Technical Papers
Sep 10, 2020

Modeling Storm Surge in a Small Tidal Two-Inlet System

Publication: Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 6

Abstract

Model simulations using a depth-averaged ocean circulation model (ADCIRC) two-way coupled with a wave model (STWAVE) through the Coastal Storm Modeling System Coupling Framework (CSTORM-MS) are compared with observations made in the shallow, two-inlet tidal Katama Bay system on the Atlantic coast of Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts, during Hurricane Irene. The CSTORM-MS framework integrates high-resolution bathymetric grids of this system with the North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study (NACCS) performed by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. The effects of bathymetric resolution and wave-flow coupling on the accuracy of modeled storm surge were investigated by comparing observations with the high bathymetric resolution, coupled model (CSTORM), a high-resolution uncoupled ADCIRC model, and a low bathymetric resolution, coupled model (NACCS). During the peak storm surge period, the coupled model using high-spatial resolution bathymetry reduced error in the study area by over 30% compared with the lower-resolution NACCS model, and by 16% compared with the high-resolution, uncoupled ADCIRC model. In addition, the high-resolution models indicate alongshore flows with magnitudes over 2.0 m/s along the southern coast of Martha's Vineyard, and a net northward circulation through Katama Bay and Edgartown Channel, which are not apparent in the lower-resolution simulations. Contrary to prior research suggesting small, if any setup in the Katama Bay system from wave forcing, in the extreme wave forcing event discussed here, the northward flux through Katama Inlet on the south side of the bay does not exit completely through Edgartown Channel on the north side of Katama Bay. Thus, the drainage path is not adequate to prevent increased water elevation in the bay, resulting in a setup within Katama Bay during the peak surge event, highlighting the need for adequate model resolution for local storm surge predictions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank Levi Gorrell and the PVLAB field crew for deploying, maintaining, and recovering sensors in sometimes less-than-ideal conditions. Thanks to MVCO for wave height and wind velocity time series. Funding was provided by a Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellowship [OUSD(R&E)], Sea Grant, the National Science Foundation (NSF), and Office of Naval Research.

