Technical Papers
Mar 10, 2021

Gibbs Sampling for Damage Detection Using Complex Modal Data from Multiple Setups

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7, Issue 2

Abstract

This paper presents a novel Gibbs sampling approach for structural health monitoring (SHM) with detection of structural changes/damages using incomplete complex modal data measured with a limited number of sensors. The usual difficulty with the availability of sensors in SHM practices and enforcing data acquisition in multiple setups is thoroughly addressed. Structural modeling incorporated with damping is considered in this proposed inverse problem exercise to calibrate damping parameters along with the stiffness and mass parameters facilitating SHM. Both proportional and nonproportional viscous damping are adopted in structural modeling. Detailed formulations on the probabilistic detection of changes/damages are presented in detail. Moreover, a Gibbs sampling technique is introduced to quantify uncertainties of the various sets of uncertain parameters, where samples of the conditional probability density function of a parameter set are obtained iteratively. The proposed approach retains the typical advantage of the nonrequirement of mode-matching. A validation exercise is performed using a three-dimensional building structure (attached with supplementary viscous dampers) and a laboratory steel structure considering multiple damage cases and different sensor placements. The proposed methodology is observed to be efficient for SHM using incomplete complex modal data measured with a limited number of sensors.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all of the data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions. Except for the data and model, the code (developed in-house) implementing the proposed methodology is proprietary. However, the code can be shared with the restriction that the shared code cannot be distributed further and will be used only for review purposes.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India (Project file No. YSS/2015/001224).

