Fragility Analysis of Pile-Supported Wharves and Piers Exposed to Storm Surge and Waves
Publication: Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 2
Abstract
Ports are located in areas often susceptible to storm surge and flooding from severe storms as well as the potential impacts of climate change, such as sea level rise. Although there is a significant body of work addressing the vulnerability of ports subjected to earthquakes, models that support risk assessment of ports subjected to storm surge and waves from coastal hazards, including hurricanes, are scarce. This study presents a methodology for fragility analysis of wharf/pier structures typical in port facilities that are subjected to hurricane-induced storm surge and wave loading. Such models enable future risk assessment of these structures when exposed to current or projected storm conditions. The framework presented first utilizes Latin hypercube sampling within a Monte Carlo simulation to estimate uncertain vertical and horizontal demands from surge and wave loading, along with uncertain capacities associated with uplift, shear, and flexural failure. Fragility surfaces are then generated, expressing failure probability given wave height and relative surge elevation. Furthermore, stepwise logistic regression is applied to derive the parameterized deck–pile connection fragility functions for ready application in regional risk assessment. The proposed approach is applied to four alternative deck–pile connections typically found in wharves/piers: a full moment connection with dowels inside of the compression zone, a full moment connection with dowels outside of the compression zone, a partial moment connection with dowels inside of the compression zone, and a partial moment connection with dowels outside of the compression zone. The results suggest that the dominant structural failure mode for all of the examined cases is uplift. Furthermore, the partial moment connections are more vulnerable to storm surge and waves compared to full moment connections. Although providing sufficient clearance is a preferred method for port safety, it is not always possible to keep the wharf/pier deck sufficiently elevated above the sea level. Given the criticality of these structures to maintain port operations posthazard event, this paper offers a method for efficiently estimating their hurricane fragility that can be extended in the future to a portfolio of portstructures and applied for current hazard conditions or future scenarios including the effects of climate change.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of this research by the Shell Center for Sustainability. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsor.
References
AASHTO. (2008). Guide specifications for bridges vulnerable to coastal storms, Washington, DC.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). (2014). “Building code requirements for structural concrete.” ACI 318-14, Farmington Hills, MI.
Allsop, W., Cuomo, G., and Tirindelli, M. (2006). “New prediction method for wave-in-deck loads on exposed piers/jetties/bridges.” Proc., 30th Int. Conf. on Coastal Engineering, World Scientific, Singapore, 4482–4493.
Ang, A., and Tang, W. H. (2007). Probability concepts in engineering: Emphasis on applications to civil & environmental engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
API (American Petroleum Institute). (2000). “Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms—Working stress design.” RP 2A-WSD, Washington, DC.
ASCE. (2014). “Seismic design of piers and wharves.” ASCE/COPRI 61-14, Reston, VA.
Ataei, N., and Padgett, J. E. (2013). “Probabilistic modeling of bridge deck unseating during hurricane events.” J. Bridge Eng., 275–286.
Bardi, J. C., Ostbo, B. I., Fenical, S., and Tirindelli, M. (2007). “Cozumel’s international cruise terminal: Hurricane Wilma recovery and reconstruction.” Proc., ASCE Ports 2007: 30 Years of Sharing Ideas: 1977–2007, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–10.
Becker, A., Inoue, S., Fischer, M., and Schwegler, B. (2012). “Climate change impacts on international seaports: Knowledge, perceptions, and planning efforts among port administrators.” Clim. Change, 110(1), 5–29.
Bender, C., Smith, J. M., Kennedy, A., and Jensen, R. (2013). “STWAVE simulation of Hurricane Ike: Model results and comparison to data.” Coastal Eng., 73, 58–70.
Chiou, J.-S., Chiang, C.-H., Yang, H.-H., and Hsu, S.-Y. (2011). “Developing fragility curves for a pile-supported wharf.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 31(5), 830–840.
Christian, J., Fang, Z., Torres, J., Deitz, R., and Bedient, P. (2015). “Modeling the hydraulic effectiveness of a proposed storm surge barrier system for the Houston ship channel during hurricane events.” Nat. Hazards Rev., 04014015.
Cuomo, G., Shimosako, K., and Takahashi, S. (2009). “Wave-in-deck loads on coastal bridges and the role of air.” Coastal Eng., 56(8), 793–809.
Cuomo, G., Tirindelli, M., and Allsop, W. (2007). “Wave-in-deck loads on exposed jetties.” Coastal Eng., 54(9), 657–679.
Dean, R. G., and Dalrymple, R. A. (1991). Water wave mechanics for engineers and scientists, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
Dietrich, J., et al. (2011). “Modeling hurricane waves and storm surge using integrally-coupled, scalable computations.” Coastal Eng., 58(1), 45–65.
FEMA. (2009). “Hurricane Ike in Texas and Louisiana: Building performance observations, recommendations, and technical guidance.” FEMA P-757, Mitigation Assessment Team Rep. (MAT), Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2011). “Coastal construction manual: Principles and practices of planning, siting, designing, constructing, and maintaining residential buildings in coastal areas.” FEMA P-55, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2012a). Hazus-MH 2.1—Earthquake model technical manual, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2012b). Hazus-MH 2.1—Earthquake model user manual, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2012c). Hazus-MH 2.1—Flood model user manual, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2012d). Hazus-MH 2.1—Hurricane model user manual, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2013). “Hurricane Sandy in New Jersey and New York: Building performance observations, recommendations, and technical guidance.” FEMA P-942, Mitigation Assessment Team Rep. (MAT), Washington, DC.
Ghosh, J., Padgett, J. E., and Dueñas-Osorio, L. (2013). “Surrogate modeling and failure surface visualization for efficient seismic vulnerability assessment of highway bridges.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 34, 189–199.
