Surrogate-Based Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty Analysis for DNAPL-Contaminated Aquifer Remediation
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 142, Issue 11
Abstract
To limit the high cost of surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation (SEAR) for clearing dense nonaqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs), the simulation-optimization technique is generally adopted for determining the optimal remediation strategy in advance. The simulation model requires an uncertainty analysis, and incorporating the results into the SEAR strategy optimization process is critical. However, previous studies have rarely involved corresponding problems. In the present study, an uncertainty analysis is performed by combining a Monte Carlo random simulation with the Sobol’ global sensitivity analysis to assess the contribution of different parameters to the remediation efficiency and distribution characteristics of the simulation model outputs. The surrogate model technique based on Kriging was used to reduce the high computational load of the sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that the porosity is the most important parameter with the largest influence on the remediation efficiency at a weight of 70%, followed by the oleic phase dispersity at a weight of 27%; the influence from variations in other parameters can be neglected. The rebuilt surrogate model with fewer input variables performed significantly better than the one built before the sensitivity analysis for all performance evaluation indices. Uncertainty in the aquifer parameters resulted in clear variations in the simulation model outputs. Output fluctuations from the average were nearly 2.5%. The results of this study showed that the failure risk of a given remediation strategy can be obtained based on the distribution of model outputs.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China #1 (Grant No. 41372237), National Major Science and Technology Program of China for Water Pollution Control and Treatment #2 (No. 2012ZX07201-001), and Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
References
Carrero, E., Queipo, N. V., Pintos, S., and Zerpa, L. E. (2007). “Global sensitivity analysis of alkali-surfactant–polymer enhanced oil recovery processes.” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 58(1–2), 30–42.
Chu, H. B., and Lu, W. X. (2015). “Adaptive Kriging surrogate model for the optimization design of a DNAPLs-contaminated groundwater remediation process.” Water Sci. Technol., 15(2), 263–270.
Delshad, M., Pope, G. A., and Sepehrnoori, K. (1996). “A compositional simulator for modeling surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation, 1 formulation.” J. Contam. Hydrol., 23(4), 303–327.
Fernández-Garcia, D., Bolster, D., Sanchez-Vila, X., and Tartakovsky, D. M. (2012). “A Bayesian approach to integrate temporal data into probabilistic risk analysis of monitored NAPL remediation.” Adv. Water Resour., 36, 108–120.
Hou, Z. Y., Lu, W. X., Chu, H. B., and Luo, J. N. (2015). “Selecting parameter-optimized surrogate models in DNAPL-contaminated aquifer remediation strategies.” Environ. Eng. Sci., 32(12), 1016–1026.
Li, M. S., et al. (2013). “Prediction of gas solubility in polymers by back propagation artificial neural network based on self-adaptive particle swarm optimization algorithm and chaos theory.” Fluid Phase Equilib., 356(2013), 11–17.
Li, Y. C., Zhou, X. Q., Lu, M. M., Lin, J. Q., and Sun, J. B. (2014). “Parameters optimization for machining optical parts of difficult-to-cut materials by genetic algorithm.” Mater. Manuf. Processes, 29(1), 9–14.
Liu, L. (2005). “Modeling for surfactant-enhanced groundwater remediation processes at DNAPLs-contaminated sites.” J. Environ. Inf., 5(2), 42–52.
Lu, W. X., Chu, H. B., Zhao, Y., and Luo, J. N. (2013). “Optimization of denser nonaqueous phase liquids-contaminated groundwater remediation based on Kriging surrogate model.” Water Pract. Technol., 8(2), 304–314.
Luo, J. N., Lu, W. X., Xin, X., and Chu, H. B. (2013). “Surrogate model application to the identification of an optimal surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation strategy for DNAPL-contaminated sites.” J. Earth Sci., 24(6), 1023–1032.
Manoochehri, M., and Kolahan, F. (2014). “Integration of artificial neural network and simulated annealing algorithm to optimize deep drawing process.” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 73(1–4), 241–249.
MATLAB R2014a [Computer software]. MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Nossent, J., Elsen, P., and Bauwens, W. (2011). “Sobol’ sensitivity analysis of a complex environmental model.” Environ. Model. Software, 26(12), 1515–1525.
Oladyshkin, S., de Barros, F. P. J., and Nowak, W. (2012). “Global sensitivity analysis: A flexible and efficient framework with an example from stochastic hydrogeology.” Adv. Water Resour., 37(2012), 10–22.
Prosser, M., Speight, V., and Filion, Y. (2015). “Sensitivity analysis of energy use in pipe-replacement planning for a large water-distribution network.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 04015001.
Qin, X. S., Huang, G. H., Chakma, A., Chen, B., and Zeng, G. M. (2007). “Simulation-based process optimization for surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation at heterogeneous DNAPL-contaminated sites.” Sci. Total Environ., 381(1–3), 17–37.
Rahbeh, M. E., and Mohtar, R. H. (2006). “Application of multiphase transport models to field remediation by air sparging and soil vapor extraction.” J. Hazard. Mater., 143(1–2), 156–170.
Rohmer, J., and Foerster, E. (2011). “Global sensitivity analysis of large-scale numerical landslide models based on Gaussian-process meta-modeling.” Comput. Geosci., 37(7), 917–927.
Saltelli, A., et al. (2008). Global sensitivity analysis: The primer, Wiley, West Sussex, England.
Song, X., Bryan, B. A., Paul, K. I., and Zhao, G. (2012). “Variance-based sensitivity analysis of a forest growth model.” Ecol. Model., 247(2012), 135–143.
Sreekanth, J., and Datta, B. (2010). “Multi-objective management of saltwater intrusion in coastal aquifers using genetic programming and modular neural network based surrogate models.” J. Hydrol., 393(3–4), 245–256.
Volkova, E., Iooss, B., and Van Dorpe, F. (2008). “Global sensitivity analysis for a numerical model of radionuclide migration from the RRC ‘Kurchatov Institute’ radwaste disposal site.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 22(1), 17–31.
Wang, F. K., and Huang, P. R. (2014). “Implementing particle swarm optimization algorithm to estimate the mixture of two Weibull parameters with censored data.” J. Stat. Comput. Simul., 84(9), 1975–1989.
Zeng, X., Wang, D., and Wu, J. (2012). “Sensitivity analysis of the probability distribution of groundwater level series based on information entropy.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 26(3), 345–356.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 17, 2015
Accepted: Mar 9, 2016
Published online: Jun 14, 2016
Published in print: Nov 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Nov 14, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.