Technical Papers
Apr 22, 2020

Multiple Approaches to Numerical Modeling of Container Ship Squat in Confined Water

Publication: Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 4

Abstract

Various unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) modeling techniques to predict container ship squat in confined water are investigated and compared in this study to assess the suitability of each modeling technique. Five methods are compared, among which three are quasi-statical estimations of squat from computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-computed hydrodynamic forces and moment (QS), and two are based on directly computed squat utilizing dynamic overset meshing (OV) technique. In addition, the effect of self-propulsion on the squat is investigated by comparing different methods of propulsion, i.e., the hull is either towed (T) or self-propelled by means of body-force propulsion virtual disc (VD) model or a fully discretized propeller (DP). The investigation shows that the QS methods tend to be superior in terms of computation efficiency, range of applicability, and trim prediction accuracy. It is also shown that the effect of self-propulsion is significant and should be accounted for to provide accurate results, especially at relatively high speeds. Moreover, virtual disc modeling is more computationally economical while also providing a degree of accuracy similar to that of a discretized propeller. Thus, the most suitable method is the quasi-static method with virtual disc self-propulsion (QS-VD). However, for very shallow cases where h/T < 1.14, the towed quasi-static squat model (QS-T) is recommended due to better accuracy.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the funding and resources provided by NCMEH Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania and the Tasmanian Partnership for Advanced Computing for the HPC for performing the computations.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
AE
propeller expanded area (m2);
AO
propeller disc area (m2);
B
ship beam (m);
CB
block coefficient;
C0.7
propeller chord length at 0.7 radius (m);
DP
propeller diameter (m);
Frh
Froude depth number [Frh = U/(gh)1/2];
g
gravitational constant (m/s2);
h
water depth (m);
LPP
length between perpendiculars of ship (m);
P0.7
propeller blade pitch at 0.7 radius (m);
T
ship draft (m);
U
ship speed (m/s);
Δ
displacement (t);
λ
scale;
ρ
fluid density (kg/m3); and
volumetric displacement of ship (m3).

