Developing Key Indicators for Adaptive Water Planning
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 141, Issue 7
Abstract
With hard-to-predict changes in future demand, climate, supply options, technological opportunities, and budgetary constraints, water agency plans should be flexible and robust, designed to meet agency goals over a wide range of plausible future conditions. But current state-of-the-art approaches to water planning make it difficult to craft flexible and robust plans to guide resource allocation and facilitate discussions with the agency’s constituents and ratepayers. This paper describes an innovative effort by one agency, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (termed Metropolitan), to begin to address these challenges. Metropolitan’s year 2010 integrated resources plan (IRP) update specifies resource allocations over 25 years and calls for an adaptive management approach to revisit these allocations over time. Using a quantitative decision support approach called robust decision-making (RDM), an enhanced version of Metropolitan’s main planning model was run, over many thousands of cases representing different combinations of assumptions about future demand, conditions in the bay/delta, climate conditions, local resource yields, and implementation challenges. Statistical cluster analysis on the resulting database of model runs identifies scenarios that succinctly summarize the types of future conditions in which the IRP core resources strategy does and does not meet its goals. These scenarios inform early warning indicators that can guide the adaptive management component of the IRP. The robust decision methods presented in this paper should prove broadly useful for Metropolitan in addition to other water agencies seeking to develop robust and adaptive plans in the face of uncertain future conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Boland, J. J., Chesnutt, T. W., Dziegielewski, B., and Hall, D. C. (2006). The application of scenario planning to Metropolitan’s integrated area studies: Final technical memorandum, appendix 13, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Brown, C. (2010). “The end of reliability.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 136(2), 143–145.
Bryant, B. P., and Lempert, R. J. (2010). “Thinking inside the box: A participatory, computer-assisted approach to scenario discovery.” Technol. Forecasting Social Change, 77(1), 34–49.
California Climate Action Team. (2010). “Climate action team biennial report.” Sacramento, CA, 〈http://www.energy.ca.gov/2010publications/CAT-1000-2010-004/CAT-1000-2010-004.PDF〉.
Carter, T. R., et al. (2007). “New assessment methods and the characterisation of future conditions.” Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Rep. of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. v. d. Linden, and C. E. Hanson, eds., Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 33–171.
Cayan, D. R., Das, T., Pierce, D. W., Barnett, T. P., Tyree, M., and Gershunov, A. (2010). “Future dryness in the southwest US and the hydrology of the early 21st century drought.” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 107(50), 21271–21276.
Christensen, N. S., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2007). “A multimodel ensemble approach to assessment of climate change impacts on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11(4), 1417–1434.
Dessai, S., and Hulme, M. (2007). “Assessing the robustness of adaptation decisions to climate change uncertainties: A case study on water resources management in the east of England.” Global Environ. Change, 17(1), 59–72.
Friedman, J. H., and Fisher, N. I. (1999). “Bump hunting in high-dimensional data.” Stat. Comput., 9(2), 123–143.
Georgakakos, A., et al. (2014). “Chapter 3, water resources.” Climate change impacts in the United States: The third national climate assessment, J. M. Melilo, T. Richmond, and G. Yohe, eds., U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, 69–112.
Groves, D. G. (2006). “New methods for identifying robust long-term water resources management strategies for California.” Ph.D. thesis, Pardee RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica, CA.
Groves, D. G., Davis, M., Wilkinson, R., and Lempert, R. J. (2008). “Planning for climate change in the Inland Empire: Southern California.” Water Resour. Impact., 10(4), 14–17.
Groves, D. G., Fischbach, J. R., Bloom, E., Knopman, D., and Keefe, R. (2013). Adapting to a changing Colorado River, RAND, Santa Monica, CA.
Groves, D. G., and Lempert, R. J. (2007). “A new analytic method for finding policy-relevant scenarios.” Global Environ. Change Part A: Hum. Policy Dimension., 17(1), 73–85.
Haasnoot, M., Kwakkel, J. H., Walker, W. E., and ter Maat, J. (2013). “Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A new method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world.” Global Environ. Change, 23(2), 485–498.
IRPSIM 7.0 [Computer software]. Kansas City, MO, Cross River Software.
