Technical Papers
Mar 9, 2021

Reliability-Based Probabilistic Safety Evaluation of Seismic Design Approaches for RC–MR Buildings

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7, Issue 2

Abstract

This study evaluates the seismic safety of reinforced concrete moment-resistant (RC–MR) buildings designed with two different methods, i.e., direct displacement based design (DDBD) and conventional force based design (FBD), through a reliability-based probabilistic approach. Two groups of buildings with irregular but symmetric configuration of frames and different heights are designed based on the aforementioned seismic design approaches. After validation of the model developed in OpenSees version 2.5.0 software, all buildings are subjected to incremental dynamic analysis. The results indicate that the irregularity of the configuration of the frames has challenged the seismic performance of the buildings designed with the DDBD approach, whereas changing the height does not significantly affect the seismic performance. Comparison of the two seismic design approaches shows that by changing the approach from DDBD to FBD, the structures behave in a highly vulnerable and unreliable way, exhibiting poor seismic performance. Finally, the evaluation of various probabilistic methods indicates that the use of both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties increases the mean annual frequency of exceedance, resulting in a more conservative level of damage.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data, models, or codes generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request (i.e., OpenSees modeling files and generated outputs).

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 1989. Building code requirement for reinforced concrete. ACI 318-89. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Adeli, M. M., M. Banazadeh, and A. Deylami. 2011. “Bayesian approach for determination of drift hazard curves for generic steel moment-resisting frames in territory of Tehran.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. 9 (3): 145–154.
Asgarian, B., A. Sadrinezhad, and P. Alanjari. 2010. “Seismic performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frames through incremental dynamic analysis.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 66 (2): 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.09.001.
Bhosale, A. S., R. Davis, and P. Sarkar. 2017. “Vertical irregularity of buildings: Regularity index versus seismic risk.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 3 (3): 04017001. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000900.
Bracci, J. M., A. M. Reinhorn, and J. B. Mander. 1992. Seismic resistance of reinforced concrete structures designed only for gravity loads: Part I—Design and properties of a one-third scale model structure.. New York: Univ. of Buffalo.
Bracci, J. M., A. M. Reinhorn, and J. B. Mander. 1995. “Seismic resistance of reinforced concrete frame structures designed for gravity loads: Performance of structural system.” ACI Mater. J. 92 (5): 597–609. https://doi.org/10.14359/909.
Cornell, C. A., F. Jalayer, R. O. Hamburger, and D. A. Foutch. 2002. “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4): 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526).
Dhir, P. K., R. Davis, and P. Sarkar. 2018. “Safety assessment of gravity load-designed reinforced concrete-framed buildings.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 4 (2): 04018004. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000955.
Dhir, P. K., N. P. Zade, A. Basu, R. Davis, and P. Sarkar. 2020. “Implications of Importance factor on seismic design from 2000 SAC-FEMA perspective.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 6 (2): 04020016. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001048.
FEMA. 2000. Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2009. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Fox, M. J., T. J. Sullivan, and K. Beyer. 2014. “Comparison of force-based and displacement-based design approaches for RC coupled walls in New Zealand.” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 47 (3): 190–205. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.47.3.190-205.
Garcia, R., T. J. Sullivan, and G. D. Corte. 2010. “Development of a displacement-based design method for steel frame-RC wall buildings.” J. Earthquake Eng. 14 (2): 252–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460902995138.
Homaei, F., H. Shakib, and M. Soltani. 2017. “Probabilistic seismic performance evaluation of vertically irregular steel building considering soil–structure interaction.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. 15 (4): 611–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0165-z.
BHRC (Building and Housing Research Center). 2015. Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings. [In Persian.] 4th ed. Tehran, Iran: Building and Housing Research Center.
Izadi, E., and A. S. Moghadam. 2015. “Two important issues relevant to torsional response of asymmetric 8-story RC building designed with direct displacement based design approach.” Int. J. Eng. 28 (9): 1257–1267.
Jalayer, F., and C. A. Cornell. 2003. A technical framework for probability-based demand and capacity factor design (DCFD) seismic formats.. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Kim, D. H., and R. T. Leon. 2013. “Fragility analyses of mid-rise T-stub PR frames in the Mid-America earthquake region.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 13 (1): 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-013-1008-7.
Kim, T., and J. Kim. 2007. “Seismic performance evaluation of a RC special moment frame.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 27 (6): 671–682. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2007.27.6.671.
Lu, D., X. Yu, M. Jia, and G. Wang. 2014. “Seismic risk assessment for a reinforced concrete frame designed according to Chinese codes.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 10 (10): 1295–1310. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.791326.
Malekpour, S., and F. Dashti. 2013. “Application of the direct displacement based design methodology for different types of RC structural systems.” Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 7 (2): 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-013-0043-2.
Mander, J. B., M. J. N. Priestley, and R. Park. 1988. “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 114 (8): 1804–1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
McKenna, F., G. L. Fenves, and M. H. Scott. 2016. OpenSees: Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Mohebi, B. 2016. “Evaluation of the effect of connection fracture and configuration of fracturing connections on seismic performance of steel moment frames.” Amirkabir J. Civ. Eng. 48 (4): 459–474. https://doi.org/10.22060/ceej.2015.497.
