Technical Papers
Jan 25, 2021

Preferences for Alternative Water Supplies in the Pacific Northwest: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 147, Issue 4

Abstract

Understanding residential water preferences allows utility and municipal water managers to improve residents’ welfare through informed pricing and investment decisions. This paper employs a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit residents’ stated preferences for water sources, storage methods, and conservation policies across the inland Pacific Northwest. Generally, results suggest that—conditional on needing an additional municipal water supply—individuals have a strong aversion to creek water, and are relatively indifferent to reclaimed wastewater or additional diversions from large rivers. Residents also have a strong preference for additional local water storage, either in the form of aquifer injection or reservoirs. DCE results suggest strong heterogeneity in preferences correlated with gender and issue awareness, but few other seemingly relevant respondent characteristics are significant in explaining this heterogeneity. In particular, males are significantly more price-driven than females, while females more strongly oppose lawn watering restrictions and are more strongly favor local storage options. Respondents familiar with the water supply issues in the region favor using reclaimed water over all other available water sources.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated by the authors or analyzed during the study are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3985683.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the NSF Sustainability Research Network (SRN) Cooperative Agreement 1444758 and USGS 104b for providing financial support for this research.

References

Attari, S. Z. 2014. “Perceptions of water use.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111 (14): 5129–5134. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1316402111.
AWWA (American Water Works Association). 2012. Buried no longer: Confronting America’s water infrastructure challenge. Denver: AWWA.
Blamey, R., J. Gordon, and R. Chapman. 1999. “Choice modelling: Assessing the environmental values of water supply options.” Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 43 (3): 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.00083.
Blomquist, G. C., K. Blumenschein, and M. Johannesson. 2009. “Eliciting willingness to pay without bias using follow-up certainty statements: Comparisons between probably/definitely and a 10-point certainty scale.” Environ. Resour. Econ. 43 (4): 473–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9242-8.
Breffle, W. S., M. E. Eiswerth, D. Muralidharan, and J. Thornton. 2015. “Understanding how income influences willingness to pay for joint programs: A more equitable value measure for the less wealthy.” Ecol. Econ. 109 (Jan): 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.001.
Brouwer, R., J. Martin-Ortega, and J. Berbel. 2010. “Spatial preference heterogeneity: A choice experiment.” Land Econ. 86 (3): 552–568. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.86.3.552.
Brox, J. A., R. C. Kumar, and K. R. Stollery. 2003. “Estimating willingness to pay for improved water quality in the presence of item nonresponse bias.” Am. J. Agric. Econ. 85 (2): 414–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00130.
Cambardella, C., T. Moorman, D. Jaynes, J. Hatfield, T. Parkin, W. Simpkins, and D. Karlen. 1999. “Water quality in walnut creek watershed: Nitrate-nitrogen in soils, subsurface drainage water, and shallow groundwater.” J. Environ. Qual. 28 (1): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1999.00472425002800010003x.
Carson, R. T., and T. Groves. 2007. “Incentive and informational properties of preference questions.” Environ. Resour. Econ. 37 (1): 181–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5.
Caussade, S., J. de Dios Ortúzar, L. I. Rizzi, and D. A. Hensher. 2005. “Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 39 (7): 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2004.07.006.
Chellattan Veettil, P., S. Speelman, A. Frija, J. Buysse, K. Mondelaers, and G. Van Huylenbroeck. 2011. “Price sensitivity of farmer preferences for irrigation water–pricing method: Evidence from a choice model analysis in Krishna river basin, India.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 137 (2): 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000103.
Cooper, B., M. Burton, and L. Crase. 2019. “Willingness to pay to avoid water restrictions in Australia under a changing climate.” Environ. Resour. Econ. 72 (3): 823–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-018-0228-x.
Crabill, C., R. Donald, J. Snelling, R. Foust, and G. Southam. 1999. “The impact of sediment fecal coliform reservoirs on seasonal water quality in Oak creek, Arizona.” Water Res. 33 (9): 2163–2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00437-0.
Dalhuisen, J. M., R. J. Florax, H. L. De Groot, and P. Nijkamp. 2003. “Price and income elasticities of residential water demand: A meta-analysis.” Land Econ. 79 (2): 292–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146872.
