Technical Papers
Nov 1, 2021

Anthropogenic Interventions in Watersheds on River Flow Health: Assessment Using Bootstrapped Principal Component Analysis

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 148, Issue 1

Abstract

Comprehensive assessment of hydrological alteration due to anthropogenic interventions is a prerequisite for sustaining the native biological profile and integrity of river ecosystems. This paper proposes a novel strategy to measurably evaluate how the dams have modified the natural flow regime at a downstream site. The Bhagirathi Basin, a part of the Himalayan ranges of the Ganga River Basin in India, is studied to comprehend the impact of multiple dams on natural river flow at Devprayag. The methodology for estimating the River Flow Health Index (RFHI) consists of four steps: (1) segregation of the flow data based on preimpact and postimpact periods, (2) identification of important hydrological parameters, (3) assessment of the alterations, and (4) development of an index indicating the health of the river flow during the altered period on a 0–1 scale. Results show that the different components of the flow regime have changed due to construction of dams across the river, and the hydrological alterations could be seen at the downstream site, Devprayag. The RFHI increased after subsequent addition of dams, i.e., 0.328 after commissioning of Maneri Bhali I hydro-electric projects (HEP), 0.374 after Maneri Bhali I HEP, Maneri Bhali II HEP, and Tehri HEP were commissioned, and 0.411 after Koteshwar HEP was commissioned in 2011. Our results may help upgrade the design and implementation of reservoir operation policies that consider downstream hydrological alterations. Further studies can be made to consider the coordination of hydrological alterations with different river ecosystem services important for the sustainable management of water assets.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The river gauge and discharge data used in this study are classified government data and may only be provided with restrictions by the Central Water Commission (CWC), Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India.

Acknowledgments

The data and financial support for this study were received through the Centre for Ganga River Basin Management and Studies (cGanga) led by IIT Kanpur and supported by National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG), Department of Water Resources, River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation, Ministry of Jal Shakti, India. The preliminary efforts to initiate the work by Dr. Chiranjib Chaudhuri when working with cGanga (now Postdoctoral Fellow, Wilfrid Laurier University, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Waterloo, Canada) are duly acknowledged.

