Technical Papers
Nov 17, 2017

Using Joint Probability Distribution of Reliability and Vulnerability to Develop a Water System Performance Index

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 144, Issue 2

Abstract

Assessing the long-term reliability and vulnerability of municipal water supply systems often employs system modeling to analyze performance. Generally, decision-makers have long been in search of a metric that presents a comprehensive assessment of water-supply systems. The system’s condition is often evaluated by a univariate measure of reliability, resiliency, or vulnerability, which individually cannot provide a comprehensive understanding of the system’s performance. In this study, instead of an individual measure, the joint probability distribution of reliability and vulnerability is used to assess the performance of water systems. To quantify the joint probability distribution between reliability and vulnerability, different copula functions are tested, and the most appropriate one is selected. The copula function couples one-dimensional marginal distributions of reliability and vulnerability to form the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the joint probability. Then, a novel index, the Water System Performance Index (WSPI), is derived from the copula CDF based on exceedance and nonexceedance probability of these two metrics. WSPI presents simultaneous information about the frequency and magnitude of failures in water systems. The proposed WSPI increases with an increase in reliability and a decrease in vulnerability of the system and vice versa. The WSPI is demonstrated and tested using two reservoirs of the Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU) water system. WSPI, first, is employed to present the performance of the system during the historical period of 1981–2010. Then, WSPI values are estimated for the system under future climate projections. Results suggest the WSPI provides a useful tool for managers and stakeholders to represent simultaneous information about frequency, magnitude, and recovery period of a system under different failure conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Akaike, H. (1974). “A new look at the statistical model identification.” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 19(6), 716–723.
Cancelliere, A., and Salas, J. D. (2004). “Drought length properties for periodic-stochastic hydrologic data.” Water Resour. Res., 40(2), W02503.
Dracup, J. A., Lee, K. S., and Paulson, E. G., Jr. (1980). “On the definition of droughts.” Water Resour. Res., 16(2), 297–302.
Eban, E., Rothschild, R., Mizrahi, A., Nelken, I., and Elidan, G. (2013). “Dynamic copula networks for modeling real-valued time series.” Proc., 16th Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), Scottsdale, AZ, 1–9.
Esty, D. C., Levy, M., Srebotnjak, T., and Sherbinin, A. (2005). “Environmental sustainability index: Benchmarking national environmental stewardship.” Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, New Haven, CT.
Goharian, E. (2016). “A framework for water supply system performance assessment to support integrated water resources management and decision making process.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, 172.
Goharian, E. (2017), “Water system performance index (WSPI).” GitHub Repository, San Francisco.
Goharian, E., Burian, S., Bardsley, T., and Strong, C. (2015). “Incorporating potential severity into vulnerability assessment of water supply systems under climate change conditions.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 04015051.
Goharian, E., and Burian, S. J. (2014). “Integrated urban water resources modeling in a semi-arid mountainous region using a cyberinfrastructure framework.” Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Hydroinformatics, HIC 2014, CUNY Academic Works, New York.
Goharian, E., Burian, S. J., Lillywhite, J., and Hile, R. (2016). “Vulnerability assessment to support integrated water resources management of metropolitan water supply systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 04016080.
GoldSim version 11.1 [Computer software]. Goldsim Technical Group, Washington, DC.
Hashimoto, T., Stedinger, J. R., and Loucks, D. P. (1982). “Reliability, resiliency and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation.” Water Resour. Res., 18(1), 14–20.
Kao, S.-C., and Govindaraju, R. S. (2008). “Trivariate statistical analysis of extreme rainfall events via the Plackett family of copulas.” Water Resour. Res., 44(2), W02415.
Karamouz, M., Goharian, E., and Nazif, S. (2013). “Reliability assessment of the water supply systems under uncertain future extreme climate conditions.” Earth Interact., 17(20), 1–27.
Li, D. Q., and Tang, X. S. (2014). “Modeling and simulation of bivariate distribution of shear strength parameters using copulas.” Chapter 2, Risk and reliability in geotechnical engineering, K.-K. Phoon and J. Ching, eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 77–128.
