Technical Papers
Jul 22, 2014

Water Distribution System Rehabilitation under Climate Change Mitigation Scenarios in Canada

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 141, Issue 4

Abstract

Many countries are considering policy instruments such as a carbon tax and economic discounting to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in key sectors like the water sector. This paper examines the impact of economic discounting and a carbon tax on the optimization of water main rehabilitation. A new pipe rehabilitation optimization algorithm that accounts for GHGs was developed and applied to the Fairfield water distribution system in Amherstview, Ontario, Canada. GHG intensity factors for the provinces of Ontario (low-carbon) and Alberta (high-carbon) were applied to the Fairfield network. In both cases, adopting a low discount rate and levying a carbon tax had a weak effect in reducing energy use, GHG emissions, pipe breaks, and leakage. Further, a low discount rate and a carbon tax encouraged the search process to invest in rehabilitation early in the planning period to reduce continuing leakage, pipe repair, energy, and GHG costs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank David Thompson, P.Eng., at Loyalist Township for providing data and advice in the development of this paper. This research was financially supported by Queen’s University and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council.

References

Ainger, C., Butler, D., Caffor, I., Crawford-Brown, D., Helm, D., and Stephenson, T. (2009). “A low carbon water industry in 2050.” U.K. Environment Agency, Bristol, U.K. 〈http://cdn.environment-agency.gov.uk/scho1209brob-e-e.pdf〉.
Alvisi, S., and Franchini, M. (2009). “Multiobjective optimization of rehabilitation and leakage detection scheduling in water distribution systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 426–439.
American Society of Civil Engineers. (2009). “America’s infrastructure report card: Drinking water.” 〈http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/fact-sheet/drinking-water〉.
Arai, N. (2012). “Best practice: Water leakage prevention controls.” 〈www.nyc.gov/globalpartners/innovationexchange〉.
Arulraj, G. P., and Suresh, H. R. (1995). “Concept of significance index for maintenance and design of pipe networks.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 833–837.
Brothers, K. J. (2001). “Water leakage and sustainable supply-truth or consequences?” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 93(4), 150–152.
Canadian Infrastructure Report Card. (2012). “Vol. 1: 2012 municipal roads and water systems.” 〈www.canadainfrastructure.ca〉.
CH2MHill. (2007). “Fairfield water storage project: Final report.” Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Clark, R. M., Sivaganesan, M., Selvakumar, A., and Sethi, V. (2002). “Cost models for water supply distribution systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 312–321.
Dandy, G., Bogdanowicz, A., Craven, J., Maywald, A., and Liu, P. (2008). “Optimizing the sustainability of water distribution systems.” 10th Water Distribution Systems Analysis Symp., Kruger National Park, South Africa, 267–277.
Dandy, G., Roberts, A, Hewitson, C., and Chrystie, P. (2006). “Sustainability objectives for the optimization of water distribution networks.” 8th Annual Water Distribution Systems Analysis Symp., Cincinnati, OH, 1–11.
Dandy, G. C., and Engelhardt, M. (2001). “Optimal scheduling of water pipe replacement using genetic algorithms.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 214–223.
Dandy, G. C., and Engelhardt, M. (2006). “Multi-objective trade-offs between cost and reliability in the replacement of water mains.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 79–88.
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T. (2002). “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II.” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 6(2), 182–197.
Environment Canada. (2013). “National inventory report 1990-2011: Greenhouse gas sources and sinks in Canada.” Ottawa, ON, Canada.
European Environment Agency. (2010). “Indicator fact sheet, WQ06, water use efficiency (in cites): Leakage.” 〈http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/water-use-efficiency-in-cities-leakage/water-use-efficiency-in-cities-leakage〉.
Fearnside, P. M. (2002). “Time preference in global warming calculations: A proposal for a unified index.” Ecol. Econ., 41(1), 21–31.
Filion, Y. R., MacLean, H., and Karney, B. W. (2004). “Life-cycle energy analysis of a water distribution system.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 120–130.
Fire Underwriters Survey (FUS). (1999). “Water supply for public protection.” CGI Group, Markham, ON, Canada.