References

Barrass, C. 1979. “The phenomena of ship squat.” Int. Shipbuild. Prog. 26 (294): 44–47. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISP-1979-2629403.
Beck, R. F., J. N. Newman, and E. O. Tuck. 1974. “Hydrodynamic forces on ships in dredged channels.” J. Ship Res. 19 (3): 166–171.
CD-Adapco. 2014. User guide STAR-CCM+ version 9.0.6. Melville, NY: CD-Adapco.
Cong, L., and C. Hsiung. 1991. “Computing wave resistance, wave profile, sinkage and trim of transom stern ships.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Computer Aided Design, Manufacture and Operation in the Marine and Offshore Industries, 99–112. Southampton, UK: Computational Mechanics.
Constantine, T. 1960. “On the movement of ships in restricted waterways.” J. Fluid Mech. 9 (2): 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112060001080.
Dand, I., and A. Ferguson. 1973. The squat of full ships in shallow water. Teddington, UK: National Physical Laboratory.
Delefortrie, G., M. Vantorre, K. Eloot, J. Verwilligen, and E. Lataire. 2010. “Squat prediction in muddy navigation areas.” Ocean Eng. 37 (16): 1464–1476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.08.003.
Deng, G., E. Guilmineau, A. Leroyer, P. Queutey, M. Visonneau, and J. Wackers. 2014. “Simulation of container ship in shallow water at model scale and full scale.” In Proc., 3rd National CFD Workshop for Ship and Offshore Engineering. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09377255.2017.1349723?src=recsys.
Duffy, J. T. 2008. Modelling of ship-bank interaction and ship squat for ship-handling simulation. Hobart: Univ. of Tasmania.
Duffy, J. T., and M. R. Renilson. 2000. “An investigation into the effect of propulsion on ship squat.” Oceanic Eng. Int. 4 (1): 1–12.
Eloot, K., J. Verwilligen, and M. Vantorre. 2008. “An overview of squat measurements for container ships in restricted water.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Safety and Operations in Canals and Waterways, 106–116. Glasgow, UK: Univ. of Strathclyde Glasgow & Univ. of Glasgow.
Fuehrer, M., and K. Römisch. 1977. “Effects of modern ship traffic on islands and ocean waterways and their structures.” In Proc., 24th Int. Navigation Congress, 236–244. Leningrad-Russia: PIANC.
Gourlay, T. P., J. H. Ha, P. Mucha, and K. Uliczka. 2015. “Sinkage and trim of modern container ships in shallow water.” In Proc., Australasian Coasts & Ports Conf. 2015, 344–351. Auckland, New Zealand: Engineers Australia.
Gourlay, T. P., E. Lataire, and G. Delefortrie. 2016. “Application of potential flow methods to ship squat in different canal widths.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Ship Manoeuvring in Shallow and Confined Water, 146–155. Karlsruhe, Germany: Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau.
Jachowski, J. 2008. “Assessment of ship squat in shallow water using CFD.” Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 8 (1): 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1644-9665%2812%2960264-7.
Lataire, E., M. Vantorre, and G. Delefortrie. 2012. “A prediction method for squat in restricted and unrestricted rectangular fairways.” Ocean Eng. 55: 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.07.009.
Mucha, P., O. El Moctar, and C.-U. Böttner. 2014. “Presquat—Workshop on numerical prediction of ship squat in restricted waters.” Ship Technol. Res. 61 (3): 162–165. https://doi.org/10.1179/str.2014.61.3.004.
Naghdi, P., and M. Rubin. 1984. “On the squat of a ship.” J. Ship Res. 28: 107–117.
Shevchuk, I., C.-U. Böttner, and N. Kornev. 2016. “Numerical analysis of the flow in the Gap between the ship hull and the fairway bottom in extremely shallow water.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Ship Manoeuvring in Shallow and Confined Water, 37–42. Karlsruhe, Germany: Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau.
Stern, F., R. V. Wilson, H. W. Coleman, and E. G. Paterson. 2001. “Comprehensive approach to verification and validation of CFD simulations—Part 1: Methodology and procedures.” J. Fluids Eng. 123 (4): 793–802. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1412235.
Tezdogan, T., Y. K. Demirel, P. Kellett, M. Khorasanchi, A. Incecik, and O. Turan. 2015. “Full-scale unsteady RANS CFD simulations of ship behaviour and performance in head seas due to slow steaming.” Ocean Eng. 97: 186–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.01.011.
Tezdogan, T., A. Incecik, and O. Turan. 2016. “A numerical investigation of the squat and resistance of ships advancing through a canal using CFD.” J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 21 (1): 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-015-0334-1.
Tuck, E. 1966. “Shallow-water flows past slender bodies.” J. Fluid Mech. 26 (1): 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112066001101.
Tuck, E. 1973. “Sinkage and trim in shallow water of finite width.” Schiffstechnik 14: 92–94.
Wilson, R. V., F. Stern, H. W. Coleman, and E. G. Paterson. 2001. “Comprehensive approach to verification and validation of CFD simulations—Part 2: Application for RANS simulation of a cargo/container ship.” J. Fluids Eng. 123 (4): 803–810. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1412236.
Yao, J.-X., and Z.-J. Zou. 2010. “Calculation of ship squat in restricted waterways by using a 3D panel method.” J. Hydrodyn. Ser. B 22 (5): 489–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(09)60241-9.
Zhang, Z.-H., H. Deng, and C. Wang. 2015. “Analytical models of hydrodynamic pressure field causing by a moving ship in restricted waterways.” Ocean Eng. 108: 563–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.08.046.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 146Issue 4July 2020

History

Received: Jul 10, 2019
Accepted: Jan 9, 2020
Published online: Apr 22, 2020
Published in print: Jul 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 22, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

National Centre for Maritime Engineering and Hydrodynamics, Australian Maritime College, Univ. of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4068-8343. Email: [email protected]
National Centre for Maritime Engineering and Hydrodynamics, Australian Maritime College, Univ. of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3484-1345. Email: [email protected]
Shuhong Chai [email protected]
National Centre for Maritime Engineering and Hydrodynamics, Australian Maritime College, Univ. of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Technology Centre for Offshore and Marine Singapore, 12 Prince George’s Park, Singapore, 118411, Singapore. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share