes generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the head manager and all personnel for their participation in the implementation of the studied construction project. This work was supported by the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Technology of Qom University of Medical Sciences and Health Services under Grant No. 971000. Approval code: IR.MUQ.REC.138.030.

References

Awwad, R., O. El Souki, and M. Jabbour. 2016. “Construction safety practices and challenges in a Middle Eastern developing country.” Saf. Sci. 83 (Mar): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.10.016.
Berhanu, F., M. Gebrehiwot, and Z. Gizaw. 2019. “Workplace injury and associated factors among construction workers in Gondar town, Northwest Ethiopia.” BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 20 (1): 523. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2917-1.
Cafiso, S., A. Di Graziano, and G. Pappalardo. 2013. “Using the Delphi method to evaluate opinions of public transport managers on bus safety.” Saf. Sci. 57 (Aug): 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.03.001.
Chang, D.-Y. 1996. “Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 95 (3): 649–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2.
Chou, C.-H., G.-S. Liang, and H.-C. Chang. 2013. “A fuzzy AHP approach based on the concept of possibility extent.” Qual. Quantity 47 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9473-6.
Gibb, A., H. Lingard, M. Behm, and T. Cooke. 2014. “Construction accident causality: Learning from different countries and differing consequences.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 32 (5): 446–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2014.907498.
Golfam, P., P.-S. Ashofteh, T. Rajaee, and X. Chu. 2019. “Prioritization of water allocation for adaptation to climate change using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM).” Water Resour. Manage. 33 (10): 3401–3416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02307-7.
Hong, X. 2002. “A comparative study of contractor performance based on Japanese, UK and US construction practice.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Univ. of Wolverhampton.
Kabak, Ö., F. Ülengin, B. Çekyay, Ş. Önsel, and Ö. Özaydın. 2016. “Critical success factors for the iron and steel industry in Turkey: A fuzzy DEMATEL approach.” Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 18 (3): 523–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-015-0067-7.
Keshtegar, B., M. Bagheri, C.-W. Fei, C. Lu, O. Taylan, and D.-K. Thai. 2021. “Multi-extremum-modified response basis model for nonlinear response prediction of dynamic turbine blisk.” Engineering with Computers. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01273-8.
Kim, J.-M., T. Kim, J. Bae, K. Son, and S. Ahn. 2019. “Analysis of plant construction accidents and loss estimation using insurance loss records.” J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 18 (6): 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2019.1687089.
Lu, C., C.-W. Fei, H.-T. Liu, H. Li, and L.-Q. An. 2020. “Moving extremum surrogate modeling strategy for dynamic reliability estimation of turbine blisk with multi-physics fields.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 106 (Nov): 106112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106112.
Mohammadfam, I., M. M. Aliabadi, A. R. Soltanian, M. Tabibzadeh, and M. Mahdinia. 2019. “Investigating interactions among vital variables affecting situation awareness based on Fuzzy DEMATEL method.” Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 74: (Nov): 102842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.102842.
Mohammadfam, I., A. Soltanzadeh, A. Moghimbeigi, and M. Akbarzadeh. 2016. “Modeling of individual and organizational factors affecting traumatic occupational injuries based on the structural equation modeling: A case study in large construction industries.” Arch. Trauma Res. 5 (3): e33595–e33595. https://doi.org/10.5812/atr.33595.
Novák, V., I. Perfilieva, and J. Mockor. 2012. Mathematical principles of fuzzy logic. New York: Springer.
Penfold, S. 2000. “Information warriors in the 21st century: Managing change for information services.” Business Inform. Rev. 17 (1): 34–42.
Ramanathan, R., and L. Ganesh. 1994. “Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members’ weightages.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 79 (2): 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90356-5.
Saaty, T. L. 1989. “Group decision making and the AHP.” In The analytic hierarchy process, 59–67. New York: Springer.
Samantra, C., S. Datta, and S. S. Mahapatra. 2017. “Fuzzy based risk assessment module for metropolitan construction project: An empirical study.” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 65 (Oct): 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2017.04.019.
Sambasivan, M., and N. Y. Fei. 2008. “Evaluation of critical success factors of implementation of ISO 14001 using analytic hierarchy process (AHP): A case study from Malaysia.” J. Cleaner Prod. 16 (13): 1424–1433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.003.
Sanni-Anibire, M. O., A. S. Mahmoud, M. A. Hassanain, and B. A. Salami. 2020. “A risk assessment approach for enhancing construction safety performance.” Saf. Sci. 121 (Jan): 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.044.
Soltanzadeh, A., H. R. Heidari, M. Mahdinia, H. Mohammadi, A. Mohammadbeigi, and I. Mohammadfam. 2019. “Path analysis of occupational injuries based on the structural equation modeling approach: A retrospective study in the construction industry.” Iran Occup. Health 16 (3): 47–57.
Soltanzadeh, A., I. Mohammadfam, A. Moghimbeigi, and R. Ghiasvand. 2016. “Key factors contributing to accident severity rate in construction industry in Iran: A regression modelling approach/Primjena regresijskog modela u analizi ključnih čimbenika koji pridonose težini nesreća u građevinskoj industriji u Iranu.” Arch. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 67 (1): 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1515/aiht-2016-67-2687.
Soltanzadeh, A., I. Mohammadfam, A. Moghimbeygi, and R. Ghiasvand. 2017. “Exploring causal factors on the severity rate of occupational accidents in construction worksites.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. 15 (7): 959–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0184-9.
Sousa, V., N. M. Almeida, and L. A. Dias. 2014. “Risk-based management of occupational safety and health in the construction industry—Part 1: Background knowledge.” Saf. Sci. 66 (Jul): 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.02.008.
Szymański, P. 2017. “Risk management in construction projects.” Procedia Eng. 208: 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.036.
Winge, S., E. Albrechtsen, and B. A. Mostue. 2019. “Causal factors and connections in construction accidents.” Saf. Sci. 112 (Feb): 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.10.015.
Zandieh, M., and B. Aslani. 2019. “A hybrid MCDM approach for order distribution in a multiple-supplier supply chain: A case study.” J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 16 (Dec): 100104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2019.08.002.
Zheng, G., N. Zhu, Z. Tian, Y. Chen, and B. Sun. 2012. “Application of a trapezoidal fuzzy AHP method for work safety evaluation and early warning rating of hot and humid environments.” Saf. Sci. 50 (2): 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.042.
Zhou, Q., W. Huang, and Y. Zhang. 2011. “Identifying critical success factors in emergency management using a fuzzy DEMATEL method.” Saf. Sci. 49 (2): 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.08.005.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7Issue 3September 2021

