Technical Papers
Jun 14, 2018

Scenario Analysis and PERT/CPM Applied to Strategic Investment at an Automated Container Port

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 4, Issue 3

Abstract

Particular scenarios of emergent and future conditions are more disruptive than others in terms of project schedules and the evolving priorities of project managers. It is essential to associate the scenarios with cost and schedule impacts to guide corrective or precautionary actions. The innovation of this paper is to use scenarios to investigate two modes of project disruption: (1) scenario-based preferences that change the relative emphasis placed on project management success criteria, and (2) scenarios that may change the structure of the project network and parameters of the constituent activities. These disruptions are used to reprioritize the activities of projects across scenarios subject to precedence constraints. The developed methodology is demonstrated with applications to strategic planning, capacity expansion, and operations of a shipping container port with billions of dollars of planned investment and millions of container transactions per year. The results characterize the scenarios that are most and least disruptive.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant 1541165 “CRISP Type 2: Collaborative Research: Resilience Analytics: A Data-Driven Approach for Enhanced Interdependent Network Resilience.” Additional support for this effort was provided by the Commonwealth Center for Advanced Logistics Systems (CCALS), The Port of Virginia, and the Volkswagen Group of North America Fellowship. This project was done in part with funding from Virginia International Terminals, LLC (VIT), a single-member limited liability company wholly owned by the Virginia Port Authority (VPA). In addition, Hampton Roads Chassis Pool (HRCP II), on behalf of and wholly owned by VIT, operates and manages the intermodal chassis and empty container yards. Collectively the three entities are marketed as The Port of Virginia, and referred to as such in this paper.