Dauda, S. A., M. R. Yacob, and A. Radam. 2015. “Household’s willingness to pay for heterogeneous attributes of drinking water quality and services improvement: An application of choice experiment.” Appl. Water Sci. 5 (3): 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-014-0186-6.
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., M. Ryan, and K. Gerard. 2012. “Discrete choice experiments in health economics: A review of the literature.” Health Econ. 21 (2): 145–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1697.
del Saz-Salazar, S., M. A. García-Rubio, F. González-Gómez, and A. J. Picazo-Tadeo. 2016. “Managing water resources under conditions of scarcity: On consumers’ willingness to pay for improving water supply infrastructure.” Water Resour. Manage. 30 (5): 1723–1738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1247-4.
Dilling, L., M. E. Daly, D. A. Kenney, R. Klein, K. Miller, A. J. Ray, W. R. Travis, and O. Wilhelmi. 2019. “Drought in urban water systems: Learning lessons for climate adaptive capacity.” Clim. Risk Manage. 23 (Jan): 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2018.11.001.
Duan, K., P. V. Caldwell, G. Sun, S. G. McNulty, Y. Zhang, E. Shuster, B. Liu, and P. V. Bolstad. 2019. “Understanding the role of regional water connectivity in mitigating climate change impacts on surface water supply stress in the United States.” J. Hydrol. 570 (Mar): 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.01.011.
Fifer, S., J. Rose, and S. Greaves. 2014. “Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Is it a problem? And if so, how do we deal with it?” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 61 (Mar): 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.12.010.
Flyr, M., J. Burkhardt, C. Goemans, L. Hans, A. Neel, and A. Maas. 2019. “Modeling commercial demand for water: Exploring alternative prices, instrumental variables, and heterogeneity.” Land Econ. 95 (2): 211–224. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.95.2.211.
Garcia-Cuerva, L., E. Z. Berglund, and A. R. Binder. 2016. “Public perceptions of water shortages, conservation behaviors, and support for water reuse in the US.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 113 (Oct): 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.006.
Gober, P. 2019. “The demography of water use: Why the past is a poor predictor of the future.” In Population, place, and spatial interaction, 249–260. New York: Springer.
Goldstein, J. 1986. “Full-cost water pricing.” J. Am. Water Works Assn. 78 (2): 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1986.tb05695.x.
Grigg, N. S. 2005. “Institutional analysis of infrastructure problems: Case study of water quality in distribution systems.” J. Manage. Eng. 21 (4): 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2005)21:4(152).
Grigg, N. S., T. Connor, and A. Maas. 2018. “Financing integration of urban water systems: From service provision to resource management.” Public Works Manage. Policy 23 (2): 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X17732789.
Hahn, J., J. Hausman, and J. Lustig. 2020. “Specification test on mixed logit models.” J. Econom. 219 (1): 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.
Haider, W., and H. Rasid. 2002. “Eliciting public preferences for municipal water supply options.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 22 (4): 337–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00017-3.
Hallegatte, S., C. Green, R. J. Nicholls, and J. Corfee-Morlot. 2013. “Future flood losses in major coastal cities.” Nat. Clim. Change 3 (9): 802–806. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1979.
Hanley, N., S. Mourato, and R. E. Wright. 2001. “Choice modelling approaches: A superior alternative for environmental valuation?” J. Econ. Surv. 15 (3): 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00145.
Hanley, N., R. E. Wright, and G. Koop. 2002. “Modelling recreation demand using choice experiments: Climbing in Scotland.” Environ. Resour. Econ. 22 (3): 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016077425039.
Hauber, A. B., J. M. González, C. G. Groothuis-Oudshoorn, T. Prior, D. A. Marshall, C. Cunningham, M. J. IJzerman, and J. F. Bridges. 2016. “Statistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice experiments: A report of the Ispor conjoint analysis good research practices task force.” Value Health 19 (4): 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004.
Hensher, D., N. Shore, and K. Train. 2005. “Households’ willingness to pay for water service attributes.” Environ. Resour. Econ. 32 (4): 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-7686-7.
Hensher, D., N. Shore, and K. Train. 2006. “Water supply security and willingness to pay to avoid drought restrictions.” Econ. Rec. 82 (256): 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2006.00293.x.
Hensher, D. A., and W. H. Greene. 2001. The mixed logit model: The state of practice and warnings for the unwary, 1–39. Leeds, UK: Institute of Transport Studies.
