Case Studies
May 11, 2021

Vulnerability Analysis of Interdependent Infrastructure Systems Based on Inoperability Input–Output Models

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7, Issue 3

Abstract

Interdependent infrastructure systems consist of several sectors, including gas, power, transportation, and health systems, and are important in modern societies because they provide essential services for the continuous functioning of communities and society. This study presents a framework for conducting vulnerability analyses and key sector identification in interdependent infrastructure systems during and after the occurrence of an external perturbation. To analyze the correlation of sectors and identify the key sectors at different stages of a hazard, this study introduces input-output models, demand-driven inoperability input-output models (IIMs), and supply-driven IIMs. Moreover, an interdependency matrix is used to construct the network in an interdependent infrastructure system, and new indicators of importance and vulnerability indexes are defined to analyze changes in key sectors in different periods of an external hazard. The proposed model is illustrated through a hypothetical four-sector interdependent infrastructure system based on a flash flood event. However, the model is applicable to any physically interdependent system, such as a transportation system, power supply system, and so on. The importance and vulnerability attributes of interdependent infrastructure systems at different stages of the risk management process also provide guidance for decision makers involved in dealing with natural hazards such as flash flood events.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the comments from Kash Barker in University of Oklahoma. The research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Youth Foundation of China (No. 71503194), the Youth Foundation of Education Department of Hubei Province (Grant No. 17Q043), and the Centre for Service Science and Engineering Foundation of WUST (Grant No. CSSE2017GA02).

