Importance of Free-Flowing Rivers for Recreation: Case Study of the River Mur in Styria, Austria
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 141, Issue 2
Abstract
Hydroelectric power plants are often assumed to serve a wide range of purposes, from renewable electricity production to flood control and new recreational opportunities. Planning documents and strategies often presume that hydroelectric power plants have additional recreational (use) values. However, there is some evidence of both alternatives in empirical studies which accentuate the benefits of additional recreational opportunities, as opposed to those studies that draw attention to the costs in terms of reduced recreational values. The objective of this paper is to clarify whether respondents in a survey value recreational opportunities along free-flowing sections of a river differently to those along dammed-up stretches. The novel discussion in this paper is on the results of a representative empirical survey of households in the River Mur Basin in the Federal Province of Styria in Austria. The respondents presented a detailed and differentiated picture of their recreational activities along the river. It turned out that all the activities, such as walking, hiking, and wildlife observation, are mostly pursued along the free-flowing sections of the river, contrary to some existing empirical papers emphasizing the great importance of dammed-up river stretches for recreation. In order to compute the recreational benefit of the free-flowing stretches of the river, recreational demand models (travel cost) were estimated econometrically for those recreational activities most often chosen by the respondents. While some prior hypotheses were supported (e.g., that the respondents make less frequent trips to the River Mur with higher travel costs, and with lower (perceived) water quality), the free-flowing character of the river adds a significant benefit. There is a close correlation between the free-flowing stretches of the river and the recreational benefits that range from 24 Euro to over 130 Euro per person and trip which are higher than those along the dammed-up sections depending in particular on the kind of recreational activity.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The current paper is a result of a survey carried out within an ecosystem services valuation study commissioned by the Nature Stewardship Council, Styria. I am very thankful to M. Jungmeier for productive comments on the survey, and to E. Enfield for her kind support in drafting this paper. Anonymous reviewers provided suggestions for substantial improvements of the paper. All errors are, of course, the responsibility of the author.
References
Ahmadi, A., Karamouz, M., Moridi, A., and Han, D. (2012). “Integrated planning of land use and water allocation on a watershed scale considering social and water quality issues.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 671–681.
Bade, S., Gsponer, G., and Ott, W. (2007). “Vorstudie Erholungswert naturnaher Landschaften, insbesondere von Wasserläufen [Recreation value of natural landscapes, especially waters].” Final Rep., Econcept, Zurich.
Berrens, R. P., Bohara, A. K., Jenkins-Smith, H., Silva, C. L., Ganderton, P., and Brookshire, D. (1998). “A joint investigation of public support and public values: Case of instream flows in New Mexico.” Ecol. Econ., 27(2), 189–203.
Blaas, W., and Hlava, A. (1990). “Indirekte Auswirkungen von Wasserkraftwerken: Eine Methode zur ökonomischen Bewertung [Indirect effects of hydroelectric power plants: A method for economic valuation].” Studie im Auftrag der Forschungsinitiative des Verbundkonzerns, Vol. 5, Österreichische Elektrizitätswirtschafts-AG, Vienna.
Bliem, M., and Getzner, M. (2012). “Willingness-to-pay for river restoration: Differences across time and scenarios.” Environ. Econ. Pol. Stud., 14(3), 241–260.
Bohlen, C., and Lewis, L. Y. (2009). “Examining the economic impacts of hydropower dams on property values using GIS.” J. Environ. Manage., 90(3), S258–S269.
Brown, P. H., Tullos, D., Tilt, B., Magee, D., and Wolf, A. T. (2009). “Modeling the costs and benefits of dam construction from a multidisciplinary perspective.” J. Environ. Manage., 90(3), S303–S311.
Cameron, T. A., Shaw, W. D., Ragland, S. E., Callaway, J. M., and Keefe, S. (1996). “Using actual and contingent behavior data with differing levels of time aggregation to model recreation demand.” J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 21(1), 130–149.
Castelletti, A., Pianosi, F., and Soncini-Sessa, R. (2008). “Water reservoir control under economic, social and environmental constraints.” Automatica, 44(6), 1595–1607.
Daubert, J. T., and Young, R. A. (1981). “Recreational demands for maintaining instream flows: A contingent valuation approach.” Am. J. Agric. Econ., 63(4), 666–676.
de Miranda Ribeiro, F., and da Silva, G. A. (2010). “Life-cycle inventory for hydroelectric generation: A Brazilian case study.” J. Cleaner Prod., 18(1), 44–54.
Doyle, M. W., Harbor, J. M., and Stanley, E. H. (2003). “Toward policies and decision-making for dam removal.” Environ. Manage., 31(4), 453–465.
Duffield, J. W., Neher, C. J., and Brown, T. C. (1992). “Recreation benefits of instream flows: Application to Montana’s Big Hole and Bitterroot Rivers.” Water Resour. Res., 28(9), 2169–2181.
European Environment Agency (EEA). (2013). “Heavily modified water bodies.” Copenhagen, 〈http://www.eea.europa.eu〉 (Jul. 29, 2013).
Getzner, M. (2012). “The regional context of infrastructure policy and environmental valuation: The importance of stakeholders’ opinions.” J. Environ. Econ. Pol., 1(3), 1–12.
Getzner, M., Jungmeier, M., Köstl, T., and Weiglhofer, S. (2011). “Fließstrecken der Mur—Ermittlung der Ökosystemleistungen [Free-flowing sections of the River Mur—Valuation of ecosystem services].” Final report to Landesumweltanwaltschaft Steiermark (Nature Stewardship Council, Styria), E.C.O. Institute of Ecology, Klagenfurt.
Giesecke, J., and Mosonyi, E. (2005). Wasserkraftanlagen [Hydroelectric power plants], Springer, Berlin.