References

Bansal, S. 2015. “A new Gibbs sampling based Bayesian model updating approach using modal data from multiple setups.” Int. J. Uncertainty Quantif. 5 (4): 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2015013581.
Beck, J. L. 1996. “System identification methods applied to measured seismic response.” In Proc., 11th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. New York: Elsevier.
Beck, J. L., and S. K. Au. 2002. “Bayesian updating of structural models and reliability using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation.” J. Eng. Mech. 128 (4): 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:4(380).
Beck, J. L., and L. S. Katafygiotis. 1998. “Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework.” J. Eng. Mech. 124 (4): 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:4(455).
Behmanesh, I., and B. Moaveni. 2015. “Probabilistic identification of simulated damage on the Dowling Hall footbridge through Bayesian finite element model updating.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 22 (3): 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1684.
Bernardo, J. M., and A. F. M. Smith. 2000. Bayesian theory. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Boulkaibet, I., T. Marwala, L. Mthembu, M. I. Friswell, and S. Adhikari. 2012. “Sampling techniques in Bayesian finite element model updating.” Proc. Soc. Exp. Mech. 29: 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2431-4_8..
Boulkaibet, I., L. Mthembu, T. Marwala, M. I. Friswell, and S. Adhikari. 2015. “Finite element model updating using the shadow hybrid Monte Carlo technique.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 52–53 (Feb): 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.06.005.
Chen, H. P. 2018. Structural health monitoring of large civil engineering structures. New York: Wiley.
Cheung, S. H., and S. Bansal. 2017. “A new Gibbs sampling based algorithm for Bayesian model updating with incomplete complex modal data.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 92 (Aug): 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.01.015.
Cheung, S. H., and J. L. Beck. 2009. “Bayesian model updating using hybrid Monte Carlo simulation with application to structural dynamic models with many uncertain parameters.” J. Eng. Mech. 135 (4): 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:4(243).
Ching, J., and Y. C. Chen. 2007. “Transitional Markov Chain Monte Carlo method for Bayesian model updating, model class selection, and model averaging.” J. Eng. Mech. 133 (7): 816–832. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:7(816).
Ching, J., M. Muto, and J. L. Beck. 2006. “Structural model updating and health monitoring with incomplete modal data using Gibbs sampler.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 21 (4): 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2006.00432.x.
Conte, J. P., X. Xianfei He, B. Moaveni, S. F. Masri, J. P. Caffrey, M. Wahbeh, F. Tasbihgoo, D. H. Whang, and A. Elgamal. 2008. “Dynamic testing of Alfred Zampa memorial bridge.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (6): 1006–1015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:6(1006).
Cowles, M. K., and B. P. Carlin. 1996. “Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence diagnostics: A comparative study.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 91 (434): 883–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1996.10476956.
Das, A., and N. Debnath. 2018. “A Bayesian finite element model updating with combined normal and lognormal probability distributions using modal measurements.” Appl. Math. Modell. 61 (May): 457–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.05.004.
Das, A., and N. Debnath. 2020. “A Bayesian model updating with incomplete complex modal data.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 136 (Feb): 106524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106524.
Debnath, N., A. Dutta, and S. K. Deb. 2012. “Placement of sensors in operational modal analysis for truss bridges.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 31 (Aug): 196–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.04.006.
Doebling, S. W., C. R. Farrar, and M. B. Prime. 1998. “A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods.” Shock Vib. Dig. 30 (2): 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/058310249803000201.
Esfandiari, A., F. Bakhtiari-Nejad, A. Rahai, and M. Sanayei. 2009. “Structural model updating using frequency response function and quasi-linear sensitivity equation.” J. Sound Vib. 326 (3–5): 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2009.07.001.
Ewins, D. J. 2000. “Adjustment or updating of models.” Sadhana 25 (3): 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703542.
Ewins, D. J. 2003. Modal testing: Theory, practice and application. Baldock, UK: Research Studies Press.
Friswell, M. I., and J. E. Mottershead. 1995. Finite element model updating in structural dynamics. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gelman, A. B., and D. B. Rubin. 1992. “Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences.” Stat. Sci. 7 (4): 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011136.
Geman, S., and D. Geman. 1984. “Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images.” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI-6 (6): 721–741. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596.
Goller, B., J. L. Beck, and G. I. Schueller. 2012. “Evidence-based identification of weighting factors in Bayesian model updating using modal data.” J. Eng. Mech. 138 (5): 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000351.
Jaishi, B., and W.-X. Ren. 2006. “Damage detection by finite element model updating using modal flexibility residual.” J. Sound Vib. 290 (1–2): 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.04.006.
Jaynes, E. T. W. 1978. Where do we stand on maximum entropy, edited by R. D. Levine and M. Tribus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jiang, J., and Y. Yuan. 2018. “Updating stiffness and hysteretic damping matrices using measured modal data.” Shock Vib. 3727021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3727021.
Johnson, E., H. F. Lam, L. S. Katafygiotis, and J. L. Beck. 2004. “The phase I IASC-ASCE structural health monitoring benchmark problem using simulated data.” J. Eng. Mech. 130 (1): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:1(3).
Juang, J. N., and R. S. Pappa. 1985. “An Eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction.” J. Guidance Control Dyn. 8 (5): 620–627. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20031.
Katafygiotis, L., and J. Beck. 1998. “Updating models and their uncertainties. II: Model identifiability.” J. Eng. Mech. 124 (4): 463. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:4(463).
Lam, H. F., J. Hu, and J. H. Yang. 2017. “Bayesian operational modal analysis and Markov chain Monte Carlo-based model updating of a factory building.” Eng. Struct. 132 (Feb): 314–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.048.
Lam, H. F., J. Yang, and S. K. Au. 2015. “Bayesian model updating of a coupled-slab system using field test data utilizing an enhanced Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation algorithm.” Eng. Struct. 102 (Nov): 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.08.005.
Link, M. 2006. Using complex modes for model updating of structures with nonproportional damping. In Proc., Int. Conf. on Noise and Vibration Engineering, ISM, 18–20 September 2006. Belgium: Univ. of Leuven.
Marwala, T. 2010. Finite element model updating using computational intelligence techniques. Berlin: Springer.
Marwala, T., and S. Sibisi. 2005. “Finite element model updating using Bayesian approach.” In Proc., Int. Modal Analysis Conf. New York: Springer.
Metropolis, N., A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller. 1953. “Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines.” J. Chem. Phys. 21 (6): 1087–1092. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114.
Mottershead, J. E., and M. I. Friswell. 1993. “Model updating in structural dynamics: A survey.” J. Sound Vib. 167 (2): 347–375. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1993.1340.
Mottershead, J. E., and M. I. Friswell. 2001. “Physical understanding of structures by model updating.” In Proc., COST F3 Int. Conf. on Structural Identification, 81–96. Bristol, UK: Univ. of Bristol.
Mottershead, J. E., M. Link, and M. I. Friswell. 2011. “The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 25 (7): 2275–2296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.10.012.
Mustafa, S., N. Debnath, and A. Dutta. 2015. “Bayesian probabilistic approach for model updating and damage detection for a large truss bridge.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 15 (2): 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-015-6016-3.
Mustafa, S., and Y. Matsumoto. 2017. “Bayesian model updating and its limitations for detecting local damage of an existing truss bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (7): 04017019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001044.
Pastor, M., M. Binda, and T. Harcarik. 2012. “Modal assurance criterion.” Procedia Eng. 48: 543–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.551.
Petersen, Ø. W., and O. Øiseth. 2017. “Sensitivity-based finite element model updating of a pontoon bridge.” Eng. Struct. 150 (Nov): 573–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.025.
Prajapat, K., and S. Ray-Chaudhuri. 2016. “Prediction error variances in Bayesian model updating employing data sensitivity.” J. Eng. Mech. 142 (12): 04016096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001158.
Simoen, E., G. De Roeck, and G. Lombaert. 2015. “Dealing with uncertainty in model updating for damage assessment: A review.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 56 (May): 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.11.001.
Sipple, J. D., and M. Sanayei. 2014. “Finite element model updating using frequency response functions and numerical sensitivities.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 21 (5): 784–802. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1601.
Sohn, H., C. R. Farrar, N. F. Hunter, and K. Worden. 2001. “Structural health monitoring using statistical pattern recognition techniques.” J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 123 (4): 706–711. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1410933.
Sun, H., and O. Büyüköztürk. 2016. “Probabilistic updating of building models using incomplete modal data.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 75 (Jun): 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.12.024.
Vanik, M. W., J. L. Beck, and S. K. Au. 2000. “Bayesian probabilistic approach to structural health monitoring.” J. Eng. Mech. 126 (7): 738–745. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:7(738).
van Overschee, P., and B. L. de Moor. 1996. Subspace identification for linear systems. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Yuen, K. V. 2010. Bayesian methods for structural dynamics and civil engineering. New York: Wiley.
Zhang, L., T. Wang, and Y. Tamura. 2010. “A frequency–spatial domain decomposition (FSDD) method for operational modal analysis.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 24 (5): 1227–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.10.024.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7Issue 2June 2021

History

Received: Sep 1, 2020
Accepted: Dec 31, 2020
Published online: Mar 10, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 10, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Silchar, Assam 788010, India. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Silchar, Assam 788010, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5618-1902. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share