References

Bennett, V. C. C., R. P. Mulligan, and C. J. Hapke. 2018. “A numerical model investigation of the impacts of Hurricane Sandy on water level variability in Great South Bay, New York.” Cont. Shelf Res. 161: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2018.04.003.
Bertin, X., A. B. Fortunato, and A. Oliveira. 2009. “A modeling-based analysis of processes driving wave-dominated inlets.” Cont. Shelf Res. 29 (5–6): 819–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2008.12.019.
Blain, C. A., J. J. Westerink, and R. A. Luettich Jr. 1994. “The influence of domain size on the response characteristics of a hurricane storm surge model.” J. Geophys. Res. 99 (C9): 18467. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JC01348.
Blake, E. S., E. N. Rappaport, J. D. Jarrell, and C. W. Landsea. 2007. The deadliest, costliest and most intense United States hurricanes from 1851 to 2004 (and other frequently requested hurricane facts). Technical Memorandum NWS-TPC-5. Washington, DC: NOAA.
Bryant, M. A., and R. E. Jensen. 2017. “Application of the nearshore wave model STWAVE to the North Atlantic coast comprehensive study.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 143 (5): 04017026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000412.
Chen, C., et al. 2013. An unstructured-grid, finite-volume community ocean model FVCOM user manual. 3rd ed. SMAST/UMASSD Technical Rep. No. 13-0701. New Bedford, MA: Univ. of Massachusetts.-Dartmouth.
Cialone, M. A., A. S. Grzegorzewski, D. J. Mark, M. A. Bryant, and T. C. Massey. 2017. “Coastal-storm model development and water-level validation for the North Atlantic coast comprehensive study.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 143 (5): 04017031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000408.
Cialone, M. A., T. C. Massey, M. E. Anderson, A. S. Grzegorzewski, R. E. Jensen, A. Cialone, D. J. Mark, K. C. Pevey, B. L. Gunkel, and T. O. McAlpin. 2015. North Atlantic Coast comprehensive study (NACCS) coastal storm model simulations: Waves and water levels. ERDC/CHL TR-15-14. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineering Research and Development Center.
Dietrich, J., S. Tanaka, J. Westerink, C. Dawson, R. Luettich Jr., M. Zijlema, L. Holthuijsen, J. Smith, L. Westerink, and H. Westerink. 2012. “Performance of the unstructured-mesh, SWAN + ADCIRC model in computing hurricane waves and surge.” J. Sci. Comput. 52 (2): 468–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-011-9555-6.
Dodet, G., X. Bertin, N. Bruneau, A. B. Fortunato, A. Nahon, and A. Roland. 2013. “Wave–current interactions in a wave-dominated tidal inlet.” J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 118 (3): 1587–1605. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20146.
Gonçalves, M., E. Rusu, and C. Guedes Soares. 2015. “Evaluation of two spectral wave models in coastal areas.” J. Coastal Res. 300: 326–339. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-12-00226.1.
Hopkins, J., S. Elgar, and B. Raubenheimer. 2016. “Observations and model simulations of wave–current interaction on the inner shelf.” J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 121 (1): 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC010788.
Hopkins, J., S. Elgar, and B. Raubenheimer. 2017. “Flow separation effects on shoreline sediment transport.” Coastal Eng. 125: 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2017.04.007.
Jensen, R., A. Cialone, J. Smith, M. Bryant, and T. Hesser. 2016. “Regional wave modeling and evaluation for the North Atlantic Coast comprehensive study.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 143 (2): B4016001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000342.
Kang, X., and M. Xia. 2020. “The study of the hurricane-induced storm surge and bay-ocean exchange using a nesting model.” Estuaries Coasts 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-020-00695-3.
Kerr, P. C., R. C. Martyr, A. S. Donahue, M. E. Hope, J. J. Westerink, R. A. Luettich, A. B. Kennedy, J. C. Dietrich, C. Dawson, and H. J. Westerink. 2013. “U.S. IOOS coastal and ocean modeling testbed: Evaluation of tide, wave, and hurricane surge response sensitivities to mesh resolution and friction in the Gulf of Mexico.” J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 118 (9): 4633–4661. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20305.
Komen, G. J., L. Cavaleri, M. Donelan, K. Hasselmann, S. Hasselmann, and P. A. E. M. Janssen. 1994. Dynamics and modeling of ocean waves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kumar, N., G. Voulgaris, and J. C. Warner. 2011. “Implementation and modification of a three-dimensional radiation stress formulation for surf zone and rip-current applications.” Coastal Eng. 58 (12): 1097–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2011.06.009.
Lawler, S., J. Haddad, and C. M. Ferreira. 2016. “Sensitivity considerations and the impact of spatial scaling for storm surge modeling in wetlands of the Mid-Atlantic region.” Ocean Coastal Manage. 134: 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.10.008.
Luettich, R. A., Jr., J. J. Westerink, and N. W. Scheffner. 1992. ADCIRC: An advanced three-dimensional circulation model for shelves, coasts, and estuaries. Technical Rep. No. DRP-92-6. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Malhadas, M. S., P. C. Leitao, A. Silva, and R. Neves. 2009. “Effect of coastal waves on sea level in Obidos Lagoon, Portugal.” Cont. Shelf Res. 29 (9): 1240–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2009.02.007.
Mao, M., and M. Xia. 2018. “Wave–current dynamics and interactions near the two inlets of a shallow lagoon–inlet–coastal ocean system under hurricane conditions.” Ocean Modell. 129: 124–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2018.08.002.
Massey, T. C., M. E. Anderson, J. M. Smith, J. Gomez, and R. Jones. 2011a. STWAVE: Steady-state spectral wave model user’s manual for STWAVE, version 6.0. ERDC/CHL SR−11−1. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Massey, T. C., T. V. Wamsley, and M. A. Cialone. 2011b. “Coastal storm modeling—System integration.” In Proc., 2011 Solutions to Coastal Disasters Conf., 99–108.
Neumann, J., K. Emanuel, S. Ravela, L. Ludwig, P. Kirshen, K. Bosma, and J. Martinich. 2015. “Joint effects of storm surge and sea-level rise on US coasts: New economic estimates of impacts, adaptation, and benefits of mitigation policy.” Clim. Change 129 (1–2): 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1304-z.
Olabarrieta, M., J. C. Warner, and N. Kumar. 2011. “Wave–current interaction in Willipa Bay.” J. Geophys. Res. 116: C12014. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007387.
Orescanin, M., S. Elgar, and B. Raubenheimer. 2016. “Changes in bay circulation in an evolving multiple inlet system.” Cont. Shelf Res. 124: 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2016.05.005.
Orescanin, M., B. Raubenheimer, and S. Elgar. 2014. “Observations of wave effects on inlet circulation.” Cont. Shelf Res. 82: 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2014.04.010.
Orton, P., N. Georgas, A. Blumberg, and J. Pullen. 2012. “Detailed modeling of recent severe storm tides in estuaries of the New York City region.” J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 117: C09030. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008220.
OWI (Oceanweather, Inc.). 2015. Development of wind and pressure forcing for the North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study (NACCS). Stamford, CT: U.S. Army Engineer, Engineer Research and Development Center.
Smith, J. M., and S. J. Smith. 2002. Grid nesting with STWAVE. ERDC/CHL CHETN I-66. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Sun, Y., C. Chen, R. C. Beardsley, Q. Xu, J. Qi, and H. Lin. 2013. “Impact of current-wave interaction on storm surge simulation: A case study for Hurricane Bob.” J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 118 (5): 2685–2701. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20207.
SWAN Team. 2017. Scientific and technical documentation for SWAN cycle III, version 41.20. Delft, Netherlands: Delft Univ. of Technology.
Tolman, H. L. 2014. User manual and system documentation of WaveWatch III, version 4.18. Technical Note. MMAB Contribution No. 316. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
Westerink, J. J., R. A. Luettich, A. M. Baptists, N. W. Scheffner, and P. Farrar. 1992. “Tide and storm surge predictions using finite element model.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 118 (10): 1373–1390. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1992)118:10(1373).
Yin, J., N. Lin, and D. Yu. 2016. “Coupled modeling of storm surge and coastal inundation: A case study in New York City during Hurricane Sandy.” Water Resour. Res. 52 (11): 8685–8699. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019102.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 146Issue 6November 2020

History

Received: Feb 3, 2020
Accepted: Jun 10, 2020
Published online: Sep 10, 2020
Published in print: Nov 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Feb 10, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Matthew Reffitt
Dept. of Oceanography, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943.
Dept. of Oceanography, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0865-2738. Email: [email protected]
Chris Massey
US Army, Engineering Research and Development Center, Coastal Hydraulics Laboratory, Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199.
Britt Raubenheimer, A.M.ASCE
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543.
Robert E. Jensen
US Army, Engineering Research and Development Center, Coastal Hydraulics Laboratory, Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199.
Steve Elgar
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share