Technical Papers
Nov 7, 2012

Application of Multimodal Optimization for Uncertainty Estimation of Computationally Expensive Hydrologic Models

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 140, Issue 3

Abstract

The generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) framework has been widely used in hydrologic studies. However, the extensive random sampling causes a high computational burden that prohibits the efficient application of GLUE to costly distributed hydrologic models such as the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT). In this study, a multimodal optimization algorithm called isolated-speciation-based particle swarm optimization (ISPSO) is employed to take samples from the search space. A comparison between the ISPSO-GLUE, proposed here, and traditional GLUE approaches shows that the two approaches generate similar uncertainty bounds, but that the convergence rate to stable uncertainty bounds is much faster for ISPSO-GLUE than for GLUE. That is, ISPSO-GLUE needs a much smaller number of samples than GLUE to arrive at a very similar answer. Although ISPSO-GLUE slightly underestimated the prediction uncertainty and missed a number of observed values, the proposed approach is considered to be a good alternative to the typical GLUE approach that employs random sampling.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Korean Government through the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation grant M06-2003-000-10064-0. The authors would like to thank the manuscript reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

References

ASCE. (1993). “Criteria for evaluation of watershed models.” ASCE Task Committee on the Definition of Criteria for Evaluation of Watershed Models of the Watershed Management Committee, Irrigation and Drainage Committee, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 429–442.
Andréassian, V., et al. (2007). “What is really undermining hydrologic science today?” Hydrol. Proc., 21(20), 2819–2822.
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R. (1998). “Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment, Part I: Model development.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(1), 73–89.
Aronica, G., Hankin, B., and Beven, K. (1998). “Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data.” Adv. Water Resour., 22(4), 349–365.
Bagnold, R. A. (1977). “Bedload transport in natural rivers.” Water Resour. Res., 13(2), 303–312.
Beven, K. (2006a). “A manifesto for the equifinality thesis.” J. Hydrol., 320(1–2), 18–36.
Beven, K. (2006b). “On undermining the science?” Hydrol. Proc., 20(14), 3141–3146.
Beven, K., and Binley, A. (1992). “The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction.” Hydrol. Proc., 6(3), 279–298.
Beven, K., and Freer, J. (2001). “Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology.” J. Hydrol., 249(1–4), 11–29.
Beven, K., Freer, J., Hankin, B., and Schulz, K. (2000). “The use of generalised likelihood measures for uncertainty estimation in high order models of environmental systems.” Nonlinear and nonstationary signal processing, W. J. Fitzgerald, R. L. Smith, A. T. Walden, and P. C. Young, eds., Cambridge University Press, New York, 115–151.
Beven, K., Smith, P., and Freer, J. (2007). “Comment on ‘Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology’ by Pietro Mantovan and Ezio Todini.” J. Hydrol., 338(3–4), 315–318.
Beven, K., Smith, P., and Freer, J. (2008). “So just why would a modeller choose to be incoherent?” J. Hydrol., 354(1–4), 15–32.
Beven, K., Smith, P., and Wood, A. (2011). “On the colour and spin of epistemic error (and what we might do about it).” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3123–3133.
Beven, K., and Young, P. (2003). “‘Comment on ‘Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models’ by M. Thiemann, M. Trosset, H. Gupta, and S. Sorroshian.” Water Resour. Res., 39(5), COM 1-1–COM 1-4.
Cameron, D., Beven, K., Tawn, J., and Naden, P. (2000). “Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation (with likelihood based uncertainty estimation).” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4(1), 23–34.
Cho, H., Kim, D., Olivera, F., and Guikema, S. D. (2011). “Enhanced speciation in particle swarm optimization for multi-modal problems.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 213(1), 15–23.
Cho, H., and Olivera, F. (2009). “Effect of the spatial variability of land use, soil type, and precipitation on streamflows in small watersheds.” J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc., 45(3), 673–686.
Di Luzio, M., Srinivasan, R., Arnold, J. G., and Neitsch, S. L. (2002). ArcView interface for SWAT2000 user’s guide, Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, TX.
Faure, H., and Tezuka, S. (2000). “Another random scrambling of digital (t, s)-sequences.” Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo methods, K. T. Fang, F. J. Hickernell, and H. Niederreiter, eds., Springer-Verlag, 242–256.
Freer, J., Beven, K., and Ambroise, B. (1996). “Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: An application of the GLUE approach.” Water Resour. Res., 32(7), 2161–2173.
Gupta, H., Thiemann, M., Trosset, M., and Sorooshian, S. (2003). “Reply to comment by K. Beven and P. Young on ‘Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models.’” Water Resour. Res., 39(5), COM 2-1–COM 2-5.