References

Archfield, S. A., J. G. Kennen, D. M. Carlisle, and D. M. Wolock. 2014. “An objective and parsimonious approach for classifying natural flow regimes at a continental scale.” River Res. Appl. 30 (Jan): 132–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2710.
Babamoradi, H., F. Van Den Berg, and A. Rinnan. 2013. “Bootstrap based confidence limits in principal component analysis—A case study.” Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 120 (May): 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2012.10.007.
Bizzi, S., F. Pianosi, and R. Soncini-Sessa. 2012. “Valuing hydrological alteration in multi-objective water resources management.” J. Hydrol. 472–473 (9): 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.09.033.
Bunn, S. E., and A. H. Arthington. 2002. “Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity.” Environ. Manage. 30 (4): 492–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0.
Central Water Commission. 2017. “Handbook for hydrometeorological observations.” Accessed May 14, 2020. http://www.cwc.gov.in/sites/default/files/final-hm-handbook-jan-2017.pdf.
Daigle, A., A. Caudron, L. Vigier, and H. Pella. 2017. “Optimization methodology for a river temperature monitoring network for the characterization of fish thermal habitat.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 62 (3): 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1242869.
Dunteman, G. H. 1989. Principal components analysis. New York: SAGE.
Eng, K., T. E. Grantham, D. M. Carlisle, and D. M. Wolock. 2017. “Predictability and selection of hydrologic metrics in riverine ecohydrology.” Freshwater Sci. 36 (4): 915–926. https://doi.org/10.1086/694912.
Erfon, B., and R. Tibshirani. 1986. “Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy.” Stat. Sci. 1 (1): 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177013815.
Hannachi, A. 2007. “Pattern hunting in climate: A new method for finding trends in gridded climate data.” Int. J. Climatol. 27 (4): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1375.
Hecht, J. S., G. Lacombe, M. E. Arias, T. D. Dang, and T. Piman. 2019. “Hydropower dams of the Mekong River Basin: A review of their hydrological impacts.” J. Hydrol. 568 (Oct): 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.045.
Henriksen, J. A., J. Heasley, G. J. Kennen, and S. Nieswand. 2006. Users manual for the hydroecological integrity assessment process software (including the New Jersey Assessment Tools). Reston, VA: USGS.
Horn, J. L. 1965. “A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis.” Psychometrica 30 (2): 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447.
Jain, S. K., P. K. Agarwal, and V. P. Singh. 2007. “Hydrology and water resources of India.” In Runoff and streamflow, 193–234. Berlin: Springer.
Kennard, M. J., S. J. Mackay, B. J. Pusey, J. D. Olden, and N. Marsh. 2010. “Quantifying uncertainty in estimation of hydrologic metrics for ecohydrological studies.” River Res. Appl. 26 (2): 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1249.
Kim, N. W., J. E. Lee, and J. T. Kim. 2012. “Assessment of flow regulation effects by dams in the Han River, Korea, on the downstream flow regimes using SWAT.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 138 (1): 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000148.
Kroll, C. N., K. E. Croteau, and R. M. Vogel. 2015. “Hypothesis tests for hydrologic alteration.” J. Hydrol. 530 (Jan): 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.057.
Leathwick, J. R., T. Snelder, W. L. Chadderton, J. Elith, K. Julian, and S. Ferrier. 2011. “Use of generalized dissimilarity modeling to improve the biological discrimination of river and stream classifications.” Freshwater Biol. 56 (1): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02414.x.
Li, Y., J. Chang, T. Huan, and X. Wang. 2016. “Impact of the Sanmenxia and Xiaolangdi reservoirs operation on the hydrologic regime of the Lower Yellow River.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 21 (3): 06015015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001290.
Liermann, C. R., J. D. Olden, T. J. Beechie, M. J. Kennard, P. B. Skidmore, C. P. Konrad, and H. Imaki. 2012. “Hydrogeomorphic classification of Washington State rivers to support emerging environmental flow management strategies.” River Res. Appl. 28 (9): 1340–1358. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1541.
Magilligan, F. J., and K. H. Nislow. 2005. “Changes in hydrologic regime by dams.” Geomorphology 71 (1–2): 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.08.017.
Mathews, R., and B. D. Richter. 2007. “Application of the indicators of hydrologic alteration software in environmental flow setting.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 43 (6): 1400–1413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00099.x.
Mcmanamay, R. A., M. S. Bevelhimer, and S. C. Kao. 2014. “Updating the U.S. hydrologic classification: An approach to clustering and stratifying ecohydrologic data.” Ecohydrology 7 (3): 903–926. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1410.
Olden, J. D., and N. L. Poff. 2003. “Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes.” River Res. Appl. 19 (2): 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.700.
Patterson, N. K., B. A. Lane, S. Sandoval-Solis, G. B. Pasternack, S. M. Yarnell, and Y. Qiu. 2020. “A hydrologic feature detection algorithm to quantify seasonal components of flow regimes.” J. Hydrol. 585 (12): 124787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124787.
Poff, N. L. 2009. “Managing for variability to sustain freshwater ecosystems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 135 (1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:1(1).
Poff, N. L., J. D. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, K. L. Prestegaard, B. D. Richter, R. E. Sparks, and J. C. Stromberg. 1997. “The natural flow regime: A paradigm for river conservation and restoration.” Bioscience 47 (11): 769–784. https://doi.org/10.2307/1313099.
Poff, N. L., and J. K. H. Zimmerman. 2010. “Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: A literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows.” Freshwater Biol. 55 (1): 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02272.x.
Ravi Chopra Committee. 2014. Assessment of environmental degradation and impact of hydroelectric projects during the June 2013 disaster in Uttarakhand Part I-main report. Uttarakhand, India: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.
Richter, B. D., J. V. Baumgartner, D. P. Braun, and J. Powell. 1998. “A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network.” Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage. 14 (4): 329. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199807/08)14:4%3C329::AID-RRR505%3E3.0.CO;2-E.
Richter, B. D., J. V. Baumgartner, J. Powell, and D. P. Braun. 1996. “A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems.” Conserv. Biol. 10 (4): 1163–1174. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10041163.x.
Sati, S. P., S. Sharma, Y. P. Sundriyal, D. Rawat, and M. Riyal. 2020. “Geoenvironmental consequences of obstructing the Bhagirathi River, Uttarakhand Himalaya, India.” Geomatics Nat. Hazards Risk 11 (1): 887–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2020.1756464.
Sillmann, J., T. Thorarinsdottir, N. Keenlyside, N. Schaller, L. V. Alexander, G. Hegerl, S. I. Seneviratne, R. Vautard, X. Zhang, and F. W. Zwiers. 2017. “Understanding, modeling and predicting weather and climate extremes: Challenges and opportunities.” Weather Clim. Extremes 18 (Apr): 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2017.10.003.
Song, X., Y. Zhuang, X. Wang, and E. Li. 2018. “Combined effect of danjiangkou reservoir and cascade reservoirs on hydrologic regime downstream.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 23 (6): 05018008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001660.
Timpe, K., and D. Kaplan. 2017. “The changing hydrology of a dammed Amazon.” Sci. Adv. 3 (11): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700611.
Ward, J. V., and J. Stanford. 1983. “Serial discontinuity concept of lotic ecosystems.” In Vol. 12 of Dynamics of lotic ecosystems, 29–42. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Sciences.
Winemiller, K. O., et al. 2016. “Balancing hydropower and biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong.” Science 351 (6269): 128–129. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac7082.
Yarnell, S. M., G. E. Petts, J. C. Schmidt, A. A. Whipple, E. E. Beller, C. N. Dahm, P. Goodwin, and J. H. Viers. 2015. “Functional flows in modified riverscapes: Hydrographs, habitats and opportunities.” Bioscience 65 (10): 963–972. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv102.
Yarnell, S. M., E. D. Stein, J. A. Webb, T. Grantham, R. A. Lusardi, J. Zimmerman, R. A. Peek, B. A. Lane, J. Howard, and S. Sandoval-Solis. 2020. “A functional flows approach to selecting ecologically relevant flow metrics for environmental flow applications.” River Res. Appl. 36 (2): 318–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3575.
Yin, X., J. Zhang, and J. Chen. 2020. “The impact of multi-projects on the alteration of the flow regime in the middle and lower course of the Hanjiang River, China.” Water 12 (8): 2301. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12082301.
Yu, C. C., J. T. Quinn, C. M. Dufournaud, J. J. Harrington, P. P. Rogers, and B. N. Lohani. 1998. “Effective dimensionality of environmental indicators: A principal component analysis with bootstrap confidence intervals.” J. Environ. Manage. 53 (1): 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1998.0184.
Zhang, Z., Y. Huang, and J. Huang. 2016. “Hydrologic alteration associated with dam construction in a medium-sized coastal watershed of southeast China.” Water 8 (8): 317. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8080317.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 148Issue 1January 2022

History

Received: Oct 26, 2020
Accepted: Sep 22, 2021
Published online: Nov 1, 2021
Published in print: Jan 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Apr 1, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Maithili Mohanty [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208016, India. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208016, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2228-545X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Selecting reservoir reconstruction schemes from an ecological-economic trade-off perspective: Model building and case study, Journal of Cleaner Production, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134183, 376, (134183), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share