Cost Distribution of Environmental Flow Demands in a Large-Scale Multireservoir System
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 144, Issue 6
Abstract
Among the environmental effects caused by dams, the alteration of flow regimes is one of the most critical to river ecosystems given its influence in long river reaches and its continuous pattern. Provided it is technically feasible, the reoperation of hydroelectric reservoir systems can, in principle, mitigate the effects on degraded freshwater ecosystems by recovering some of the natural flow regime. The typical approach to implement hydropower-to-environment water transfers focuses on the reoperation of the dam located immediately upstream of the environmentally sensitive area, meaning that only one power station will bear the brunt of the benefits forgone for the power sector. By ignoring the contribution of upstream infrastructures to the alteration of the flow regime, the opportunity cost associated with the restoration of a flow regime is not equitably distributed among the power companies in the river basin, therefore slowing the establishment of environmental flow programs. Yet, there is no criterion nor institutional mechanisms to ensure a fair distribution of the opportunity cost among power stations. This paper addresses this issue by comparing five rules to redistribute the costs faced by the power sector when environmental flows (eflows) must be implemented in a multireservoir system. The rules are based on the installed capacity of the power plants; the live storage capacity of the reservoirs; the ratio between the incremental flows; the extent of the storage services (i.e., the volume of water effectively transferred by each reservoir); and the deregulation effect caused by other reservoirs downstream. The analysis is carried out using the Paraná River Basin (Brazil) as a case study.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by CNPq Grant No. 201185/2011-3, CAPES Grant No. 88881.065004/2014-01, and by the Institut Hydro-Quebec en environnement, développement et société (Institut EDS) de l’Université Laval.
References
Agostinho, A. A., Gomes, L. C., Suzuki, H. I., and Júlio-Junior, H. F. (2003). Migratory fishes of South America: Biology, fisheries and conservation status, J. Carolsfeld, B. Hervey, C. Ross, and A. Baer, eds., International Development Research Centre and the World Bank, Victoria, Canada.
Agostinho, A. A., Gomes, L. C., Veríssimo, S., and Okada, E. (2004a). “Flood regime, dam regulation and fish in the upper Paraná River: Effects on assemblage attributes, reproduction and recruitment.” Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 14(1), 11–19.
Agostinho, A. A., Gomes, L. C., and Zalewski, M. (2001). “The importance of floodplains for the dynamics of fish communities of the upper river Paraná.” Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol., 1(1–2), 209–217.
Agostinho, A. A., Thomaz, S. M., and Gomes, L. C. (2004b). “Threats for biodiversity in the floodplain of the Upper Paraná River: Effects of hydrological regulation by dams.” Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol., 4(3), 255–256.
Agostinho, A., and Zalewski, M. (1995). “The dependence of fish community structure and dynamics on floodplain and riparian ecotone in Parana River, Brazil.” Hydrobiologia, 303(1–3), 141–148.
Ai, X. S., Sandoval-Solis, S., Dahlke, H. E., and Lane, B. A. (2015). “Reconciling hydropower and environmental water uses in the Leishui River basin.” River Res. Appl., 31(2), 181–192.
Alfieri, L., Perona, P., and Burlando, P. (2006). “Optimal water allocation for an alpine hydropower system under changing scenarios.” Water Resour. Manage., 20(5), 761–778.
Ambec, S., and Sprumont, Y. (2002). “Sharing a river.” J. Econ. Theory, 107(2), 453–462.
ANA. (2018). “Regiao hidrografica do parana.” ⟨http://www3.ana.gov.br/portal/ANA/as-12-regioes-hidrograficas-brasileiras/parana⟩ (Mar. 7, 2018).
ANEEL (Agencia Nacional de Energia Eletrica). (2008). Atlas de energia eletrica do Brasil, Vol. 3, Brasília, Brazil.
Buchholz, W., Haupt, A., and Peters, W. (2016). “Equity as a prerequisite for stability of cooperation on global public good provision.” Environ. Resour. Econ., 65(1), 61–78.
Bunn, S., and Arthington, A. (2002). “Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity.” Environ. Manage., 30(4), 492–507.
Burke, M., Jorde, K., and Bungton, J. M. (2009). “Application of a hierarchical framework for assessing environmental impacts of dam operation: Changes in streamflow, bed mobility and recruitment of riparian trees in a western North American river.” J. Environ. Manage., 90, s224–s236.
Caruso, B. (2013). “Hydrologic modification from hydroelectric power operations in a mountain basin.” River Res. Appl., 29(4), 420–440.