Joyce, B., Purkey, D., Yates, D., Groves, D., and Draper, A. (2010). Integrated scenario analysis for the 2009 California water plan update, Vol. 4, California Dept. of Water Resources, Sacramento, CA.
Lee, K. N. (1993). Compass and gyroscope: Integrating science and politics for the environment, Island Press, Washington, DC.
Lempert, R., and Groves, D. G. (2010). “Identifying and evaluating robust adaptive policy responses to climate change for water management agencies in the American west.” Technol. Forecast. Social Change, 77(6), 960–974.
Lempert, R., Nakicenovic, N., Sarewitz, D., and Schlesinger, M. (2004). “Characterizing climate-change uncertainties for decision-makers—An editorial essay.” Clim. Change, 65(1–2), 1–9.
Lempert, R. J., and Collins, M. T. (2007). “Managing the risk of uncertain threshold responses: Comparison of robust, optimum, and precautionary approaches.” Risk Anal. Int. J., 27(4), 1009–1026.
Lempert, R. J., Groves, D. G., Popper, S. W., and Bankes, S. C. (2006). “A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios.” Manage. Sci., 52(4), 514–528.
Lempert, R. J., and Popper, S. W. (2005). “High-performance government in an uncertain world.” High performance government: Structure, leadership, incentives, RAND Corporation Monograph Rep. MG-256-PRGS, R. Klitgaard and P. C. Light, eds., Santa Monica, CA.
Lempert, R. J., Popper, S. W., and Bankes, S. C. (2003). “Shaping the next one hundred years: New methods for quantitative, long-term policy analysis.”, RAND, Santa Monica, CA, 210.
Means, E., Laugier, M., Daw, J., Kaatz, L., and Waage, M. (2010). Decision support planning methods: Incorporating climate change into water planning, Water Utility Climate Alliance, Clear Water, FL.
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. (2010). Integrated water resources plan 2010 update: Technical appendix, Los Angeles.
Moss, R., et al. (2014). “Decision support: Connecting science, risk perception, and decisions.” Climate change impacts in the United States: The third national climate assessment, J. M. Melilo, T. Richmond, and G. Yohe, eds., U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, 620–647.
Nakicenovic, N., et al. (2000). Special Rep. on Emissions Scenarios: A Special Rep. of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
National Research Council. (2009). Informing decisions in a changing climate, National Academies, Washington, DC.
Ranger, N., Millner, A., Dietz, S., Fankhauser, S., Lopez, A., and Ruta, G. (2010). Adaptation in the UK: A decision making process, U.K. Environment Agency, London.
Rosenhead, J. (1989). “Robustness analysis: Keeping your options open.” Rational analysis for a problematic world, J. Rosenhead, ed., Wiley, New York.
Rosenzweig, C., et al. (2011). “Developing coastal adaptation to climate change in the New York City infrastructure-shed: Process, approach, tools, and strategies.” Clim. Change, 106(1), 93–127.
Schwarz, A., et al. (2011). Climate change handbook for regional water planning, Dept. of Water Resources, Sacramento, CA.
Simon, H. A. (1956). “Rational choice and the structure of the environment.” Psychol. Rev., 63(2), 129–138.
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR). (2007). “Colorado River basin water supply and demand study: Study report.” Washington, DC.
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR). (2012). “Colorado River basin water supply and demand study: Study report.” Washington, DC.
Walker, W. E., Rahman, S. A., and Cave, J. (2001). “Adaptive policies, policy analysis, and policy-making.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 128(2), 282–289.
Weaver, C. P., Lempert, R. J., Brown, C., Hall, J. A., Revell, D., and Sarewitz, D. (2013). “Improving the contribution of climate model information to decision making: The value and demands of robust decision frameworks.” WIREs Clim. Change, 4(1), 39–60.
Yates, D., Purkey, D., Sieber, J., Huber-Lee, A., and Galbraith, H. (2005). “WEAP21—A demand-, priority-, and preference-driven water planning model.” Water Int., 30(4), 501–512.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 141 • Issue 7 • July 2015
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 13, 2013
Accepted: Jun 20, 2014
Published online: Sep 15, 2014
Discussion open until: Feb 15, 2015
Published in print: Jul 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.