Case Studies
Nov 17, 2012

Collaborative Approach to Calibration of a Riverine Water Quality Model

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 140, Issue 3

Abstract

Stakeholder involvement in watershed management decisions remains challenging, particularly when one is relying upon modeling efforts as one of the primary means to understand and communicate the complicated processes controlling a natural riverine system. To determine how to meet the instream water quality standards as required by the total maximum daily load (TMDL) program, a QUAL2Kw water quality model was developed and calibrated for the Jordan River, Utah. To improve transparency, increase stakeholder engagement, and reach agreement more effectively, a collaborative approach was taken to calibrate the model that included Utah Division of Water Quality (UDWQ) staff, consultants, key stakeholder representatives, and independent experts. The study reach of the Jordan River flows 83 km from Utah Lake to the Great Salt Lake through the urbanized Salt Lake Valley in Utah. Several segments of the river have been listed by UDWQ as impaired for a number of constituents, but the present effort focuses on the dissolved oxygen (DO) impairment. In cooperation with stakeholder groups, four seasonal synoptic sampling surveys and additional research studies were conducted for use in calibrating and validating the model. The collaborative calibration process involved many meetings and workshops where model performance was iteratively evaluated in order to reach consensus on model inputs and parameterization. The end result of the collaborative calibration of the QUAL2Kw model was the development of a scientifically defensible tool used to establish a consensus that decomposition of organic matter and poor reaeration are the primary causes of the DO impairment in the Jordan River. Without the collaborative approach to calibration, agreement regarding the causes of water quality impairments would not likely have occurred. While clearly improving stakeholder believability in the model, a comparison of the collaborative calibration model performance to an autocalibrated version demonstrated that both approaches resulted in similar predictive accuracy.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the following contributors. Dave Wham with UDWQ completed the validation of the model. Carl Adams and Hilary Arens with UDWQ, David Rosenberg with Utah State University, and other anonymous reviewers, reviewed and commented on a draft manuscript of this paper. Mark Stanger with UDWQ prepared the watershed map. This project was funded by the Utah Division of Water Quality.