References

Adedeji, T., D. Proverbs, X. Hong, C. Paul, and O. Victor. 2019. “Making Birmingham a flood resilient city: Challenges and opportunities.” Water (Basel) 8 (11): 1699.
Alinizzi, M., S. Chen, S. Labi, and A. Kandil. 2018. “A methodology to account for one-way infrastructure interdependency in preservation activity scheduling.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 33 (11): 905–925. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12380.
Almoghathawi, Y., K. Barker, C. M. Rocco, and C. D. Nicholson. 2017. “A multi-criteria decision analysis approach for importance ranking of network components.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 158 (Feb): 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.007.
Anderson, C. W., J. R. Santos, and Y. Y. Haimes. 2007. “A risk-based input-output methodology for measuring the effects of the August 2003 northeast blackout.” Econ. Syst. Res. 19 (2): 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310701330233.
Aviso, K. B., A. P. Mayol, M. A. B. Promentilla, J. R. Santos, R. R. Tan, A. T. Ubando, and K. D. S. Yu. 2018. “Allocating human resources in organizations operating under crisis conditions: A fuzzy input-output optimization modeling framework.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 128 (Jan): 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.07.009.
Barker, K., and Y. Y. Haimes. 2009a. “Assessing uncertainty in extreme events: Applications to risk based decision making in interdependent infrastructure sectors.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94 (4): 819–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.09.008.
Barker, K., and Y. Y. Haimes. 2009b. “Uncertainty analysis of interdependencies in dynamic infrastructure recovery: Applications in risk based decision making.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 15 (4): 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2009)15:4(394).
Barker, K., J. H. Lambert, C. W. Zobel, A. H. Tapia, J. E. Ramirez-Marquez, L. A. McLay, C. D. Nicholson, and C. Caragea. 2017. “Defining resilience analytics for interdependent cyber-physical-social networks.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 2 (2): 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1294859.
Baroud, H., and K. Barker. 2014. “Inherent costs and interdependent impacts of infrastructure network resilience.” Risk Anal. 35 (4): 642–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12223.
Berle, O., B. Asbjornslett, and J. Rice. 2011. “Formal vulnerability assessment of a maritime transportation system.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96 (6): 696–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.011.
Collier, M., and R. H. Webb. 1992. Floods, droughts, and climate change. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
Dietzenbacher, E., and R. E. Miller. 2015. “Reflections on the inoperability input-output model.” Econ. Syst. Res. 27 (4): 478–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2015.1052375.
Guido, C., S. Elena, Q. Y. Huang, S. Emily, H. Jeff, and W. Nigel. 2016. “Using Twitter for tasking remote-sensing data collection and damage assessment: 2013 Boulder flood case study.” Int. J. Remote Sens. 37 (1): 100–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2015.1117684.
Haimes, Y. Y., B. M. Horowitz, J. H. Lambert, J. R. Santos, K. G. Crowther, and C. Y. Lian. 2005. “Inoperability input-output model for interdependent infrastructure sectors: Case study.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 11 (2): 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:2(80).
Haimes, Y. Y., and P. Jiang. 2011. “Leontief-based model of risk in complex interconnected infrastructures.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 7 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:1(1).
He, P., T. S. Ng, and B. Su. 2017. “Energy-economic recovery resilience with Input-Output linear programming models.” Energy Econ. 68 (Oct): 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.10.005.
Heracleous, C., P. Kolios, C. G. Panayiotou, G. Ellinas, and M. M. Polycarpou. 2017. “Hybrid systems modeling for critical infrastructures interdependency analysis.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 165 (Sep): 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.028.
Hosseini, S., and K. Barker. 2016. “Modeling infrastructure resilience using Bayesian networks: A case study of inland waterway ports.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 93 (Mar): 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.01.007.
Huang, C. N., J. J. H. Liou, and Y. C. Chuang. 2014. “A method for exploring the interdependencies and importance of critical infrastructures.” Knowl.-Based Syst. 55 (Jan): 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.10.010.
Jonkeren, O., and G. Giannopoulos. 2014. “Analyzing critical infrastructure failure with a resilience inoperability input-output model.” Econ. Syst. Res. 26 (1): 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2013.872604.
Kaegi, M., R. Mock, and W. Kröger. 2009. “Analyzing maintenance strategies by agent-based simulations: A feasibility study.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94 (9): 1416–1421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.02.002.
Kuznetsova, E., R. Louhichi, E. Zio, and R. Farel. 2017. “Input-output Inoperability model for the risk analysis of eco-industrial parks.” J. Manuf. Syst. 164 (15): 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.250.
Lanndon, O., J. G. Masbad, V. M. Noel, and R. S. Omega. 2016. “Supply-side inoperability input-output model (SIIM) for risk analysis in manufacturing systems.” J. Manuf. Syst. 41 (Oct): 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.07.005.
Leontief, W. W. 1951. “Input-output economics.” Sci. Am. 185 (4): 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1051-15.
Leung, M., Y. Y. Haimes, and J. R. Santos. 2007. “Supply- and output-side extensions to the inoperability input-output model for interdependent infrastructures.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 13 (4): 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2007)13:4(299).
Miller, R. E., and P. D. Blair. 1985. Input-output analysis: Foundations and extensions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Nicholson, C. D., K. Barker, and J. E. Ramirez-Marquez. 2016. “Flow-based vulnerability measures for network component importance: Experimentation with preparedness planning.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 145 (Jan): 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.014.
Oosterhaven, J. 2017. “On the limited usability of the inoperability input-output model.” Econ. Syst. Res. 29 (3): 452–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2017.1301395.
Oosterhaven, J., and M. C. Bouwmeester. 2016. “A new approach to modelling the impact of disruptive events.” J. Reg. Sci. 56 (4): 583–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12262.
Ouyang, M. 2014. “Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 121 (2014): 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.06.040.
Ouyang, M. 2017. “A mathematical framework to optimize resilience of interdependent critical infrastructure systems under spatially localized attacks.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 262 (3): 1072–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.022.
Percoco, M. 2006. “A note on the inoperability input-output model.” Risk Anal. 26 (3): 589–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00765.x.
Percoco, M. 2011. “On the local sensitivity analysis of the inoperability input-output model.” Risk Anal. 31 (7): 1038–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01574.x.
Raymond, R., K. B. Tan, M. A. B. Aviso, F. D. Promentilla, K. D. S. Y. Solis, and J. R. Santos. 2015. “A shock absorption index for inoperability input–output models.” Econ. Syst. Res. 27 (1): 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2014.922462.
Rose, A., and S. Liao. 2005. “Modeling regional economic resilience to disasters: A computable general equilibrium analysis of water service disruptions.” J. Reg. Sci. 45 (1): 75–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4146.2005.00365.x.
Rose, A., and D. Wei. 2013. “Estimating the economic consequences of a port shutdown: The special role of resilience.” Econ. Syst. Res. 25 (2): 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2012.731379.
Santos, J. R., L. May, and A. E. Haimar. 2013. “Risk-based input-output analysis of influenza epidemic consequences on interdependent workforce sectors.” Risk Anal. 33 (9): 1620–1635. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12002.
Santos, J. R., K. D. S. Yu, S. A. T. Pagsuyoin, and R. R. Tan. 2014. “Time-varying disaster recovery model for interdependent economic systems using hybrid input–output and event tree analysis.” Econ. Syst. Re. 26 (1): 60–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2013.872602.
Sonis, M., J. D. Hewings, and J. M. Guo. 2000. “A new image of classical key sector analysis: Minimum information decomposition of the Leontief inverse.” Econ. Syst. Res. 12 (3): 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310050120952.
Utne, I. B., P. Hokstad, and J. Vatn. 2011. “A method for risk modeling of interdependencies in critical infrastructures.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96 (6): 671–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.006.
Wu, X., Y. Wang, L. Yang, S. Song, G. Wei, and J. Guo. 2016. “Impact of political dispute on international trade based on an international trade inoperability input-output model: A case study of the 2012 Diaoyu Islands dispute.” J. Int. Trade Econ. Dev. 25 (1): 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2015.1019552.
Xu, W. P., L. Hong, L. G. He, S. L. Wang, and X. G. Chen. 2011. “Supply-driven dynamic inoperability input-output price model for interdependent infrastructure systems.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 17 (4): 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000058.
Xu, W. P., Z. J. Wang, L. Hong, L. G. He, and X. G. Chen. 2015. “The uncertainty recovery analysis for interdependent infrastructure systems using the dynamic inoperability input-output model.” Int. J. Syst. Sci. 46 (7): 1299–1306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2013.822121.
Xu, W. P., M. Zhong, Y. Hong, and K. Lin. 2020. “Enhancing community resilience to urban floods with a network structuring model.” Saf. Sci. 127: 104699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104699.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7Issue 3September 2021

History

Received: May 6, 2020
Accepted: Feb 15, 2021
Published online: May 11, 2021
Published in print: Sep 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Oct 11, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Wenping Xu, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Evergrande School of Management, Wuhan Univ. of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430065, China. Email: [email protected]
Master of Engineering, Evergrande School of Management, Wuhan Univ. of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430065, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4474-1583. Email: [email protected]
Lingli Xiang [email protected]
Master of Engineering, Evergrande School of Management, Wuhan Univ. of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430065, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Computing, Engineering and the Built Environment, Birmingham City Univ., Wolverhampton WV11 2BR, UK. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3297-2205. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share