Technical Papers
May 16, 2022

Conceptual Model for the Operational Performance of the Container Terminals in India

Publication: Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 4

Abstract

In the upcoming years, container terminals in India can attain more substantial throughput targets by exploiting their untapped potential of throughput. Numerous factors may affect the existing terminals’ ability to perform to their maximum capability. Despite the significance of the untapped potential, very few studies are available on the identification of the factors and their influence on the operational performance of the container terminals in India. The objective of this study is to identify the enabling and inhibiting factors and develop a conceptual model that indicates how their relationships affect the operational performance of the container terminals in India. This study identified 21 enabler attributes, 15 inhibitor attributes, and seven performance indicators through an extensive literature review and expert consultation. Furthermore, exploratory factor analysis was adopted to group the identified attributes into five enabling factors, three inhibiting factors, and two performance indicator factors through a questionnaire survey of 81 respondents from different container terminals in India. A hypothesized conceptual model encompassing all these attributes and factors was created and tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS SEM). The results revealed that the considered enabling and inhibiting factors have a significant influence on the operational performance of container terminals. Infrastructure upgrading and system initiatives, terminal facilities and policy, reefer (refrigerated container) systems and logistics advantage, systems and process, and concessions and cost initiatives are the critical enabling factors. In addition, management- and resource-related issues, infrastructure issues and market capture, and policy- and procedure-related issues may be deemed as critical inhibiting factors. This study may help port professionals and port operators to incorporate these factors and improve the operational performance of container terminals. Furthermore, this study contributes to the minimal literature available on the factors influencing the performance of Indian container terminals.

Practical Applications

This research identified 21 enabler attributes, 15 inhibitors attributes, and seven performance indicators influencing the operational performance of container terminals of India through literature review and expert opinions. These attributes were grouped using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) into five enabling factors, three inhibiting factors, and two performance indicators. A total of 81 respondents with 5 to 20+ plus years of experience from 26 Indian container terminals provided their responses to the questions asked in the survey. Structural equation modeling was utilized to develop a conceptual model indicating the relationships among the enabling, inhibiting, and performance indicator factors. The results revealed that infrastructure upgrading and system initiatives, terminal facilities and policy, reefer systems and logistics advantage, systems and process, and concessions and cost initiatives are the critical enabling factors. In addition, management- and resource-related issues, infrastructure issues and market capture, and policy- and procedure-related issues are deemed as critical inhibiting factors. This research shall help the port authorities to adopt enabling factors and mitigate the inhibitor factors to improve the operational performance of container terminals