Goda, Y. (2010). Random seas and design of maritime structures, World Scientific, Singapore.
Gutierrez, C., Cresanti, R., and Jeffrey, W. (2006). “Performance of physical structures in Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita: A reconnaissance report.” NIST Technical Note 1476, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington, DC.
Harn, R., Mays, T. W., and Johnson, G. S. (2010). “Proposed seismic detailing criteria for piers and wharves.” Proc., ASCE Ports 2010: Building on the Past, Respecting the Future, ASCE, Reston, VA, 460–469.
HAZUS-MH [Computer software]. FEMA, Washington, DC.
Heidary-Torkamani, H., Bargi, K., Amirabadi, R., and McCllough, N. J. (2014). “Fragility estimation and sensitivity analysis of an idealized pile-supported wharf with batter piles.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 61, 92–106.
Hosmer, D. W., and Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
HSE (Health and Safety Executive). (2004). “Review of wave in deck loads assessment procedure.” Offshore Technology Rep. OTO 97 073”, Sheffield, U.K.
JCSS (Joint Committee on Structural Safety). (2001). “JCSS probabilistic model code.” 〈http://www.jcss.byg.dtu.dk/〉 (May 2, 2017).
Kameshwar, S., and Padgett, J. E. (2014). “Multi-hazard risk assessment of highway bridges subjected to earthquake and hurricane hazards.” Eng. Struct., 78, 154–166.
Kohavi, R., and Provost, F. (1998). “Glossary of terms.” Mach. Learn., 30, 271–274.
Kong, D., Setunge, S., Molyneaux, T., Zhang, G., and Law, D. (2013). “Structural resilience of core port infrastructure in a changing climate.” Enhancing the Resilience of Seaports to a Changing Climate Rep. Series, National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Gold Coast, Australia.
Lamberti, A., Martinelli, L., Gabriella Gaeta, M., Tirindelli, M., and Alderson, J. (2011). “Experimental spatial correlation of wave loads on front decks.” J. Hydraul. Res., 49(sup1), 81–90.
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. (1983). “On the joint distribution of wave periods and amplitudes in a random wave field.” Proc., R. Soc. London A, 389(1797), 241–258.
MacGregor, J. G., and Wight, J. K. (2005). Reinforced concrete: Mechanics and design, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Madsen, H. O., Krenk, S., and Lind, N. C. (1986). Methods of structural safety, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Massel, S. R. (1996). Ocean surface waves: Their physics and prediction, World Scientific, River Edge, NJ.
Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., and Fenves, G. L. (2006). OpenSees command language manual, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
McConnell, K., Allsop, W., and Cruickshank, I. (2004). Piers, jetties and related structures exposed to waves: guidelines for hydraulic loadings, Thomas Telford, London.
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., and Conover, W. J. (1979). “Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code.” Technometrics, 21(2), 239–245.
McKenna, F., Fenves, G. L., and Scott, M. H. (2000). Open system for earthquake engineering simulation, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Na, U. J., Chaudhuri, S. R., and Shinozuka, M. (2008). “Probabilistic assessment for seismic performance of port structures.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 28(2), 147–158.
Neyman, J., and Pearson, E. S. (1928). “On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference: Part I.” Biometrika, 20A(1/2), 175–240.
Neyman, J., and Pearson, E. S. (1933). “The testing of statistical hypotheses in relation to probabilities a priori.” Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 29(4), 492–510.
NIST (National Institute of Standards and Commerce). (2016). “Critical assessment of lifeline system performance: Understanding societal needs in disaster recovery.” NIST GCR 16-917-39, Washington, DC.
Nowak, A. S., and Collins, K. R. (2000). Reliability of structures, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Nowak, A. S., Rakoczy, A. M., and Szeliga, E. K. (2012). “Revised statistical resistance models for r/c structural components.” ACI Spec. Publ., 284, 1–16.
Nowak, A. S., and Szerszen, M. M. (2003). “Calibration of design code for buildings (ACI 318): Part 1—Statistical models for resistance.” ACI Struct. J., 100(3), 377–382.
OpenSees [Computer software]. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Ott, R. L., and Longnecker, M. T. (2001). An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis, Duxbery Press, Pacific Grove, CA.
POLA (Port of Los Angeles). (2010). Code for seismic design, repair and upgrade of container wharves, Los Angeles, CA.
POLB (Port of Long Beach). (2012). Wharf design criteria, version 3.0, Long Beach, CA.
Ren, B., and Wang, Y. (2003). “Experimental study of irregular wave impact on structures in the splash zone.” Ocean Eng., 30(18), 2363–2377.
Sorensen, R. M. (1993). Basic wave mechanics: For coastal and ocean engineers, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Stringer, S., and Harn, R. (2013). “Seismic stability of marine piers built with prestressed concrete piles.” ACI Spec. Publ., 295, 1–22.
Sturgis, L. A., Smythe, T. C., and Tucci, A. E. (2014). Port recovery in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy: Improving port resiliency in the era of climate change, Center for a New American Security (CNAS), Washington, DC.
UFC (Unified Facilities Criteria). (2017). “Design: Piers and wharves.” UFC 4-152-01, Dept. of Defense, Arlington County, VA.
Yang, C.-S. W., DesRoches, R., and Rix, G. J. (2012). “Numerical fragility analysis of vertical-pile-supported wharves in the western United States.” J. Earthquake Eng., 16(4), 579–594.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 144 • Issue 2 • March 2018
Copyright
© 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 9, 2017
Accepted: Sep 11, 2017
Published online: Dec 14, 2017
Published in print: Mar 1, 2018
Discussion open until: May 14, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.