Hall, J., O’Connel, E., and Ewen, J. (2007). “On not undermining the science: Coherence, validation and expertise. Discussion of Invited Commentary by Keith Beven Hydrological Processes, 20, 3141–3146 (2006).” Hydrol. Proc., 21(7), 985–988.
Jacquin, A. P., and Shamseldin, A. Y. (2007). “Development of a possibilistic method for the evaluation of predictive uncertainty in rainfall-runoff modeling.” Water Resour. Res., 43(4), W04425.
Jeremiah, E., Sisson, S., Marshall, L., and Mehrotra, R. (2011). “Bayesian calibration and uncertainty analysis of hydrological models: A comparison of adaptive Metropolis and sequential Monte Carlo samplers.” Water Resour. Res., 47(7), W07547.
Kavetski, D., Franks, S. W., and Kuczera, G. (2003). “Confronting input uncertainty in environmental modelling.” Calibration of watershed models, Q. Duan, H. V. Gupta, S. Sorooshian, A. N. Rousseau, and R. Turcotte, eds., Vol. 6 of Water Science and Application Series, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 49–68.
Makowski, D., Wallach, D., and Tremblay, M. (2002). “Using a Bayesian approach to parameter estimation; comparison of the GLUE and MCMC methods.” Agronomie, 22(2), 191–203.
Mantovan, P., and Todini, E. (2006). “Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology.” J. Hydrol., 330(1–2), 368–381.
Montanari, A. (2005). “Large sample behaviors of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) in assessing the uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations.” Water Resour. Res., 41(8), W08406.
Muleta, M. K., and Nicklow, J. W. (2005). “Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model.” J. Hydrol., 306(1–4), 127–145.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models, part I-A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Williams, J. R., and King, K. W. (2002). SWAT2000 user manual, Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, TX.
NOAA-NCDC. (2011). “National Climatic Data Center (NCDC).” 〈http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov〉 (Aug. 1, 2011).
Olivera, F., et al. (2006). “ArcGIS-SWAT: A geodata model and GIS interface for SWAT.” J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc., 42(2), 295–309.
Owen, A. B. (1998). “Scrambling Sobol’ and Niederreiter-Xing points.” J. Complex., 14(4), 466–489.
Smith, T. J., and Marshall, L. A. (2008). “Bayesian methods in hydrologic modeling: A study of recent advancements in Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques.” Water Resour. Res., 44(12), W00B05.
Sobol’, I. M. (1967). “The distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals.” USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 7(4), 86–112.
Soil Conservation Service. (1972). National engineering handbook, US Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
Thiemann, M., Trosset, M., Gupta, H., and Sorooshian, S. (2001). “Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models.” Water Resour. Res., 37(10), 2521–2535.
Todini, E., and Mantovan, P. (2007). “Comment on: ‘On undermining the science?’ by Keith Beven.” Hydrol. Proc., 21(12), 1633–1638.
USDA-NRCS. (2011a). “U.S. General Soil Map (STATSGO2)” 〈http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/statsgo〉 (Aug. 1, 2011).
USDA-NRCS. (2011b). “Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database.” 〈http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/ssurgo〉 (Aug. 1, 2011).
USGS. (2011a). “National Elevation Dataset” 〈http://ned.usgs.gov〉 (Aug. 1, 2011).
USGS. (2011b). “National Land Cover Dataset 1992 (NLCD 1992).” 〈http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd1992.php〉 (Aug. 1, 2011).
USGS. (2011c). “USGS water data for the nation” 〈http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis〉 (Aug. 1, 2011).
USGS. (2011d). “Daily values of suspended sediment and ancillary data.” 〈http://co.water.usgs.gov/sediment/seddatabase.cfm〉 (Aug. 1, 2011).
van Griensven, A., and Meixner, T. (2007). “A global and efficient multi-objective auto-calibration and uncertainty estimation method for water quality catchment models.” J. Hydroinf., 9(4), 277–291.
Williams, J. R. (1969). “Flood routing with variable travel time or variable storage coefficients.” Trans. ASAE, 12(1), 100–103.
Williams, J. R. (1995). “The EPIC model.” In Computer models of watershed hydrology, V. P. Singh, ed., Water Resources Publications, Littleton, CO, 909–1000.
Zheng, Y., and Keller, A. A. (2007). “Uncertainty assessment in watershed-scale water quality modeling and management: 1. Framework and application of generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) approach.” Water Resour. Res., 43(8), W08407.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 140Issue 3March 2014
Pages: 313 - 321

History

Received: Sep 5, 2011
Accepted: Nov 5, 2012
Published online: Nov 7, 2012
Discussion open until: Apr 7, 2013
Published in print: Mar 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Huidae Cho
M.ASCE
Former Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., 3136 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3136.
Francisco Olivera [email protected]
M.ASCE
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., 3136 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3136 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share