Technical Papers
Feb 7, 2013

Subdivision Infrastructure Affecting Storm Water Runoff and Residential Property Values

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 140, Issue 4

Abstract

In many areas of the country, urban storm water runoff is a growing water quality problem. To improve storm water programs, regulatory officials are now placing greater emphasis on reducing the volume of runoff. Called green infrastructure or low-impact development, storm water control is increasingly focused on reducing the amount of urban impervious land cover and using vegetative conveyance systems and infiltration areas to reduce negative environmental impacts. While many green infrastructure practices reduce capital infrastructure costs, less is known about the opportunity costs and pecuniary benefits to developers from implementation of green infrastructure to reduce storm water effects. This paper presents a hedonic property-value model of residential property sale prices regressed on property and location characteristics, which include differing infrastructure design features that affect storm water runoff (street widths, cul-de-sacs, curb-and-gutters). The data include 1,360 single-family property transactions in Hanover County, Virginia that occurred in 1995 and 1996. Results suggest that prohibiting curb-and-gutters and cul-de-sacs would impose an opportunity cost on developers; buyers are willing to pay 1.3 and 7.8% property-price premiums for homes located on a street with a cul-de-sac and curb-and-gutters, respectively. Constructing narrower streets would provide a pecuniary benefit to developers because people would pay approximately 3.5% more for these properties.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station and the Virginia Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance Department. We gratefully acknowledge the comments and assistance of Wen You, Sapna Kaul, and Congwen Zhang. All errors and omissions remain the responsibility of the authors.