References

Abdi, H. 2007. “The Kendall rank correlation coefficient.” In Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics, edited by N. Salkind. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Allen, S., and P. C. Hardin. 2008. “Developing instructional technology products using effective project management practices.” J. Comput. High Educ. 19 (2): 72–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033427.
Aoieong, R. T., S. L. Tang, and S. M. Ahmed. 2002. “A process approach in measuring quality costs of construction projects: Model development.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 20 (2): 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190110109157.
Atkinson, R. 1999. “Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria.” Int. J. Project Manage. 17 (6): 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6.
Babu, A. J. G., and N. Suresh. 1996. “Project management with time, cost, and quality considerations.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 88 (2): 320–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00202-9.
Belton, V., and T. J. Stewart. 2002. Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bishop, P., A. Hines, and T. Collins. 2007. “The current state of scenario development: An overview of techniques.” Foresight 9 (1): 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680710727516.
Bratton, J., D. Burke, P. Ulrich, S. Laxmana, and S. Raetz. 2015. Wide open: How the Panama Canal expansion is redrawing the logistics map. Boston: Boston Consulting Group.
Browning, T. R. 1999. “Sources of schedule risk in complex systems development.” Syst. Eng. 2 (3): 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6858(1999)2:3%3C129::AID-SYS1%3E3.0.CO;2-H.
Chan, A. P. C., and A. P. L. Chan. 2004. “Key performance indicators for measuring construction success.” Benchmarking Int. J. 11 (2): 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770410532624.
Chapman, R. J. 2001. “The controlling influences on effective risk identification and assessment for construction design management.” Int. J. Project Manage. 19 (3): 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00070-8.
Collier, Z. A., E. B. Connelly, T. L. Polmateer, and J. H. Lambert. 2017. “Value chain for next-generation biofuels: Resilience and sustainability of the product life cycle.” Environ. Syst. Decisions 37 (1): 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-016-9618-1.
Collier, Z. A., and J. H. Lambert. 2018. “Time management of infrastructure recovery schedules by anticipation and valuation of disruptions.” J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 4 (2): 04018012. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000961.
Connelly, E. B., L. M. Colosi, A. F. Clarens, and J. H. Lambert. 2015. “Risk analysis of biofuels industry for aviation with scenario-based expert elicitation.” Syst. Eng. 18 (2): 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21298.
Cooke-Davies, T. 2002. “The ‘real’ success factors on projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 20 (3): 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00067-9.
Creemers, S., E. Demeulemeester, and S. van de Vonder. 2010. A new approach for quantitative risk analysis. Leuven, Belgium: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
de Meyer, A., C. H. Loch, and M. T. Pich. 2002. “Managing project uncertainty: From variation to chaos.” MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 43 (2): 60–67.
de Miranda Mota, C. M., A. T. de Almeida, and L. H. Alencar. 2009. “A multiple criteria decision model for assigning priorities to activities in project management.” Int. J. Project Manage. 27 (2): 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.08.005.
de Siqueira Santos, S., D. Y. Takahashi, A. Nakata, and A. Fijita. 2014. “A comparative study of statistical methods used to identify dependencies between gene expression signals.” Briefings Bioinf. 15 (6): 906–918. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbt051.
Durbach, I. N., and T. J. Stewart. 2012a. “A comparison of simplified value function approaches for treating uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis.” Omega 40 (4): 456–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2011.08.004.
Durbach, I. N., and T. J. Stewart. 2012b. “Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.04.038.
Elmaghraby, S. E. 2000. “On criticality and sensitivity in activity networks.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 127 (2): 220–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00483-X.
Ferson, S. 2005. Bayesian methods in risk assessment. Setauket, NY: Applied Biomathematics.
Galway, L. A. 2007. Subjective probability distribution elicitation in cost risk analysis: A review. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Goodwin, P., and G. Wright. 2001. “Enhancing strategy evaluation in scenario planning: A role for decision analysis.” J. Manage. Stud. 38 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00225.
Hadad, Y., and B. Keren. 2013. “Decision support model for ranking project network activities based on multiple criteria of precedence, duration and cost.” Int. J. Eng. Manage. Econ. 4 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEME.2013.055984.
Hadad, Y., B. Keren, and Z. Laslo. 2016. “Multi-criteria methods for ranking project activities.” Yugosl J. Oper. Res. 26 (2): 199–217. https://doi.org/10.2298/YJOR140618012H.
Haimes, Y. Y. 2012. “Systems-based guiding principles for risk modeling, planning, assessment, management, and communication.” Risk Anal. 32 (9): 1451–1467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01809.
Hall, D., and D. Hulett. 2002. Universal risk project final report. San Diego, CA: RMRP.
Hamilton, M. C., J. H. Lambert, E. B. Connelly, and K. Barker. 2016. “Resilience analytics with disruption of preferences and lifecycle cost analysis for energy microgrids.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 150 (1): 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.01.005.