Dong, B., Ni, D., and Wang, Y. (2012). “Sharing a polluted river network.” Environ. Resour. Econ., 53(3), 367–387.
Gao, Y., Vogel, R., Kroll, C., Poff, N., and Olden, J. (2009). “Development of representative indicators of hydrologic alteration.” J. Hydrol., 374(1–2), 136–147.
Goor, Q., Kelman, R., and Tilmant, A. (2011). “Optimal multipurpose-multireservoir operation model with variable productivity of hydropower plants.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 258–267.
Gorla, L., and Perona, P. (2013). “On quantifying ecologically sustainable flow releases in a diverted river reach.” J. Hydrol., 489, 98–107.
Harman, C., and Stewardson, M. (2005). “Optimizing dam release rules to meet environmental flow targets.” River Res. Appl., 21(2-3), 113–129.
Jager, H., and Smith, B. (2008). “Sustainable reservoir operation: Can we generate hydropower and preserve ecosystem values?” River Res. Appl., 24(3), 340–352.
Kotchen, M., Moore, M., Lupi, F., and Rutherford, E. (2006). “Environmental constraints on hydropower: An ex post benefit-cost analysis of dam relicensing in Michigan.” Land Econ., 82(3), 384–403.
Manyari, V., and Carvalho, A. O., Jr. (2007). “Environmental considerations in energy planning for the Amazon region: Downstream effects of dams.” Energy Policy, 35(12), 6526–6534.
Naiman, R. J., Latterell, J. J., Pettit, N. E., and Olden, J. D. (2008). “Flow variability and the biophysical vitality of river systems.” C.R. Geosci., 340(9–10), 629–643.
Olivares, M., and Lund, J. (2012). “Representing energy price variability in long- and medium-term hydropower optimization.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 606–613.
Pereira, M. V. F., and Pinto, L. M. V. G. (1985). “Stochastic optimization of a multireservoir hydroelectric system: A decomposition approach.” Water Resour. Res., 21(6), 779–792.
Pérez-Díaz, J. I., and Wilhelmi, J. R. (2010). “Assessment of the economic impact of environmental constraints on short-term hydropower plant operation.” Energy Policy, 38(12), 7960–7970.
Perona, P., Durrenmatt, D., and Characklis, G. (2013). “Obtaining natural-like flow releases in diverted river reaches from simple riparian benefit economic models.” J. Environ. Manage., 118, 161–169.
Poff, N. L., et al. (1997). “The natural flow regime: A paradigm for river conservation and restoration.” Bioscience, 47(11), 769–784.
Richter, B. D., and Thomas, G. A. (2007). “Restoring environmental flows by modifying dam operations.” Ecol. Soc., 12(1), 12.
Steinschneider, S., Bernstein, A., Palmer, R., and Polebitski, A. (2013). “Reservoir management optimization for basin-wide ecological restoration in the Connecticut River.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 04014023.
Suen, J.-P., and Eheart, J. W. (2006). “Reservoir management to balance ecosystem and human needs: Incorporating the paradigm of the ecological flow regime.” Water Resour. Res., 42(3), 1–9.
Suzuki, H., Agostinho, A., Bailly, D., Gimenes, M., Júlio-Junior, H., and Gomes, L. (2009). “Inter-annual variations in the abundance of young-of-the-year of migratory fishes in the upper Paraná River floodplain: Relations with hydrographic attributes.” Braz. J. Biol., 69(S2), 649–660.
Tharme, R. (2003). “A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: Emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers.” River Res. Appl., 19(5–6), 397–441.
Tilmant, A., Arjoon, D., and Marques, G. F. (2012). “The economic value of storage in multireservoir systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 375–383.
Tilmant, A., Beevers, L., and Muyumda, B. (2010). “Restoring a flow regime through the coordinated operation of a multireservoir system: The case of the Zambezi River basin.” Water Resour. Res., 46(7), 1–11.
Tilmant, A., and Kelman, R. (2007). “A stochastic approach to analyze trade-offs and risks associated with large-scale water resources systems.” Water Resour. Res., 43(6), W06425.
Valle, A., Aguiar, M., and Cruz, G., Jr. (2009). “The impact of water quality as an environmental constraint on operation planning of a hydro-thermal power system.” Renewable Energy, 34(3), 655–659.
WCD (World Commission on Dams). (2000). Dams and development: A new framework for decision-making, Earthscan Publications, London.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 144 • Issue 6 • June 2018
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 14, 2017
Accepted: Dec 7, 2017
Published online: Apr 10, 2018
Published in print: Jun 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Sep 10, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.