Technical Papers
Jun 14, 2016

Surrogate-Based Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty Analysis for DNAPL-Contaminated Aquifer Remediation

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 142, Issue 11

Abstract

To limit the high cost of surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation (SEAR) for clearing dense nonaqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs), the simulation-optimization technique is generally adopted for determining the optimal remediation strategy in advance. The simulation model requires an uncertainty analysis, and incorporating the results into the SEAR strategy optimization process is critical. However, previous studies have rarely involved corresponding problems. In the present study, an uncertainty analysis is performed by combining a Monte Carlo random simulation with the Sobol’ global sensitivity analysis to assess the contribution of different parameters to the remediation efficiency and distribution characteristics of the simulation model outputs. The surrogate model technique based on Kriging was used to reduce the high computational load of the sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that the porosity is the most important parameter with the largest influence on the remediation efficiency at a weight of 70%, followed by the oleic phase dispersity at a weight of 27%; the influence from variations in other parameters can be neglected. The rebuilt surrogate model with fewer input variables performed significantly better than the one built before the sensitivity analysis for all performance evaluation indices. Uncertainty in the aquifer parameters resulted in clear variations in the simulation model outputs. Output fluctuations from the average were nearly 2.5%. The results of this study showed that the failure risk of a given remediation strategy can be obtained based on the distribution of model outputs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China #1 (Grant No. 41372237), National Major Science and Technology Program of China for Water Pollution Control and Treatment #2 (No. 2012ZX07201-001), and Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun, China.

References

Carrero, E., Queipo, N. V., Pintos, S., and Zerpa, L. E. (2007). “Global sensitivity analysis of alkali-surfactant–polymer enhanced oil recovery processes.” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 58(1–2), 30–42.
Chu, H. B., and Lu, W. X. (2015). “Adaptive Kriging surrogate model for the optimization design of a DNAPLs-contaminated groundwater remediation process.” Water Sci. Technol., 15(2), 263–270.
Delshad, M., Pope, G. A., and Sepehrnoori, K. (1996). “A compositional simulator for modeling surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation, 1 formulation.” J. Contam. Hydrol., 23(4), 303–327.
Fernández-Garcia, D., Bolster, D., Sanchez-Vila, X., and Tartakovsky, D. M. (2012). “A Bayesian approach to integrate temporal data into probabilistic risk analysis of monitored NAPL remediation.” Adv. Water Resour., 36, 108–120.
Hou, Z. Y., Lu, W. X., Chu, H. B., and Luo, J. N. (2015). “Selecting parameter-optimized surrogate models in DNAPL-contaminated aquifer remediation strategies.” Environ. Eng. Sci., 32(12), 1016–1026.
Li, M. S., et al. (2013). “Prediction of gas solubility in polymers by back propagation artificial neural network based on self-adaptive particle swarm optimization algorithm and chaos theory.” Fluid Phase Equilib., 356(2013), 11–17.
Li, Y. C., Zhou, X. Q., Lu, M. M., Lin, J. Q., and Sun, J. B. (2014). “Parameters optimization for machining optical parts of difficult-to-cut materials by genetic algorithm.” Mater. Manuf. Processes, 29(1), 9–14.
Liu, L. (2005). “Modeling for surfactant-enhanced groundwater remediation processes at DNAPLs-contaminated sites.” J. Environ. Inf., 5(2), 42–52.
Lu, W. X., Chu, H. B., Zhao, Y., and Luo, J. N. (2013). “Optimization of denser nonaqueous phase liquids-contaminated groundwater remediation based on Kriging surrogate model.” Water Pract. Technol., 8(2), 304–314.
Luo, J. N., Lu, W. X., Xin, X., and Chu, H. B. (2013). “Surrogate model application to the identification of an optimal surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation strategy for DNAPL-contaminated sites.” J. Earth Sci., 24(6), 1023–1032.
Manoochehri, M., and Kolahan, F. (2014). “Integration of artificial neural network and simulated annealing algorithm to optimize deep drawing process.” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 73(1–4), 241–249.
MATLAB R2014a [Computer software]. MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Nossent, J., Elsen, P., and Bauwens, W. (2011). “Sobol’ sensitivity analysis of a complex environmental model.” Environ. Model. Software, 26(12), 1515–1525.
Oladyshkin, S., de Barros, F. P. J., and Nowak, W. (2012). “Global sensitivity analysis: A flexible and efficient framework with an example from stochastic hydrogeology.” Adv. Water Resour., 37(2012), 10–22.
Prosser, M., Speight, V., and Filion, Y. (2015). “Sensitivity analysis of energy use in pipe-replacement planning for a large water-distribution network.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 04015001.
Qin, X. S., Huang, G. H., Chakma, A., Chen, B., and Zeng, G. M. (2007). “Simulation-based process optimization for surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation at heterogeneous DNAPL-contaminated sites.” Sci. Total Environ., 381(1–3), 17–37.
Rahbeh, M. E., and Mohtar, R. H. (2006). “Application of multiphase transport models to field remediation by air sparging and soil vapor extraction.” J. Hazard. Mater., 143(1–2), 156–170.
Rohmer, J., and Foerster, E. (2011). “Global sensitivity analysis of large-scale numerical landslide models based on Gaussian-process meta-modeling.” Comput. Geosci., 37(7), 917–927.
Saltelli, A., et al. (2008). Global sensitivity analysis: The primer, Wiley, West Sussex, England.
Song, X., Bryan, B. A., Paul, K. I., and Zhao, G. (2012). “Variance-based sensitivity analysis of a forest growth model.” Ecol. Model., 247(2012), 135–143.
Sreekanth, J., and Datta, B. (2010). “Multi-objective management of saltwater intrusion in coastal aquifers using genetic programming and modular neural network based surrogate models.” J. Hydrol., 393(3–4), 245–256.
Volkova, E., Iooss, B., and Van Dorpe, F. (2008). “Global sensitivity analysis for a numerical model of radionuclide migration from the RRC ‘Kurchatov Institute’ radwaste disposal site.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 22(1), 17–31.
Wang, F. K., and Huang, P. R. (2014). “Implementing particle swarm optimization algorithm to estimate the mixture of two Weibull parameters with censored data.” J. Stat. Comput. Simul., 84(9), 1975–1989.
Zeng, X., Wang, D., and Wu, J. (2012). “Sensitivity analysis of the probability distribution of groundwater level series based on information entropy.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 26(3), 345–356.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 142Issue 11November 2016

History

Received: Nov 17, 2015
Accepted: Mar 9, 2016
Published online: Jun 14, 2016
Published in print: Nov 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Nov 14, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin Univ., Changchun 130021, China; Ph.D. Candidate, College of Environment and Resources, Jilin Univ., Changchun 130021, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin Univ., Changchun 130021, China; Professor, College of Environment and Resources, Jilin Univ., Changchun 130021, China (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin Univ., Changchun 130021, China; Ph.D. Candidate, College of Environment and Resources, Jilin Univ., Changchun 130021, China. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share