Hamilton, M. C., J. H. Lambert, and L. J. Valverde Jr. 2015. “Climate and related uncertainties influencing research and development priorities.” J. Risk Uncertain Eng. Syst. A Civ. Eng. 1 (2): 04015005. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000814.
Herroelen, W., and R. Leus. 2004. “The construction of stable project baseline schedules.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156 (3): 550–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00130-9.
Hillson, D. 2003. “Using a risk breakdown structure in project management.” J. Facil. Manage. 2 (1): 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725960410808131.
Huchzermeier, A., and C. H. Loch. 2001. “Project management under risk: Using the real options approach to evaluate flexibility in R&D.” Manage. Sci. 47 (1): 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.1.85.10661.
Icmeli-Tukel, O., and W. O. Rom. 1997. “Ensuring quality in resource constrained project scheduling.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 103 (3): 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00305-0.
Jensen, P. A. 2013. “Value triangles in the management of building projects.” In Proc., 19th CIB World Building Congress. Delft, Netherlands: International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction.
Kaplan, S., and B. J. Garrick. 1981. “On the quantitative definition of risk.” Risk Anal. 1 (1): 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.
Karvetski, C. W., and J. H. Lambert. 2011. “Scenario and multiple criteria decision analysis for energy and environmental security of military and industrial installations.” Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. 7 (2): 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.137.
Karvetski, C. W., and J. H. Lambert. 2012. “Evaluating deep uncertainties in strategic priority-setting with an application to facility energy investments.” Syst. Eng. 15 (4): 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21215.
Karvetski, C. W., J. H. Lambert, and I. Linkov. 2009. “Emergent conditions and multiple criteria analysis in infrastructure: Prioritization for developing countries.” J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 16 (5–6): 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.444.
Khang, D. B., and Y. M. Myint. 1999. “Time, cost and quality trade-off in project management: A case study.” Int. J. Project Manage. 17 (4): 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00043-X.
Kim, J. Y., C. W. Kang, and I. K. Hwang. 2012. “A practical approach to project scheduling: Considering the potential quality loss cost in the time-cost tradeoff problem.” Int. J. Project Manage. 30 (2): 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.05.004.
Lambert, J. H., et al. 2012. “Prioritizing infrastructure investments in Afghanistan with multiagency stakeholders and deep uncertainty of emergent conditions.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 18 (2): 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000078.
Lambert, J. H., Y. J. Wu, H. You, A. Clarens, and B. Smith. 2013. “Climate change influence on priority setting for transportation infrastructure assets.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (1): 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000094.
Leach, L. 2003. “Schedule and cost buffer sizing: How to account for the bias between project performance and your model.” Project Manage. J. 34 (2): 34–47.
Lee, D. E. 2005. “Probability of project completion using stochastic project scheduling simulation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (3): 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:3(310).
Lempert, R. J., S. W. Popper, and S. C. Bankes. 2003. Shaping the next one hundred years: New methods for quantitative, long-term policy analysis. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Liberatore, M. J., and B. Pollack-Johnson. 2009. “Quality, time, and cost tradeoffs in project management decision making.” In PICMET 2009 Proc. Portland, OR: Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology.
Liberatore, M. J., and B. Pollack-Johnson. 2013. “Improving project management decision making by modeling quality, time, and cost continuously.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 60 (3): 518–528. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2012.2219586.
Love, P. E. D., and Z. Irani. 2003. “A project management quality cost information system for the construction industry.” Inf. Manage. 40 (7): 649–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00094-0.
Marcelino-Sádaba, S., A. Pérez-Ezcurdia, A. M. Echeverría Lazcano, and P. Villanueva. 2014. “Project risk management methodology for small firms.” Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (2): 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.009.
Maylor, H. 2001. “Beyond the Gantt chart: Project management moving on.” Eur. Manage. J. 19 (1): 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(00)00074-8.
Moffatt & Nichol. 2016. “Draft consulting engineer’s report.” Mofatt & Nichol, Long Beach, CA. Accessed June. 5, 2017. http://www.portofvirginia.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/160914-2016-PoV-Consulting-Engineers-Report-Draft-_Redacted.pdf.
Nandhakumar, J., and M. Jones. 2001. “Accounting for time: Managing time in project-based teamworking.” Account Org. Soc. 26 (3): 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00051-3.
Ogilvy, J., and P. Schwartz. 2004. Planning your scenarios. Emeryville, CA: GBN Global Business Network.
Paquin, J. P., J. Couillard, and D. J. Ferrand. 2000. “Assessing and controlling the quality of a project end product: The earned quality method.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 47 (1): 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.820728.
