Technical Papers
Nov 18, 2020

Stochastic Optimization of Reservoir Operation by Applying Hedging Rules

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 147, Issue 2

Abstract

The high percentage of reliability of water resources systems has always been considered as a positive advantage by users. However, in arid and semiarid areas in which the flow rate of the reservoir is highly variable, it makes sense to reduce the system reliability and allocate less water to demand sites in order to avoid critical conditions such as reservoir depletion and to reduce severity of failure in low water months. In this study, a parameterization-simulation-optimization (PSO) based operation model was used whereby the efficiency of two different hedging rules was studied based on one-dimensional and two-dimensional relationships between release, storage, and input flow considering the stochastic conditions of the input flow. The optimal hedging parameters were determined through linking the reservoir simulation model to the multiobjective imperialist competitive algorithm. The model combines stochastic and historical monthly flow data of the Marun River (10,800 months in total) to optimize the system and extract hedging rules for the Marun Dam reservoir in Iran. In order to validate the developed model, the combination of stochastic data and residual historical data (612 months in total) was used. The model results from two different hedging policies were then compared with those from standard operating policies (SOPs). The results indicated that PSO model based on one-dimensional reservoir hedging policy compared to two-dimensional hedging methods and SOP was able to manage needs allocation in dry months and prevent reservoir depletion.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Aboutalebi, M., O. Bozorg Haddad, and H. A. Loáiciga. 2015. “Optimal monthly reservoir operation rules for hydropower generation derived with SVR-NSGAII.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 141 (11): 04015029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000553.
Ahmed, J. A., and A. K. Sarma. 2007. “Artificial neural network model for synthetic streamflow generation.” Water Resour. Manage. 21 (6): 1015–1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9070-y.
Atashpaz-Gargari, E., and C. Lucas. 2007. “Imperialist competitive algorithm: An algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition.” In Proc., IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 4661–4667. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2007.4425083.
Azari, A., S. Hamzeh, and S. Naderi. 2018. “Multi-objective optimization of the reservoir system operation by using the hedging policy.” Water Resour. Manage. 32 (6): 2061–2078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1917-5.
Bayazit, M., and N. E. Ünal. 1990. “Effects of hedging on reservoir performance.” Water Resour. Res. 26 (4): 713–719. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i004p00713.
Celeste, A. B., and M. Billib. 2009. “Evaluation of stochastic reservoir operation optimization models.” Adv. Water Resour. 32 (9): 1429–1443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.06.008.
Efstratiadis, A., D. Bouziotas, and D. Koutsoyiannis. 2012. “The parameterization-simulation-optimisation framework for the management of hydroelectric reservoir systems.” In Proc., Hydrology and Society, EGU Leonardo Topical Conf. Series on the Hydrological Cycle. Torino, Italy: European Geosciences Union. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36437.22243.
Enayatifar, R., H. J. Sadaei, A. H. Abdullah, and A. Gani. 2013. “Imperialist competitive algorithm combined with refined high-order weighted fuzzy time series (RHWFTS–ICA) for short term load forecasting.” Energy Convers. Manage. 76 (Dec): 1104–1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.08.039.
Eum, H. I., Y. O. Kim, and R. N. Palmer. 2011. “Optimal drought management using sampling stochastic dynamic programming with a hedging rule.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 137 (1): 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000095.
Fayaed, S. S., A. El-Shafie, and O. Jaafar. 2013. “Reservoir-system simulation and optimization techniques.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 27 (7): 1751–1772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0711-4.
Felfelani, F., A. J. Movahed, and M. Zarghami. 2013. “Simulating hedging rules for effective reservoir operation by using system dynamics: A case study of Dez Reservoir, Iran.” Lake Reservoir Manage. 29 (2): 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2013.801542.
Ilich, N. 2014. “An effective three-step algorithm for multi-site generation of stochastic weekly hydrological time series.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 59 (1): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.822643.
Ji, Y., X. Lei, S. Cai, and X. Wang. 2016. “Hedging rules for water supply reservoir based on the model of simulation and optimization.” Water 8 (6): 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8060249.
Koutsoyiannis, D., and A. Economou. 2003. “Evaluation of the parameterization-simulation-optimization approach for the control of reservoir systems.” Water Resour. Res. 39 (6): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002148.
Koutsoyiannis, D., A. Efstratiadis, and G. Karavokiros. 2002. “A decision support tool for the management of multi-reservoir systems.” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 38 (4): 945–958. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb05536.x.
Kumar, K., and S. Kasthurirengan. 2018. “Generalized linear two-point hedging rule for water supply reservoir operation.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 144 (9): 04018051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000964.
Labadie, J. W. 2004. “Optimal operation of multireservoir systems: State-of-the-art review.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 130 (2): 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:2(93).
