Technical Notes
May 12, 2022

How the Cooperation between Reservoir Operation and Unit Commitment Can Reduce Scheduled Spillages

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 148, Issue 7

Abstract

Units in a hydroplant are usually committed after the operational results are derived for multiple cascaded reservoirs. Such a procedure may make hydro units difficult to harmonize their constraints (e.g., allowable operating zones, start-up frequency, minimum up/down duration, and so on) with the boundary conditions imposed by the operation of cascaded reservoirs. This paper investigated how and how much the cooperation between reservoir operation and unit commitment can contribute to the reduction in water and energy spillages when constraints on units are enforced. With multiple iterations involved, this work employed a two-level synergic mechanism, where the unit commitment provides feedback on the boundary conditions expecting from the higher-level reservoir operation. The procedure was applied to a hydropower system that consists of 45 reservoirs. Even starting with a very good initial solution to the operational problem of the reservoir system, the results strongly suggest the necessity to employ the two-level synergic mechanism, which contributes to the reduction in scheduled water and energy spillages by 34% and 41%, respectively.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions.The historical data of inflow into reservoir in the case study belongs to Yunnan Electric Power Dispatch and Control Center and are confidential. Also, the water consumption rate curve for each reservoir and output characteristic curve for each hydropower unit are confidential and restricted to those utilized for calculations in the study.

References

Brito, B. H., E. C. Finardi, and F. Y. K. Takigawa. 2020. “Unit-commitment via logarithmic aggregated convex combination in multi-unit hydro plants.” Electr. Power Syst. Res. 189 (Dec): 106784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106784.
Cheng, C., J. Shen, and X. Wu. 2012. “Short-term scheduling for large-scale cascaded hydropower systems with multivibration zones of high head.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 138 (3): 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000174.
Cheng, C. T., C. G. Su, P. L. Wang, J. J. Shen, J. Y. Lu, and X. Y. Wu. 2018. “An MILP-based model for short-term peak shaving operation of pumped-storage hydropower plants serving multiple power grids.” Energy 163 (Nov): 722–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.077.
Daadaa, M., S. Séguin, K. Demeester, and M. F. Anjos. 2021. “An optimization model to maximize energy generation in short-term hydropower unit commitment using efficiency points.” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 125 (Feb): 106419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106419.
Finardi, E. C., and E. L. da Silva. 2005. “Unit commitment of single hydroelectric plant.” Electr. Power Syst. Res. 75 (2): 116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2005.01.008.
Li, X., T. Li, J. Wei, G. Wang, and W. W. Yeh. 2014. “Hydro unit commitment via mixed integer linear programming: A case study of the three gorges project, China.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 29 (3): 1232–1241. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2288933.
Liao, S., Z. Liu, B. Liu, X. Wu, C. Cheng, and H. Su. 2021. “Short-term hydro scheduling considering multiple units sharing a common tunnel and crossing vibration zones constraints.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 147 (10): 04021063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001438.
Liao, S., Y. Zhang, B. Liu, Z. Liu, Z. Fang, and S. Li. 2020. “Short-term peak-shaving operation of head-sensitive cascaded hydropower plants based on spillage adjustment.” Water 12 (12): 3438. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123438..
Lu, P., J. Zhou, C. Li, C. Wang, and L. Mo. 2015. “Quarter-hourly generation scheduling of hydropower systems considering peak saving demands among multiple provincial power grids in central China.” Int. J. Electr. Energy 3: 145–150. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijoee.3.3.145-150.
Nazari-Heris, M., A. F. Babaei, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, and S. Asadi. 2018. “Improved harmony search algorithm for the solution of non-linear non-convex short-term hydrothermal scheduling.” Energy 151 (May): 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.043.
Pérez-Díaz, J. I., J. R. Wilhelmi, and L. A. Arévalo. 2010. “Optimal short-term operation schedule of a hydropower plant in a competitive electricity market.” Energy Convers. Manage. 51 (12): 2955–2966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.038.
Shen, J.-J., Q.-Q. Shen, C.-T. Cheng, X.-F. Zhang, and J. Wang. 2020. “Large-scale unit commitment for cascaded hydropower plants with hydraulic coupling and head-sensitive forbidden zones: Case of the Xiluodu and Xiangjiaba hydropower system.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 146 (11): 05020023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001292.
Wang, J., C. Chen, and S. Liu. 2018a. “A new field-levelling procedure to minimize spillages in hydropower reservoir operation.” Energy 160 (Oct): 979–985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.089.
Wang, J., M. Guo, and Y. Liu. 2018b. “Hydropower unit commitment with nonlinearity decoupled from mixed integer nonlinear problem.” Energy 150 (May): 839–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.128.
Wang, J., W. Hu, and S. Liu. 2018c. “Short-term hydropower scheduling model with two coupled temporal scales.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 144 (2): 04017095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000889.
Wang, J., and Y. Zhang. 2012. “Short-term optimal operation of hydropower reservoirs with unit commitment and navigation.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 138 (1): 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000142.
Xu, B., P.-A. Zhong, Y.-F. Zhao, Y.-Z. Zhu, and G.-Q. Zhang. 2014. “Comparison between dynamic programming and genetic algorithm for hydro unit economic load dispatch.” Water Sci. Eng. 7 (4): 420–432. https://doi.org/10.3882/j.issn.1674-2370.2014.04.007.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 148Issue 7July 2022

History

Received: Sep 8, 2021
Accepted: Apr 1, 2022
Published online: May 12, 2022
Published in print: Jul 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Oct 12, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jinwen Wang [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Joint International Water Security Research Center, Huazhong Univ. of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Huazhong Univ. of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, PR China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6786-7950
Postdoctoral Fellow, School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Joint International Water Security Research Center, Huazhong Univ. of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, PR China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0807-3397. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Shuangquan Liu [email protected]
Yunnan Electric Power Dispatch and Control Center, No. 73, Tuodong Rd., Guandu District, Kunming, Yunnan 650001, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Huan Chen
SPIC Guangxi Electric Power Co., Ltd., No. 99, Luban Rd., Xixiangtang District, Nanning, Guangxi 530003, PR China.
Ran Liu
Patent Examination Cooperation (Tianjin) Center of the Patent Office, No. 21, Huaxing Rd., Dongli District, Tianjin 300304, PR China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Comparison of Procedures to Combine Operating Zones of Multiple Units into Plant-Based Operating Zones, Energies, 10.3390/en16031435, 16, 3, (1435), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share