Parth, F. R. 2014. “Planning and controlling megaprojects. Part I: Control to maximize profits.” In PMI Global Congress 2014. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Pelletier, G. 2009. “YASAIw.xla—A modified version of an open-source add-in for Excel to provide additional functions for Monte Carlo simulation.” State of Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA. Accessed May 15, 2017. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/eap/models.html.
Pich, M. T., C. H. Loch, and A. de Meyer. 2002. “On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management.” Manage. Sci. 48 (8): 1008–1023. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1008.163.
PMI (Project Management Institute). 2013. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). 5th ed. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
PMI (Project Management Institute). 2016. The high cost of low performance: How will you improve business results? PMI’s pulse of the profession, 8th Global Project Management Survey. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Pollack-Johnson, B., and M. J. Liberatore. 2005. “Project planning under uncertainty using scenario analysis.” Project Manage. J. 36 (1): 15–26.
Pollack-Johnson, B., and M. J. Liberatore. 2006. “Incorporating quality considerations into project time/cost tradeoff analysis and decision making.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 53 (4): 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.883705.
Port of Virginia. 2015. “2065 master plan: Executive summary.” Port of Virginia, Norfolk, VA. Accessed June 5, 2017. http://www.portofvirginia.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/TPOV-master-plan-2065-final-020316.pdf.
Raffo, D. M. 2005. “Software project management using PROMPT: A hybrid metrics, modeling and utility framework.” Inf. Software Technol. 47 (15): 1009–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2005.09.004.
Ram, C., G. Montibeller, and A. Morton. 2011. “Extending the use of scenario planning and MCDA for the evaluation of strategic options.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 62 (5): 817–829. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.90.
Regnier, E. 2005. “Hidden assumptions in project management tools.” DRMI Newsletter, Defense Resources Management Institute, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA. Accessed September 30, 2017. http://edocs.nps.edu/npspubs/institutional/newsletters/DRMI/2005/Jan05.pdf.
Rodrigue, J. P. 2010. Maritime transportation: Drivers for the shipping and port industries. Leipzig, Germany: International Transport Forum.
Seal, K. C. 2001. “A generalized PERT/CPM implementation in a spreadsheet.” INFORMS Trans. Educ. 2 (1): 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2.1.16.
Shoemaker, P. J. H. 1995. “Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking.” MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 36 (2): 25–40.
Stewart, T. J., S. French, and J. Rios. 2013. “Integrating multicriteria decision analysis and scenario planning—Review and extension.” Omega 41 (4): 679–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.09.003.
Stillwell, W. G., D. A. Seaver, and W. Edwards. 1981. “A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multiattribute utility decision-making.” Organizational Behav. Hum. Perform. 28 (1): 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(81)90015-5.
Tesch, D., T. J. Kloppenborg, and M. N. Frolick. 2007. “IT project risk factors: The project management professionals perspective.” J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 47 (4): 61–69.
Thomson, D. S., S. A. Austin, H. Devine-Wright, and G. R. Mills. 2003. “Managing value and quality in design.” Build. Res. Inf. 31 (5): 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961321032000087981.
Trietsch, D., and K. R. Baker. 2012. “PERT 21: Fitting PERT/CPM for use in the 21st century.” Int. J. Project Manage. 30 (4): 490–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.09.004.
van der Westhuizen, D., and E. P. Fitzgerald. 2005. “Defining and measuring project success.” In Proc., European Conf. on IS Management, Leadership and Governance, 157–163. Reading, UK: Academic Conferences Limited.
Vanhoucke, M. 2010. “Using activity sensitivity and network topology information to monitor project time performance.” Omega 38 (5): 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2009.10.001.
Virine, L., and M. Trumper. 2008. Project decisions: The art and science. Vienna, VA: Management Concepts.
Yu, A. G., P. D. Flett, and J. A. Bowers. 2005. “Developing a value-centered proposal for assessing project success.” Int. J. Project Manage. 23 (6): 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.01.008.
Zaiontz, C. 2013. “Kendall’s correlation testing with ties.” Real Statistics Using Excel. Accessed May 15, 2017. http://www.real-statistics.com/correlation/kendalls-tau-correlation/kendalls-correlation-testing-with-ties/.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 4Issue 3September 2018

History

Received: Oct 6, 2017
Accepted: Mar 5, 2018
Published online: Jun 14, 2018
Published in print: Sep 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Nov 14, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Zachary A. Collier [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Systems and Information Engineering, Univ. of Virginia, 151 Engineer’s Way, P.O. Box 400747, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4747 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Daniel Hendrickson
Vice President, Strategic Planning and Analytics, The Port of Virginia, 600 World Trade Center, Norfolk, VA 23510.
Thomas L. Polmateer
Logistics Research Systems Analyst, Dept. of Systems and Information Engineering, Commonwealth Center for Advanced Logistics Systems and Univ. of Virginia, 151 Engineer’s Way, P.O. Box 400747, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4747.
James H. Lambert, F.ASCE [email protected]
Research Professor, Dept. of Systems and Information Engineering, Univ. of Virginia, 151 Engineer’s Way, P.O. Box 400747, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4747. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share