Muljati, I., F. Asisi, and K. Willyanto. 2015. “Performance of force based design versus direct displacement based design in predicting seismic demands of regular concrete special moment resisting frames.” Procedia Eng. 125 (11): 1050–1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.161.
Noruzvand, M., M. Mohebbi, and K. Shakeri. 2020. “Modified direct displacement-based design approach for structures equipped with fluid viscous damper.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 27 (1): e2465. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2465.
O’Reilly, G. J., and T. J. Sullivan. 2016. “Direct displacement-based seismic design of eccentrically braced steel frames.” J. Earthquake Eng. 20 (2): 243–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2015.1061465.
Pettinga, J. D., and M. J. N. Priestley. 2005. “Dynamic behaviour of reinforced concrete frames designed with direct displacement-based design.” J. Earthquake Eng. 9 (2): 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246905002419.
Piluso, V., G. Rizzano, and I. Tolone. 2009. “Seismic reliability assessment of a two-story steel-concrete composite frame designed according to Eurocode 8.” Struct. Saf. 31 (5): 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.01.001.
Pirizadeh, M., and H. Shakib. 2013. “Probabilistic seismic performance evaluation of non-geometric vertically irregular steel buildings.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 82 (Mar): 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.12.012.
Pourgharibshahi, A., and T. Taghikhany. 2012. “Reliability-based assessment of deteriorating steel moment resisting frames.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 71 (Apr): 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.07.019.
Priestley, M. J. N. 2007. “Fundamentals of direct displacement-based seismic design and assessment.” In CISM Int. Centre for mechanical sciences: Courses and lectures, 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-74214-3_8.
Priestley, M. J. N., G. M. Calvi, and M. Kowalsky. 2007. Displacement-based seismic design of structures. Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press.
Priestley, M. J. N., and M. Kowalsky. 2000. “Direct displacement-based seismic design of concrete buildings.” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 33 (4): 421–444. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.33.4.421-444.
Rahman, M. A., and S. Sritharan. 2007. “Performance-based seismic evaluation of two five-story precast concrete hybrid frame buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (11): 1489–1500. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1489).
Rizzano, G., and I. Tolone. 2009. “Seismic assessment of existing RC frames: Probabilistic approach.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (7): 836–852. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:7(836).
Sahoo, D. R., and A. Prakash. 2019. “Seismic behavior of concentrically braced frames designed using direct displacement-based method.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 19 (1): 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0092-0.
Shahi, R., N. Lam, E. Gad, J. Wilson, and K. Watson. 2017. “Seismic assessment of cold-formed steel stud bracing wall panels using direct displacement based design approach.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 15 (3): 1261–1277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9980-x.
Shakib, H., and F. Homaei. 2017. “Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of the soil-structure interaction effect on seismic response of mid-rise setback steel buildings.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 15 (7): 2827–2851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0087-9.
Shakib, H., and M. Pirizadeh. 2014. “Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of setback buildings under bidirectional excitation.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (2): 04013061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000835.
Shibata, A., and M. A. Sozen. 1976. “Substitute-structure method for seismic design in R/C.” J. Struct. Div. 102 (1): 1–18.
Shokrgozar, H. R., I. Mansouri, and J. W. Hu. 2018. “Comparison of seismic reliability and risk assessment for special and intermediate steel moment frames.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 22 (9): 3452–3461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-0283-4.
Sil, A., G. Das, and P. Hait. 2019. “Characteristics of FBD and DDBD techniques for SMRF buildings designed for seismic zone-V in India.” J. Build. Pathol. Rehabil. 4 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-018-0040-6.
Sullivan, T. J. 2013. “Direct displacement-based seismic design of steel eccentrically braced frame structures.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 11 (6): 2197–2231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9486-8.
Sullivan, T. J., and A. Lago. 2012. “Towards a simplified direct DBD procedure for the seismic design of moment resisting frames with viscous dampers.” Eng. Struct. 35 (Feb): 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.11.010.
Sullivan, T. J., M. J. N. Priestley, and G. M. Calvi, eds. 2012. A model code for the displacement-based seismic design of structures: DBD12. Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press.
Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2002. “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3): 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
Vamvatsikos, D., F. Jalayer, and C. A. Cornell. 2003. “Application of incremental dynamic analysis to an RC-structure.” In Proc. FIB Symp. Concrete Structures Seismic Regions, 1–12. Athens: FIB Publisher.
Vidot-Vega, A. L., and M. J. Kowalsky. 2013. “Drift, strain limits and ductility demands for RC moment frames designed with displacement-based and force-based design methods.” Eng. Struct. 51 (Jun): 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.004.
Yahyai, M., and B. Rezayibana. 2015. “Direct displacement-based design of special concentrically-braced frames in near-fault regions.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 13 (10): 2945–2971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9749-7.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7Issue 2June 2021

History

Received: Jun 12, 2020
Accepted: Dec 14, 2020
Published online: Mar 9, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 9, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dariush Alimohammadi [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad Univ., Najafabad 8514143131, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Esmaeel Izadi Zaman Abadi [email protected]
Asisstant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad Univ., Najafabad 8514143131, Iran (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share