References

Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Germany; Boston, MA.
Anselin, L., and Bera, A. K. (1998). “Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics.” Handbook of applied economic statistics, A. Ullah and D. E. A. Giles, eds., Marcel Dekker, New York, 237–290.
Arendt, R. (1994). Designing open space subdivisions: A practical step-by-step approach, Natural Lands Trust, Media, PA.
Asabere, P. K. (1990). “The value of a neighborhood street with reference to the cul-de-sac.” J. Real Estate Finance Econ., 3(2), 185–193.
Booth, D. B., Hartley, D., and Jackson, R. (2002). “Forest cover, impervious surface area, and the mitigation of stormwater impacts.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 38(3), 835–845.
Boyle, M. A., and Kiel, K. A. (2001). “A survey of house price hedonic studies of the impact of environmental externalities.” J. Real Estate Lit., 9(2), 117–144.
Braden, J. B., and Johnston, D. M. (2004). “Downstream economic benefits from storm-water management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 498–505.
Cebula, R. J. (2009). “The hedonic pricing model applied to the housing market of the city of Savannah and its Savannah historic landmark district.” Rev. Reg. Stud., 39(1), 9–22.
Center for Watershed Protection (CWP). (2001). The economic benefits of better site design in Virginia, Document prepared for Virginia Dept. of Conservation and Recreation, Richmond, VA.
Center for Watershed Protection (CWP), The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation, US EPA Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Chesapeake Bay Trust, Turner Foundation, Chesapeake Bay Program. (1998). Better site design: A handbook for changing development rules in your community, CWP Site Planning Roundtable, Ellicott City, MD.
Cook, R. D. (1979). “Influential observations in linear regression.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 74(365), 169–174.
Cook, R. D. (2000). “Detection of influential observation in linear regression.” Technometrics, 42(1), 65–68.
Fullerton, T. M., Jr., and Villalobos, E. (2011). “Street widths, international ports of entry and border region house values.” J. Econ. Issues, 45(2), 493–510.
Green, R. K. (1999). “Land use regulation and the price of housing in a suburban Wisconsin county.” J. Hous. Econ., 8(2), 144–159.
H.R. 6-110th Congress: Energy Independence and Security Act (2007). “Library of congress.” 〈http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-110hr6enr/pdf/BILLS-110hr6enr.pdf〉 (Apr. 9, 2012).
Johnston, D. M., Braden, J. B., and Price, T. H. (2006). “Downstream economic benefits of conservation development.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 35–43.
Jud, D. G. (1980). “The effects of zoning on single-family residential property values: Charlotte, North Carolina.” Land Econ., 56(2), 142–154.
Jud, D. G., and Watts, J. M. (1981). “Schools and housing values.” Land Econ., 57(3), 459–470.
Kuminoff, N., Parmeter, C. F., and Pope, J. C. (2010). “Which hedonic models can we trust to recover the marginal willingness to pay for environmental amenities?’’ J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 60(3), 145–160.
Kwon, H. Y. (2000). “An introduction to better site design: The practice of watershed protection.” Watershed Protection Techniques, 3(2), 623–632.
National Research Council (NRC), and Committee on Reducing Stormwater Discharge Contributions to Water Pollution. (2009). Urban stormwater management in the United States, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
Rhode Island Stormwater Solutions. (2009). “RI stormwater low impact development (LID) inventory.” 〈http://www.ristormwatersolutions.org/SW_ri_lidtour.html#Pavement〉 (Apr. 17, 2012).
Schueler, T. R., Fraley-McNeal, L., and Cappiella, K. (2009). “Is impervious cover still important? Review of recent research.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 309–315.
Sirmans, C. F., Turnbull, G. K., and Dombrow, J. (1997). “Residential development, risk, and land prices.” J. Reg. Sci., 37(4), 613–628.
Song, Y., and Knaap, G. J. (2003). “New urbanism and housing values: A disaggregate assessment.” J. Urban Econ., 54(2), 218–238.
Southworth, M., and Ben-Joseph, E. (2004). “Reconsidering the cul-de-sac.” Access, 24, 28–33.
Stata/MP 10 [Computer software]. College Station, TX, StataCorp.
Taylor, L. O. (2003). “The hedonic method.” A primer on nonmarket valuation, P. A. Champ, K. J. Boyle, and T. C. Brown, eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 331–394.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). “Census 2000 Gateway.” 〈http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html〉 (Aug. 17, 2012).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2007). “Reducing stormwater costs through low impact development (LID) strategies and practices.”, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2009). “Technical guidance on implementing the stormwater runoff requirements for federal projects under section 438 of the Energy Independence and Security Act.”, Office of Water (4503T), Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2011). “Proposed national rulemaking to strengthen the stormwater program.” National pollutant discharge elimination system (NPDES), 〈http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/rulemaking.cfm〉 (Jan. 2, 2012).
Virginia Dept. of Conservation, and Recreation (VADCR). (2011). “Bioretention.” Virginia DCR Stormwater Design Specification No.9, 〈http://vwrrc.vt.edu/swc/NonPBMPSpecsMarch11/VASWMBMPSpec9BIORETENTION.html〉 (Apr. 4, 2012).
Virginia Dept. of Transportation (VDOT). (2010). “Appendix B(1) subdivision street design guide.” Road design manual, 〈http://www.virginiadot.org/business/locdes/rdmanual-index.asp〉 (Aug. 5, 2012).
Williams, E. S. (2003). “Hydrological and economic impacts of alternative residential land development methods.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Williams, E. S., and Wise, W. R. (2009). “Economic impacts of alternative approaches to stormwater management and land development.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 537–546.
Zajac, S. S., and Ivan, J. N. (2003). “Factors influencing the severity of motor vehicle-crossing pedestrian crashes in rural Connecticut.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 35(3), 369–379.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 140Issue 4April 2014
Pages: 524 - 532

History

Received: May 10, 2012
Accepted: Feb 5, 2013
Published online: Feb 7, 2013
Discussion open until: Jul 7, 2013
Published in print: Apr 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jessica Boatwright [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech, 208 Hutcheson Hall (0401), Blacksburg, VA 24061 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Kurt Stephenson [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech, 312 Hutcheson Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061. E-mail: [email protected]
Kevin Boyle [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech, 305 Hutcheson Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061. E-mail: [email protected]
Sara Nienow [email protected]
Economist II, Division of Budget, Planning and Analysis, North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources, 217 Jones St., Raleigh-Durham, NC 27603. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share