References

Baker, M. (2009). “Summary and interpretation of 2009 Jordan River chlorophyll bioassay results.” Dept. of Biology, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT.
Bowie, G. L., et al. (1985). “Rates, constants, and kinetics formulations in surface water quality modeling (2nd Ed.).” EPA/600/3-85/040, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.
Chapra, S. C., and Pelletier, G. J. (2003). “QUAL2K: A modeling framework for simulating river and stream water quality: Documentation and users manual.” Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Tufts Univ., Medford, MA.
Charbonneau, P., and Knapp, B. (1995). “A user’s guide to PIKAIA 1.0.”, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO.
Cirrus Ecological Solutions, and Stantec Consulting. (2009). Jordan River TMDL: Work element 2—pollutant identification and loading, Div. of Water Quality, Dept. of Environmental Quality, State of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Cirrus Ecological Solutions, and Stantec Consulting. (2010). Jordan River TMDL: Technical memoranda: Updated current pollutant source characterization; projected future pollutants—no action; critical conditions, endpoints, and permissible loads; a proportional load allocation, Div. of Water Quality, Dept. of Environmental Quality, State of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Dupont, R. (2010). “Excel spreadsheet to calculate CBOD decay and nitrification rates.” Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT.
Goel, R., and Hogsett, M. (2009). “Interim status report.” Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Grayson, R. B., Doolan, J. M., and Blake, T. (1994). “Application of AEAM (adaptive environmental assessment and management) to water quality in the Latrobe River catchment.” J. Environ. Manage., 41(3), 245–258.
Hatterman, F. F., and Kundzewicz, Z. W. (2009). Water framework directive: Model supported implementation; a water manager’s guide, IWA Publishing, London.
Jakeman, A. J., Letcher, R. A., and Norton, J. P. (2006). “Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models.” Environ. Model. Software, 21(5), 602–614.
Korfmacher, K. S. (1998). “Water quality modeling for environmental management: lessons from the policy sciences.” Policy Sci., 31(1), 35–54.
Maguire, L. A. (2003). “Interplay of science and stakeholder values in Neuse River total maximum daily load process.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 261–270.
Miller, T. (2009). PAR light extinction data collected at various sites along Jordan River, Jordan River/Farmington Bay Water Quality Council, Salt Lake City.
Moellmer, W. O. (2010). Preliminary assessment of the QUAL2Kw August 2009 calibration of the Jordan River TMDL, Jordan River/Farmington Bay Water Quality Council, Salt Lake City.
Neilson, B. T., Hobson, A. J., von Stackelberg, N. O., Shupryt, M., and Ostermiller, J. (2012). “Using QUAL2K modeling to support nutrient criteria development and wasteload analyses in Utah.” Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT, and Dept. of Environmental Quality, State of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality. (2009). “TTools 7.56 ArcGIS 9.0 Extension.” Dept. of Environmental Quality, State of Oregon, Portland.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2002a). “Participative and stakeholder-based policy design, evaluation and modeling processes.” Integr. Assess., 3(1), 3–14.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2002b). “Towards sustainability in the water sector—the importance of human actors and processes of social learning.” Aquat. Sci., 64(4), 394–411.
Pelletier, G., and Chapra, S. (2008a). QUAL2Kw user manual (version 5.1), Washington State Dept. of Ecology, Olympia, WA.
Pelletier, G., and Chapra, S. (2008b). QUAL2Kw theory and documentation (version 5.1), Dept. of Ecology, state of Washington, Olympia, WA.
Pelletier, G. J., Chapra, S. C., and Tao, H. (2006). “QUAL2Kw—A framework for modeling water quality in streams and rivers using a genetic algorithm for calibration.” Environ. Model. Software, 21(3), 419–425.
Reitsma, R., Zigurs, I., Lewis, C., Wilson, V., and Sloane, A. (1996). “Experiment with simulation models in water-resources negotiations.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 64–70.
Rushforth, S. R., and Rushforth, S. J. (2009a). Assessment of the phytoplankton floras of the Jordan River, Rushforth Phycology, LLC.
Rushforth, S. R., and Rushforth, S. J. (2009b). Assessment of the periphyton communities of the Jordan River, Rushforth Phycology, LLC.
Sheppard, S. R. J. (2005). “Participatory decision support for sustainable forest management: A framework for planning with local communities at the landscape level in Canada.” Can. J. For. Res., 35(7), 1515–1526.
Stantec Consulting. (2006). Draft lower Jordan River TMDL: Work element 4—flow and water quality modeling report, Div. of Water Quality, Dept. of Environmental Quality, State of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Stantec Consulting. (2008). Jordan River TMDL: QUAL2K model parameter sensitivity analysis report, Div. of Water Quality, Dept. of Environmental Quality, State of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Stantec Consulting. (2010a). Jordan River TMDL: 2010 QUAL2Kw model calibration technical memorandum, Div. of Water Quality, Dept. of Environmental Quality, State of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Stantec Consulting. (2010b). Jordan River TMDL contract amendment 5 QUAL2Kw uncertainty analysis memorandum, Div. of Water Quality, Dept. of Environmental Quality, State of Utah, Salt Lake City.
SWCA Environmental Consultants. (2010a). Middle Bear River and Cutler Reservoir total maximum daily load, Div. of Water Quality, Dept. of Environmental Quality, State of Utah, Salt Lake City.
SWCA Environmental Consultants. (2010b). East Canyon Reservoir and East Canyon Creek total maximum daily load, Div. of Water Quality, Dept. of Environmental Quality, State of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Tetra Tech. (2002). Pineview Reservoir total maximum daily load, Div. of Water Quality, Dept. of Environmental Quality, State of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Thiros, S. A. (2003). “Quality and source of shallow ground water in areas of recent residential development in Salt Lake Valley, Salt Lake County, Utah.”, U.S. Geological Survey, West Valley City, UT.
Utah Div. of Water Quality (UDWQ). (2006). Utah’s 2006 integrated report, Div. of Water Quality, Dept. of Environmental Quality, State of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Washington Dept. of Ecology. (2009). “Shade.xls: a tool for estimating shade from riparian vegetation (Version 30).” Dept. of Ecology, State of Washington, Olympia, WA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 140Issue 3March 2014
Pages: 393 - 405

History

Received: Jan 23, 2012
Accepted: Nov 14, 2012
Published online: Nov 17, 2012
Discussion open until: Apr 17, 2013
Published in print: Mar 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

N. O. von Stackelberg [email protected]
Environmental Engineer, Utah Dept. of Environmental Quality, 195 North 1950 West, Third Floor, Salt Lake City, UT 84116 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
B. T. Neilson
M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share