Technical Papers
Aug 14, 2013

Reservoir Management Optimization for Basin-Wide Ecological Restoration in the Connecticut River

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 140, Issue 9

Abstract

Evidence from ecological studies suggests that the alteration of river flows downstream of reservoirs can threaten native aquatic ecosystems and the services they offer. Innovative revisions to water management practices are required to improve the health of aquatic species while maintaining the benefits from current infrastructure projects. The impacts of individual reservoir operations on ecosystem vitality are often masked by the uncoordinated and compounding influences of several impoundments upstream, undermining the examination of environmental impacts from particular reservoirs in a large watershed system. This paper presents a large-scale optimization model that investigates the value of coordinated reservoir management practices for ecological benefits in a large watershed with several major reservoir systems operating for a range of management objectives. An application of the model is presented for the Connecticut River watershed, the largest river basin in New England and one of the most impounded rivers in the United States. The model can examine trade-offs between the maintenance of ecologically acceptable, daily streamflows at key locations throughout the watershed and traditional reservoir objectives, including flood risk reduction, municipal and riparian water supply, hydropower production, and recreation. The ecological streamflow targets are designed specifically for the basin’s ecology in a collaborative process engaging regional experts and constitute a unique and innovative component of the modeling approach. This study focuses on the re-operation of a network of federal flood control dams for the restoration of environmental flows. Results suggest that coordinated changes to current flood control reservoir operations can restore aspects of the natural hydrologic flow regime necessary for ecosystem persistence without significantly reducing current flood risk reduction capabilities.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the Nature Conservancy (TNC). The authors thank TNC for all of their support during this project. The authors also wish to thank three anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful criticisms and advice that helped to significantly improve this paper.