Loucks, D. P. (1997). “Quantifying trends in system sustainability.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 42(4), 513–530.
Loucks, D. P., and Van Beek, E. (2005). Water resources systems planning and management, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris.
Maity, R., Sharma, A., Nagesh Kumar, D., and Chanda, K. (2013). “Characterizing drought using the reliability-resiliency-vulnerability concept.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 859–869.
Maurer, E. P., Brekke, L., Pruitt, T., and Duffy, P. B. (2007). “Fine-resolution climate projections enhance regional climate change impact studies.” Eos. Trans., 88(47), 504.
McKee, T. B., Doeskin, N. J., and Kieist, J. (1993). “The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales.” Proc., 8th Conf. on Applied Climatology, American Meteorological Society, Boston, 179–184.
McKee, T. B., Doeskin, N. J., and Kieist, J. (1995). “Drought monitoring with multiple time scales.” Proc., 9th Conf. on Applied Climatology, American Meteorological Society, Boston, 233–236.
Meucci, A. (2011). “A new breed of copulas for risk and portfolio management.” Risk, 24(9), 122–126.
Mirabbasi, R., Fakheri-Fard, A., and Dinpashoh, Y. (2012). “Bivariate drought frequency analysis using the copula method.” Theor. Appl. Climatol., 108(1–2), 191–206.
Nadarajah, S. (2009). “A bivariate pareto model for drought.” Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess, 23(6), 811–822.
Nazif, S., and Karamouz, M. (2009). “Algorithm for assessment of water distribution system’s readiness: Planning for disasters.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 244–252.
Nelson, R. B. (2006). An introduction to copulas, Springer, New York, 269.
Palmer, W. C. (1965). “Meteorological drought.”, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, DC, 58.
Policy Research Initiative. (2007). “Canadian water sustainability index (CWSI): Project report.” ⟨http://publications.gc.ca/Collection/PH4-38-2007E.pdf⟩ (Aug. 25 2015).
Sainz, P. (1989). “An index of social welfare.” Towards a new way to measure development, Office of the South Commission, Caracas, Venezuela, 156–160.
Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities. (1999). “Salt Lake City water management plan.” ⟨http://www.slcdocs.com/utilities/PDF%20Files/slcwatershedmgtplan.pdf⟩ (Mar. 12, 2015).
Sandoval-Solis, S., McKinney, D., and Loucks, D. (2011). “Sustainability index for water resources planning and management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 381–390.
Schölzel, C., and Friederichs, P. (2008). “Multivariate non-normally distributed random variables in climate research—Introduction to the copula approach.” Nonlinear Processes Geophys., 15(5), 761–772.
Schwarz, G. E. (1978). “Estimating the dimension of a model.” Ann. Stat., 6(2), 461–464.
Shafer, B. A., and Dezman, L. E. (1982). “Development of a surface water supply index (SWSI) to assess the severity of drought conditions in snowpack runoff areas.” 50th Annual Western Snow Conf., Colorado State Univ., Reno, NV, 164–175.
Sklar, A. (1959). Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges [n-dimensional distribution functions and their margins], Vol. 8, Institut Statistique de l’Université de Paris, Paris, 229–231.
Thompson, D., and Kilgore, R. (2011). “Estimating joint flow probabilities at stream confluences using copulas.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2262, 200–206.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2017). “Geospatial data gateway.” ⟨https://gdg.sc.egov.usda.gov/⟩ (Apr. 21, 2017).
U.S. Environmental Protection Website. (2015). “Impaired waters and total maximum daily loads.” ⟨http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/cwa/tmdl/index.cfm⟩ (Mar. 12, 2015).
Vangelis, H., Spiliotis, M., and Tsakiris, G. (2011). “Drought severity assessment based on bivariate probability analysis.” Water Resour. Manage., 25(1), 357–371.
Yazdi, J., Lee, E. H., and Kim, J. H. (2014). “Stochastic multiobjective optimization model for urban drainage network rehabilitation.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 04014091.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 144Issue 2February 2018

History

Received: Aug 15, 2016
Accepted: Jul 21, 2017
Published online: Nov 17, 2017
Published in print: Feb 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Apr 17, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Erfan Goharian, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Steven J. Burian, M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
Mohammad Karamouz, F.ASCE
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Univ. of Tehran, 1417466191 Tehran, Iran.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share