Hensher, D. A., and W. H. Greene. 2003. “The mixed logit model: The state of practice.” Transportation 30 (2): 133–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022558715350.
Hole, A. R. 2007a. “A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures.” Health Econ. 16 (8): 827–840. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1197.
Hole, A. R. 2007b. “Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood.” Stata J. 7 (3): 388–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0700700306.
Holmes, T. P., W. L. Adamowicz, and F. Carlsson. 2017. “Choice experiments.” In A primer on nonmarket valuation, 133–186. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8.
Jaynes, D., J. Hatfield, and D. Meek. 1999. “Water quality in Walnut Creek watershed: Herbicides and nitrate in surface waters.” J. Environ. Qual. 28 (1): 45–59. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1999.00472425002800010005x.
Karytsas, S., O. Polyzou, and C. Karytsas. 2019. “Factors affecting willingness to adopt and willingness to pay for a residential hybrid system that provides heating/cooling and domestic hot water.” Renewable Energy 142 (Nov): 591–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.108.
Lancsar, E., and J. Louviere. 2008. “Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making.” Pharmacoeconomics 26 (8): 661–677. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004.
López-Mosquera, N. 2016. “Gender differences, theory of planned behavior and willingness to pay.” J. Environ. Psychol. 45 (Mar): 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.01.006.
Loureiro, M. L., J. J. McCluskey, and R. C. Mittelhammer. 2002. “Will consumers pay a premium for eco-labeled apples?” J. Consum. Aff. 36 (2): 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2002.tb00430.x.
Louviere, J. J., T. N. Flynn, and R. T. Carson. 2010. “Discrete choice experiments are not conjoint analysis.” J. Choice Modell. 3 (3): 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70014-9.
Maas, A., C. Goemans, D. Manning, S. Kroll, M. Arabi, and M. Rodriguez-McGoffin. 2017. “Evaluating the effect of conservation motivations on residential water demand.” J. Environ. Manage. 196 (Jul): 394–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.008.
MacDonald, D. H., M. D. Morrison, and M. B. Barnes. 2010. “Willingness to pay and willingness to accept compensation for changes in urban water customer service standards.” Water Resour. Manage. 24 (12): 3145–3158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9599-7.
Marlow, D. R., M. Moglia, S. Cook, and D. J. Beale. 2013. “Towards sustainable urban water management: A critical reassessment.” Water Res. 47 (20): 7150–7161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.046.
Martin-Ortega, J., R. Brouwer, E. Ojea, and J. Berbel. 2012. “Benefit transfer and spatial heterogeneity of preferences for water quality improvements.” J. Environ. Manage. 106 (Sep): 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.031.
McFadden, D. 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, 105–142. New York: New York Academic Press.
McFadden, D., and K. Train. 2000. “Mixed MNL models for discrete response.” J. Appl. Econom. 15 (5): 447–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5%3C447::AID-JAE570%3E3.0.CO;2-1.
Meas, T., W. Hu, M. T. Batte, T. A. Woods, and S. Ernst. 2015. “Substitutes or complements? Consumer preference for local and organic food attributes.” Am. J. Agric. Econ. 97 (4): 1044–1071. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aau108.
Mercer, K. 2017. “2017 AWWA state of the water industry report results are in!” Opflow 43 (6): 8–9. https://doi.org/10.5991/OPF.2017.43.0039.
Meyerhoff, J., and U. Liebe. 2009. “Status quo effect in choice experiments: Empirical evidence on attitudes and choice task complexity.” Land Econ. 85 (3): 515–528. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.85.3.515.
Montginoul, M. 2007. “Analysing the diversity of water pricing structures: The case of France.” Water Resour. Manage. 21 (5): 861–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9104-5.
Ormerod, K. J., and C. A. Scott. 2013. “Drinking wastewater: Public trust in potable reuse.” Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 38 (3): 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912444736.
PBAC (Palouse Basin Aquifer Committee). 2017a. Annual water use report 2017. Pullman, WA: PBAC.
PBAC (Palouse Basin Aquifer Committee). 2017b. Palouse groundwater basin water supply alternatives analysis report. Pullman, WA: PBAC.
PBAC (Palouse Basin Aquifer Committee). 2018. Palouse basin aquifer committee (PBAC) fact sheet. Pullman, WA: PBAC.
Penn, J., and W. Hu. 2019. “Cheap talk efficacy under potential and actual hypothetical bias: A meta-analysis.” J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 96 (Jul): 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.02.005.
Powe, N., G. Garrod, P. McMahon, and K. Willis. 2004. “Assessing customer preferences for water supply options using mixed methodology choice experiments.” Water Policy 6 (5): 427–441. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2004.0028.