Goossen, M., and Langers, F. (2000). “Assessing quality of rural areas in the Netherlands: Finding the most important indicators for recreation.” Landscape Urban Plann., 46(4), 241–251.
Harpman, D. A., Sparling, E. W., and Waddle, T. J. (1993). “A methodology for quantifying and valuing the impacts of flow changes on a fishery.” Water Resour. Res., 29(3), 575–582.
Hörnstein, L., and Fredman, P. (2000). “On the distance to recreational forests in Sweden.” Landscape Urban Plann., 51(1), 1–10.
Hynes, S., and Hanley, N. (2006). “Preservation versus development on Irish rivers: Whitewater kayaking and hydro-power in Ireland.” Land Use Policy, 23(2), 170–180.
Hynes, S., Hanley, N., and O’Donoghue, C. (2009). “Alternative treatments of the cost of time in recreational demand models: An application to whitewater kayaking in Ireland.” J. Environ. Manage., 90(2), 1014–1021.
Jakus, P. M., Dowell, P., and Murray, M. N. (2000). “The effect of fluctuating water levels on reservoir fishing.” J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 25(2), 520–532.
Kataria, M. (2009). “Willingness to pay for environmental improvements in hydropower regulated rivers.” Energy Econ., 31(1), 69–76.
Klimpt, J.-É., Rivero, C., Puranen, H., and Koch, F. (2002). “Recommendations for sustainable hydroelectric development.” Energy Policy, 30(14), 1305–1312.
Kling, C. L., and Crooker, J. R. (1999). “Recreation demand models for environmental valuation.” Handbook of environmental and resource economics, J. V. D. Bergh, ed., Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 755–764.
Koch, F. (2002). “Hydropower—The politics of water and energy: Introduction and overview.” Energy Policy, 30(14), 1207–1213.
Kohler, B. (2006). “Externe Effekte der Laufwasserkraftnutzung [External effects of hydroelectric power plants].” Mitteilungen des Instituts für Wasserbau, Vol. 149, Univ. of Stuttgart.
Kotchen, M. J., Moore, M. R., Lupi, F., and Rutherford, E. S. (2006). “Environmental constraints on hydropower: An ex post benefit-cost analysis of dam relicensing in Michigan.” Land Econ., 82(3), 384–403.
Lewis, L., Bohlen, C., and Wilson, S. (2008). “Dams, dam removal, and river restoration: A hedonic property value analysis.” Contemp. Econ. Policy, 26(2), 175–186.
Lienhoop, N., and Ansmann, T. (2011). “Valuing water level changes in reservoirs using two stated preference approaches: An exploration of validity.” Ecol. Econ., 70(7), 1250–1258.
Lindhjem, H., and Navrud, S. (2011). “Are Internet surveys an alternative to face-to-face interviews in contingent valuation?” Ecol. Econ., 70(9), 1628–1637.
Loomis, J. (1998). “Estimating the public’s values for instream flow: Economic techniques and dollar values.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(5), 1007–1014.
Loomis, J. (2000). “Environmental valuation techniques in water resource decision making.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 339–344.
Loomis, J. (2006). “Importance of including use and passive use values of river and lake restoration.” J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ., 134(1), 4–8.
Loomis, J., and Creel, M. (1992). “Recreation benefits of increased flow in California’s San Joaquin and Stanilaus rivers.” Rivers, 3(1), 1–13.
Loomis, J., Sorg, C., and Donnelly, D. (1986). “Economic losses to recreational fisheries due to small-head hydro-power development: A case study of Henry’s Fork in Idaho.” J. Environ. Manage., 22(1), 85–94.
Parsons, G. R. (2013). “Travel cost methods.” Encyclopedia of energy, natural resource, and environmental economics, J. Shogren, ed., Vol. 3, Elsevier, London, 349–358.
Pejchar, L., and Warner, K. (2001). “A river might run through it again: Criteria for consideration of dam removal and interim lessons from California.” Environ. Manage., 28(5), 561–575.
Phaneuf, D. J., and Smith, V. K. (2005). “Recreation demand models.” Handbook of environmental economics, K. G. Mäler and J. Vincent, eds., Vol. 2, North Holland, Amsterdam, 671–761.
Robbins, J. L., and Lewis, L. (2008). “Demolish it and they will come: Estimating the economic impacts of restoring a recreational fishery.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 44(6), 1488–1499.
RVS. (2010). “Nutzen-Kosten-Untersuchungen im Verkehrswesen.” Austrian Ministry of Transport Innovation and Technology, Vienna.
Shabman, L., and Stephenson, K. (2000). “Environmental valuation and its economic critics.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 382–388.
Thompson, S. A. (1999). Water use, management, and planning in the United States, Academic Press, London.
Waltert, F., and Schläpfer, F. (2010). “Landscape amenities and local development: A review of migration, regional economic and hedonic pricing studies.” Ecol. Econ., 70(2), 141–152.
Weber, M., and Berrens, R. (2006). “Value of instream recreation in the Sonoran Desert.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 53–60.
Whitelaw, E., and Macmullan, E. (2002). “A framework for estimating the costs and benefits of dam removal.” BioScience, 52(8), 724–730.
World Commission on Dams. (2000). “Dams and development: A new framework for decision-making.” Earthscan, London.
Wyrick, J. R., Rischman, B. A., Burke, C. A., McGee, C., and Williams, C. (2009). “Using hydraulic modeling to address social impacts of small dam removals in southern New Jersey.” J. Environ. Manage., 90(3), S270–S278.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 141 • Issue 2 • February 2015
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 31, 2013
Accepted: Feb 5, 2014
Published online: Feb 7, 2014
Discussion open until: Dec 8, 2014
Published in print: Feb 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.