Germanopoulos, G. (1985). “A technical note on the inclusion of pressure dependent demand and leakage terms in water supply network models.” Civ. Eng. Syst., 2(3), 171–179.
Goldstein, R., and Smith, W. (2002). “Water and sustainability: U.S. electricity consumption for water supply and treatment: The next half century.” Electric Power Research Institute, 〈https://www.rivernetwork.org/rn/climate/EPRIwsv4〉.
Hadka, D., and Reed, P. (2013). “Borg: An auto-adaptive many-objective evolutionary computing framework.” Evol. Comput., 21(2), 231–259.
Hasselmann, K., Hasselmann, S., Giering, R., Ocana, V., and Storch, H. V. (1997). “Sensitivity study of optimal CO2 emission paths using a simplified structural integrated assessment model (SIAM).” Clim. Change, 37(2), 345–386.
Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO). (2013). “Composition of Ontario’s electricity supply mix continues to change: Consumer response supports reliability.” 〈http://www.ieso.ca/imoweb/media/md_newsitem.asp?newsID=5930〉.
Kleiner, Y., and Rajani, B. (1999). “Using limited data to assess future needs.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 91(7), 47–61.
Mailhot, A, Poulin, A., and Villeneuve, J. P. (2003). “Optimal replacement of water pipes.” Water Resour. Res., 39(5), 1136–1150.
National Energy Board (NEB). (2007). “Canada’s energy future reference case and scenarios to 2030: An energy market assessment.” National Energy Board Publications, Calgary, Canada.
National Round Table on the Environment, and the Economy (NRTEE). (2009). “Achieving 2050: A carbon pricing policy for Canada.” Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Ontario Energy Board (OEB). (2012). “Regulated price plan price report.” Queen’s Printer for Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Pembina Institute. (2009). “Greening the grid powering Alberta’s future with renewable energy.” Pembina Institute, Calgary, Alberta.
Roshani, E., and Filion, Y. R. (2009). “Accounting for greenhouse gas emissions in the multi-objective optimization of the Kamalsaleh water transmission systems using NSGA-II.” Computing and Control in the Water Industry, 799–805.
Roshani, E., and Filion, Y. R. (2013). “Event-based approach to optimize the timing of water main rehabilitation with asset management strategies.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 04014004.
Roshani, E., MacLeod, S. P., and Filion, Y. R. (2012). “Evaluating the impact of climate change mitigation strategies on the optimal design and expansion of the Amherstview, Ontario water network: A Canadian case study.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 100–110.
Rossman, L. A. (2000). EPANET2 user’s manual, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC.
Shamir, U., and Howard, C. D. D. (1979). “An analytic approach to scheduling pipe replacement.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 71(5), 248–258.
Sharp, W., and Walski, T. M. (1988). “Predicting internal roughness in water mains.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 80(11), 34–40.
S & T Consultants Inc. (2008). “2008 GHGenius update.” Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa.
Stern, N., et al. (2006). Stern review: The economics of climate change, HM Treasury, London.
Thompson, D. (2011). Personal communication, Director of Engineering, Loyalist Township, ON, Canada.
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS). (2007). “Benefit-cost analysis guide interim report.” Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Walski, T. M. (1986). “Predicting costs of pipe cleaning and lining projects.” J. Transp. Eng., 317–327.
Walski, T. M., and Pelliccia, A. (1982). “Economic analysis of water main breaks.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 74(3) 140–147.
Wu, W., Simpson, A. R., and Maier, H. R. (2008). “Multi-objective genetic algorithm optimization of water distribution systems accounting for sustainability.” 10th Annual Symp. on Water Distribution Systems Analysis, Engineers Australia, 1–12.
Wu, W., Simpson, A. R., and Maier, H. R. (2010). “Accounting for greenhouse gas emissions in multi-objective genetic algorithm optimization of water distribution systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 146–155.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 141Issue 4April 2015

History

Received: Jan 14, 2013
Accepted: Mar 4, 2014
Published online: Jul 22, 2014
Discussion open until: Dec 22, 2014
Published in print: Apr 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hydraulic Specialist, HydraTek and Associates Inc., Woodbridge, ON, Canada L4L 8S5; formerly, Applied Research, Bentley Systems Inc., Burlington, ON, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]
Y. R. Filion [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L3N6 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share