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Anwar, M., L. Henesey, and E. Casalicchio. 2019. “Digitalization in container terminal logistics: A literature review.” In Proc., 27th Annual Conf., of Int. Association of Maritime Economists, 1–25. Greece: International Association of Maritime Economists.
Aqmarina, A., and N. Achjar. 2017. “Determinants of port performance – Case study of 4 main ports in Indonesia (2005–2015).” Econ. Finance Indonesia 63 (2): 176–185. https://doi.org/10.7454/efi.v63i2.574.
Behera, S. K. 2016. Indian container market report. Drewry and gateway research. Chennai, India: Maritime Gateway. http://gatewayresearch.in/reports/INDIAN-CONTAINER-MARKET-REPORT-2016.pdf.
Behera, S. K. 2017. Indian container market report. Drewry and gateway research. Chennai, India: Maritime Gateway. http://www.containersindia.in/pdf/INDIAN CONTAINER MARKET REPORT-2016.pdf.
Behera, S. K., and R. Oruganti. 2019. Indian container market report. Chennai, India: Maritime Gateway.
BRIEF. 2017. Direct delivery at Indian ports. New Delhi, India: BRIEF.
Caldeirinha, V. R., J. A. Felício, S. F. da Cunha, L. Machado, V. R. Caldeirinha, J. A. Felício, S. F. Cunha, and L. Machado. 2018. “The nexus between port governance and performance.” Marit. Policy Manage. 45 (7): 877–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1485076.
Chandrasekaran, N., and S. M. Kumar. 2014. Seaport: Challenges and issues in India. Guindy, India: CII Institute of Logistics.
Dappe, M. H., and A. Suárez-Alemán. 2016. Competitiveness of south Asia’s container ports: A comprehensive assessment of performance, drivers, and costs. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Demirel, B., K. Cullinane, and H. Haralambides. 2012. “Container terminal efficiency and private sector participation.” In The Blackwell companion to maritime economics, edited by W. K. Talley, 571–598. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Fenton, C., P. Storrs-Fox, M. Joerss, S. Saxon, and M. Stone. 2018. Brave new world?  Container transport in 2043. London: TT Club.
FICCI-EY. 2015. India PPP summit 2015 restoring the momentum and reviving PPPs in India. New Delhi, India: FICCI-EY.
Field, A. 2018. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 5th ed. London: Sage.
Gangwar, R. 2013. “Tariff regulation in port sector: Experiences from India.” In Vol. 13 of World Conf., on Transport Research. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.
Gayathri, C., V. Kamala, M. S. Gajanand, and S. Yamini. 2022. “Analysis of operational and financial performance of ports: An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL-TOPSIS approach.” Benchmarking Int. J. 29 (3): 1046–1066. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-03-2020-0123.
Gena, B., D. Arief, K. Tridoyo, and Z. Nimmi. 2020. “Competitive advantage improvement strategy of container shipping industry: Case of Indonesia.” Int. J. Ship. Transp. Logist. 12 (4): 307–339. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2020.108403.
Golbabaie, F., S. S. Ganji, and N. Arabshahi. 2010. “Multi-criteria evaluation of stacking yard configuration.” J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 24 (1): 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2010.08.010.
Gorsuch, R. L. 2015. Factor analysis. Classic ed. New York: Routledge.
Hair, J., G. T. Hult, C. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2017. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hair, J. F., J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle. 2019. “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM.” Eur. Bus. Rev. 31 (1): 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
IBEF (Indian Brand Equity Foundation). 2020. Vol. 30 of IBEF and Techsci research. New Delhi, India: IBEF.
Iyer, K. C., and V. P. S. N. Nanyam. 2021a. “A grounded theory approach in the identification of enabling and inhibiting factors affecting the performance of container terminals.” Transp. Dev. Econ. 7 (2): 1–17.
Iyer, K. C., and V. P. S. N. Nanyam. 2021b. “Concentration analysis of container terminals in India.” Marit. Transp. Res. 2 (August): 100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2021.100037.
Iyer, K. C., and V. P. S. N. Nanyam. 2021c. “Technical efficiency analysis of container terminals in India.” Asian J. Ship. Logist. 37 (1): 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2020.07.002.
Kanellopoulos, J. 2018. “Port of the future challenges, enablers and barriers.” Accessed July 27, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5bf625369&appId=PPGMS.
Kannika, N., K. H. Tan, and K. Pawar. 2019. “Enhancing the competitiveness of container seaports through sustainability: A case study of Thailand.” Procedia Manuf. 39: 1587–1596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.283.
Manoj, P. K. 2015. “International Container Transhipment Terminal (ICTT) and its impact on coffee exports from India: An analysis.” Int. J. Trade Global Bus. Perspect. Pezzottaite J. 4 (3): 5.
Maskey, R., J. Fei, and H.-O. Nguyen. 2018. “Use of exploratory factor analysis in maritime research.” Asian J. Ship. Logist. 34 (2): 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2018.06.006.
MoPSW (Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways). 2021. Maritime India vision 2030. New Delhi, India: MoPSW.
MoS (Ministry of Shipping). 2016. “Sagarmala national perspective plan.” Government of India. http://sagarmala.gov.in/about-sagarmala/national-perspective-plans.
Mitra, S., A. Sanganeria, P. Banerjee, M. Pratap, and D. Gadh. 2021. “Reforming port processes in India for logistics efficiency.” ADB Briefs 4 (187). https://doi.org/10.22617/BRF210328-2.
Mundfrom, D. J., D. G. Shaw, and T. L. Ke. 2005. “Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses.” Int. J. Test. 5 (2): 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4.
Pillai, A., and J. Paul. 2011. “Effect of cabotage policy.” AMET J. Manage. 2 (1): 1–10.
Raghuram, G., and P. D. Udayakumar. 2015. Effect of tariff regulation in major port container terminals: The case of Jawaharlal Nehru port trust. W.P. No. 2015-12-04. Ahmedabad, India: Indian Institute of Management.
Rajasekar, T., and M. Deo. 2014. “Determinants of port performance–Evidence from major ports in India–A panel approach.” Int. J. Econ. Financ. Manage. 2 (5): 206–213.
Rao, A. J., T. B. Raju, H. Roy, and N. B. Prakash. 2017. “Benchmarking and probing its applicability: Major seaports of India.” SCMS J. Indian Manage. 4 (December): 35–53.
Rathi, A., A. P. Singh, and S. Narayanaswami. 2012. Enhancing port performance: A case of Jawaharlal Nehru port trust. W.P. No. 2012-12-04. Ahmedabad, India: Indian Institute of Management.
Sekar, R. T., S. Ashraf P, and M. Deo P. 2014. “Measurement of efficiency of major ports in India – A data envelopment analysis approach.” Int. J. Environ. Sci. 4 (5): 926–936.
Sequeira, S., and S. Djankov. 2010. “An empirical study of corruption in ports.” Munich Personal RePEc Archive 1 (21791): 59.
Singh, A. 2017. Port logistics issues and challenges in India. Noida, India: Dun & Bradstreet Information Services India.
Sislian, L., and A. Jaegler. 2020. “ERP implementation effects on sustainable maritime balanced scorecard: Evidence from major European ports.” Supply Chain Forum 21 (2): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2020.1754116.
Tongzon, J. L., and H.-O. Nguyen. 2021. “Effects of port-shipping logistics integration on technical and allocative efficiency.” Asian J. Ship. Logist. 37 (2): 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2021.01.001.
Vasantha, S., and S. Meena. 2019. “Challenges faced by freight forwarders in their operations in Chennai City, Tamil Nadu.” Asian Rev. Social Sci. 8 (1): 6–8. https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2019.8.1.1543.
Walters, D., E. Wadsworth, and S. Bhattacharya. 2020. “What about the workers? — Experiences of arrangements for safety and health in global container terminals.” Saf. Sci. 121 (May 2019): 474–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.017.
Williams, L. J., R. J. Vandenberg, and J. R. Edwards. 2009. “12 structural equation modeling in management research: A guide for improved analysis.” Acad. Manage. Ann. 3 (1): 543–604. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903065683.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 148Issue 4July 2022

History

Received: Oct 10, 2021
Accepted: Apr 1, 2022
Published online: May 16, 2022
Published in print: Jul 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Oct 16, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India; Assistant Professor, RICS School of Built Environment, Amity Univ., Noida 201301, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3649-8213. Email: [email protected]
Kumar Neeraj Jha, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Operational performance model for Indian container terminals using qualitative comparative analysis, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 10.1016/j.ajsl.2022.08.001, 38, 4, (197-206), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share