History

Received: Jan 29, 2021
Accepted: Apr 17, 2021
Published online: Jul 15, 2021
Published in print: Sep 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 15, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Occupational Safety and Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Qom Univ. of Medical Sciences, Rooh Allah Sq., Qom 37156-14566, Iran. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3874-3438. Email: [email protected]
Researcher, Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran Univ. of Medical Sciences, Enghelab St., Tehran 1417613151, Iran. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2512-8591. Email: [email protected]
Researcher, Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad Univ., Pounak Sq., Tehran 1468763785, Iran. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8925-7926. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Occupational Safety and Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Qom Univ. of Medical Sciences, Rooh Allah Sq., Qom 37156-14566, Iran (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6976-1276. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Deep-Sea Accident Risk Posture Assessment Based on a Variable-Weighted Five-Element Connection Number, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1168, 10, 2, (2024).
  • Extension Cloud Model and Grey Clustering Evaluation of Enterprise Safety Management System: Based on COWA-CRITIC Combination Weighting, Sustainability, 10.3390/su152215734, 15, 22, (15734), (2023).
  • Multicriteria Health and Safety Risk Assessments in Highway Construction Projects, Sustainability, 10.3390/su15129241, 15, 12, (9241), (2023).
  • Construction Safety Risk Assessment and Early Warning of Nearshore Tunnel Based on BIM Technology, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10.3390/jmse11101996, 11, 10, (1996), (2023).
  • Risk perception in the construction industry: A literature review and future research directions, Work, 10.3233/WOR-220379, 76, 4, (1333-1344), (2023).
  • Development of a novel ergonomic index assessment in the workplace based on physical, cognitive, and environmental components, Work, 10.3233/WOR-220335, 75, 3, (1071-1086), (2023).
  • Development of an ergonomics management model in the workplace: Introduction of the TUGA ergonomics management and analysis model (TEMA), Work, 10.3233/WOR-220251, 76, 1, (205-224), (2023).
  • Occupational safety risk analysis in construction sites based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A case study in a large construction project, Work, 10.3233/WOR-220086, 76, 2, (771-782), (2023).
  • Application of multiple-criteria decision making methods for construction safety research, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law, 10.1680/jmapl.23.00006, (1-10), (2023).
  • Shear Performance of Large-Thickness Precast Shear Walls with Cast-in-Place Belts and Grouting Sleeves, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1000, 9, 2, (2023).
  • See more

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share