Li, H., P. Liu, S. Guo, B. Ming, L. Cheng, and Y. Zhou. 2018. “Hybrid two-stage stochastic methods using scenario-based forecasts for reservoir refill operations.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 144 (12): 04018080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001013.
Li, Y., C. Zhang, J. Chu, X. Cai, and H. Zhou. 2015. “Reservoir operation with combined natural inflow and controlled inflow through interbasin transfer: Biliu reservoir in Northeastern China.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 142 (2): 05015009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000607.
Maciel, F., R. Terra, and R. Chaer. 2015. “Economic impact of considering El Niño-Southern Oscillation on the representation of streamflow in an electric system simulator.” Int. J. Climatol. 35 (14): 4094–4102. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4269.
McMahon, T. A., and R. G. Mein. 1986. River and reservoir yield, 368. Fort Collins, CO: Water Resources Publications.
Morlando, F., L. Cimorelli, L. Cozzolino, G. Mancini, D. Pianese, and F. Garofalo. 2016. “Shot noise modeling of daily streamflows: A hybrid spectral-and time-domain calibration approach.” Water Resour. Res. 52 (6): 4730–4744. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017613.
Nalbantis, I., and D. Koutsoyiannis. 1997. “A parametric rule for planning and management of multiple-reservoir systems.” Water Resour. Res. 33 (9): 2165–2177. https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR01034.
Ndiritu, J., J. Odiyo, R. Makungo, B. Mwaka, N. Mthethwa, C. Ntuli, and A. Andanje. 2017. “Development of probabilistic operating rules for Hluhluwe Dam, South Africa.” Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 100 (Aug): 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2016.10.017.
Neelakantan, T. R., and K. Sasireka. 2015. “Review of hedging rules applied to reservoir operation.” Int. J. Eng. Technol. 7 (5): 1571–1580.
Patskoski, J., and A. Sankarasubramanian. 2015. “Improved reservoir sizing utilizing observed and reconstructed streamflows within a Bayesian combination framework.” Water Resour. Res. 51 (7): 5677–5697. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016189.
Porter, J. W., and B. J. Pink. 1991. “Method of synthetic fragments for disaggregation in stochastic data generation.” In Proc., National Conf. Publication-Institute of Engineers, 187–191. Barton, Australia: Institution of Engineers.
Rittima, A. 2009. “Hedging policy for reservoir system operation: A case study of Mun Bon and Lam Chae reservoirs.” Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.) 43 (4): 833–842.
Sapin, J., B. Rajagopalan, L. Saito, and R. J. Caldwell. 2017. “A K-Nearest neighbor based stochastic multisite flow and stream temperature generation technique.” Environ. Modell. Software 91 (May): 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.02.005.
Shih, J. S., and C. ReVelle. 1994. “Water-supply operations during drought: Continuous hedging rule.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 120 (5): 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1994)120:5(613).
Sieber, J., and D. Purkey. 2015. User guide for WEAP. Somerville, MA: Stockholm Environment Institute US Center.
Soltani, M., et al. 2016. “Assessment of climate variations in temperature and precipitation extreme events over Iran.” Theor. Appl. Climatol. 126 (3–4): 775–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1609-5.
Srikanthan, R., and T. A. McMahon. 2001. “Stochastic generation of annual, monthly and daily climate data: A review.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 5 (4): 653–670. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-5-653-2001.
Sulis, A. 2018. “Improved implicit stochastic optimization technique under drought conditions: The case study of Agri–Sinni water system.” Int. J. River Basin Manage. 16 (4): 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2017.1378225.
Sulis, A., and G. M. Sechi. 2013. “Comparison of generic simulation models for water resource systems.” Environ. Modell. Software 40 (Feb): 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.012.
Taghian, M., D. Rosbjerg, A. Haghighi, and H. Madsen. 2014. “Optimization of conventional rule curves coupled with hedging rules for reservoir operation.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 140 (5): 693–698. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000355.
Tennant, D. L. 1976. “Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources.” Fisheries 1 (4): 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1976)001%3C0006:IFRFFW%3E2.0.CO;2.
Thomas, H. A., and M. B. Fiering. 1962. “Mathematical synthesis of streamflow sequences for the analysis of river basins by simulation.” In Design of water resource systems, 459–493. London: Thomas Telford.
Vogel, R. M., and A. L. Shallcross. 1996. “The moving blocks bootstrap versus parametric time series models.” Water Resour. Res. 32 (6): 1875–1882. https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR00928.
Yeo, I. K., and R. A. Johnson. 2000. “A new family of power transformation to improve normality or symmetry.” Biometrika 87: 954–959. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/87.4.954.
Zelelny, M. 1973. “Compromise programming.” In Multiple-criteria decision making, edited by J. L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, 262–301. Columbia, SC: Univ. of South Carolina Press.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 147Issue 2February 2021

History

Received: Dec 8, 2019
Accepted: Aug 14, 2020
Published online: Nov 18, 2020
Published in print: Feb 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Apr 18, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

M.Sc. Student in Water Resource Engineering, Dept. of Water Engineering, Razi Univ., Kermanshah 6715685421, Iran. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4629-0149. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Water Engineering, Razi Univ., Kermanshah 6715685421, Iran (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9643-3331. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share