References

Archfield, S. A., Steeves, P. A., Guthrie, J. D., and Ries, K. G., III. (2012). “A web-based software tool to estimate unregulated daily streamflow at ungauged rivers.” Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., 5, 2503–2526.
Arthington, A. H., Bunn, S. E., Poff, N. L., and Naiman, R. J. (2006). “The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems.” Ecol. Appl., 16(4), 1311–1318.
Benke, A. C. (1990). “A perspective on America’s vanishing streams.” J. North Am. Benthological Soc., 9(1), 77–88.
Bunn, S. E., and Arthington, A. H. (2002). “Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity.” Environ. Manage., 30(4), 492–507.
Cardwell, H., Jager, H. I., and Sale, M. J. (1996). “Designing instream flows to satisfy fish and human water needs.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 356–363.
Cohon, J. L., and Marks, D. H. (1975). “Review and evaluation of multiobjective programming techniques.” Water Resour. Res., 11(2), 208–220.
Consensus Building Institute. (2009). “Connecticut river watershed project assessment report.” The Nature Conservancy, Northampton, MA.
Draper, A. J., Jenkins, M. W., Kirby, K. W., Lund, J. R., and Howitt, R. E. (2003). “Economic-engineering optimization for California water management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 155–164.
Homa, E. S., Vogel, R. M., Smith, M. P., Apse, C. D., Huber-Lee, A., and Seiber, J. (2005). “An optimization approach for balancing human and ecological flow needs.” EWRI 2005 World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, ASCE, Anchorage, AK.
Jager, H. I., and Smith, B. T. (2008). “Sustainable reservoir operation: Can we generate hydropower and preserve ecosystem values?” River Res. Appl., 24(3), 340–352.
Kern, J., Characklis, G., Doyle, M., Blumsack, S., and Whisnant, R. (2012). “Influence of deregulated electricity markets on hydropower generation and downstream flow regime.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 342–355.
Labadie, J. W. (2004). “Optimal operation of multireservoir systems: State-of-the-art review.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 93–111.
LINDO Systems. (2007). “LINGO user’s guide, Chicago.” 〈http://www.lindo.com〉 (Jan. 9, 2012).
Loucks, D., van Beek, E., Stedinger, J., Dijkman, J., and Villars, M. (2005). Water resources systems planning and management: An introduction to methods, models and applications, UNESCO, Paris.
Magilligan, F. J., and Nislow, K. H. (2001). “Long-term changes in regional hydrologic regime following impoundment in a humid-climate watershed.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 37(6), 1551–1569.
Palmer, R. N., and Snyder, R. M. (1985). “Effects of instream flow requirements on water supply reliability.” Water Resour. Res., 21(4), 439–446.
Petts, G. E. (2009). “Instream flow science for sustainable river management.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 45(5), 1071–1086.
Poff, N. L., et al. (1997). “The natural flow regime.” BioScience, 47(11), 769–784.
Poff, N. L., et al. (2003). “River flows and water wars: Emerging science for environmental decision making.” Front. Ecol. Environ., 1(6), 298–306.
Polebitski, A. S. (2012). “Connecticut River Wiki.” 〈http://www.ctriver.ecs.umass.edu/wiki/index.php/The_Connecticut_River_Project〉.
Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J. V., Powell, J., and Braun, D. P. (1996). “A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems.” Conserv. Biol., 10(4), 1163–1174.
Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J. V., Wigington, R., and Braun, D. P. (1997). “How much water does a river need?” Freshwater Biol., 37(1), 231–249.
Sale, M. J., Brill, E. D., Jr., and Herricks, E. E. (1982). “An approach to optimizing reservoir operation for downstream aquatic resources.” Water Resour. Res., 18(4), 705–712.
Shiau, J. T., and Wu, F. C. (2004). “Feasible diversion and instream flow release using range of variability approach.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 395–404.
Shiau, J. T., and Wu, F. C. (2006). “Compromise programming methodology for determining instream flow under multiobjective water allocation criteria.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 42(5), 1179–1191.
Shiau, J. T., and Wu, F. C. (2007). “Pareto-optimal solutions for environmental flow schemes incorporating the intra-annual and interannual variability of the natural flow regime.” Water Resour. Res., 43(6), W06433.
Suen, J. P., and Eheart, J. W. (2006). “Reservoir management to balance ecosystem and human needs: Incorporating the paradigm of the ecological flow regime.” Water Resour. Res., 42(3), W03417.
Vogel, R. M., Sieber, J., Archfield, S. A., Smith, M. P., Apse, C. D., and Huber-Lee, A. (2007). “Relations among storage, yield, and instream flow.” Water Resour. Res., 43(5), W05403.
Wurbs, R. A. (1993). “Reservoir-system simulation and optimization models.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 455–472.
Yeh, W. W.-G. (1985). “Reservoir management and operations models: A state-of-the-art review.” Water Resour. Res., 21(12), 1797–1818.
Zimmerman, J. K. H. (2006). “Hydrologic effects of flood control dams in the Ashuelot River, New Hampshire, and West River, Vermont.” The Nature Conservancy, Northampton, MA.
Zimmerman, J. K. H., and Lester, A. (2006). “Spatial distribution of hydrologic alteration and fragmentation among tributaries of the Connecticut River.” The Nature Conservancy, Northampton, MA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 140Issue 9September 2014

History

Received: Feb 26, 2013
Accepted: Aug 12, 2013
Published online: Aug 14, 2013
Published in print: Sep 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Oct 12, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Scott Steinschneider, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Massachusetts Amherst, 130 Natural Resources Rd., Amherst, MA 01002 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Alec Bernstein [email protected]
Masters of Science in Civil Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Massachusetts Amherst, 130 Natural Resources Rd., Amherst, MA 01002. E-mail: [email protected]
Richard Palmer, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Massachusetts Amherst, 130 Natural Resources Rd., Amherst, MA 01002. E-mail: [email protected]
Austin Polebitski, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin-Platteville, 139 Ottensman Hall, 1 University Way, Platteville, WI 53818. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share