Puri, R., and A. Maas. 2020. “Evaluating the sensitivity of residential water demand estimation to model specification and instrument choices.” Water Resour. Res. 56 (1): e2019WR026156. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026156.
Rice, C., N. K. Ragbir, S. Rice, and G. Barcia. 2020. “Willingness to pay for sustainable aviation depends on ticket price, greenhouse gas reductions and gender.” Technol. Soc. 60 (Feb): 101224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101224.
Scarpa, R., K. G. Willis, and M. Acutt. 2007. “Valuing externalities from water supply: Status quo, choice complexity and individual random effects in panel kernel logit analysis of choice experiments.” J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 50 (4): 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560701401861.
Schubert, R., M. Brown, M. Gysler, and H. W. Brachinger. 1999. “Financial decision-making: Are women really more risk-averse?” Am. Econ. Rev. 89 (2): 381–385. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.2.381.
Stone, J., M. Costanigro, and C. Goemans. 2018. “Public opinion on Colorado water rights transfers: Are policy preferences consistent with concerns over impacts?” J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 43 (3): 403–422.
Tentes, G., and D. Damigos. 2014. “Discrete choice experiment for groundwater valuation: Case of the Asopos river basin, Greece.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 141 (7): 04014089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000481.
Torell, L. A., J. D. Libbin, and M. D. Miller. 1990. “The market value of water in the Ogallala aquifer.” Land Econ. 66 (2): 163–175. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146366.
Torgler, B., M. A. Garcia-Valiñas, and A. Macintyre. 2008. Differences in preferences towards the environment: The impact of a gender, age and parental effect. FEEM Working Paper No. 18.2008. Milan, Italy: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1105320.
Train, K. E. 2009. Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tucker, J., A. MacDonald, L. Coulter, and R. C. Calow. 2014. “Household water use, poverty and seasonality: Wealth effects, labour constraints, and minimal consumption in Ethiopia.” Water Resour. Rural Dev. 3 (Apr): 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wrr.2014.04.001.
Vanniyasingam, T., C. E. Cunningham, G. Foster, and L. Thabane. 2016. “Simulation study to determine the impact of different design features on design efficiency in discrete choice experiments.” BMJ Open 6 (7): e011985. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011985.
Vedachalam, S., and R. R. Geddes. 2017. “The water infrastructure finance and innovation act of 2014: Structure and effects.” J. Am. Water Works Assn. 109 (4): E99–E109. https://doi.org/10.5942/jawwa.2017.109.0035.
Vossler, C. A., M. Doyon, and D. Rondeau. 2012. “Truth in consequentiality: Theory and field evidence on discrete choice experiments.” Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 4 (4): 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.4.4.145.
Wardropper, C., A. Mase, J. Qiu, P. Kohl, E. Booth, and A. Rissman. 2020. “Ecological worldview, agricultural or natural resource-based activities, and geography affect perceived importance of ecosystem services.” Landscape Urban Plann. 197 (May): 103768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103768.
Wardropper, C. B., S. Gillon, and A. R. Rissman. 2017. “Uncertain monitoring and modeling in a watershed nonpoint pollution program.” Land Use Policy 67 (Sep): 690–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.016.
Weng, W., M. Morrison, K. J. Boyle, and P. C. Boxall. 2017. The effect of the number of alternatives in choice experiment questions. Milwaukee: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.259179.
Zuo, A., S. A. Wheeler, H. Bjornlund, J. Edwards, and W. Xu. 2015. “Exploring generational differences towards water resources and policy preferences of water re-allocation in Alberta, Canada.” Water Resour. Manage. 29 (14): 5073–5089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1105-9.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 147Issue 4April 2021

History

Received: Apr 5, 2020
Accepted: Oct 2, 2020
Published online: Jan 25, 2021
Published in print: Apr 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jun 25, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Koroles Awad
Research Assistant, Dept. of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Univ. of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Dr., Moscow, ID 83844-2334.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Univ. of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Dr., Moscow, ID 83844-2334 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6689-3628. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Natural Resources and Society, Univ. of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Dr., Moscow, ID 83844-1139. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0652-2315

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share